Efficacy and safety of ipragliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled on metformin: a dose-finding study.

AIMS: Ipragliflozin is a novel, selective inhibitor of sodium glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2 inhibitor) in clinical development for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) treatment. This study assessed the efficacy and safety of different doses of ipragliflozin. METHODS: In a 12-week, multicentre, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, dose-finding study patients with inadequate glycaemic control on metformin monotherapy (≥1500 mg/day) were randomized to one of four ipragliflozin treatment groups (12.5, 50, 150 or 300 mg once daily) or placebo. Primary efficacy outcome was mean change from baseline in haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) compared to placebo at week 12. Adverse events (AEs), vital signs and laboratory safety measurements were assessed. RESULTS: Ipragliflozin dose dependently decreased HbA1c from baseline to week 12 compared to placebo (-0.22, -0.34, -0.40 and -0.48% for ipragliflozin 12.5, 50, 150 and 300 mg, respectively). Decreases in body weight and blood pressure were observed for all ipragliflozin groups. AEs occurred in 39.7-51.4% of the ipragliflozin groups and 39.4% of placebo patients. Urinary tract infections (1.4-6.9 vs. 6.1%), genital infections (0-4.3 vs. 1.5%) and hypoglycaemia (0-5.9 vs. 3.0%) were similar in the ipragliflozin and placebo groups, respectively, without dose dependency. There were no clinically relevant effects on other safety measurements. CONCLUSIONS: Ipragliflozin treatment improved glycaemic control when added to metformin therapy and may be associated with weight loss and reductions in blood pressure compared to placebo. No safety or tolerability concerns were identified at any of the tested doses supporting the further development of ipragliflozin at ≥50 mg doses in T2DM patients.

Achieving 2003 European lipid goals with rosuvastatin and comparator statins in 6743 patients in real-life clinical practice: DISCOVERY meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: There is an increasing body of evidence to support the benefits of reducing low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels and this has been reflected in a lowering of LDL-C goals recommended by international guidelines. Therefore, there is a growing need for effective lipid-modifying therapies to optimise the achievement of these more stringent LDL-C goals. OBJECTIVE: A meta-analysis of data pooled from five studies participating in the DISCOVERY (DIrect Statin COmparison of LDL-C Values: an Evaluation of Rosuvastatin therapY) Programme was performed to compare the effect of rosuvastatin treatment with other statins in real-life clinical practice. RESULTS: These studies included 6743 patients with hypercholesterolaemia from different ethnicities, countries and cultural environments. The meta-analysis showed that significantly more patients receiving rosuvastatin 10 mg achieved the 2003 European LDL-C goals compared with those who received atorvastatin 10 mg or simvastatin 20 mg (p < 0.001 for both comparisons). A significantly greater proportion of patients receiving rosuvastatin 10 mg also achieved the 2003 European total cholesterol goal compared with those on atorvastatin 10 mg (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The meta-analysis showed that rosuvastatin was more effective than comparator statins at lowering LDL-C levels and enabling patients to achieve lipid goals at recommended start doses. In addition, all statins studied were well tolerated and confirmed that rosuvastatin had a similar safety profile to other statins.

Bone mineral density in premenopausal women treated for node-positive early breast cancer with 2 years of goserelin or 6 months of cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil (CMF).

The purpose of this study was to compare changes in bone mineral density (BMD) in premenopausal patients with node-positive early breast cancer treated with goserelin (Zoladex) or cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil (CMF). Patients ( n=1640) were randomized to goserelin (3.6 mg every 28 days for 2 years) or CMF (sixx28-day cycles) treatment. In a protocoled sub-study involving 96 patients from eight centers (goserelin: n=53; CMF: n=43), lumbar spine (L2-L4) and femoral neck BMD were assessed by dual X-ray absorptiometry at baseline and then annually for 3 years. At the end of the 2-year goserelin-treatment period, mean BMD losses for goserelin-treated and CMF-treated patients were -10.5% and -6.5% ( P=0.0005) for lumbar spine and -6.4% and -4.5% ( P=0.04) for femoral neck, respectively. At 3 years, partial recovery of BMD was observed in goserelin recipients. In contrast, mean BMD losses for the CMF group indicated persistent BMD loss. No significant differences in BMD were observed between groups at the 3-year assessment of the spine or femoral neck. In the CMF group, based on amenorrhea status at 48 weeks, BMD losses at the lumbar spine were greater for amenorrheic than non-amenorrheic patients. Ovarian suppression resulting in amenorrhea was closely related to BMD loss in both treatment groups. Overall, patients who received CMF did not show recovery of BMD throughout follow-up, whereas partial recovery was observed 1 year after cessation of goserelin therapy, associated with the return of ovarian function in the majority of patients.