Quality in the technical performance of screening flexible sigmoidoscopy: recommendations of an international multi-society task group.

BACKGROUND: Flexible sigmoidoscopy (FS) is a complex technical procedure performed in a variety of settings, by examiners with diverse professional backgrounds, training, and experience. Potential variation in technical quality may have a profound impact on the effectiveness of FS on the early detection and prevention of colorectal cancer. AIM: We propose a set of consensus and evidence based recommendations to assist the development of continuous quality improvement programmes around the delivery of FS for colorectal cancer screening. RECOMMENDATIONS: These recommendations address the intervals between FS examinations, documentation of results, training of endoscopists, decision making around referral for colonoscopy, policies for antibiotic prophylaxis and management of anticoagulation, insertion of the FS endoscope, bowel preparation, complications, the use of non-physicians as FS endoscopists, and FS endoscope reprocessing. For each of these areas, continuous quality improvement targets are recommended, and research questions are proposed.

A comparison of colonoscopy and double-contrast barium enema for surveillance after polypectomy. National Polyp Study Work Group.

BACKGROUND: After patients have undergone colonoscopic polypectomy, it is uncertain whether colonoscopic examination or a barium enema is the better method of surveillance. METHODS: As part of the National Polyp Study, we offered colonoscopic examination and double-contrast barium enema for surveillance to patients with newly diagnosed adenomatous polyps. Although barium enema was performed first, the endoscopist did not know the results. RESULTS: A total of 973 patients underwent one or more colonoscopic examinations for surveillance. In the case of 580 of these patients, we performed 862 paired colonoscopic examinations and barium-enema examinations that met the requirements of the protocol. The findings on barium enema were positive in 222 (26 percent) of the paired examinations, including 139 of the 392 colonoscopic examinations in which one or more polyps were detected (rate of detection, 35 percent; 95 percent confidence interval, 31 to 40 percent). The proportion of examinations in which adenomatous polyps were detected by barium enema colonoscopy was significantly related to the size of the adenomas (P=0.009); the rate was 32 percent for colonoscopic examinations in which the largest adenomas detected were 0.5 cm or less, 53 percent for those in which the largest adenomas detected were 0.6 to 1.0 cm, and 48 percent for those in which the largest adenomas detected exceeded 1.0 cm. Among the 139 paired examinations with positive results on barium enema and negative results on colonoscopic examination in the same location, 19 additional polyps, 12 of which were adenomas, were detected on colonoscopic reexamination. CONCLUSIONS: In patients who have undergone colonoscopic polypectomy, colonoscopic examination is a more effective method of surveillance than double-contrast barium enema.

Screening and surveillance for colorectal cancer.

Colorectal cancer is the second most common cause of cancer death among American men and woman. Currently available screening and surveillance techniques are effective in detecting early-stage colorectal cancer and its premalignant precursor lesion, the adenomatous polyp (adenoma). Removal of adenomas by colonoscopic polypectomy significantly reduces the incidence of colorectal cancer. Appropriate screening and surveillance recommendations should be based on the individual's colorectal cancer risk stratification. High-risk groups, such as patients with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) and familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP), should be offered genetic counseling and specialized screening recommendations for colorectal and associated extracolonic malignancies.

Natural history of colorectal cancer.

Colorectal cancer arises from a precursor lesion, the adenomatous polyp, which forms in a field of epithelial cell hyperproliferation and crypt dysplasia. Progression from this precursor lesion to colorectal cancer is a multistep process, accompanied by alterations in several suppressor genes that result in abnormalities of cell regulation, and has a natural history of 10-15 years. Environmental factors and inherited susceptibility play major roles in this sequence of events. As a result of familial and genetic studies, we now have a better understanding of various high-risk groups and the application of screening methods to these individuals and to people at average risk. In the future, further identification of genetically predisposed individuals and colonoscopic screening of the general population may provide new opportunities for control of colorectal cancer through secondary prevention, and a better understanding of lifestyle factors and their modification will lead to improved strategies for primary prevention.

Familial colorectal cancer in Ashkenazim due to a hypermutable tract in APC.

Approximately 130,000 cases of colorectal cancer (CRC) are diagnosed in the United States each year, and about 15% of these have a hereditary component. Two well-defined syndromes, familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) and hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC), account for up to 5% of the total new cases of CRC. Truncating APC mutations are responsible for FAP, and defective mismatch repair genes cause HNPCC. However, the genes responsible for most of the familial cases are unknown. Here we report a mutation (T to A at APC nucleotide 3920) found in 6% of Ashkenazi Jews and about 28% of Ashkenazim with a family history of CRC. Rather than altering the function of the encoded protein, this mutation creates a small hypermutable region of the gene, indirectly causing cancer predisposition.

Screening and surveillance for colorectal carcinoma.

Screening and surveillance examinations are effective in lowering colorectal cancer risk. Screening tests have been demonstrated to reduce colorectal cancer mortality. Colonoscopic removal of adenomatous polyps has been determined to reduce colorectal cancer incidence. High-risk individuals and their family members should be identified and offered more aggressive recommendations for appropriate screening and surveillance guidelines. Colorectal cancer screening strategies are in an acceptable range of cost effectiveness.

Initial management and follow-up surveillance of patients with colorectal adenomas.

The clinical management of patients with adenomas is interesting because of the adenomas' malignant potential, the availability of effective intervention by colonoscopy, and the increasing number of patients having adenomas detected and removed. The current literature on follow-up surveillance is reviewed, and surveillance intervals are suggested based on data from the National Polyp Study. Patients newly diagnosed with three or more adenomas, an adenoma of more than 0.5 cm, or with a family history of colorectal cancer should have surveillance colonoscopy at 3 years following the polypectomy. Surveillance of patients with single, small tubular adenomas can be extended to 5 or more years. Patients with large sessile or malignant adenomas need to have follow-up earlier. Identification and removal of adenomatous polyps have been shown to reduce colorectal cancer incidence.

Risk of colorectal cancer in the families of patients with adenomatous polyps. National Polyp Study Workgroup.

BACKGROUND: The adenoma-adenocarcinoma sequence in colorectal cancer suggests an increased risk of colorectal cancer in the families of patients with adenomatous polyps. METHODS: A random sample of participants in the National Polyp Study who had newly diagnosed adenomatous polyps were interviewed for information on the history of colorectal cancer in their parents and siblings. The risk of colorectal cancer in family members was analyzed according to the characteristics of the patients with adenomas and in comparison with a sample of patients' spouses, who served as controls. RESULTS: Among the patients with adenomas, 1199 provided information on whether they had a family history of colorectal cancer. After the exclusion of families for which information was incomplete and of 48 patients who had been referred for colonoscopy solely because they had a family history of colorectal cancer, there were 1031 patients with adenomas, 1865 parents, 2381 siblings, and 1411 spouse controls. The relative risk of colorectal cancer, adjusted for the year of birth and sex, was 1.78 for the parents and siblings of the patients with adenomas as compared with the spouse controls (95 percent confidence interval, 1.18 to 2.67). The relative risk for siblings of patients in whom adenomas were diagnosed before 60 years of age was 2.59 (95 percent confidence interval, 1.46 to 4.58) as compared with the siblings of patients who were 60 or older at the time of diagnosis and after adjustment for the sibling's year of birth and sex and a parental history of colorectal cancer. The risk increased with decreasing age at the time of the diagnosis of adenoma (P for trend < 0.001). The relative risk for the siblings of patients who had a parent with colorectal cancer, as compared with those who had no parent with cancer, was 3.25 (95 percent confidence interval, 1.92 to 5.52), after adjustment for the sibling's year of birth and sex and the patient's age at diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: Siblings and parents of patients with adenomatous polyps are at increased risk for colorectal cancer, particularly when the adenoma is diagnosed before the age of 60 or--in the case of siblings--when a parent has had colorectal cancer.