Recombinant ADAMTS13 in Congenital Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura.

BACKGROUND: Congenital thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) results from severe hereditary deficiency of ADAMTS13. The efficacy and safety of recombinant ADAMTS13 and standard therapy (plasma-derived products) administered as routine prophylaxis or on-demand treatment in patients with congenital TTP is not known. METHODS: In this phase 3, open-label, crossover trial, we randomly assigned patients in a 1:1 ratio to two 6-month periods of prophylaxis with recombinant ADAMTS13 (40 IU per kilogram of body weight, administered intravenously) or standard therapy, followed by the alternate treatment; thereafter, all the patients received recombinant ADAMTS13 for an additional 6 months. The trigger for this interim analysis was trial completion by at least 30 patients. The primary outcome was acute TTP events. Manifestations of TTP, safety, and pharmacokinetics were assessed. Patients who had an acute TTP event could receive on-demand treatment. RESULTS: A total of 48 patients underwent randomization; 32 completed the trial. No acute TTP event occurred during prophylaxis with recombinant ADAMTS13, whereas 1 patient had an acute TTP event during prophylaxis with standard therapy (mean annualized event rate, 0.05). Thrombocytopenia was the most frequent TTP manifestation (annualized event rate, 0.74 with recombinant ADAMTS13 and 1.73 with standard therapy). Adverse events occurred in 71% of the patients with recombinant ADAMTS13 and in 84% with standard therapy. Adverse events that were considered by investigators to be related to the trial drug occurred in 9% of the patients with recombinant ADAMTS13 and in 48% with standard therapy. Trial-drug interruption or discontinuation due to adverse events occurred in no patients with recombinant ADAMTS13 and in 8 patients with standard therapy. No neutralizing antibodies developed during recombinant ADAMTS13 treatment. The mean maximum ADAMTS13 activity after recombinant ADAMTS13 treatment was 101%, as compared with 19% after standard therapy. CONCLUSIONS: During prophylaxis with recombinant ADAMTS13 in patients with congenital TTP, ADAMTS13 activity reached approximately 100% of normal levels, adverse events were generally mild or moderate in severity, and TTP events and manifestations were rare. (Funded by Takeda Development Center Americas and Baxalta Innovations; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03393975.).

Long-term outcomes with emicizumab in hemophilia A without inhibitors: results from the HAVEN 3 and 4 studies.

Background: Emicizumab, a bispecific monoclonal antibody, bridges activated factor (F) IX and FX, mimicking the function of missing or deficient activated FVIII in people with hemophilia A (HA). Objectives: To evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of emicizumab prophylaxis in people with HA without FVIII inhibitors in the HAVEN 3 and 4 studies. Methods: HAVEN 3 and 4 were phase 3 open-label studies. Participants received emicizumab maintenance doses of 1.5 mg/kg every week or 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks (HAVEN 3), or 6 mg/kg every 4 weeks (HAVEN 4). Long-term efficacy and safety were assessed. Results: A total of 151 and 40 individuals without FVIII inhibitors received emicizumab in HAVEN 3 and 4, respectively. At the last patient, last visit dates (May 12, 2022 [HAVEN 3] and June 29, 2022 [HAVEN 4]), the median (range) duration of emicizumab exposure across the 2 studies was 248.1 (6.1-287.1) weeks. The mean (95% CI) annualized bleed rate for treated bleeds was 2.0 (0.23-7.15) for weeks 1 to 24, decreasing to 0.9 (0.01-5.28) by weeks 217 to 240. Overall, 188 (98.4%) participants experienced ≥1 adverse event (AE), with 185 treatment-related AEs in 71 (37.2%) participants. Forty-four (23.0%) participants reported a serious AE. Two thromboembolic events were reported, which were deemed unrelated to emicizumab by the investigator. No thrombotic microangiopathies were reported. Conclusion: With nearly 5 years of emicizumab exposure across the HAVEN 3 and 4 studies in people with HA without inhibitors, these data indicate continued bleed control with no new safety signals observed during long-term follow-up.

Recombinant porcine factor VIII in patients with congenital haemophilia A with inhibitors undergoing surgery: Phase 3, single-arm, open-label study.

INTRODUCTION: Recombinant porcine factor VIII (rpFVIII; susoctocog alfa) is predicted to provide functional FVIII activity in patients with congenital haemophilia A with inhibitors (CHAWI). AIMS: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of rpFVIII in patients with CHAWI undergoing invasive procedures. METHODS: This phase 3, multicentre, single-arm, open-label study (NCT02895945) enrolled males aged 12-75 years with severe/moderately severe CHAWI who required surgical/invasive procedures. Patients received a loading dose of rpFVIII 1-2 h before surgery. The primary outcome was the proportion of all procedures with a 'good' or 'excellent' response (treatment success) on the global haemostatic efficacy assessment score. RESULTS: Of the eight dosed patients, five completed the study. Six of seven surgeries (85.7%; 95% confidence interval, 42.1-99.6) achieved treatment success; five were rated 'excellent', one was rated 'good'. Seven surgery-related bleeding episodes occurred in three patients during the study, with none requiring additional surgical intervention. Overall, six of eight patients experienced 17 treatment-emergent adverse events. Three patients developed de novo inhibitors to rpFVIII. Five patients reported anamnestic reactions, three to both human (h) FVIII (i.e., alloantibodies to exogenous FVIII detected with anti-hFVIII assays) and rpFVIII, and two to hFVIII only. Four serious adverse events were considered related to rpFVIII (three anti-rpFVIII antibody positive; one anamnestic reaction to hFVIII and rpFVIII). CONCLUSION: Good haemostasis was achieved with rpFVIII during the immediate perioperative period. The study was terminated early because the study sponsor and health authorities determined that the risk of anamnestic reactions outweighs the benefits in this study population.

Evaluation of collagen turnover biomarkers as an objective measure for efficacy of treatment with rurioctocog alfa pegol in patients with hemophilia A: a secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Patients with hemophilia who have recurrent hemarthroses develop hemophilic arthropathy (HA). Regular prophylaxis with factor (F) VIII (FVIII) can reduce HA, but there is a need for objective outcome measures to evaluate treatment efficacy. OBJECTIVES: Evaluate and assess collagen turnover biomarkers in patients with hemophilia A to determine the efficacy of rurioctocog alfa pegol treatment and understand their potential as tools for guiding treatment decisions and monitoring outcomes. METHODS: Joint remodeling was assessed by analyzing serum levels of collagen remodeling products at baseline and months 3, 6, 9, and 12 in a 98 patient subset receiving pharmacokinetics-guided prophylaxis with rurioctocog alfa pegol, targeting FVIII trough levels of 1 to 3 International Units (IU)/dL or 8 to 12 IU/dL (PROPEL study, NCT0285960). RESULTS: Basement membrane metabolism-related type 4 collagen remodeling products (C4M and PRO-C4) decreased after 3 months at all time points by up to 25% at 1 to 3 IU/dL (P = .049, P < .0001) and 8 to 12 IU/dL FVIII trough levels (P = .0002, P < .0001). Interstitial tissue metabolism-related type 3 (C3M) and 5 (PRO-C5) collagen remodeling products decreased after 3 months, by up to 19% at 1 to 3 IU/dL FVIII trough level (P = .0001, P = .009) and 23% at 8 to 12 IU/dL FVIII trough level (P = .0002, P = .001). An increase of up to 12% was seen for cartilage metabolism-related type 2 collagen product (PRO-C2, not C2M) after 6 months at both trough levels (P = .01, P = .005). When stratified by prior treatment, changes in C3M (P = .03) and C4M (P = .02) levels were observed between trough levels for prior on-demand treatment but not for prophylaxis prior to study entry. CONCLUSION: Joint improvement measured by collagen remodeling biomarkers specific to the basement membrane, interstitial matrix, and cartilage was seen with pharmacokinetics-guided prophylaxis. These collagen remodeling biomarkers warrant further exploration as biomarkers to guide treatment toward improvement in HA.

In Search of the Perfect Thrombosis and Bleeding-Associated Cancer Scale.

Thrombosis and bleeding are commonly observed in cancer patients, and their management is crucial for positive patient outcomes. A comprehensive, prophylactic, and therapeutic management of venous thrombosis should focus on identifying the patients who would benefit most from treatment to reduce mortality and minimize the risk of thrombosis recurrence without significantly increasing the risk of bleeding. Existing cancer scales provide valuable information for assessing the overall burden of cancer and guiding treatment decisions, but their ability to predict thrombotic and bleeding events remains limited. With increasing knowledge of the pathophysiology of cancer and the availability of advanced anticancer therapies, new risk factors for cancer-associated thrombosis and bleeding are being identified. In this report, we analyze the current literature and identify new risk factors for venous thrombosis and bleeding which are not included in routinely used risk scores. While some existing cancer scales partially capture the risk of thrombosis and bleeding, there is a need for more specific and accurate scales tailored to these complications. The development of such scales could improve risk stratification, aid in treatment selection, and enhance patient care. Therefore, further research and development of novel cancer scales focused on thrombosis and bleeding are warranted to optimize patient management and outcomes.

FRONTIER1: a partially randomized phase 2 study assessing the safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of Mim8, a factor VIIIa mimetic.

BACKGROUND: Mim8 (denecimig) is a factor VIII (FVIII) mimetic bispecific antibody in development for the treatment of hemophilia. Data from the phase 1 part of FRONTIER1 (EudraCT: 2019-000465-20, NCT04204408, and NN7769-4513) suggested that Mim8 was well tolerated in healthy participants and exhibited pharmacokinetic (PK) properties consistent with dose proportionality. OBJECTIVES: The partially randomized, phase 2, multiple ascending dose (MAD) part of FRONTIER1 aimed to evaluate the safety, PK, pharmacodynamics (PD), and exploratory efficacy of Mim8 in participants with hemophilia A with or without FVIII inhibitors. METHODS: The MAD part of FRONTIER1 consisted of 42 participants, assigned to 5 cohorts, with participants in cohorts 3 and 4 randomized 1:1 to dosing weekly or every 4 weeks, respectively. Four of the 42 participants (9.5%) had FVIII inhibitors prior to study enrolment. The primary endpoint was treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). PK and PD were evaluated by Mim8 plasma concentration and thrombin generation, respectively. Exploratory efficacy was assessed via the number of treated bleeds. Safety and PD parameters were also evaluated from an exploratory cohort treated with emicizumab. RESULTS: Mim8 was well tolerated, with 1 serious TEAE (anxiety-related chest pain) deemed unrelated to Mim8. There was no dose dependency on the number, causality, type, or severity of TEAEs. PK/PD properties supported weekly to monthly dosing approaches, and few participants experienced treated bleeds beyond the lowest dose cohort (1 in cohorts 2 and 3, and 3 in cohort 5). CONCLUSION: These data support the continued clinical development of Mim8, and FRONTIER1 has proceeded onto an extension phase.

Real-world data in patients with congenital hemophilia and inhibitors: final data from the FEIBA Global Outcome (FEIBA GO) study.

Background: The bypassing agent, activated prothrombin complex concentrate [aPCC, FEIBA (factor VIII inhibitor bypass activity); Baxalta US Inc, a Takeda company, Lexington, MA, USA], is indicated for the treatment of bleeding episodes, perioperative management, and routine prophylaxis in patients with hemophilia A or B with inhibitors. In certain countries, aPCC is also indicated for the treatment of bleeding episodes and perioperative management in patients with acquired hemophilia A. Objectives: To describe long-term, real-world effectiveness, safety, and quality-of-life outcomes for patients with congenital hemophilia A or B and high-responding inhibitors receiving aPCC treatment in routine clinical practice. Design: FEIBA Global Outcome (FEIBA GO; EUPAS6691) was a prospective, observational study. Methods: Investigators determined the treatment regimen and clinical monitoring frequency. The planned patient observation period was 4 years. Data are from the safety analysis set (patients who received ⩾1 aPCC infusion). Results: Overall, 50 patients received either aPCC prophylaxis (n = 37) or on-demand therapy (n = 13) at screening [hemophilia A, n = 49; hemophilia B, n = 1; median (range) age, 16.5 [2-71] years). Mean ±â€„standard deviation overall annualized bleeding rate and annualized joint bleeding rate for patients receiving prophylaxis were 6.82 ± 11.52 and 3.77 ± 5.71, respectively, and for patients receiving on-demand therapy were 10.94 ± 11.27 and 6.94 ± 7.39, respectively. Overall, 177 and 31 adverse events (AEs) were reported in 28 of 40 and 10 of 13 patients receiving prophylaxis or on-demand therapy, respectively. Two serious AEs were considered possibly related to aPCC: acute myocardial infarction due to coronary artery embolism in one patient receiving prophylaxis. No thrombotic microangiopathy was reported. No AEs resulted in death. Conclusion: This study demonstrated the long-term, real-world effectiveness and consistent safety profile of aPCC as on-demand therapy and prophylactic treatment in patients with hemophilia and high-responding inhibitors. Trial registry: FEIBA Global Outcome Study; EUPAS6691 https://www.encepp.eu/encepp/viewResource.htm?id=32774.

Phase 3 Trial of Concizumab in Hemophilia with Inhibitors.

BACKGROUND: Concizumab is an anti-tissue factor pathway inhibitor monoclonal antibody designed to achieve hemostasis in all hemophilia types, with subcutaneous administration. A previous trial of concizumab (explorer4) established proof of concept in patients with hemophilia A or B with inhibitors. METHODS: We conducted the explorer7 trial to assess the safety and efficacy of concizumab in patients with hemophilia A or B with inhibitors. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:2 ratio to receive no prophylaxis for at least 24 weeks (group 1) or concizumab prophylaxis for at least 32 weeks (group 2) or were nonrandomly assigned to receive concizumab prophylaxis for at least 24 weeks (groups 3 and 4). After a treatment pause due to nonfatal thromboembolic events in three patients receiving concizumab, including one from the explorer7 trial, concizumab therapy was restarted with a loading dose of 1.0 mg per kilogram of body weight, followed by 0.2 mg per kilogram daily (potentially adjusted on the basis of concizumab plasma concentration as measured at week 4). The primary end-point analysis compared treated spontaneous and traumatic bleeding episodes in group 1 and group 2. Safety, patient-reported outcomes, and pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics were also assessed. RESULTS: Of 133 enrolled patients, 19 were randomly assigned to group 1 and 33 to group 2; the remaining 81 were assigned to groups 3 and 4. The estimated mean annualized bleeding rate in group 1 was 11.8 episodes (95% confidence interval [CI], 7.0 to 19.9), as compared with 1.7 episodes (95% CI, 1.0 to 2.9) in group 2 (rate ratio, 0.14 [95% CI, 0.07 to 0.29]; P<0.001). The overall median annualized bleeding rate for patients receiving concizumab (groups 2, 3, and 4) was 0 episodes. No thromboembolic events were reported after concizumab therapy was restarted. The plasma concentrations of concizumab remained stable over time. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with hemophilia A or B with inhibitors, the annualized bleeding rate was lower with concizumab prophylaxis than with no prophylaxis. (Funded by Novo Nordisk; explorer7 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04083781.).

Targeting an elevated FVIII level using personalized rurioctocog alfa pegol prophylaxis in specific patient populations with hemophilia A: post hoc subanalysis of the randomized, phase 3 PROPEL study.

Background: The phase 3, prospective PROPEL study demonstrated that pharmacokinetic (PK)-guided prophylaxis targeting elevated factor VIII (FVIII) troughs in patients with hemophilia A resulted in lower annualized bleeding rates (ABRs) and a higher proportion of patients experiencing zero bleeds in the second 6 months of treatment when targeting a FVIII trough of 8-12% versus 1-3%. Objective: To investigate the benefit of PK-guided prophylaxis with rurioctocog alfa pegol targeting two FVIII trough levels in specific patient subgroups in a post hoc analysis using data from PROPEL. Design: This is a post hoc analysis of data from the PROPEL study. The design and primary outcomes of the prospective, randomized PROPEL study (NCT02585960) have been reported previously. Methods: This post hoc analysis reports data stratified by FVIII half-life (t1/2), hemophilic arthropathy status, number of target joints at screening, previous treatment regimen, and ABR range in the 12 months before study entry. Results: Targeting an elevated FVIII trough of 8-12% was associated with higher average FVIII levels over time, regardless of FVIII t1/2 at baseline. The decrease in total ABR between the 8-12% and 1-3% arms was greatest in patients with a FVIII t1/2 of 6 to <12 h (0.7 versus 3.5); a higher number of target joints, that is, at least four target joints, at baseline (0.2 versus 1.6); the presence of arthropathy (0.1 versus 1.7); and those previously treated on-demand (0.3 versus 1.8). Conclusion: These results support the feasibility of targeting elevated FVIII levels using personalized rurioctocog alfa pegol prophylaxis. These benefits may be especially important in patients with a short FVIII t1/2 and those receiving standard prophylaxis with frequent breakthrough bleeds, arthropathy, and target joints. Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02585960; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02585960.

Antithrombotic Treatment in Patients With Hemophilia: an EHA-ISTH-EAHAD-ESO Clinical Practice Guidance.

Cardiovascular disease is an emerging medical issue in patients with hemophilia (PWH) and its prevalence is increasing up to 15% in PWH in the United States. Atrial fibrillation, acute and chronic coronary syndromes, venous thromboembolism, and cerebral thrombosis are frequent thrombotic or prothrombotic situations, which require a careful approach to fine-tune the delicate balance between thrombosis and hemostasis in PWH when using both procoagulant and anticoagulant treatments. Generally, PWH could be considered as being naturally anticoagulated when clotting factors are <20 IU/dL, but specific recommendations in patients with very low levels according to the different clinical situations are lacking and mainly based on the anecdotal series. For PWH with baseline clotting factor levels >20 IU/dL in need for any form of antithrombotic therapy, usually treatment without additional clotting factor prophylaxis could be used, but careful monitoring for bleeding is recommended. For antiplatelet treatment, this threshold could be lower with single-antiplatelet agent, but again factor level should be at least 20 IU/dL for dual antiplatelet treatment. In this complex growing scenario, the European Hematology Association in collaboration with the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis, the European Association for Hemophilia and Allied Disorders, the European Stroke Organization, and a representative of the European Society of Cardiology Working Group on Thrombosis has produced this current guidance document to provide clinical practice recommendations for health care providers who care for PWH.

Complement Inhibition in Paroxysmal Nocturnal Hemoglobinuria (PNH): A Systematic Review and Expert Opinion from Central Europe on Special Patient Populations.

INTRODUCTION: Hemolysis in paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH) is complement-mediated due to the lack of complement inhibitors in the hemopoietic cell membranes, making complement inhibition the best approach to manage PNH. Three complement inhibitors are approved by the European Medicines Agency as targeted therapy for PNH: eculizumab and ravulizumab, two humanized monoclonal antibodies targeting the same complement 5 (C5) epitope, approved in 2007 and 2019, respectively, and the more recently approved cyclic peptide, the complement 3 (C3) inhibitor pegcetacoplan. Although national and international PNH treatment guidelines exist, they do not take into consideration the latest clinical trial evidence. Given the lack of evidence-based data for some clinical situations encountered in real life, we identified specific populations of patients who may benefit from switching to proximal C3 from terminal C5 inhibition. METHODS: The expert recommendations presented here were created using a Delphi-like process by a group of expert PNH specialists across Central Europe. Based on an initial advisory board meeting discussion, recommendations were prepared and reviewed as part of a Delphi survey to test agreement. RESULTS: Using a systematic approach, literature databases were searched for relevant studies, and 50 articles were reviewed by the experts and included as supporting evidence. CONCLUSION: Implementation of these recommendations uniformly across healthcare institutions will promote the best use of complement inhibition in managing PNH, and has the potential to positively impact patient outcomes in Central Europe and worldwide.

Emicizumab in people with moderate or mild haemophilia A (HAVEN 6): a multicentre, open-label, single-arm, phase 3 study.

BACKGROUND: Clinical trial data are scarce for the use of prophylaxis in people with non-severe haemophilia A. The HAVEN 6 study aims to assess safety and efficacy of emicizumab prophylaxis in people with non-severe haemophilia A without factor VIII (FVIII) inhibitors. METHODS: HAVEN 6 is a multicentre, open-label, single-arm, phase 3 study taking place in 22 specialty clinics and hospitals in Europe, North America, and South Africa. Eligible participants were people of all ages weighing at least 3 kg with a diagnosis of moderate (FVIII activity ≥1%-≤5%) or mild (FVIII >5%-<40%) haemophilia A without FVIII inhibitors requiring prophylaxis as assessed by the treating physician. Participants received subcutaneous emicizumab 3 mg/kg of bodyweight once weekly for 4 weeks, followed by the participant's choice of maintenance dose: 1·5 mg/kg once weekly, 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks, or 6 mg/kg every 4 weeks. Safety was the primary objective of the study. Safety endpoints included adverse events, serious adverse events, and adverse events of special interest including thromboembolic events and thrombotic microangiopathies. The primary efficacy endpoint was the annualised bleed rate for treated bleeds. Analyses were done for participants who received at least one dose of emicizumab. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT04158648, and is active but not recruiting. FINDINGS: Between Feb 10, 2020, and Aug 31, 2021, we assigned 73 people to treatment. 72 participants received at least one dose of emicizumab (51 moderate [71%]; 21 mild [29%]; 69 male [96%]; three female [4%]; and 61 White [85%]). Median age was 23·5 years (IQR 12·0-36·0); median follow-up was 55·6 weeks (IQR 52·3-61·6) weeks. At baseline, 24 participants (33%) had target joints and 37 (51%) were receiving FVIII prophylaxis. 60 participants (83%) had at least one adverse event; the most common adverse events were headache (in 12 participants [17%]), injection-site reaction (12 [17%]), and arthralgia (11 [15%]). 15 (21%) had at least one emicizumab-related adverse event; no adverse events led to treatment withdrawal, modification, or interruption. Eight participants (11%) reported ten serious adverse events in total, none emicizumab-related. There were no deaths or thrombotic microangiopathies. One participant had grade 1 thrombosed haemorrhoids (classified as a thromboembolic event), unrelated to emicizumab. The annualised bleed rate was 0·9 (95% CI 0·55-1·52) for treated bleeds. 48 participants (67%) had no treated bleeds. All-bleed annualised bleed rates were 10·1 (95% CI 6·93-14·76) from 24 weeks pre-study and 2·3 (1·67-3·12) on-study after a median follow-up of 55·6 weeks. INTERPRETATION: These data show efficacy and a favourable safety profile of emicizumab in people with non-severe haemophilia A without FVIII inhibitors who warrant prophylaxis, confirming emicizumab as a valuable treatment option in this population. FUNDING: F Hoffmann-La Roche.

Applicability of the European Society of Cardiology Guidelines on the management of acute coronary syndromes to older people with haemophilia A - A modified Delphi consensus by the ADVANCE Working Group.

INTRODUCTION: As people with haemophilia (PWH) receive better treatment and live longer they are more likely to encounter cardiovascular disease (CVD) and other comorbidities. ESC guidelines for the acute management of patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) are based on the non-haemophilia population. AIM: To review the guidelines and propose relevant adaptations for PWHA without inhibitors who are treated with prophylaxis and present with ACS. METHODS: As part of the ADVANCE Group, 20 European haemophilia experts used a modified Delphi approach to develop and gain consensus on proposed adaptations of the ESC guidelines for PWHA without inhibitors. RESULTS: Of the 32 Class I recommendations across both guidelines, adaptions were considered necessary and proposed for 15. The adaptions highlight the need to provide sufficient FVIII trough levels at the time of antithrombotic treatment in people with haemophilia A (HA) without inhibitors. Patients receiving emicizumab prophylaxis and requiring oral anticoagulation therapy or combined single antiplatelet plus oral anticoagulation therapy will require additional FVIII replacement therapy. CONCLUSION: In the absence of high-quality clinical evidence, the combined expert opinion used to develop these adaptions to the current ESC guidelines may help to guide clinicians in their treatment decisions when a PWHA presents with ACS.

Hereditary thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura and COVID-19: Impacts of vaccination and infection in this rare disease.

Introduction: Severe COVID-19 is associated with an important increase of von Willebrand factor and mild lowering of ADAMTS13 activity that may, in the presence of a strong inflammatory reaction, increase the risk of acute thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP). Although acute episodes of immune-mediated TTP associated with COVID-19 or SARS-CoV-2 vaccination have been reported, data about clinical evolution of hereditary TTP (hTTP) during the pandemic are scarce. Method: We conducted a survey among adult patients of the International Hereditary TTP Registry about SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, COVID-19, and occurrence of acute hTTP episodes. Results: Of 122 adult hTTP patients invited to participate, 86 (70.5%) responded. Sixty-five had been vaccinated (75.6%), of which 14 had received in addition a booster, resulting in 139 individual vaccine shots. Although vaccinations in patients on plasma prophylaxis were done within 1 week of the last plasma infusion, all 23 patients treated with plasma on demand were vaccinated without prior plasma infusions. One patient on uninterrupted weekly plasma infusions presented within 3 days from his second vaccination with neurological symptoms and computed tomography scan 9 days later showed subacute ischemic/hemorrhagic frontal lobe infarction. A second male patient developed acute myocarditis after his second dose of mRNA-1273 vaccine. Twelve (14%) patients had COVID-19, associated with an acute hTTP episode in three of them: one patient had a transient ischemic attack, one a stroke, and a pregnant woman was hospitalized to intensify plasma treatment. Discussion: The risk of an acute episode triggered by COVID-19 seems higher than following vaccination in hTTP patients, who can be safely vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2.

Continuous Infusion of Factor VIII and von Willebrand Factor in Surgery: Trials with pdFVIII LFB or pdVWF LFB in Patients with Bleeding Disorders.

BACKGROUND: A plasma-derived factor VIII product (pdFVIII; Factane 100 or 200 IU/mL) and a plasma-derived von Willebrand factor product (pdVWF; Wilfactin 100 IU/mL) are approved for replacement therapy by intravenous bolus injections in hemophilia A (HA) and von Willebrand disease (VWD), respectively. However, in situations requiring intensive treatment, continuous infusion (CI) may be desirable to better control target plasma factor levels. AIM: To evaluate the perioperative hemostatic efficacy and safety of these concentrates administered by CI. METHODS: Three phase III trials were conducted. Adults with HA (FVIII:C < 1%) (studies 1 and 2) or VWD (VWF:RCo < 20%) (Study 3) received a preoperative bolus followed by CI of undiluted concentrate for at least 6 days. Bolus doses and CI rates were based on individual recovery and clearance, respectively. The initial infusion rate had to be higher for 48 hours for HA and 24 hours for VWD patients to anticipate potential fluctuations of factor concentrations during major surgery. Target levels of FVIII:C in HA and VWF:RCo in VWD were 80 and 70 IU/dL, respectively. Efficacy was assessed using a global hemostatic efficacy score. RESULTS: Studies 1, 2, and 3 included 12, 4, and 6 patients, respectively. Efficacy outcomes were excellent/good in all 22 major surgeries including 18 orthopedic procedures. Most daily measured FVIII and VWF levels (92%) were on target. No safety concerns, thrombotic events, or inhibitors were identified. CONCLUSION: pdFVIII and pdVWF administered by CI represent an effective and safe alternative to bolus injections in patients with severe HA or VWD undergoing surgery.