Bariatric Surgery Is Efficacious and Improves Access to Transplantation for Morbidly Obese Renal Transplant Candidates.

BACKGROUND: The surgical risk of morbidly obese patients is high and even higher for kidney transplant candidates. A BMI > 35-40 kg/m2 is often a contraindication for that surgery. The safety, feasibility, and outcome of bariatric surgery for those patients are inconclusive. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective chart review of prospectively collected data on morbidly obese renal transplant candidates who underwent laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) or laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) in our institution between January 2009 and September 2017. The reported outcome included body weight and graft status after a mean follow-up of 47 months (range 0.5-5 years). RESULTS: Twenty-four patients (8 females, 16 males, average age 54 years, average preoperative BMI 41 kg/m2 [range 35-51]) underwent LSG (n = 17) or LRYGB (n = 7). Sixteen of them (67%) proceeded to kidney transplantation. Of the 8 pre-transplant and post-bariatric surgery patients, 5 are on the waitlist, and 2 patients died (one of staple line leakage, and one from sepsis unrelated to the bariatric surgery). The average time from bariatric surgery to transplantation was 1.5 years (range 1 month to 4.3 years). The average pre-transplantation BMI was 28 kg/m2 (range 19-36). The mean percentage of excess weight loss was 66% (n = 21), and the total percentage of weight loss was 29% (n = 21). Comorbidities (type 2 diabetes, hypertension, and dyslipidemia) improved significantly following both surgical approaches. CONCLUSIONS: LSG and LRYGB appear to effectively address obesity issues before kidney transplantation and improve surgical access. Morbidly obese transplant candidates would benefit from prior bariatric surgery.

Survival benefit in bariatric surgery kidney recipients may be mediated through effects on kidney graft function and improvement of co-morbidities: A case-control study.

BACKGROUND: Data on the benefits of bariatric surgery for morbid obesity among kidney transplant recipients are scarce. OBJECTIVE: To examine the effect of bariatric surgery on graft function and survival and on obesity-related co-morbidities. SETTING: University hospital. METHODS: This case-control study used retrospectively collected data of all kidney recipients who underwent bariatric surgery in our institution between November 2011 and August 2016 (n = 30, 11 females). Nonbariatric operated kidney recipients matched for age, sex, and time elapsed since transplantation served as controls (n = 50, 23 females). Main outcomes were renal function, graft loss events, mortality, and obesity-related co-morbidities. RESULTS: The mean follow-up duration was 2.4 ± 1.3 years for both groups. At final follow-up, there was an increase in estimated glomerular filtration rates for the bariatric surgery group, and a decrease for the controls (13.4 ± 19.9 and -3.9 ± 15.8 mL/min/1.73 m2, respectively, P < .001). The chronic kidney disease classification improved in 9 bariatric surgery group patients and in 6 controls (P = .1). Two patients in the bariatric surgery group and 6 controls died. Total death or graft function loss during the follow-up was 6.7% and 16.7%, respectively (P = .3). The total numbers of co-morbidities and medications were lower in the bariatric surgery patients (-.7 and -2, respectively) and higher in the controls (+.3 and +1.1; P < .001) at study closure. CONCLUSIONS: There was an improvement in renal function, graft survival, and obesity-related co-morbidities among kidney transplant recipients who underwent bariatric surgery compared with those who did not. These findings support bariatric surgery in this population and warrant prospective studies.

Bariatric surgery in solid organ transplant patients: Long-term follow-up results of outcome, safety, and effect on immunosuppression.

The surgical risk of transplanted patients is high, and the modified gastrointestinal anatomy after bariatric surgery (BS) may lead to pharmacokinetic alterations in the absorption of immunosuppressive drugs. Data on outcomes of BS and the safety and feasibility of maintaining immunosuppression and graft safety among solid organ transplanted patients are scarce. In the current study, weight loss, improvement in comorbidities, and changes in dosage and trough levels of immunosuppression drugs before and after BS were analyzed for all transplanted patients who underwent laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) or laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) in our institution between November 2011 and January 2017. Thirty-four patients (13 females, 21 males, average age 53 years) were included in the study. A successful weight loss (>50% excess weight loss in 28 of them [82%]) was recorded at the last follow-up. Comorbidities improved significantly. Immunosuppressive stability increased from 39% to 47% among all patients. The tacrolimus blood trough levels declined slightly, but remained within therapeutic range. These data suggest that LSG and LRYGB ensure good immunosuppressive maintenance together with significant weight loss and improvement in comorbidities without serious graft rejection or dysfunction. The surgical risk is higher than in the regular BS population.

The urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio: assessment of its performance in the renal transplant recipient population.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Microalbuminuria predicts graft loss and death in the renal transplant population. Measurement of the urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR) is recommended for its detection. There is uncertainty regarding the optimal UACR cutoff values. Few studies have examined the accuracy of UACR in the general population and none have been conducted in renal transplant recipients. The aim of this study is to determine the performance of UACR in the renal transplant population. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS & MEASUREMENTS: Renal transplant recipients with a daily urinary albumin excretion rate of up to 300 mg accurately carried out a 24-hour urine collection and provided a morning urine sample for the measurement of albuminuria and UACR. The performance measures of UACR for the detection of microalbuminuria (30 to 300 mg/d) were calculated using different cutoffs. RESULTS: Median albuminuria was 23 mg/d, and median UACR was 17 mg/g. The area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve was 0.94 in men and 0.98 in women. The optimal cutoff was 21 mg/g in men and 24 mg/g in women. In men, the 30-, 17-, and 21-mg/g cutoffs provided a sensitivity of 0.79, 0.89, and 0.87. In women, the 30-, 25-, and 24-mg/g cutoffs provided a sensitivity of 0.90, 0.97, and 1.0. CONCLUSIONS: These data show that in the renal transplant population, lower gender-specific cutoffs should be used for the detection of microalbuminuria than the recommended 30-mg/g cutoff. These data support the need for a reappraisal of the 30-mg/g cutoff for the detection of microalbuminuria.

Does acupuncture improve the orthopedic management of chronic low back pain--a randomized, blinded, controlled trial with 3 months follow up.

This prospective, randomised controlled trial, with three parallel groups, patient and observer blinded for verum and sham acupuncture and a follow up of 3 months raises the question: "Does a combination of acupuncture and conservative orthopedic treatment improve conservative orthopedic treatment in chronic low back pain (LBP). 186 in-patients of a LBP rehabilitation center with a history of LBP >or=6 weeks, VAS >or=50mm, and no pending compensation claims, were selected; for the three random group 4 weeks of treatment was applied. 174 patients met the protocol criteria and reported after treatment, 124 reported after 3 months follow up. Patients were assorted 4 strata: chronic LBP, or=5 years. Analysis was by intention to treat. Group 1 (Verum+COT) received 12 treatments of verum acupuncture and conservative orthopedic treatment (COT). Group 2 (Sham+COT) received 12 treatments of non-specific needling and COT. Group 3 (nil+COT) received COT alone. Verum- and Sham acupuncture were blinded against patient and examiner. The primary endpoints were pain reduction >or=50% on VAS 3 months after the end of the treatment protocol. Secondary endpoints were pain reduction >or=50% on VAS and treatment efficacy on a four-point box scale directly after the end of the treatment protocol and treatment efficacy after 3 months. In the whole sample a pain relief of >or=50% on VAS was reported directly after the end of treatment protocol: Verum+COT 65% (95%CI 51-77%), Sham+COT 34% (95%ci 22-49%), nil+COT 43% (95%ci 29-58%) - results are significant for Verum+COT over Sham+COT (P