Latest pharmaceutical approaches across the spectrum of heart failure.

Despite major advances in prevention and medical therapy, heart failure (HF) remains associated with high morbidity and mortality, especially in older and frailer patients. Therefore, a complete, guideline-based treatment is essential, even in HF patients with conditions traditionally associated with a problematic initiation and escalation of the medical HF therapy, such as chronic kidney disease and arterial hypotension, as the potential adverse effects are overcome by the overall decrease of the absolute risk. Furthermore, since the latest data suggest that the benefit of a combined medical therapy (MRA, ARNI, SGLT2i, beta-blocker) may extend up to a LVEF of 65%, further trials on these subgroups of patients (HFmrEF, HFpEF) are needed to re-evaluate the guideline-directed medical therapy across the HF spectrum. In particular, the use of SGLT2i was recently extended to HFpEF patients, as evidenced by the DELIVER and EMPEROR-preserved trials. Moreover, the indication for other conservative treatments in HF patients, such as the intravenous iron supplementation, was accordingly strengthened in the latest guidelines. Finally, the possible implementation of newer substances, such as finerenone, in guideline-directed medical practice for HF is anticipated with great interest.

Impedance-based remote monitoring in patients with heart failure and concomitant chronic kidney disease.

AIMS: Remote monitoring (RM) of thoracic impedance represents an early marker of pulmonary congestion in heart failure (HF). Chronic kidney disease (CKD) may promote fluid overload in HF patients. We investigated whether concomitant CKD affected the efficacy of impedance-based RM in the OptiLink HF trial. METHODS AND RESULTS: Among HF patients included in the OptiLink HF trial, time to the first cardiovascular hospitalization and all-cause death according to the presence of concomitant CKD was analysed. CKD was defined as GFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 at enrolment. Of the 1002 patients included in OptiLink HF, 326 patients (33%) had HF with concomitant CKD. The presence of CKD increased transmission of telemedical alerts (median of 2 (1-5) vs. 1 (0-3); P = 0.012). Appropriate contacting after alert transmission was equally low in patients with and without CKD (57% vs. 59%, P = 0.593). The risk of the primary endpoint was higher in patients with CKD compared with patients without CKD (hazard ratio (HR), 1.62 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.16-2.28]; P = 0.005). Impedance-based RM independently reduced primary events in HF patients with preserved renal function, but not in those with CKD (HR 0.68 [95% CI, 0.52-0.89]; P = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: The presence of CKD in HF patients led to a higher number of telemedical alert transmissions and increased the risk of the primary endpoint. Inappropriate handling of alert transmission was commonly observed in patients with chronic HF and CKD. Guidance of HF management by impedance-based RM significantly decreased primary event rates in patients without CKD, but not in patients with CKD.

Renal denervation reduces atrial remodeling in hypertensive rats with metabolic syndrome.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is highly prevalent in hypertensive patients with metabolic syndrome and is related to inflammation and activation of the sympathoadrenergic system. The multi-ligand Receptor-for-Advanced-Glycation-End-products (RAGE) activates inflammation-associated tissue remodeling and is regulated by the sympathetic nervous system. Its counterpart, soluble RAGE (sRAGE), serves as anti-inflammatory decoy receptor with protective properties. We investigated the effect of sympathetic modulation by renal denervation (RDN) on atrial remodeling, RAGE/sRAGE and RAGE ligands in metabolic syndrome. RDN was performed in spontaneously hypertensive obese rats (SHRob) with metabolic syndrome compared with lean spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR) and with normotensive non-obese control rats. Blood pressure and heart rate were measured by telemetry. The animals were killed 12 weeks after RDN. Left atrial (LA) and right atrial (RA) remodeling was assessed by histological analysis and collagen types. Sympathetic innervation was measured by tyrosine hydroxylase staining of atrial nerve fibers, RAGE/sRAGE, RAGE ligands, cytokine expressions and inflammatory infiltrates were analyzed by Western blot and immunofluorescence staining. LA sympathetic nerve fiber density was higher in SHRob (+44%) versus controls and reduced after RDN (-64% versus SHRob). RAGE was increased (+718%) and sRAGE decreased (- 62%) in SHRob as compared with controls. RDN reduced RAGE expression (- 61% versus SHRob), significantly increased sRAGE levels (+162%) and induced a significant decrease in RAGE ligand levels in SHRob (- 57% CML and - 51% HMGB1) with reduced pro-inflammatory NFkB activation (- 96%), IL-6 production (- 55%) and reduced inflammatory infiltrates. This led to a reduction in atrial fibrosis (- 33%), collagen type I content (- 72%), accompanied by reduced LA myocyte hypertrophy (- 21%). Transfection experiments on H9C2 cardiomyoblasts demonstrated that RAGE is directly involved in fibrosis formation by influencing cellular production of collagen type I. In conclusion, suppression of renal sympathetic nerve activity by RDN prevents atrial remodeling in metabolic syndrome by reducing atrial sympathetic innervation and by modulating RAGE/sRAGE balance and reducing pro-inflammatory and pro-fibrotic RAGE ligands, which provides a potential therapeutic mechanism to reduce the development of AF.

Management strategies in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.

The diagnosis and therapy of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) remain challenging. Currently, there are ongoing discussions on whether the diagnosis of HFpEF should be based solely on left ventricular ejection fraction, which may not account for the heterogeneity of HFpEF syndrome. This aspect has been addressed by the recently proposed HFA-PEFF and the H2FPEF algorithms, which take numerous diagnostic modalities into account to establish the diagnosis of HFpEF. Moreover, this review focuses on the adequate treatment of comorbidities and risk factors in HFpEF that should be an essential part of any HFpEF therapy. Furthermore, the management of fluid level in HFpEF patients is pointed out, as it plays an important role in symptom control. In addition, the value of LCZ696 therapy in HFpEF is discussed. Although LCZ696 had neutral effects in the large PARAGON-HF trial, it had previously been granted an extended indication by the Food and Drug Administration. Since the publication of the EMPEROR-Preserved trial, empagliflozin now represents the first drug to significantly improve the prognosis of HFpEF patients. Therefore, the role of SGLT2 inhibitors in HFpEF management is highlighted. Overall, this review aims to enhance the knowledge on the diagnostic processes and best treatments available for HFpEF patients.

Heart-Focused Anxiety, General Anxiety, Depression and Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation Undergoing Pulmonary Vein Isolation.

(1) Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with anxiety, depression, and chronic stress, and vice versa. The purpose of this study was to evaluate potential effects of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) on psychological factors. (2) Methods: Psychological assessment was performed before PVI as well as after six months. (3) Results: A total of 118 patients [age 64 ± 9 years, 69% male, left ventricular ejection fraction 57 ± 8%, 56% paroxysmal AF] undergoing PVI were included. After PVI, significant improvements were observed in the mean total heart-focused anxiety (HFA) score, as well as in the Cardiac Anxiety Questionnaire (CAQ) sub-scores: HFA attention, HFA fear, and HFA avoidance scores. Subgroup analyses showed an association of improvement with freedom of documented AF recurrence. Mean scores of general anxiety and depression evaluated by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) decreased significantly after PVI in all subgroups regardless of AF recurrence. Further, both physical and mental composite scores of the Short Form Health Survey (SF-12) increased significantly from baseline. (4) Conclusions: PVI results in a significant reduction in HFA. Improvements in general anxiety and depressive symptoms did not seem to be related only to rhythm control per se. Therefore, CAQ may represent a more specific evaluation tool as HADS in patients with AF.

Renal Denervation Prevents Atrial Arrhythmogenic Substrate Development in CKD.

BACKGROUND: In patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), atrial fibrillation (AF) is highly prevalent and represents a major risk factor for stroke and death. CKD is associated with atrial proarrhythmic remodeling and activation of the sympathetic nervous system. Whether reduction of the sympathetic nerve activity by renal denervation (RDN) inhibits AF vulnerability in CKD is unknown. METHODS: Left atrial (LA) fibrosis was analyzed in samples from patients with AF and concomitant CKD (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR], <60 mL/min per 1.73 m2) using picrosirius red and compared with AF patients without CKD and patients with sinus rhythm with and without CKD. In a translational approach, male Sprague Dawley rats were fed with 0.25% adenine (AD)-containing chow for 16 weeks to induce CKD. At week 5, AD-fed rats underwent RDN or sham operation (AD). Rats on normal chow served as control. After 16 weeks, cardiac function and AF susceptibility were assessed by echocardiography, radiotelemetry, electrophysiological mapping, and burst stimulation, respectively. LA tissue was histologically analyzed for sympathetic innervation using tyrosine hydroxylase staining, and LA fibrosis was determined using picrosirius red. RESULTS: Sirius red staining demonstrated significantly increased LA fibrosis in patients with AF+CKD compared with AF without CKD or sinus rhythm. In rats, AD demonstrated LA structural changes with enhanced sympathetic innervation compared with control. In AD, LA enlargement was associated with prolonged duration of induced AF episodes, impaired LA conduction latency, and increased absolute conduction inhomogeneity. RDN treatment improved LA remodeling and reduced LA diameter compared with sham-operated AD. Furthermore, RDN decreased AF susceptibility and ameliorated LA conduction latency and absolute conduction inhomogeneity, independent of blood pressure reduction and renal function. CONCLUSIONS: In an experimental rat model of CKD, RDN inhibited progression of atrial structural and electrophysiological remodeling. Therefore, RDN represents a potential therapeutic tool to reduce the risk of AF in CKD, independent of changes in renal function and blood pressure.

[Update on diagnostics and treatment of heart failure]. / Neues zur Diagnostik und Therapie der Herzinsuffizienz.

The incidence and prevalence of heart failure are increasing worldwide. Despite numerous scientific and clinical innovations the mortality and morbidity rates in heart failure patients remain high, so that guideline-conform diagnostics and treatment are of decisive importance. Cardiac decompensation is one of the leading reasons for hospital admissions in Germany. Thus, the treatment of patients with heart failure represents a substantial challenge for the German healthcare system. This article highlights the latest scientific knowledge on acute and chronic heart failure from the years 2018-2020.

Less loop diuretic use in patients on sacubitril/valsartan undergoing remote pulmonary artery pressure monitoring.

AIMS: Control of pulmonary pressures monitored remotely reduced heart failure hospitalizations mainly by lowering filling pressures through the use of loop diuretics. Sacubitril/valsartan improves heart failure outcomes and increases the kidney sensitivity for diuretics. We explored whether sacubitril/valsartan is associated with less utilization of loop diuretics in patients guided with haemodynamic monitoring in the CardioMEMS European Monitoring Study for Heart Failure (MEMS-HF). METHODS AND RESULTS: The MEMS-HF population (n = 239) was separated by the use of sacubitril/valsartan (n = 68) or no use of it (n = 164). Utilization of diuretics and their doses was prespecified in the protocol and was monitored in both groups. Multivariable regression, ANCOVA, and a generalized linear model were used to fit baseline covariates with furosemide equivalents and changes for 12 months. MEMS-HF participants (n = 239) were grouped in sacubitril/valsartan users [n = 68, 64 ± 11 years, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) 25 ± 9%, cardiac index (CI) 1.89 ± 0.4 L/min/m2 ] vs. non-users (n = 164, 70 ± 10 years, LVEF 36 ± 16%, CI 2.11 ± 0.58 L/min/m2 , P = 0.0002, P < 0.0001, and P = 0.0015, respectively). In contrast, mean pulmonary artery pressure (PAP) values were comparable between groups (29 ± 11 vs. 31 ± 11 mmHg, P = 0.127). Utilization of loop diuretics was lower in patients taking sacubitril/valsartan compared with those without (P = 0.01). Significant predictor of loop diuretic use was a history of renal failure (P = 0.005) but not age (P = 0.091). After subjects were stratified by sacubitril/valsartan or other diuretic use, PAP was nominally, but not significantly lower in sacubitril/valsartan-treated patients (baseline: P = 0.52; 6 months: P = 0.07; 12 months: P = 0.53), while there was no difference in outcome or PAP changes. This difference was observed despite lower CI (P = 0.0015). Comparable changes were not observed for other non-loop diuretics (P = 0.21). CONCLUSIONS: In patients whose treatment was guided by remote PAP monitoring, concomitant use of sacubitril/valsartan was associated with reduced utilization of loop diuretics, which could potentially be relevant for outcomes.

Drug Layering in Heart Failure: Phenotype-Guided Initiation.

Medications with proven benefit in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction are recommended, according to prospective large clinical trials, in the stable patient after careful up-titration in a strict sequential order. Although the relevance of careful clinical up-titration is unproven, there is evidence that after recompensation and shortly after hospital discharge, the rate of cardiovascular death and hospitalization is high. Clinical studies provided evidence that the onset of treatment effects is rapid, occurring within 28 days with most of these drugs used, and in some trials, early treatment after discharge or already started in the hospital has provided benefits. Therefore, early treatment without deferring it to the stable outpatient may be useful to reduce cardiac-related events further. This expert opinion proposes treatment layering according to individual patient phenotypes involving heart rate, blood pressure, impaired renal function, and electrolyte disturbances, as well as dedicated subgroups of patients with specific requirements for treatment initiation. This complements other approaches that suggest starting sequential treatment according to the size of treatment effects of drugs, specific cardiac diseases, and patient wishes. Patient phenotyping may guide personalized drug layering in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction that provides the best outcomes, whereas pragmatic clinical trials are warranted to scrutinize the effectiveness of these approaches.

'Time is prognosis' in heart failure: time-to-treatment initiation as a modifiable risk factor.

In heart failure (HF), acute decompensation can occur quickly and unexpectedly because of worsening of chronic HF or to new-onset HF diagnosed for the first time ('de novo'). Patients presenting with acute HF (AHF) have a poor prognosis comparable with those with acute myocardial infarction, and any delay of treatment initiation is associated with worse outcomes. Recent HF guidelines and recommendations have highlighted the importance of a timely diagnosis and immediate treatment for patients presenting with AHF to decrease disease progression and improve prognosis. However, based on the available data, there is still uncertainty regarding the optimal 'time-to-treatment' effect in AHF. Furthermore, the immediate post-worsening HF period plays an important role in clinical outcomes in HF patients after hospitalization and is known as the 'vulnerable phase' characterized by high risk of readmission and early death. Early and intensive treatment for HF patients in the 'vulnerable phase' might be associated with lower rates of early readmission and mortality. Additionally, in the chronic stable HF outpatient, treatments are often delayed or not initiated when symptoms are stable, ignoring the risk for adverse outcomes such as sudden death. Consequently, there is a dire need to better identify HF patients during hospitalization and after discharge and treating them adequately to improve their prognosis. HF is an urgent clinical scenario along all its stages and disease conditions. Therefore, time plays a significant role throughout the entire patient's journey. Therapy should be optimized as soon as possible, because this is beneficial regardless of severity or duration of HF. Time lavished before treatment initiation is recognized as important modifiable risk factor in HF.

Differences in management of telemedicine alerts on weekdays and public holidays: Results from the OptiLink heart failure trial.

BACKGROUND: In the OptiLink heart failure study, timely and appropriate reactions to telemedicine alerts improved clinical outcomes in heart failure patients. This analysis investigates the relation between the weekday of alert transmission and the subsequent patient contact. METHODS: In patients enrolled in the intervention arm of the OptiLink heart failure study (n = 505, age 66.1 ± 10.1, 77.2% male, left-ventricular ejection fraction 26.7% ± 6.1%), fluid index threshold crossing alerts were analysed according to the weekday of the transmission. Transmissions on Mondays-Thursdays were categorized as TD1, Fridays-Sundays as well as public holidays as TD2. RESULTS: Of 1365 transmitted alerts, 867 (63.5%) were categorized as TD1 and 498 (36.5%) as TD2. Same day telephone contacts were more frequent in TD1 (46.2%) than in TD2 (18.3%; p < 0.001). Accordingly, the median time to contact was significantly longer in TD2 compared with TD1 (2(1-3) vs 0(0-1) days; p < 0.001). Rates of no telephone contact were no different between the groups (12.1% vs 12.4%; p = 0.866). Although signs of worsening heart failure were prevalent in 32.4% in TD1 versus 32.1% in TD2 (p = 0.996), initiation of a pharmacological intervention occurred more likely in TD1 compared with TD2 (27.9% vs 22.9%; p = 0.041). No differences existed concerning hospitalization for heart failure within 30 days after alert transmission (3.9% vs 3.4%; p = 0.636). CONCLUSION: Alert transmissions during weekends and public holidays were less likely associated with timely patient contacts and initiation of pharmacological interventions than during the week. Telemedical centres providing 24/7 remote monitoring service and specific education programmes for physicians might help to optimize patient care.

Timely and individualized heart failure management: need for implementation into the new guidelines.

Due to remarkable improvements in heart failure (HF) management over the last 30 years, a significant reduction in mortality and hospitalization rates in HF patients with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) has been observed. Currently, the optimization of guideline-directed chronic HF therapy remains the mainstay to further improve outcomes for patients with HFrEF to reduce mortality and HF hospitalization. This includes established device therapies, such as implantable defibrillators and cardiac resynchronization therapies, which improved patients' symptoms and prognosis. Over the last 10 years, new HF drugs have merged targeting various pathways, such as those that simultaneously suppress the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system and the breakdown of endogenous natriuretic peptides (e.g., sacubitril/valsartan), and those that inhibit the If channel and, thus, reduce heart rate (e.g., ivabradine). Furthermore, the treatment of patient comorbidities (e.g., iron deficiency) has shown to improve functional capacity and to reduce hospitalization rates, when added to standard therapy. More recently, other potential treatment mechanisms have been explored, such as the sodium/glucose co-transporter inhibitors, the guanylate cyclase stimulators and the cardiac myosin activators. In this review, we summarize the novel developments in HFrEF pharmacological and device therapy and discuss their implementation strategies into practice to further improve outcomes.

Mapping of an atrial tachycardia after Epicor™ high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation: A case report.

BACKGROUND: Surgical techniques, such as the application of high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU), can be used for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). CASE SUMMARY: We report a case of a 73-year old patient, in whom HIFU failed to achieve PVI but promoted the occurrence of a scar-related atrial tachycardia (AT). Voltage mapping of the left atrium revealed multiple gaps along the ablation line. Coherent mapping with visualization of velocity vectors allowed the correct interpretation and the targeted ablation of the AT. DISCUSSION: Cardiac surgery can promote scar-related AT. The coherent mapping function could simplify the mapping of scar-related AT in the future.

Inducibility of atrial fibrillation after catheter ablation predicts recurrences of atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is a component of standard care for patients with symptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF). Procedural inducibility of AF following PVI has been suggested as predictor of AF recurrence but is discussed controversially. This meta-analysis aimed at evaluating the relevance of electrophysiological inducibility of AF following PVI for future AF recurrences. METHODS: A literature search of MEDLINE and Web of Science was performed until April 2020. Prospective trials of PVI in patients with AF and post-procedural atrial stimulation to test for inducibility of AF as well as adequate follow-up for AF recurrence (defined as AF >10 s to >10 min at follow-up) were included. Odds ratios (ORs) were analyzed using random-effects models. RESULTS: A total of 11 trials with 1544 patients (follow-up 7-39 months, age 56 ± 6 years, predominantly male 74 ± 6%) were included. Inducibility of AF post-PVI was predictive for AF recurrence during follow-up (OR 2.08; 95% CI 1.25 to 3.46). Prediction for AF recurrence at follow-up was better for patients with paroxysmal AF (OR 4.06; 95% CI 1.39 to 11.91), stimulation in the CS (OR 2.82, 95% CI 1.17 to 6.79). A trend towards higher ORs was seen without the use of isoproterenol (OR 2.43; 95% CI 1.17 to 5.07), as well as few stimulations during induction and a short definition of AF in meta-regression analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Electrophysiological inducibility of AF following PVI was predictive for future recurrence of AF, in particular in patients with paroxysmal AF, stimulation in only CS and no use of isoproterenol.

Remote Monitoring With Appropriate Reaction to Alerts Was Associated With Improved Outcomes in Chronic Heart Failure: Results From the OptiLink HF Study.

BACKGROUND: Impedance-based remote monitoring (RM) failed to reduce clinical events in the OptiLink heart failure (HF) trial. However, rates of alert-driven interventions triggered by intrathoracic fluid index threshold crossings (FTC) were low indicating physicians' inappropriate reactions to alerts. METHODS: We separated appropriate from inappropriate contacts to FTC transmissions in the OptiLink HF trial (Optimization of Heart Failure Management Using OptiVol™ Fluid Status Monitoring and CareLink™). Appropriate contacts had to meet the following criteria: (1) initial telephone contact within 2 working days after FTC transmission, (2) follow-up contacts according to study protocol, and (3) medical intervention initiated after FTC due to cardiac decompensation. We compared time to cardiovascular death or HF hospitalization between RM patients contacted appropriately or inappropriately and patients with usual care. RESULTS: In the RM group, at least one FTC alert was transmitted in 356 patients (70.5%; n=505). Of note, only 55.5% (n=758) of all transmitted FTCs (n=1365) were followed by an appropriate contact. While 113 patients (31.7%; n=356) have been contacted appropriately after every FTC, in 243 patients (68.3%; n=356) at least one FTC was not responded by an appropriate contact. Compared with usual care, RM with appropriate contacts to FTC alerts independently reduced the risk of the primary end point (hazard ratio, 0.61 [95% CI, 0.39-0.95]; P=0.027). CONCLUSIONS: RM appropriate reactions to FTC alerts are associated with significantly improved clinical outcomes in patients with advanced HF and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators.

Therapeutic approaches in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: past, present, and future.

In contrast to the wealth of proven therapies for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), therapeutic efforts in the past have failed to improve outcomes in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Moreover, to this day, diagnosis of HFpEF remains controversial. However, there is growing appreciation that HFpEF represents a heterogeneous syndrome with various phenotypes and comorbidities which are hardly to differentiate solely by LVEF and might benefit from individually tailored approaches. These hypotheses are supported by the recently presented PARAGON-HF trial. Although treatment with LCZ696 did not result in a significantly lower rate of total hospitalizations for heart failure and death from cardiovascular causes among HFpEF patients, subanalyses suggest beneficial effects in female patients and those with an LVEF between 45 and 57%. In the future, prospective randomized trials should focus on dedicated, well-defined subgroups based on various information such as clinical characteristics, biomarker levels, and imaging modalities. These could clarify the role of LCZ696 in selected individuals. Furthermore, sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors have just proven efficient in HFrEF patients and are currently also studied in large prospective clinical trials enrolling HFpEF patients. In addition, several novel disease-modifying drugs that pursue different strategies such as targeting cardiac inflammation and fibrosis have delivered preliminary optimistic results and are subject of further research. Moreover, innovative device therapies may enhance management of HFpEF, but need prospective adequately powered clinical trials to confirm safety and efficacy regarding clinical outcomes. This review highlights the past, present, and future therapeutic approaches in HFpEF.

Optimization of Heart Failure Treatment by Heart Rate Reduction.

Heart failure (HF) treatment should be optimized in addition to guideline-directed and recommended drugs to achieve an appropriate heart rate (i.e. 50-60 bpm) by ivabradine in patients with a heart rate >70 bpm in sinus rhythm and with an ejection fraction ≤35%. Heart rate reduction was to reduce cardiovascular death and HF hospitalization dependent on baseline resting heart rate. In particular in patients at a heart rate >75 bpm, a reduction in cardiovascular death, all-cause death, HF death, HF hospitalization and all-cause hospitalization has been observed. The optimal heart rate achieved appears to be between 50-60 bpm, if well tolerated as in these patients the lowest event rate is observed on treatment. Heart rate reduction is, therefore, a treatable risk factor in chronic HF. Observational studies support the concept that it is a risk indicator in other cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular conditions. Whether heart rate reduction is also modifying risk in other conditions than chronic HF should be explored in prospective clinical trials.

Ventricular arrhythmias and myocardial inflammation: Long-term follow-up of patients with suspected myocarditis.

BACKGROUND: Inflammatory heart disease is known to be associated with ventricular arrhythmias (VA) and impaired ventricular function at presentation or during follow-up. We aimed to investigate the need for implanted cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) due to ventricular dysfunction and occurrence of VA during long-term follow-up in patients admitted with suspected myocarditis. METHODS: Between 2000 and 2016, 191 patients (age 43 ±â€¯13 years, 71% male, mean left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) 33 ±â€¯15%) with clinically suspected myocarditis, who underwent endomyocardial biopsies (EMB), were prospectively enrolled and followed up in 6-months-intervals (median follow-up was 83 (49-156) months). The primary endpoint was deterioration of cardiac function (LVEF ≤ 35%) or occurrence of VA leading to ICD implantation. RESULTS: According to EMB results, patients were stratified in three diagnostic groups: acute myocarditis (5%), chronic myocarditis (50%) and dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) (45%). An ICD implantation was performed in 58 patients (30%, n = 38 for primary prevention). Besides LVEF at baseline, chronic myocardial inflammation was the only independent predictor of ICD implantation for primary prevention (hazard ratio 2.48 (95% confidence interval 1.02-5.5); p = 0.045). VA requiring ICD therapy occurred in 29 of 58 patients (50%) after a median of 14 (2-37) months without a significant difference between presence and absence of myocardial inflammation. CONCLUSIONS: Nearly one third of patients with suspected myocarditis require an ICD due to impaired LVEF or occurrence of VA. Half of these patients experienced VA with adequate ICD therapy.