Emerging arguments for reproductive technologies in wildlife and their implications for assisted reproduction and conservation of threatened marsupials.

Assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs) have significant potential to make a meaningful contribution to the conservation of threatened wildlife. This is true of Australia's iconic, and endangered koala (Phascolarctos cinereus). If developed, ARTs could offer a solution to manage genetic diversity and costs in breeding programs and may provide frozen repositories for either insurance or the practical production of genetically resilient koalas for release and on-ground recovery. Holding back the wider use of ARTs for koalas and other wildlife is a lack of funding to close the remaining knowledge gaps in the marsupial reproductive sciences and develop the reproductive tools needed. This lack of funding is arguably driven by a poor understanding of the potential contribution ARTs could make to threatened species management. We present a review of our cross-disciplinary and accessible strategy to draw much needed public attention and funding for the development of ARTs in wildlife, using emerging cost and genetic modelling arguments and the koala as a case study.

Modeling genetic benefits and financial costs of integrating biobanking into the conservation breeding of managed marsupials.

Managed breeding programs are an important tool in marsupial conservation efforts but may be costly and have adverse genetic effects in unavoidably small captive colonies. Biobanking and assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs) could help overcome these challenges, but further demonstration of their potential is required to improve uptake. We used genetic and economic models to examine whether supplementing hypothetical captive populations of dibblers (Parantechinus apicalis) and numbats (Myrmecobius fasciatus) with biobanked founder sperm through ARTs could reduce inbreeding, lower required colony sizes, and reduce program costs. We also asked practitioners of the black-footed ferret (Mustela nigripes) captive recovery program to complete a questionnaire to examine the resources and model species research pathways required to develop an optimized biobanking protocol in the black-footed ferret. We used data from this questionnaire to devise similar costed research pathways for Australian marsupials. With biobanking and assisted reproduction, inbreeding was reduced on average by between 80% and 98%, colony sizes were on average 99% smaller, and program costs were 69- to 83-fold lower. Integrating biobanking made long-standing captive genetic retention targets possible in marsupials (90% source population heterozygosity for a minimum of 100 years) within realistic cost frameworks. Lessons from the use of biobanking technology that contributed to the recovery of the black-footed ferret include the importance of adequate research funding (US$4.2 million), extensive partnerships that provide access to facilities and equipment, colony animals, appropriate research model species, and professional and technical staff required to address knowledge gaps to deliver an optimized biobanking protocol. Applied research investment of A$133 million across marsupial research pathways could deliver biobanking protocols for 15 of Australia's most at-risk marsupial species and 7 model species. The technical expertise and ex situ facilities exist to emulate the success of the black-footed ferret recovery program in threatened marsupials using these research pathways. All that is needed now for significant and cost-effective conservation gains is greater investment by policy makers in marsupial ARTs.

Los programas de reproducción controlada son una herramienta importante para los esfuerzos de conservación de marsupiales, aunque pueden resultar costosos y tener efectos genéticos adversos en las colonias cautivas incapaces de aumentar en tamaño. Los biobancos y las tecnologías de reproducción asistida (TRA) podrían ayudar a superar estos problemas, pero es necesario seguir demostrando su potencial para mejorar su adopción. Utilizamos modelos genéticos y económicos para analizar si la introducción de esperma fundador proveniente de biobancos mediante tecnologías de reproducción asistida a poblaciones cautivas hipotéticas de los marsupiales Parantechinus apicalis y Myrmecobius fasciatus podría reducir la endogamia, disminuir el tamaño efectivo de las colonias y reducir el costo de los programas. También pedimos a los profesionales del programa de recuperación en cautiverio del hurón de patas negras (Mustella nigripes) que respondieran un cuestionario para analizar los recursos y los métodos de investigación de las especies modelo necesarias para desarrollar un protocolo de biobanco optimizado para el hurón de patas negras. Utilizamos los datos de este cuestionario para diseñar métodos de investigación con costos similares para los marsupiales australianos. Con el biobanco y la reproducción asistida, la endogamia se redujo en promedio entre un 80 y un 98%, el tamaño de las colonias fue en promedio un 99% más pequeño y los costos del programa entre 69 y 83 veces menores. La integración del biobanco posibilitó los objetivos de retención genética en cautiverio a largo plazo en marsupiales (90% de heterocigosidad de la población de origen durante un mínimo de 100 años) dentro de un marco realista de costos. Entre el aprendizaje extraído del uso de la tecnología de biobancos que contribuyó a la recuperación del hurón de patas negras figuran la importancia de una financiación adecuada de la investigación (4.2 millones de dólares), colaboraciones profundas que faciliten el acceso a instalaciones y equipos, colonias de animales, especies modelo adecuadas para la investigación y el personal profesional y técnico necesario para abordar las lagunas de conocimiento y ofrecer un protocolo optimizado para los biobancos. Una inversión en investigación aplicada de 133 millones de dólares australianos para la investigación de los marsupiales podría proporcionar protocolos de biobancos para 15 de las especies de marsupiales australianos en mayor riesgo y 7 especies modelo. Existen los conocimientos técnicos y las instalaciones ex situ para emular el éxito del programa de recuperación del hurón de patas negras en marsupiales amenazados utilizando estas vías de investigación. Ahora sólo se necesita una mayor inversión por parte de los responsables políticos de las TRA para marsupiales para obtener beneficios de conservación significativos y rentables.

Modelling Genetic Benefits and Financial Costs of Integrating Biobanking into the Captive Management of Koalas.

Zoo and wildlife hospital networks are set to become a vital component of Australia's contemporary efforts to conserve the iconic and imperiled koala (Phascolarctos cinereus). Managed breeding programs held across zoo-based networks typically face high economic costs and can be at risk of adverse genetic effects typical of unavoidably small captive colonies. Emerging evidence suggests that biobanking and associated assisted reproductive technologies could address these economic and genetic challenges. We present a modelled scenario, supported by detailed costings, where these technologies are optimized and could be integrated into conservation breeding programs of koalas across the established zoo and wildlife hospital network. Genetic and economic modelling comparing closed captive koala populations suggest that supplementing them with cryopreserved founder sperm using artificial insemination or intracytoplasmic sperm injection could substantially reduce inbreeding, lower the required colony sizes of conservation breeding programs, and greatly reduce program costs. Ambitious genetic retention targets (maintaining 90%, 95% and 99% of source population heterozygosity for 100 years) could be possible within realistic cost frameworks, with output koalas suited for wild release. Integrating biobanking into the zoo and wildlife hospital network presents a cost-effective and financially feasible model for the uptake of these tools due to the technical and research expertise, captive koala colonies, and ex situ facilities that already exist across these networks.

Integrating biobanking could produce significant cost benefits and minimise inbreeding for Australian amphibian captive breeding programs.

Captive breeding is an important tool for amphibian conservation despite high economic costs and deleterious genetic effects of sustained captivity and unavoidably small colony sizes. Integration of biobanking and assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs) could provide solutions to these challenges, but is rarely used due to lack of recognition of the potential benefits and clear policy direction. Here we present compelling genetic and economic arguments to integrate biobanking and ARTs into captive breeding programs using modelled captive populations of two Australian threatened frogs, namely the orange-bellied frog Geocrinia vitellina and the white bellied frog Geocrinia alba . Back-crossing with frozen founder spermatozoa using ARTs every generation minimises rates of inbreeding and provides considerable reductions in colony size and program costs compared with conventional captive management. Biobanking could allow captive institutions to meet or exceed longstanding genetic retention targets (90% of source population heterozygosity over 100 years). We provide a broad policy direction that could make biobanking technology a practical reality across Australia's ex situ management of amphibians in current and future holdings. Incorporating biobanking technology widely across this network could deliver outcomes by maintaining high levels of source population genetic diversity and freeing economic resources to develop ex situ programs for a greater number of threatened amphibian species.

Real-time drone derived thermal imagery outperforms traditional survey methods for an arboreal forest mammal.

Koalas (Phascolarctos cinereus) are cryptic and currently face regional extinction. The direct detection (physical sighting) of individuals is required to improve conservation management strategies. We provide a comparative assessment of three survey methods for the direct detection of koalas: systematic spotlighting (Spotlight), remotely piloted aircraft system thermal imaging (RPAS), and the refined diurnal radial search component of the spot assessment technique (SAT). Each survey method was repeated on the same morning with independent observers (03:00-12:00 hrs) for a total of 10 survey occasions at sites with fixed boundaries (28-76 ha) in Port Stephens (n = 6) and Gilead (n = 1) in New South Wales between May and July 2019. Koalas were directly detected on 22 occasions during 7 of 10 comparative surveys (Spotlight: n = 7; RPAS: n = 14; and SAT: n = 1), for a total of 12 unique individuals (Spotlight: n = 4; RPAS: n = 11; SAT: n = 1). In 3 of 10 comparative surveys no koalas were detected. Detection probability was 38.9 ± 20.03% for Spotlight, 83.3 ± 11.39% for RPAS and 4.2 ± 4.17% for SAT. Effective detectability per site was 1 ± 0.44 koalas per 6.75 ± 1.03 hrs for Spotlight (1 koala per 6.75 hrs), 2 ± 0.38 koalas per 4.35 ± 0.28 hrs for RPAS (1 koala per 2.18 hrs) and 0.14 ± 0.14 per 6.20 ± 0.93 hrs for SAT (1 koala per 43.39 hrs). RPAS thermal imaging technology appears to offer an efficient method to directly survey koalas comparative to Spotlight and SAT and has potential as a valuable conservation tool to inform on-ground management of declining koala populations.

Induction of synchronous oestrus but not ovulation after pre-treatment with the GnRH agonist, Lucrin® Depot, in the tammar wallaby.

We investigated the capacity for pregnant mare serum gonadotrophin (PMSG) and human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG) to induce synchronous oestrus and ovulation in the tammar wallaby (Notamacropus eugenii) after follicular suppression with Lucrin® Depot, a one-month GnRH agonist. On Day 0 pouch young were removed (RPY) to reactivate a normal oestrous cycle and then two groups were treated with vehicle (Control; n = 5 and Superovulation (SOvn); n = 5) and two groups were treated with 7.5 mg of Lucrin Depot (Lucrin; n = 6; Lucrin+SOvn, n = 6). On Day 20 RPY the SOvn and Lucrin+SOvn Group received 20 IU of PMSG, which was followed on Day 23 RPY with 500 IU of hCG. The Lucrin+SOvn females underwent a more synchronous oestrus with 5 of 6 mating on Day 26 RPY while the SOvn (n = 5/5) and Control (n = 5/5) Groups copulated over two days, between Day 25-27 RPY and Day 27-29 RPY respectively. Mating plugs were not detected in any of the females in the Lucrin Group by Day 31 RPY. Autopsy on Day 31 RPY confirmed all females in each treatment group had undergone a reactivated cycle as evidenced by the presence of a large corpus luteum (CL) in one ovary. At autopsy the females in the Lucrin+SOvn Group had highly stimulated reproductive tracts, and their ovaries contained many follicles >3 mm; 14 ± 2.1 and 15.3 ± 2.1 follicles >3 mm in the CL-bearing ovary and contralateral ovary respectively. Similarly, females in the SOvn Group had 11.4 ± 2.4 and 17.4 ± 1.9 follicles >3 mm in each respective ovary. Uterine flushing and ovarian histology confirmed that females in Lucrin+SOvn and SOvn Groups had not ovulated, but normal oocytes were present in the follicles. By comparison, the Control Group had ovulated with a single embryo being recovered from the uterus of 4 of 5 females. In contrast to all groups, females in the Lucrin Group showed follicular suppression (all follicles <1.5 mm) and an unstimulated reproductive tract. We conclude that a suppression plus stimulation regimen using Lucrin Depot followed by PMSG and hCG has the capacity to synchronise oestrus, and that 20 IU of PMSG stimulates the development of antral follicles >3 mm in both ovaries. However, a single 500 IU treatment of hCG on Day 23 RPY was not able to induce ovulation in the tammar wallaby.

Deconstructing compassionate conservation.

Compassionate conservation focuses on 4 tenets: first, do no harm; individuals matter; inclusivity of individual animals; and peaceful coexistence between humans and animals. Recently, compassionate conservation has been promoted as an alternative to conventional conservation philosophy. We believe examples presented by compassionate conservationists are deliberately or arbitrarily chosen to focus on mammals; inherently not compassionate; and offer ineffective conservation solutions. Compassionate conservation arbitrarily focuses on charismatic species, notably large predators and megaherbivores. The philosophy is not compassionate when it leaves invasive predators in the environment to cause harm to vastly more individuals of native species or uses the fear of harm by apex predators to terrorize mesopredators. Hindering the control of exotic species (megafauna, predators) in situ will not improve the conservation condition of the majority of biodiversity. The positions taken by so-called compassionate conservationists on particular species and on conservation actions could be extended to hinder other forms of conservation, including translocations, conservation fencing, and fertility control. Animal welfare is incredibly important to conservation, but ironically compassionate conservation does not offer the best welfare outcomes to animals and is often ineffective in achieving conservation goals. Consequently, compassionate conservation may threaten public and governmental support for conservation because of the limited understanding of conservation problems by the general public.

Deconstrucción de la Conservación Compasiva Resumen La conservación compasiva se enfoca en cuatro principios: no causar daño; los individuos importan; la integración de los animales individualmente; y la coexistencia pacífica entre los humanos u los animales. Recientemente, la conservación compasiva ha sido promovida como una alternativa a la filosofía convencional de la conservación. Creemos que los ejemplos presentados por los conservacionistas compasivos han sido elegidos arbitraria o deliberadamente por estar enfocados en los mamíferos; por ser inherentes y no compasivos; y por ofrecer soluciones de conservación poco efectivas. La conservación compasiva se enfoca arbitrariamente en las especies carismáticas, principalmente los grandes depredadores y los megaherbívoros. La filosofía no es compasiva cuando deja que los depredadores invasores dentro del ambiente causen daño a un vasto número de individuos nativos o usa el miedo al daño por superdepredadores para aterrorizar a los mesodepredadores. El entorpecimiento del control de especies exóticas (megafauna, depredadores) in situ no mejorará las condiciones de conservación de la mayoría de la biodiversidad, incluso si los conservacionistas compasivos no dañan a los individuos exóticos. Las posiciones que toman los llamados conservacionistas compasivos sobre especies particulares y sobre las acciones de conservación podrían extenderse para entorpecer otros tipos de conservación, incluyendo las reubicaciones, el encercado para la conservación y el control de la fertilidad. El bienestar animal es increíblemente importante para la conservación e irónicamente, la conservación compasiva no ofrece los mejores resultados de bienestar para los animales y comúnmente es poco efectiva en el logro de los objetivos de conservación. Como consecuencia, la conservación compasiva puede poner en peligro el apoyo público y del gobierno que tiene la conservación debido al entendimiento poco limitado que tiene el público general sobre los problemas de conservación.

Delayed return to estrus following treatment with the gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist, Lucrin® Depot, in the tammar wallaby.

Gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonists that induce a reversible contraceptive state in several marsupials have the potential to be used to synchronize estrus. We used a model macropod, the tammar wallaby (Notamacropus eugenii), to investigate whether Lucrin Depot (AbbVie), a GnRH agonist microsphere preparation, could (1) inhibit follicular development and estrus in a cycle reactivated by removal of pouch young (RPY) and (2) facilitate a synchronous return to estrus. Our results show that females reactivated with bromocriptine and RPY in early seasonal quiescence (July 2015) were inhibited by Lucrin Depot (0.125-0.5 mg kg -1, n = 9) and unlike control females (n = 3), did not copulate before Day 32 RPY. During the next breeding season (February 2016), the return to estrus after RPY was not delayed in animals treated with Lucrin Depot (≤0.20 mg kg -1; n = 12), and copulation occurred in treated and control females within the expected natural period after RPY (Day 26-33 RPY). In the following breeding season (March 2017), estrus was delayed in animals treated with Lucrin Depot (1.25 mg kg -1) on either Day 0 (Group A, n = 6) or Day 10 (Group B, n = 6) after RPY compared to control females (n = 6). Estrus was detected in Group A between 39 and 66 days (55 ±â€¯4.8d) and in Group B between 43 and 71 days (55.2 ±â€¯3.9d) after RPY. In contrast, all control females underwent estrus and copulated as expected by Day 30 RPY. We conclude Lucrin Depot can inhibit ovarian follicular activity after RPY but as a standalone treatment does not result in a highly synchronous return to estrus in the tammar wallaby.

Breeding in the fat-tailed dunnart following ovarian suppression with the gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist Lucrin® Depot.

Lucrin Depot (AbbVie), a 1-month microsphere gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist preparation, was investigated as a potential agent to synchronise cycling in the fat-tailed dunnart (Sminthopsis crassicaudata). Forty-eight randomly selected females were treated with 5 or 10mgkg-1 Lucrin Depot (n=24 per dose). Eighteen females per treatment had their reproductive activity scored at 4, 8, 12 and 16 weeks using two ovarian (Graafian follicle and corpus luteum status) and two reproductive tract (uterine and vaginal muscularity and vascularity) parameters that formed a reproductive activity score. Six females per treatment were paired with a male at 4 weeks. Fertility was assessed between 8 and 16 weeks by pouch check, and thereafter by dissection. The effects of the 5 and 10mgkg-1 doses were statistically equivalent. Females showed suppression at 4-8 weeks, an increase in reproductive activity at 8-12 weeks and all were cycling normally at 16 weeks. Six pouch young were born at 12 weeks to two females treated with the 5mgkg-1 dose. Nine embryos were recovered at 16 weeks from two females treated with the 10mgkg-1 dose. In conclusion, Lucrin Depot can suppress breeding, and fertile mating can occur in subsequent cycles in the dunnart. There is potential for Lucrin Depot to be used as an assisted breeding tool, but it may need to be combined with ovarian stimulation treatment to achieve practical levels of synchronisation in the fat-tailed dunnart.

Recent advances in tools and technologies for monitoring and controlling ovarian activity in marsupials.

Components of assisted reproduction technologies (ART), such as sperm cryopreservation, artificial insemination, superovulation and pouch young surrogacy, have been developed for a range of Australian and American marsupials. However, methods to effectively control ovarian function, arguably the key limiting factors in applying and integrating ART as a practical tool in conservation management, remain poorly developed. This is largely due to unique characteristics of the marsupial corpus luteum and its failure to respond to agents used to synchronize ovarian function in eutherian mammals. This paper presents an overview of relevant aspects of marsupial reproductive biology across marsupial taxonomic groups including information on the long-established technique of removal of suckling young to activate ovarian cycles. Ovarian monitoring tools for marsupials are reviewed and their usefulness for ART assessed (laparotomy, hormone cycling, vaginal cytology, laparoscopy and ultrasonography). We also discuss promising recent work examining the potential of manipulating hypothalamic-pituitary function using GnRH agonists and antagonists as the basis of ovarian control (female synchronization) strategies.