ABSTRACT
In 1998, the aminoglycoside antibiotic gentamicin sulfate caused several cases of deaths in the United States, after the switch from twice- to once-daily application. Endotoxins were discussed as the cause for the adverse effects and sisomicin was identified as the lead impurity; batches containing sisomicin were contaminated with more impurities and were responsible for the fatalities. In 2016, anaphylactic reactions in horses, and later in humans with one fatality, were observed after application of gentamicin sulfate contaminated with histamine. To determine whether histamine was responsible for the 1990s death cases as well, histamine was quantified by means of liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) in 30 samples of gentamicin sulfate analyzed in previous studies. Furthermore, a relative quantification of sisomicin was performed to check for a correlation between histamine and the lead impurity. A maximum amount of 11.52 ppm histamine was detected, which is below the limit for anaphylactic reactions of 16 ppm, and no correlation of the two impurities was observed. However, the European Medicines Agency recommends a stricter limit with regard to the maximum single dose of gentamicin sulfate to reach a greater gap between the maximum histamine exposition of 4.3 µg and the quantity known to cause hypotension of 7 µg. The low amounts of histamine and the fact that there is no connection with the contamination with sisomicin showed that histamine was not the cause for the death cases in the United States in 1998, and endotoxins remain the most probable explanation.
Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/analysis , Gentamicins/analysis , Histamine/analysis , Sisomicin/analysis , Anti-Bacterial Agents/adverse effects , Anti-Bacterial Agents/chemistry , Chromatography, Liquid , Drug Contamination , Gentamicins/adverse effects , Gentamicins/chemistry , Tandem Mass SpectrometryABSTRACT
Upon emergence of nitrosamines in various drugs, e.g in valsartan, metformin and ranitidine, 4-methyl-1-nitrosopiperazine (MeNP) was found in rifampicin in August 2020. Rifampicin is used, amongst others, for post-exposure prophylaxis of leprosy. The occurrence of MeNP can be explained by the synthesis, because 1-amino-4-methylpiperazine is concomitantly used with the organic oxidizing reagent isoamyl nitrite. According to a method reported by the FDA, the quantification of MeNP in rifampicin capsules was performed by LC-MS/HRMS. A significant contamination with MeNP was found in all samples, ranging from 0.7 to 5.1 ppm and exceeding the acceptable intake limit proposed by the FDA up to 32-fold. However, the severity of a possible leprosy infection outweighs the risks, which are concomitant with the intake of a single dose of rifampicin for post-exposure prophylaxis. Nevertheless, the extent of contamination is alarming, and countermeasures are needed to minimize public health risks. The presence of nitrosamines in rifampicin illustrates the need for better strategies in impurity profiling and compendial testing once again.
Subject(s)
Nitrosamines , Rifampin , Capsules , Chromatography, Liquid , Tandem Mass SpectrometryABSTRACT
In July 2018 one of the bestselling antihypertensive agents valsartan manufactured in China was found to be contaminated by the "probably carcinogenic" nitrosamine N-nitrosodimethylamine (NDMA), followed by the detection of N-nitrosodiethylamine (NDEA) by us and others soon after. Our work also revealed that two additional non-nitrosamine contaminations valeramide (VLA) and N,N-dimethylvaleramide (VLA-DEM) were present in sartan tablets. Early measurements by others and us were performed by GC-MS or GC-MS/MS, which does not reach the sensitivity needed to find and quantitate trace levels of NDMA and NDEA. A highly sensitive LC-MS/MS method with APCI ionization was developed to detect and quantitate NDMA, NDEA, VLA and VLA-DIM in 152 sartan tablets from 8 structurally different sartan molecules. Good linearity for each compound could be demonstrated over calibration ranges in the lower nanograms. The assay for all substances was accurate and precise. With this method, a LLOQ of 0.00026 ppm for NDMA and 0.00013 ppm for NDEA could be achieved. NDMA, NDEA, VLA and VLA-DIM were found in 21 (13.8%), 9 (5.9%), 13 (8.6%) and 7 (4.6) % of the tablets, respectively. In addition, one candesartan product was found contaminated with NDEA. The implications of our findings for the testing of pharmaceutical products are discussed.
Subject(s)
Drug Contamination/prevention & control , Valsartan/chemistry , China , Chromatography, Liquid/methods , Diethylnitrosamine/chemistry , Dimethylnitrosamine/chemistry , Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry/methods , Nitrosamines , Tandem Mass Spectrometry/methods , Water Pollutants, Chemical/chemistryABSTRACT
The recent incidences of contaminated valsartan drug products gave rise to review the suitability of current impurity profiling workflows implemented at authorities and pharmaceutical companies. The major drawback of targeted impurity profiling, where a considerable amount of prior knowledge about possible contaminants is necessary, is the fact that unexpected impurities are overlooked easily. Here, a generic untargeted approach was applied on sartan containing drug products. The untargeted workflow allowed for the discrimination of different batches, different production sites, and differences after changes in the production process. The presented universal workflow makes use of LC-HRMS/MS and multivariate analysis for the interpretation of the data. Sartan samples contaminated with N-nitrosodimethylamine could be very well discriminated from N-nitrosodimethylamine-free samples using the procedure. Furthermore, untargeted approaches revealed two new impurities in various sartans drug products: valeramide and N,N-dimethylvaleramide.