Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Vasc Surg ; 79(4): 847-855.e5, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38103806

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Predictive models for reintervention may guide clinicians to optimize selection, education, and follow-up of patients undergoing endovascular iliac revascularization. Although the impact of lesion- and device-related characteristics on iliac restenosis and reintervention risk is well-defined, data on patient-specific risk factors are scarce and conflicting. This study aimed to explore the value of patient-related factors in predicting the need for clinically driven target-vessel revascularization (CD-TVR) in patients undergoing primary endovascular treatment of iliac artery disease. METHODS: Consecutively enrolled patients undergoing endovascular revascularization for symptomatic iliac artery disease at a tertiary vascular referral center between January 2008 and June 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. Primary and secondary outcomes were CD-TVR occurrence within 24 months and time to CD-TVR, respectively. Patients who died or did not require CD-TVR within 24 months were censored at the date of death or at 730 days, respectively. Multiple imputation was used to account for missing data in primary analyses. RESULTS: A total of 1538 iliac interventions were performed in 1113 patients (26% females; 68 years). CD-TVR occurred in 108 limbs (74 patients; 7.0%) with a median time to CD-TVR of 246 days. On multivariable analysis, increasing age was associated with lower likelihood of CD-TVR (odds ratio [OR], 0.64; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.50-0.83; P = .001) and decreased risk of CD-TVR at any given time (hazard ratio [HR], 0.66; 95% CI, 0.52-0.84; P = .001). Similarly, a lower likelihood of CD-TVR (OR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.59-0.95; P = .017) and decreased risk of CD-TVR at any given time (HR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.58-0.93; P = .009) were observed with higher glomerular filtration rates. Lastly, revascularization of common vs external iliac artery disease was associated with lower likelihood of CD-TVR (OR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.24-0.93; P = .030) and decreased risk of CD-TVR at any given time (HR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.25-0.92; P = .027). No associations were observed between traditional cardiovascular risk factors (sex, hypertension, higher low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, higher hemoglobin A1c, smoking) and CD-TVR. CONCLUSIONS: In this retrospective cohort study, younger age, impaired kidney function, and external iliac artery disease were associated with CD-TVR. Traditional markers of cardiovascular risk were not seen to predict reintervention.


Subject(s)
Endovascular Procedures , Peripheral Arterial Disease , Female , Humans , Male , Iliac Artery/diagnostic imaging , Iliac Artery/surgery , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Endovascular Procedures/adverse effects , Risk Factors , Peripheral Arterial Disease/diagnostic imaging , Peripheral Arterial Disease/therapy , Peripheral Arterial Disease/etiology
2.
Cureus ; 15(9): e45513, 2023 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37868501

ABSTRACT

In this article, we reflect on the pros and cons of artificial intelligence (AI)-augmented scientific writing for more comprehensible research towards society to gain trust for science-led policy. For this purpose, we integrated our thoughts into the Factors of Perceived Trustworthiness from Mayer, Davis, and Schoorman's Model of Trust and made propositions to define AI's role in trustful scholarly communication.

4.
GMS J Med Educ ; 40(1): Doc4, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36923320

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Students frequently rely on part-time jobs to earn a living wage. We sought to evaluate the sociodemographic status of Swiss medical students and their perception regarding equal career opportunities in view of impaired part-time job opportunities under the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: We conducted an anonymous online survey among Swiss medical students from Bern and Geneva over a period of 4 months between December 2020 and April 2021. We evaluated sociodemographic data, current living situation, part-time job occupation as well as other sources of income to fund living expenses, and, by means of a five-point Likert scale (1=strongly disagree and 5=strongly agree), whether COVID-19 was perceived as impeding equal career opportunities. Results: Of 968 participants, corresponding to around 13.8% of all medical students in Switzerland, 81.3% had part-time jobs. Amongst the employed, 54.8% worked to afford living expenses and 28.9% reported a negative financial impact due to reduced part-time jobs under the pandemic. The loss of part-time jobs was perceived to make medical studies a privilege for students with higher socioeconomic status (4.11±1.0), whose opportunity to study is independent of a regular income. A governmental backup plan was considered crucial to support affected students (4.22±0.91). Discussion: COVID-19 and its sequelae are perceived as a threat for Swiss medical students and lead to a disadvantage for those with lower socioeconomic status. Nationwide measures should be established to foster equal career opportunities.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Students, Medical , Humans , Cross-Sectional Studies , Switzerland/epidemiology , Pandemics , Career Choice , COVID-19/epidemiology , Occupations
5.
BMC Med Educ ; 21(1): 554, 2021 Oct 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34717600

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: In the fight against the Covid-19 pandemic, medical students and residents are expected to adapt and contribute in a healthcare environment characterized by ever-changing measures and policies. The aim of this narrative review is to provide a summary of the literature that addresses the challenges of students and residents of human medicine in the first 4 months of the fight against the Covid-19 pandemic in order to identify gaps and find implications for improvement within the current situation and for potential future scenarios. METHODS: We performed a systematic literature search and content analysis (CA) of articles available in English language that address the challenges of students and residents of human medicine in the first 4 months of the fight against the Covid-19 pandemic. RESULTS: We retrieved 82 articles from a wide range of journals, professional backgrounds and countries. CA identified five recurring subgroup topics: "faculty preparation", «uncertainties and mental health¼, «clinical knowledge¼, «rights and obligations¼ and «(self-) support and supply¼. Within these subgroups the main concerns of (re-)deployment, interruption of training and career, safety issues, transmission of disease, and restricted social interaction were identified as potential stressors that hold a risk for fatigue, loss of morale and burnout. DISCUSSION: Students and residents are willing and able to participate in the fight against Covid-19 when provided with appropriate deployment, legal guidance, safety measures, clinical knowledge, thorough supervision, social integration and mental health support. Preceding interviews to decide on reasonable voluntary deployment, the use of new technology and frequent feedback communication with faculties, educators and policymakers can further help with a successful and sustainable integration of students and residents in the fight against the pandemic. CONCLUSION: It is critical that faculties, educators and policymakers have a thorough understanding of the needs and concerns of medical trainees during pandemic times. Leaders should facilitate close communication with students and residents, value their intrinsic creativeness and regularly evaluate their needs in regards to deployment, knowledge aspects, safety measures, legal concerns and overall well-being.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Students, Medical , Delivery of Health Care , Humans , Pandemics/prevention & control , SARS-CoV-2
6.
Front Surg ; 8: 695963, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34179070

ABSTRACT

Introduction: The treatment of choice for retrosternal goiters (RSG) is surgical resection to relieve symptoms and rule out malignancy. Although the majority of RSG can be removed by a cervical approach only, an extracervical approach (e.g., sternotomy, thoracotomy or thoracoscopy) may be required. Herein, we describe a refined thoracoscopic-assisted cervical two-team RSG resection without thoracoscopic mediastinal dissection. Technique: A 57-year-old man presented with a large RSG with posterior mediastinal extension (PME) and extensive peritumoral vascularization. Due to its extension below the aortic arch and its small connection with the right thyroid lobe, a combined cervical and thoracoscopic approach was intended. The endocrine surgery unit performed the cervical mobilization of the right thyroid lobe, while the thoracic surgery unit gently pushed the mediastinal tumor through the thoracic inlet without performing mediastinal dissection. This allowed a safe visualization of the inserting vessels by the endocrine surgery team at the neck, followed by a stepwise division of the vessels and resection of the retrosternal nodule through the cervical access. Comment: The described approach is indicated for RSG with posterior mediastinal extension, anteroposterior dimension smaller than the thoracic inlet and inaccessibility from a cervical approach only. This minimally invasive approach is associated with a faster recovery, decreased morbidity and postoperative pain, shorter hospital stay and better cosmetic results.

7.
Support Care Cancer ; 29(8): 4195-4198, 2021 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33782762

ABSTRACT

Breaking bad news is a mandatory provision in the professional life of nearly every physician. One of its most frequent occasions is the diagnosis of malignancy. Responding to the recipients' emotions is a critical issue in the delivery of unsettling information, and has an impact on the patient's trust in the treating physician, adjustment to illness and ultimately treatment. Since the World Health Organization (WHO) declared COVID-19 a pandemic on March 11, 2020, several measures of social distancing and isolation have been introduced to our clinical setting. In the wake of these restrictions, it is important to reexamine existing communication guidelines to determine their applicability to face-to-face counseling in the context of social distancing, as well as to new communication technologies, such as telemedicine. We address these issues and discuss strategies to convey bad news the most empathetic and comprehensible way possible.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Neoplasms/psychology , Physical Distancing , Physician-Patient Relations/ethics , Telemedicine , Truth Disclosure , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19/psychology , Emotional Intelligence , Humans , Neoplasms/diagnosis , Physicians/ethics , Physicians/psychology , Psycho-Oncology/methods , SARS-CoV-2 , Telemedicine/ethics , Telemedicine/methods , Telemedicine/standards
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...