sFlt-1/PlGF ratio for prediction of preeclampsia in clinical routine: A pragmatic real-world analysis of healthcare resource utilisation.

BACKGROUND: We investigated the impact of the soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase 1 (sFlt-1)/placental growth factor (PlGF) ratio to predict short-term risk of preeclampsia on clinical utility and healthcare resource utilisation using real-world data (RWD), and compared findings with health economic modelling from previous studies. METHODS AND FINDINGS: This retrospective analysis compared data from the German population of a multicentre clinical study (PROGNOSIS, n = 203; sFlt-1/PlGF ratio blinded and unavailable for decision-making) with RWD from University Hospital Leipzig, Germany (n = 281; sFlt-1/PlGF ratio used to guide clinical decision-making). A subgroup of the RWD cohort with the same inclusion criteria as the PROGNOSIS trial (RWD prediction only, n = 99) was also included. sFlt-1/PlGF ratio was measured using fully automated Elecsys® sFlt-1 and PlGF immunoassays (cobas e analyser; Roche Diagnostics). A similar proportion of women in the RWD and PROGNOSIS cohorts experienced preeclampsia (14.95% vs. 13.79%; p = 0.7938); a smaller proportion of women in the RWD prediction only cohort experienced preeclampsia versus PROGNOSIS (6.06%; p = 0.0526). In women with preeclampsia, median gestational age at delivery (weeks) was comparable in the RWD and PROGNOSIS cohorts (34.0 vs. 34.3, p = 0.5895), but significantly reduced in the RWD prediction only cohort versus PROGNOSIS (27.1, p = 0.0038). sFlt-1/PlGF ratio at baseline visit was not statistically significantly different for the RWD and PROGNOSIS cohorts, irrespective of preeclampsia outcome. Hospitalisations for confirmed preeclampsia were significantly shorter in the RWD cohort versus PROGNOSIS (median 1 vs. 4 days, p = 0.0093); there was no significant difference between RWD prediction only and PROGNOSIS (3 days, p = 0.9638). All-cause hospitalisations were significantly shorter in the RWD (median 1 day; p<0.0001) and RWD prediction only (1 day; p<0.0001) cohorts versus PROGNOSIS (3 days). CONCLUSIONS: This study supports the findings of previous studies, showing that routine clinical use of the sFlt-1/PlGF ratio may result in shorter duration of hospitalisations, with potential economic benefits.

Cost effectiveness of the sFlt1/PlGF ratio test as an adjunct to the current practice of evaluating suspected preeclampsia in the United States.

OBJECTIVE: Preeclampsia is a major obstetric disorder that can lead to severe maternal, fetal and infant outcomes. In women with suspected preeclampsia, measurement of the soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1 (sFlt1) and placental growth factor (PlGF) ratio has been shown to have a high negative predictive value (>97%). Our aim was to estimate the value to the US healthcare system of adopting this test into clinical practice. STUDY DESIGN: An economic model was developed for the evaluation of suspected preeclampsia from a US payer perspective using data from a US observational study of 459 women evaluated between 23 and 34.6 weeks. Test results were not available to clinicians. The model compares two strategies for managing suspected preeclampsia: standard care versus a biomarker-informed pathway utilizing the sFlt1/PlGF ratio. RESULTS: Utilization of the sFlt1/PlGF ratio test reduced the number of women admitted for suspected preeclampsia by 34-49%. Despite fewer admissions, a higher proportion of women admitted to hospital subsequently developed preeclampsia, and the proportion of women not admitted who would subsequently develop preeclampsia remained low (3.2%-6.7%). Cost savings arising from a reduction in admissions are estimated to be $1050 in the base case; varying the hospitalization cost ±25% would lead to savings in the range $771 to $1330 per patient at 2020 prices. CONCLUSION: Adopting the sFlt1/PlGF ratio test as an adjunct to clinical criteria improves the assessment of risk in women presenting with suspicion of preeclampsia and has the potential to safely reduce unnecessary admissions and save costs.

Economic evaluation of the sFlt-1/PlGF ratio for the short-term prediction of preeclampsia in a Japanese cohort of the PROGNOSIS Asia study.

The PRediction of short-term Outcomes in preGNant wOmen with Suspected preeclampsIa Study (PROGNOSIS) Asia validated the use of the soluble fms-like tyrosine 1/placental growth factor (sFlt-1/PlGF) ratio cutoff value of ≤38 to rule out the occurrence of preeclampsia in the short term in Asian women. We assessed the economic impact of the introduction of the sFlt-1/PlGF ratio test for predicting preeclampsia in Japan using data from the Japanese cohort of PROGNOSIS Asia. The cost analysis was developed with estimates in either a no-test scenario, with clinical decisions based on standard diagnostic procedures alone, or a test scenario, in which the sFlt-1/PlGF ratio test was used in addition to standard diagnostic procedures. For both scenarios, rates of hospitalization and other test characteristics were obtained from the results for the Japanese cohort in PROGNOSIS Asia. The total cost per patient was the main outcome of this cost analysis model. Introduction of the sFlt-1/PlGF ratio test using a cutoff value of 38 resulted in a reduced hospitalization rate compared with the rate in the no-test scenario (14.4% versus 8.7%). The reduction in the rate of hospitalizations led to an estimated 16 373 JPY reduction in healthcare costs per patient. The sFlt-1/PlGF ratio test is likely to reduce the unnecessary hospitalization of women at low risk of developing preeclampsia in the short term while also identifying high-risk individuals requiring appropriate management. Reducing unnecessary hospitalizations would result in significant cost savings in the Japanese healthcare system.

Real-world data on the incidence, mortality, and cost of ischaemic stroke and major bleeding events among non-valvular atrial fibrillation patients in England.

RATIONALE, AIMS, AND OBJECTIVES: Several novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are licensed for atrial fibrillation (AF) treatment in the United Kingdom. We describe the incidence and mortality from ischaemic stroke and major bleeding in non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients in England, including treatment patterns before/following introduction of NOACs, healthcare resource utilization (HRU), and costs post-onset of these events. METHOD: Data were extracted from the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink linked to Hospital Episode Statistics secondary care and Office for National Statistics mortality data. RESULTS: Of 42 966 patients with a first AF record between 2011 and 2016, 9143 patients (21.3%) remained without AF (antiplatelets/antithrombotics) treatment post-index diagnosis. The proportion of patients receiving aspirin for ≥3 months post-index declined during the study (50.6%-5.5%), irrespective of CHA2 DS2 -VASc score, while the proportion prescribed NOACs increased (2.0%-70.1%). Rates of ischaemic stroke per 1000 patient-years (95% CI) were 9.4 (3.8-15.0) with NOACs, 10.4 (8.0-12.9) with warfarin, 20.1 (16.4-23.8) with aspirin, 21.3 (5.3-37.2) with other antiplatelets and 43.6 (39.3-47.8) in patients without AF prescription. Major bleeding occurred at a similar rate with different treatments. All-cause mortality rates were 42.8 (31.4-54.3) with NOACs, 46.3 (41.1-51.5) with warfarin, 56.5 (50.5-62.4) with aspirin, 102.2 (76.2-128.3) with other antiplatelets and 412.8 (399.6-426.0) with no AF prescription. Mean annual National Health Service healthcare costs up to 1 year post-index were lowest in patients receiving aspirin plus other antiplatelets without an event (£6152), and highest in patients with an event without AF prescriptions (£17 957). By extrapolation, national AF HRU in the United Kingdom in 2016 was estimated at £8-16 billion annually. CONCLUSIONS: These data provide temporal insights into AF treatment patterns and outcomes for NVAF patients in England and highlight the need to review higher stroke risk AF patients not receiving antiplatelet/antithrombotic prescriptions.

Diagnostic utility of angiogenic biomarkers in pregnant women with suspected preeclampsia: A health economics review.

Preeclampsia is a major cause of morbidity and mortality, can be difficult to diagnose, and is associated with significant healthcare costs. The prediction, diagnosis and prognosis of preeclampsia have depended on repeated assessment of women with known risk factors, including intensive monitoring and hospitalization. Many of these women may never go on to develop preeclampsia. Recent developments in the pathogenesis of preeclampsia have shown that maternal serum biomarkers can be used to predict preeclampsia. When the ratio of the anti-angiogenic soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1 (sFlt-1) and the pro-angiogenic placental growth factor from the placenta is altered, preeclampsia becomes more likely, providing a diagnostic measurement for risk. The use of angiogenic biomarkers in addition to standard clinical tests can more accurately predict which women are at risk of developing preeclampsia and which are at low or moderate risk, which is likely to streamline the management of pregnant women and target resources in a more efficient way. The studies reviewed here all demonstrate cost savings from use of angiogenic biomarker tests as an addition to standard care.

Economic evaluation of sFlt-1/PlGF ratio test in pre-eclampsia prediction and diagnosis in two Brazilian hospitals.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the economic impact of introducing the soluble FMS-like tyrosine kinase (sFlt-1) to placental growth factor (PlGF) ratio test into clinical practice in two Brazilian hospitals. METHODS: An economic model estimating the incremental value of the information from a Brazilian public and private healthcare payer perspective generated by the sFlt-1/PlGF ratio test, compared with current diagnostic procedures, in guiding the management of women with suspected pre-eclampsia. A cohort of 1000 pregnant women between 24 weeks and 36 + 6 weeks of gestation were managed in either a 'test' scenario in which the sFlt-1/PlGF test is used in addition to current diagnostic procedures, or a 'no-test' scenario. Information on the costs associated with diagnosis, prediction and management were derived from the cost database of Hospital M'Boi Mirim (public) and Hospital Einstein (private). The probabilities used in the decision tree were derived from PROGNOSIS. The main outcome measure from the model was the cost per patient per episode of care (from first suspicion of pre-eclampsia to birth). RESULTS: Introduction of the sFlt-1/PlGF ratio test resulted in cost savings in both settings (M'Boi Mirim: R$185.06 and Einstein: R$635.84 per patient) compared with a 'no-test' scenario. Savings are generated primarily through an improvement in diagnostic accuracy and a reduction in unnecessary hospitalization. CONCLUSIONS: The sFlt-1/PlGF ratio test has the potential to improve clinical decision-making and allocation of scarce resources by reducing unnecessary hospitalization of women at low risk of developing pre-eclampsia, and ensuring that women at higher risk are identified and managed appropriately.

Economic assessment of the use of the sFlt-1/PlGF ratio test to predict preeclampsia in Germany.

BACKGROUND: The PRediction of short-term Outcome in preGNant wOmen with Suspected preeclampsIa Study (PROGNOSIS) demonstrated that a soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase 1/placental growth factor (sFlt-1/PlGF) ratio ≤ 38 ruled out the occurrence of preeclampsia in the next week with a negative predictive value of 99.3%; a ratio > 38 indicates an increased risk of developing preeclampsia in the next 4 weeks. We performed an assessment of the economic impact of the sFlt-1/PlGF ratio test for short-term prediction of preeclampsia in Germany. METHODS: We adapted a cost-effectiveness model, which had been developed to estimate the incremental value of adding the sFlt-1/PlGF ratio test with a cut-off ratio of 38 to standard diagnostic procedures for guiding the management of women with suspected preeclampsia in the UK. We used the adapted model to estimate the incremental value of the sFlt-1/PlGF ratio test (cut-off 38) for guiding the management of women with suspected preeclampsia from a German Diagnosis-Related Group (DRG) payer perspective. The economic model estimated costs associated with diagnosis and management of preeclampsia in women managed in either a 'no-test' scenario in which clinical decisions are based on standard diagnostic procedures alone, or a 'test' scenario in which the sFlt-1/PlGF test is used in addition to standard diagnostic procedures. Test characteristics and rates of hospitalization were derived from patient-level data from PROGNOSIS. The main outcome measure from the economic model was the total cost per patient. RESULTS: In the model adapted to the German DRG payer system, introduction of the sFlt-1/PlGF ratio test with a cut-off value of 38 could reduce the proportion of women hospitalized in Germany from 44.6 to 24.0%, resulting in an expected cost saving of €361 per patient. CONCLUSIONS: The sFlt-1/PlGF ratio test is likely to reduce unnecessary hospitalization of women with a low risk of developing preeclampsia, and identify those at high risk to ensure appropriate management. Even within the restrictions of the DRG system in Germany, this results in substantial cost savings for women with suspected preeclampsia.