The glutathione transferase Mu null genotype leads to lower 6-MMPR levels in patients treated with azathioprine but not with mercaptopurine.

The conversion of azathioprine (AZA) to mercaptopurine (MP) is mediated by glutathione transferase Mu1 (GSTM1), alpha1 (GSTA1) and alpha2 (GSTA2). We designed a case-control study with data from the TOPIC trial to explore the effects of genetic variation on steady state 6-methylmercaptopurine ribonucleotide (6-MMPR) and 6-thioguanine nucleotide (6-TGN) metabolite levels. We included 199 patients with inflammatory bowel disease (126 on AZA and 73 on MP). GSTM1-null genotype carriers on AZA had two-fold lower 6-MMPR levels than AZA users carrying one or two copies of GSTM1 (2239 (1006-4587) versus 4371 (1897-7369) pmol/8 × 108 RBCs; P<0.01). In patients on MP (control group) 6-MMPR levels were comparable (6195 (1551-10712) versus 6544 (1717-11600) pmol/8 × 108 RBCs; P=0.84). The 6-TGN levels were not affected by the GSTM1 genotype. The presence of genetic variants in GSTA1 and GSTA2 was not related to the 6-MMPR and 6-TGN levels.

Risk factors for thiopurine-induced myelosuppression and infections in inflammatory bowel disease patients with a normal TPMT genotype.

BACKGROUND: Leucopenia is a common side effect in patients treated with thiopurines. Variants in the thiopurine S-methyltransferase (TPMT) gene are the best-known risk factor, but only explain up to 25% of leucopenia cases. AIM: To identify the clinical risk factors for thiopurine-induced leucopenia in patients without a common TPMT variant, and explore if these patients are at increased risk for infections. METHODS: Post hoc analysis of the Thiopurine response Optimisation by Pharmacogenetic testing in Inflammatory bowel disease Clinics (TOPIC) trial. For this analysis, patients without a variant in TPMT (*2, *3A or*3C) were included. Uni- and multivariate Cox-proportional hazard models were used to identify risk factors for leucopenia and infections. Leucopenia was defined as a white blood cell (WBC) count <3.0 × 109 /L and infections were classified according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events. RESULTS: Sixty hundred and ninety-five patients (90.6%) included in the TOPIC-trial had no variant in TPMT, of which 45 (6.5%) developed leucopenia. Median time to leucopenia was 56 (29-112) days. Multivariate analysis showed that use of mercaptopurine compared to azathioprine was associated with leucopenia (hazard ratio [HR] 2.61 [95% CIs, 1.39-4.88; P < .01]) and a higher baseline WBC count was protective (HR 0.80 [95% CIs, 0.71-0.89; P < .01]). Risk factors for infections were older age (per 10 year; HR 2.07 [95% CIs, 1.18-3.63; P = .01]) and concomitant use of biologic drugs (HR 2.15 [95% CIs, 1.14-4.07; P = .02]). CONCLUSIONS: Low baseline WBC count and mercaptopurine, due to a relatively higher dose, were risk factors for thiopurine-induced leucopenia in patients without a TPMT variant.

Azathioprine Therapy in a Pediatric TPMT-Deficient Patient-Still an Option.

We describe the case of a pediatric patient on azathioprine therapy with previously undiagnosed homozygote thiopurine S-methyltransferase (TPMT) deficiency, resulting in myelotoxic thiopurine metabolite levels. The patient was successfully treated with a very low azathioprine dose of 50 mg once a week (4% of standard dose), guided by frequent thiopurine metabolite measurement and a close clinical surveillance. We demonstrate that azathioprine therapy still might be an effective and safe therapeutic option in pediatric thiopurine S-methyltransferase-deficient IBD patients.

Early prediction of thiopurine-induced hepatotoxicity in inflammatory bowel disease.

BACKGROUND: Hepatotoxicity, gastrointestinal complaints and general malaise are common limiting adverse reactions of azathioprine and mercaptopurine in IBD patients, often related to high steady-state 6-methylmercaptopurine ribonucleotide (6-MMPR) metabolite concentrations. AIM: To determine the predictive value of 6-MMPR concentrations 1 week after treatment initiation (T1) for the development of these adverse reactions, especially hepatotoxicity, during the first 20 weeks of treatment. METHODS: The cohort study consisted of the first 270 IBD patients starting thiopurine treatment as part of the Dutch randomised-controlled trial evaluating pre-treatment thiopurine S-methyltransferase genotype testing (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00521950). Blood samples for metabolite assessment were collected at T1. Hepatotoxicity was defined by alanine aminotransaminase elevations >2 times the upper normal limit or a ratio of alanine aminotransaminase/alkaline phosphatase ≥5. RESULTS: Forty-seven patients (17%) presented hepatotoxicity during the first 20 weeks of thiopurine treatment. A T1 6-MMPR threshold of 3615 pmol/8 × 108 erythrocytes was defined. Analysis of patients on stable thiopurine dose (n = 174) showed that those exceeding the 6-MMPR threshold were at increased risk of hepatotoxicity: OR = 3.8 (95% CI: 1.8-8.0). Age, male gender and BMI were significant determinants. A predictive algorithm was developed based on these determinants and the 6-MMPR threshold to assess hepatotoxicity risk [AUC = 0.83 (95% CI: 0.75-0.91)]. 6-MMPR concentrations above the threshold also correlated with gastrointestinal complaints: OR = 2.4 (95% CI: 1.4-4.3), and general malaise: OR = 2.0 (95% CI: 1.1-3.7). CONCLUSIONS: In more than 80% of patients, thiopurine-induced hepatotoxicity could be explained by elevated T1 6-MMPR concentrations and the independent risk factors age, gender and BMI, allowing personalised thiopurine treatment in IBD to prevent early failure.

The pharmacokinetic effect of adalimumab on thiopurine metabolism in Crohn's disease patients.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: A drug interaction between infliximab and azathioprine has previously been reported in Crohn's disease patients: the concentration of the main active thiopurine metabolites, the 6-thioguanine nucleotides (6-TGN), increased 1-3 weeks after the first infliximab infusion by 50% compared to baseline. The aim of this prospective study was to determine the effect of adalimumab on thiopurine metabolism in Crohn's disease patients, evaluated by 6-TGN and 6-methylmercaptopurine ribonucleotides (6-MMPR) concentration measurement. METHODS: Crohn's disease patients on azathioprine or mercaptopurine maintenance therapy starting with concomitant adalimumab treatment were included. 6-TGN and 6-MMPR concentrations were determined before initiation of adalimumab and after 2, 4, 6 and 12 weeks of combination therapy. The activity of three essential enzymes involving thiopurine metabolism, thiopurine S-methyltransferase (TPMT), hypoxanthine-guanine phosphoribosyl transferase (HGPRT) and inosine-triphosphate pyrophosphatase (ITPase), was evaluated at baseline and week 4. Clinical outcome was evaluated by the Crohn's disease activity index and C-reactive protein concentrations at baseline, week 4 and week 12. RESULTS: Twelve Crohn's disease patients were analyzed. During the follow-up period of 12 weeks the median 6-TGN and 6-MMPR concentrations did not significantly change compared to baseline. TPMT, ITPase and HGPRT enzyme activity did not change either after 4 weeks. In two patients (17%) myelotoxicity was observed within 2-4 weeks, in whom both low therapeutic 6-TGN and 6-MMPR concentrations were found. CONCLUSIONS: In this study in Crohn's disease patients no pharmacokinetic interaction was shown between adalimumab and the conventional thiopurines, azathioprine and mercaptopurine.

Influence of 5-aminosalicylic acid on 6-thioguanosine phosphate metabolite levels: a prospective study in patients under steady thiopurine therapy.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: 5-aminosalicylate (5-ASA) raises levels of 6-thioguanine nucleotides (6-TGN), the active metabolites of thiopurines such as azathioprine (AZA). Changes in levels of each individual TGN - 6-thioguanosine mono-, di- and triphosphate (6-TGMP, 6-TGDP, 6-TGTP) - and of 6-methylmercaptopurine ribonucleotides (6-MMPR) after 5-ASA are not known. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: Effects of increasing 5-ASA doses on AZA metabolites were investigated prospectively in 22 patients with inflammatory bowel disease in 4-week study periods. Patients started with 2 g 5-ASA daily, and then were increased to 4 g daily and followed by a washout period. Thiopurine doses remained unchanged throughout the entire study. Levels of 6-TGMP, 6-TGDP, 6-TGTP and 6-MMPR as well as of 5-ASA and N-acetyl-5-aminosalicylic acid (N-Ac-5-ASA) were determined each study period. KEY RESULTS: Median baseline levels in 17 patients of 6-TGDP, 6-TGTP and 6-MMPR were 52, 319 and 1676 pmol per 8 x 10(8) red blood cells respectively. After co-administration of 2 g 5-ASA daily, median 6-TGDP and 6-TGTP levels increased but median 6-MMPR levels were unchanged. Increasing 5-ASA to 4 g daily did not affect median 6-TGDP and 6-TGTP levels, but median 6-MMPR levels decreased. After discontinuation of 5-ASA, both 6-TGDP and 6-TGTP levels decreased and median 6-MMPR levels increased. The 6-TGTP/(6-TGDP+6-TGTP)-ratio did not change during the study, but 6-MMPR/6-TGN ratios decreased. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Individual 6-TGN metabolites increased after addition of 5-ASA, but 6-MMPR-levels and the 6-MMPR/6-TGN ratios decreased. Further studies are needed to decide whether this pharmacokinetic interaction would result in improvement of efficacy and/or increased risk of toxicity of AZA.

Safe 6-thioguanine therapy of a TPMT deficient Crohn's disease patient by using therapeutic drug monitoring.

The immunosuppressive thiopurines, azathioprine (AZA) and 6-mercaptopurine (6-MP), have proven efficacy in steroid-dependant or refractory inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). In case of TPMT deficiency serious myelosuppression may occur. 6-thioguanine (6-TG), has been suggested in case of AZA and 6-MP resistant or intolerant patients. Our case demonstrates that very low dose 6-TG under close clinical surveillance and frequent therapeutic drug monitoring, may be a rescue drug for IBD-patients with low or without functional TPMT activity.