Sustained improvements in MRI outcomes with abatacept following the withdrawal of all treatments in patients with early, progressive rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVES: To assess structural damage progression with subcutaneous abatacept (ABA) in the Assessing Very Early Rheumatoid arthritis Treatment (AVERT) trial following abrupt withdrawal of all rheumatoid arthritis (RA) medication in patients achieving Disease Activity Score (DAS)-defined remission or low disease activity. METHODS: Patients with early, active RA were randomised to ABA plus methotrexate (ABA/MTX) 125 mg/week, ABA 125 mg/week or MTX for 12 months. All RA treatments were withdrawn after 12 months in patients with DAS28 (C reactive protein (CRP)) <3.2. Adjusted mean changes from baseline in MRI-based synovitis, osteitis and erosion were calculated for the intention-to-treat population. RESULTS: 351 patients were randomised and treated: ABA/MTX (n=119), ABA (n=116) or MTX (n=116). Synovitis and osteitis improved, and progression of erosion was statistically less with ABA/MTX versus MTX at month 12 (-2.35 vs -0.68, -2.58 vs -0.68, 0.19 vs 1.53, respectively; p<0.01 for each) and month 18 (-1.34 vs -0.49 -2.03 vs 0.34, 0.13 vs 2.0, respectively; p<0.01 for erosion); ABA benefits were numerically intermediate to those for ABA/MTX and MTX. CONCLUSIONS: Structural benefits with ABA/MTX or ABA may be maintained 6 months after withdrawal of all treatments in patients who have achieved remission or low disease activity. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01142726; Results.

Evaluating drug-free remission with abatacept in early rheumatoid arthritis: results from the phase 3b, multicentre, randomised, active-controlled AVERT study of 24†months, with a 12-month, double-blind treatment period.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate clinical remission with subcutaneous abatacept plus methotrexate (MTX) and abatacept monotherapy at 12 months in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and maintenance of remission following the rapid withdrawal of all RA treatment. METHODS: In the Assessing Very Early Rheumatoid arthritis Treatment phase 3b trial, patients with early active RA were randomised to double-blind, weekly, subcutaneous abatacept 125 mg plus MTX, abatacept 125 mg monotherapy, or MTX for 12 months. Patients with low disease activity (Disease Activity Score (DAS)28 (C reactive protein (CRP)) <3.2) at month 12 entered a 12-month period of withdrawal of all RA therapy. The coprimary endpoints were the proportion of patients with DAS28 (CRP) <2.6 at month 12 and both months 12 and 18, for abatacept plus MTX versus MTX. RESULTS: Patients had <2 years of RA symptoms, DAS28 (CRP) ≥3.2, anticitrullinated peptide-2 antibody positivity and 95.2% were rheumatoid factor positive. For abatacept plus MTX versus MTX, DAS28 (CRP) <2.6 was achieved in 60.9% versus 45.2% (p=0.010) at 12 months, and following treatment withdrawal, in 14.8% versus 7.8% (p=0.045) at both 12 and 18 months. DAS28 (CRP) <2.6 was achieved for abatacept monotherapy in 42.5% (month 12) and 12.4% (both months 12 and 18). Both abatacept arms had a safety profile comparable with MTX alone. CONCLUSIONS: Abatacept plus MTX demonstrated robust efficacy compared with MTX alone in early RA, with a good safety profile. The achievement of sustained remission following withdrawal of all RA therapy suggests an effect of abatacept's mechanism on autoimmune processes. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01142726.

Development of the Asthma Control Composite outcome measure to predict omalizumab response.

BACKGROUND: Previous assessments of response to omalizumab were based on diary-based data rather than standard validated instruments. A composite instrument that translates diary-based data into standard validated asthma control measures would characterize patient response to treatment in terms of current asthma control definitions. OBJECTIVE: To develop the Asthma Control Composite (ACC) tool, using real-time diary-based data to predict treatment response in terms of asthma control. METHODS: The ACC tool was derived retrospectively using pooled data from two phase 3 studies in patients with moderate to severe allergic asthma. Patients were randomized to receive subcutaneous omalizumab or placebo for 16 weeks plus stable beclomethasone dipropionate therapy, followed by a 3-month corticosteroid reduction period and 5-month double-blind safety extension. Control was assessed as "complete," "good," or "not controlled," based on a composite score of 4 elements: rescue medication (puffs/day), total asthma symptom score, average number of awakening nights/28 days, and activity limitation. RESULTS: The ACC was mapped to standard validated measures of patient-reported outcomes, with results consistent with clinical outcomes. The proportion of patients with baseline uncontrolled asthma achieving "good" or "complete" asthma control was 48% with omalizumab and 32% with placebo at approximately 4 months. The mean composite score also was improved with omalizumab (3.52) vs placebo (2.56) at approximately 4 months. CONCLUSIONS: The ACC tool accurately reflects asthma control in moderate to severe asthma patients eligible for biological therapy. Unlike the ACT, which has not been validated in this patient population, the ACC shows promise as an asthma control assessment tool in patients with moderate to severe asthma.

A randomized, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging study of single-dose omalizumab in patients with H1-antihistamine-refractory chronic idiopathic urticaria.

BACKGROUND: Proof-of-concept studies with omalizumab in patients with chronic idiopathic urticaria (CIU) have shown significant decreases in mean urticaria activity scores (UASs). OBJECTIVE: We sought to evaluate the efficacy and safety of omalizumab in patients with CIU who remain symptomatic despite concomitant H(1)-antihistamine therapy. METHODS: This phase II, prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging study investigated omalizumab in patients aged 12 to 75 years in the United States and 18 to 75 years in Germany with a UAS over 7 days (UAS7) of 12 or greater despite antihistamine therapy. Patients were randomized 1:1:1:1 to receive a single subcutaneous dose of 75, 300, or 600 mg of omalizumab or placebo added to a stable dose of H(1)-antihistamine. The primary efficacy outcome was change from baseline to week 4 in UAS7. Patients were followed for an additional 12 weeks to monitor safety. RESULTS: Ninety patients from the United States or Germany were enrolled. Both the 300-mg omalizumab group (-19.9 vs -6.9, P < .001) and the 600-mg omalizumab group (-14.6 vs -6.9, P = .047) showed greater improvement versus the placebo group in UAS7. No meaningful difference was observed for the 75-mg omalizumab group. Similar results were seen for key secondary end points of weekly hive and itch scores. Onset of effect occurred after 1 to 2 weeks. Omalizumab was well tolerated, and the incidence of adverse events was similar across treatment groups. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that a fixed dose of 300 or 600 mg of omalizumab provides rapid and effective treatment of CIU in patients who are symptomatic despite treatment with H(1)-antihistamines.

Omalizumab in severe allergic asthma inadequately controlled with standard therapy: a randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) and long-acting ß(2)-agonists (LABAs) are recommended in patients with asthma that is not well-controlled; however, many patients continue to have inadequately controlled asthma despite this therapy. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of omalizumab in patients with inadequately controlled severe asthma who are receiving high-dose ICS and LABAs, with or without additional controller therapy. DESIGN: Prospective, multicenter, randomized, parallel-group, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. (ClinicalTrials.gov registration number: NCT00314575). SETTING: 193 investigational sites in the United States and 4 sites in Canada. PATIENTS: 850 patients aged 12 to 75 years who had inadequately controlled asthma despite treatment with high-dose ICS plus LABAs, with or without other controllers. INTERVENTION: Omalizumab (n = 427) or placebo (n = 423) was added to existing medication regimens for 48 weeks. MEASUREMENTS: The primary end point was the rate of protocol-defined exacerbations over the study period. Secondary efficacy end points included the change from baseline to week 48 in mean daily number of puffs of albuterol, mean total asthma symptom score, and mean overall score on the standardized version of the Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ[S]). Safety end points included the frequency and severity of treatment-emergent adverse events. RESULTS: During 48 weeks, the rate of protocol-defined asthma exacerbations was significantly reduced for omalizumab compared with placebo (0.66 vs. 0.88 per patient; P = 0.006), representing a 25% relative reduction (incidence rate ratio, 0.75 [95% CI, 0.61 to 0.92]). Omalizumab improved mean AQLQ(S) scores (0.29 point [CI, 0.15 to 0.43]), reduced mean daily albuterol puffs (-0.27 puff/d [CI, -0.49 to -0.04 puff/d]), and decreased mean asthma symptom score (-0.26 [CI, -0.42 to -0.10]) compared with placebo during the 48-week study period. The incidence of adverse events (80.4% vs. 79.5%) and serious adverse events (9.3% vs. 10.5%) were similar in the omalizumab and placebo groups, respectively. LIMITATIONS: The results are limited by early patient discontinuation (20.8%). The study was not powered to detect rare safety events or the treatment effect in the oral corticosteroid subgroup. CONCLUSION: In this study, omalizumab provided additional clinical benefit for patients with severe allergic asthma that is inadequately controlled with high-dose ICS and LABA therapy. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: Genentech and Novartis Pharmaceuticals.

Allergy, total serum immunoglobulin E, and airflow in children and adolescents in TENOR.

In children and adolescents with difficult-to-treat asthma, few data exist characterizing the relationships between basic patient characteristics (e.g., age, sex) and atopic indicators in asthma. These associations were examined in The Epidemiology and Natural History of Asthma: Outcomes and Treatment Regimens (TENOR), an observational study of a large cohort of patients with severe or difficult-to-treat asthma. To characterize allergy patterns and the relationship between total serum immunoglobulin E (IgE) and airflow in young patients with severe or difficult-to-treat asthma. A total of 1261 patients from the TENOR study were stratified into four age groups at baseline (6-8, 9-11, 12-14, and 15-17 yr). The objective was to characterize allergy patterns and the relationship between total serum immunoglobulin E (IgE) and ratio of pre-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 second to forced vital capacity (FEV(1) /FVC) in young patients with severe or difficult-to-treat asthma. The chi-square test for categorical variables and analysis of variance for continuous variables were used to identify significant differences among age groups. Multivariable linear regression was used to evaluate the association between IgE and FEV(1) /FVC. Allergic rhinitis was reported in approximately two-thirds of patients. Up to 25% of patients had atopic dermatitis, which differed across age groups in boys (p < 0.05). Positive allergen skin test rate differed across age groups in boys (p < 0.05). Rates of asthma triggers were higher and differed across age groups in girls (p < 0.05), particularly around menarche (12-14 yr). IgE levels were higher in boys and differed across age groups in boys (p < 0.01) and girls (p < 0.05). IgE was associated with a lower FEV(1) /FVC after adjusting for age and sex (p < 0.01). Severe or difficult-to-treat asthma in children and adolescents is characterized by high frequencies of comorbid allergic diseases, allergen sensitization, and high IgE levels. This burden is amplified by the association of more airflow limitation with higher IgE levels, suggesting the need for allergy evaluations.

Churg-strauss syndrome in patients treated with omalizumab.

BACKGROUND: Churg-Strauss syndrome (CSS) is a rare systemic vasculitis associated with asthma, eosinophilia, sinusitis, and pulmonary infiltrates. CSS has been reported in association with asthma therapies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The objective is to describe the characteristics of CSS in patients treated with the anti-IgE antibody omalizumab (Xolair; Genentech Inc; South San Francisco, CA). A retrospective review of available data to identify cases of CSS was performed using the Novartis Argus global drug safety database for omalizumab in asthma patients. RESULTS: We identified 34 potential cases of CSS. Of these, 13 cases fulfilled at least four of the six criteria identified in the American College of Rheumatology classification criteria. Eight of the patients in these 13 definite or probable cases (62%) had CSS symptoms prior to receiving omalizumab or described symptom onset just after corticosteroid weaning. Six of the 13 patients (46%) were confirmed as having been treated with corticosteroids for what was perceived to be severe asthma; when corticosteroids were tapered in conjunction with omalizumab treatment, CSS symptoms appeared just after the tapering. There were 4 other cases of possible CSS, and the remaining 17 patients were judged to not have CSS. CONCLUSIONS: CSS may develop in patients receiving asthma medications who have an underlying eosinophilic disorder that is unmasked by the withdrawal of therapy with corticosteroids, or in patients who delay therapy in favor of other medications. Omalizumab treatment may unmask CSS due to the weaning of corticosteroids in some asthma patients or may delay corticosteroid treatment allowing for CSS to manifest. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00252135.

High prevalence of skin test positivity in severe or difficult-to-treat asthma.

BACKGROUND: Skin tests are considered the gold standard for detecting allergen-specific immunoglobulin E (IgE) in the clinical setting and are an important tool for diagnosing and managing allergic asthma. OBJECTIVE: To assess the prevalence of skin testing in patients > or = 12 years enrolled in The Epidemiology and Natural History of Asthma: Outcomes and Treatment Regimens (TENOR) study. METHODS: Patients were asked whether they had ever been skin tested and, if so, they were asked to provide the test results. Clinical characteristics were used to compare positive (ST+), negative (ST-), and skin test not done (STND) patients. RESULTS: Of 2,985 patients eligible, 85.8% recalled being skin tested. Of those tested, 93.5% were positive (allergist 95.7%, pulmonologist 87.3%). A high proportion of Whites (93.5%) and non-Whites (94.0%) were ST+; however, more non-Whites had never been skin tested (21.7% vs. 12.3%, respectively; p < 0.0001). Total serum IgE was 104.6 IU/mL for ST+ patients, 87.1 IU/mL for STND patients, and 32.4 IU/mL for ST- patients. Age at asthma onset, duration of asthma, and the prevalence of atopic disorders and asthma triggers differentiated the ST+ from the ST- group. Disease severity appeared similar between the two groups. In general, values for STND patients were closer to the ST+ group, suggesting that those not tested would have been ST+ if administered a test. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of ST+ patients was high in allergy and pulmonology practices, and in White and non-White patients. These data support the utility of a more complete allergic evaluation in severe asthmatics. Skin testing appears associated with disease pathophysiologies in asthma.

Symptom control and improved functioning: the effect of omalizumab on asthma-related quality of life (ARQL).

This investigation evaluated variability in asthma-related quality-of-life (ARQL) outcomes among patients randomized to omalizumab or placebo. Pooled data on the Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) from two trials were used (n = 948). Variability in ARQL outcomes was determined by categorizing AQLQ score changes according to minimal clinically important difference (MCID: 0.5 points) and large clinically important difference (LCID: 1.5 points) score changes. A greater proportion of patients achieved improvement in every domain of AQLQ scores during all periods with omalizumab compared with placebo. Omalizumab-treated patients showed greater clinically important improvement in ARQL compared with patients receiving placebo.

Discrete role for cytosolic phospholipase A(2)alpha in platelets: studies using single and double mutant mice of cytosolic and group IIA secretory phospholipase A(2).

Among several different types of phospholipase A(2) (PLA(2)), cytosolic PLA(2) (cPLA(2))alpha and group IIA (IIA) secretory PLA(2) (sPLA(2)) have been studied intensively. To determine the discrete roles of cPLA(2)alpha in platelets, we generated two sets of genetically engineered mice (cPLA(2)alpha(-/-)/sPLA(2)-IIA(-/-) and cPLA(2)alpha(-/-)/sPLA(2)-IIA(+/+)) and compared their platelet function with their respective wild-type C57BL/6J mice (cPLA(2)alpha(+/+)/sPLA(2)-IIA(-/-)) and C3H/HeN (cPLA(2)alpha(+/+)/sPLA(2)-IIA(+/+)). We found that cPLA(2)alpha is needed for the production of the vast majority of thromboxane (TX)A(2) with collagen stimulation of platelets. In cPLA(2)alpha-deficient mice, however, platelet aggregation in vitro is only fractionally decreased because small amounts of TX produced by redundant phospholipase enzymes sufficiently preserve aggregation. In comparison, adenosine triphosphate activation of platelets appears wholly independent of cPLA(2)alpha and sPLA(2)-IIA for aggregation or the production of TX, indicating that these phospholipases are specifically linked to collagen receptors. However, the lack of high levels of TX limiting vasoconstriction explains the in vivo effects seen: increased bleeding times and protection from thromboembolism. Thus, cPLA(2)alpha plays a discrete role in the collagen-stimulated production of TX and its inhibition has a therapeutic potential against thromboembolism, with potentially limited bleeding expected.