S-Cone Photoreceptors Regulate Daily Rhythms and Light-Induced Arousal/Wakefulness in Diurnal Grass Rats (Arvicanthis niloticus).

Beyond visual perception, light has non-image-forming effects mediated by melanopsin-expressing, intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells (ipRGCs). The present study first used multielectrode array recordings to show that in a diurnal rodent, Nile grass rats (Arvicanthis niloticus), ipRGCs generate rod/cone-driven and melanopsin-based photoresponses that stably encode irradiance. Subsequently, two ipRGC-mediated non-image-forming effects, namely entrainment of daily rhythms and light-induced arousal, were examined. Animals were first housed under a 12:12 h light/dark cycle (lights-on at 0600 h) with the light phase generated by a low-irradiance fluorescent light (F12), a daylight spectrum (D65) stimulating all photoreceptors, or a narrowband 480 nm spectrum (480) that maximized melanopsin stimulation and minimized S-cone stimulation (λmax 360 nm) compared to D65. Daily rhythms of locomotor activities showed onset and offset closer to lights-on and lights-off, respectively, in D65 and 480 than in F12, and higher day/night activity ratio under D65 versus 480 and F12, suggesting the importance of S-cone stimulation. To assess light-induced arousal, 3-h light exposures using 4 spectra that stimulated melanopsin equally but S-cones differentially were superimposed on F12 background lighting: D65, 480, 480 + 365 (narrowband 365 nm), and D65 - 365. Compared to the F12-only condition, all four pulses increased in-cage activity and promoted wakefulness, with 480 + 365 having the greatest and longest-lasting wakefulness-promoting effects, again indicating the importance of stimulating S-cones as well as melanopsin. These findings provide insights into the temporal dynamics of photoreceptor contributions to non-image-forming photoresponses in a diurnal rodent that may help guide future studies of lighting environments and phototherapy protocols that promote human health and productivity.

Adeno-associated virus (AAV)-mediated Cre recombinase expression in melanopsin ganglion cells without leaky expression in rod/cone photoreceptors.

BACKGROUND: Constituting about 5 % of mouse retinal ganglion cells (RGCs), intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells (ipRGCs) express the photopigment melanopsin (gene symbol Opn4) and drive such photoresponses as pupil constriction, melatonin suppression, and circadian photoentrainment. Opn4Cre mice with Cre recombinase-expressing ipRGCs have enabled genetic manipulation of ipRGCs; unfortunately, while Cre expression within the inner retina is ipRGC-specific, leaky expression also occurs in some outer retinal photoreceptors, so Cre-induced alterations in the latter cells may confound certain studies of ipRGC function. Methods that express Cre in ipRGCs but not rods or cones are needed. NEW METHOD: We have constructed a recombinant serotype-2 adeno-associated virus, rAAV2-Opn4-Cre, with the improved Cre recombinase (iCre) gene under the control of a ∼3kbp Opn4 promoter sequence, and injected it intravitreally into mice to transduce inner retinal neurons while sparing the outer retina. RESULTS: We introduced rAAV2-Opn4-Cre into Cre reporter mice in which enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) expression indicates Cre expression. Single-cell electrophysiological recordings and intracellular dye fills showed that 84 % of the EGFP+ cells were ipRGCs including M1-M6 types, while 16 % were conventional RGCs. COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHODS: Whereas Opn4Cre mice express Cre in some rod/cone photoreceptors, intravitreally applied rAAV2-Opn4-Cre induces Cre only in the inner retina, albeit with leaky expression in some conventional RGCs. CONCLUSIONS: rAAV2-Opn4-Cre has overcome a significant limitation of Opn4Cre mice. We recommend usage scenarios where the Cre-expressing conventional RGCs should not pose a problem.

Photoacoustic imaging of visually evoked cortical and subcortical hemodynamic activity in mouse brain: feasibility study with piezoelectric and capacitive micromachined ultrasonic transducer (CMUT) arrays.

This study investigates the feasibility of capturing visually evoked hemodynamic responses in the mouse brain using photoacoustic tomography (PAT) and ultrasound (US) dual-modality imaging. A commercial piezoelectric transducer array and a capacitive micromachined ultrasonic transducer (CMUT) array were compared using a programmable PAT-US imaging system. The system resolution was measured by imaging phantoms. We also tested the ability of the system to capture visually evoked hemodynamic responses in the superior colliculus as well as the primary visual cortex in wild-type mice. Results show that the piezoelectric transducer array and the CMUT array exhibit comparable imaging performance, and both arrays can capture visually evoked hemodynamic responses in subcortical as well as cortical regions of the mouse brain.

Label-free photoacoustic computed tomography of mouse cortical responses to retinal photostimulation using a pair-wise correlation map.

The lack of a non-invasive or minimally invasive imaging technique has long been a challenge to investigating brain activities in mice. Functional magnetic resonance imaging and the more recently developed diffuse optical imaging both suffer from limited spatial resolution. Photoacoustic (PA) imaging combines the sensitivity of optical excitation to hemodynamic changes and ultrasound detection's relatively high spatial resolution. In this study, we evaluated the feasibility of using a label-free, real-time PA computed tomography (PACT) system to measure visually evoked hemodynamic responses within the primary visual cortex (V1) in mice. Photostimulation of the retinas evoked significantly faster and stronger V1 responses in wild-type mice than in age-matched rod/cone-degenerate mice, consistent with known differences between rod/cone- vs. melanopsin-mediated photoreception. In conclusion, the PACT system in this study has sufficient sensitivity and spatial resolution to resolve visual cortical hemodynamics during retinal photostimulation, and PACT is a potential tool for investigating visually evoked brain activities in mouse models of retinal diseases.

Structure and function of the gap junctional network of photoreceptive ganglion cells.

Intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells (ipRGCs) signal not only anterogradely to drive behavioral responses, but also retrogradely to some amacrine interneurons to modulate retinal physiology. We previously found that all displaced amacrine cells with spiking, tonic excitatory photoresponses receive gap-junction input from ipRGCs, but the connectivity patterns and functional roles of ipRGC-amacrine coupling remained largely unknown. Here, we injected PoPro1 fluorescent tracer into all six types of mouse ipRGCs to identify coupled amacrine cells, and analyzed the latter's morphological and electrophysiological properties. We also examined how genetically disrupting ipRGC-amacrine coupling affected ipRGC photoresponses. Results showed that ipRGCs couple with not just ON- and ON/OFF-stratified amacrine cells in the ganglion-cell layer as previously reported, but also OFF-stratified amacrine cells in both ganglion-cell and inner nuclear layers. M1- and M3-type ipRGCs couple mainly with ON/OFF-stratified amacrine cells, whereas the other ipRGC types couple almost exclusively with ON-stratified ones. ipRGCs transmit melanopsin-based light responses to at least 93% of the coupled amacrine cells. Some of the ON-stratifying ipRGC-coupled amacrine cells exhibit transient hyperpolarizing light responses. We detected bidirectional electrical transmission between an ipRGC and a coupled amacrine cell, although transmission was asymmetric for this particular cell pair, favoring the ipRGC-to-amacrine direction. We also observed electrical transmission between two amacrine cells coupled to the same ipRGC. In both scenarios of coupling, the coupled cells often spiked synchronously. While ipRGC-amacrine coupling somewhat reduces the peak firing rates of ipRGCs' intrinsic melanopsin-based photoresponses, it renders these responses more sustained and longer-lasting. In summary, ipRGCs' gap junctional network involves more amacrine cell types and plays more roles than previously appreciated.

The effect of axon trajectory on retinal ganglion cell activation with epiretinal stimulation.

For epiretinal prostheses, disc electrodes stimulate retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) with electric current to create visual percepts. Prior studies have determined that the sodium channel band (SOCB), located on the RGC axon (30-50 µm from the soma) is the most sensitive site to extracellular stimulation because of its high sodium channel density. Biophysical cable models used to study RGC activation in silico often rely on simplified axon trajectories, disregarding the non-uniform paths that axons follow to the optic disc. However, since axonal activation is a critical mechanism in epiretinal stimulation, it is important to investigate variable RGC axon trajectories. In this study, we use a computational model to perform a sensitivity analysis examining how the morphology of an RGC axon affects predictions of retinal activation. We determine that RGC cable models are sensitive to changes in the ascending axon trajectory between the soma and nerve fiber layer. On the other hand, RGC cable models are relatively robust to trajectory deviations in the plane parallel to the disc electrode's surface. Overall, our results suggest that incorporating natural variations of soma depth and nerve fiber layer entry angle could result in a more realistic model of the retina's response to epiretinal stimulation and a better understanding of elicited visual percepts.

M1-Type, but Not M4-Type, Melanopsin Ganglion Cells Are Physiologically Tuned to the Central Circadian Clock.

Proper circadian photoentrainment is crucial for the survival of many organisms. In mammals, intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells (ipRGCs) can use the photopigment melanopsin to sense light independently from rod and cone photoreceptors and send this information to many brain nuclei such as the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN), the site of the central circadian pacemaker. Here, we measure ionic currents and develop mathematical models of the electrical activity of two types of ipRGCs: M1, which projects to the SCN, and M4, which does not. We illustrate how their ionic properties differ, mainly how ionic currents generate lower spike rates and depolarization block in M1 ipRGCs. Both M1 and M4 cells have large geometries and project to higher visual centers of the brain via the optic nerve. Using a partial differential equation model, we show how axons of M1 and M4 cells faithfully convey information from the soma to the synapse even when the signal at the soma is attenuated due to depolarization block. Finally, we consider an ionic model of circadian photoentrainment from ipRGCs synapsing on SCN neurons and show how the properties of M1 ipRGCs are tuned to create accurate transmission of visual signals from the retina to the central pacemaker, whereas M4 ipRGCs would not evoke nearly as efficient a postsynaptic response. This work shows how ipRGCs and SCN neurons' electrical activities are tuned to allow for accurate circadian photoentrainment.

Circadian Responses to Light-Flash Exposure: Conceptualization and New Data Guiding Future Directions.

A growing number of studies document circadian phase-shifting after exposure to millisecond light flashes. When strung together by intervening periods of darkness, these stimuli evoke pacemaker responses rivaling or outmatching those created by steady luminance, suggesting that the circadian system's relationship to light can be contextualized outside the principle of simple dose-dependence. In the current review, we present a brief chronology of this work. We then develop a conceptual model around it that attempts to relate the circadian effects of flashes to a natural integrative process the pacemaker uses to intermittently sample the photic information available at dawn and dusk. Presumably, these snapshots are employed as building blocks in the construction of a coherent representation of twilight the pacemaker consults to orient the next day's physiology (in that way, flash-resetting of pacemaker rhythms might be less an example of a circadian visual illusion and more an example of the kinds of gestalt inferences that the image-forming system routinely makes when identifying objects within the visual field; i.e., closure). We conclude our review with a discussion on the role of cones in the pacemaker's twilight predictions, providing new electrophysiological data suggesting that classical photoreceptors-but not melanopsin-are necessary for millisecond, intermediate-intensity flash responses in ipRGCs (intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells). Future investigations are necessary to confirm this "Cone Sentinel Model" of circadian flash-integration and twilight-prediction, and to further define the contribution of cones vs. rods in transducing pacemaker flash signals.

Amacrine Cells Forming Gap Junctions With Intrinsically Photosensitive Retinal Ganglion Cells: ipRGC Types, Neuromodulator Contents, and Connexin Isoform.

Purpose: Intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells (ipRGCs) signal not only centrally to non-image-forming visual centers of the brain but also intraretinally to amacrine interneurons through gap junction electrical coupling, potentially modulating image-forming retinal processing. We aimed to determine (1) which ipRGC types couple with amacrine cells, (2) the neuromodulator contents of ipRGC-coupled amacrine cells, and (3) whether connexin36 (Cx36) contributes to ipRGC-amacrine coupling. Methods: Gap junction-permeable Neurobiotin tracer was injected into green fluorescent protein (GFP)-labeled ipRGCs in Opn4Cre/+; Z/EG mice to stain coupled amacrine cells, and immunohistochemistry was performed to reveal the neuromodulator contents of the Neurobiotin-stained amacrine cells. We also created Opn4Cre/+; Cx36flox/flox; Z/EG mice to knock out Cx36 in GFP-labeled ipRGCs and looked for changes in the number of ipRGC-coupled amacrine cells. Results: Seventy-three percent of ipRGCs, including all six types (M1-M6), were tracer-coupled with amacrine somas 5.7 to 16.5 µm in diameter but not with ganglion cells. Ninety-two percent of the ipRGC-coupled somas were in the ganglion cell layer and the rest in the inner nuclear layer. Some ipRGC-coupled amacrine cells were found to accumulate serotonin or to contain nitric oxide synthase or neuropeptide Y. Knocking out Cx36 in M2 and M4 dramatically reduced the number of coupled somas. Conclusions: Heterologous gap junction coupling with amacrine cells is widespread across mouse ipRGC types. ipRGC-coupled amacrine cells probably comprise multiple morphologic types and use multiple neuromodulators, suggesting that gap junctional ipRGC-to-amacrine signaling likely exerts diverse modulatory effects on retinal physiology. ipRGC-amacrine coupling is mediated partly, but not solely, by Cx36.

Prolonged Melanopsin-based Photoresponses Depend in Part on RPE65 and Cellular Retinaldehyde-binding Protein (CRALBP).

PURPOSE: Intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells (ipRGCs) contain the photopigment melanopsin and can signal light continuously for many hours. Melanopsin is excited when its chromophore 11-cis-retinal absorbs a photon and becomes all-trans-retinal, which must be reisomerized to 11-cis-retinal to regenerate photoexcitable melanopsin. Due to the great distance separating ipRGCs from the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) whose retinoid cycle produces 11-cis-retinal, ipRGCs had been assumed to regenerate all melanopsin molecules autonomously. Surprisingly, we previously found that pharmacologically inhibiting the retinoid cycle rendered melanopsin-based responses to prolonged illumination less sustained, suggesting that the RPE may supply retinoids to help ipRGCs regenerate melanopsin during extended photostimulation. However, the specificity of those drugs is unclear. Here, we reexamined the role of the retinoid cycle, and tested whether the RPE-to-ipRGC transport of retinoids utilizes cellular retinaldehyde-binding protein (CRALBP), present throughout the RPE and Müller glia. METHODS: To measure melanopsin-mediated photoresponses in isolation, all animals were 8- to 12-month-old rod/cone-degenerate mice. We genetically knocked out RPE-specific 65 kDa protein (RPE65), a critical enzyme in the retinoid cycle. We also knocked out the CRALBP gene rlbp1 mainly in Foxg1-expressing Müller cells. We obtained multielectrode-array recordings from ipRGCs in a novel RPE-attached mouse retina preparation, and imaged pupillary light reflexes in vivo. RESULTS: Melanopsin-based ipRGC responses to prolonged light became less tonic in both knockout lines, and pupillary light reflexes were also less sustained in RPE65-knockout than control mice. CONCLUSIONS: These results confirm that ipRGCs rely partly on the retinoid cycle to continuously regenerate melanopsin during prolonged photostimulation, and suggest that CRALBP in Müller glia likely transports 11-cis-retinal from the RPE to ipRGCs - this is the first proposed functional role for CRALBP in the inner retina.

Acepromazine and Chlorpromazine as Pharmaceutical-grade Alternatives to Chlorprothixene for Pupillary Light Reflex Imaging in Mice.

Studies of visual responses in isoflurane-anesthetized mice often use the sedative chlorprothixene to decrease the amount of isoflurane used because excessive isoflurane could adversely affect light-evoked responses. However, data are not available to justify the use of this nonpharmaceutical-grade chemical. The current study tested whether pharmaceutical-grade sedatives would be appropriate alternatives for imaging pupillary light reflexes. Male 15-wk-old mice were injected intraperitoneally with 1 mg/kg chlorprothixene, 5 mg/kg acepromazine, 10 mg/kg chlorpromazine, or saline. After anesthetic induction, anesthesia maintenance used 0.5% and 1% isoflurane for sedative- and saline-injected mice, respectively. A photostimulus (16.0 log photons cm-2 s-1; 470 nm) was presented to the right eye for 20 min, during which the left eye was imaged for consensual pupillary constriction and involuntary pupil drift. Time to immobilization, loss of righting reflex, physiologic parameters, gain of righting reflex, and degree of recovery were assessed also. The sedative groups were statistically indistinguishable for all measures. By contrast, pupillary drift occurred far more often in saline-treated mice than in the sedative groups. Furthermore, saline-treated mice took longer to reach maximal pupil constriction than all sedative groups and had lower heart rates compared with chlorpromazine- and chlorprothixene-sedated mice. Full recovery (as defined by purposeful movement, response to tactile stimuli, and full alertness) was not regularly achieved in any sedative group. In conclusion, at the doses tested, acepromazine and chlorpromazine are suitable pharmaceutical-grade alternatives to chlorprothixene for pupil imaging and conceivably other in vivo photoresponse measurements; however, given the lack of full recovery, lower dosages should be investigated further for use in survival procedures.

The Roles of Rods, Cones, and Melanopsin in Photoresponses of M4 Intrinsically Photosensitive Retinal Ganglion Cells (ipRGCs) and Optokinetic Visual Behavior.

Intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells (ipRGCs) mediate not only image-forming vision like other ganglion cells, but also non-image-forming physiological responses to light such as pupil constriction and circadian photoentrainment. All ipRGCs respond to light through their endogenous photopigment melanopsin as well as rod/cone-driven synaptic inputs. A major knowledge gap is how melanopsin, rods, and cones differentially drive ipRGC photoresponses and image-forming vision. We whole-cell-recorded from M4-type ipRGCs lacking melanopsin, rod input, or cone input to dissect the roles of each component in ipRGCs' responses to steady and temporally modulated (≥0.3 Hz) lights. We also used a behavioral assay to determine how the elimination of melanopsin, rod, or cone function impacts the optokinetic visual behavior of mice. Results showed that the initial, transient peak in an M4 cell's responses to 10-s light steps arises from rod and cone inputs. Both the sustainability and poststimulus persistence of these light-step responses depend only on rod and/or cone inputs, which is unexpected because these ipRGC photoresponse properties have often been attributed primarily to melanopsin. For temporally varying stimuli, the enhancement of response sustainedness involves melanopsin, whereas stimulus tracking is mediated by rod and cone inputs. Finally, the behavioral assay showed that while all three photoreceptive systems are nearly equally important for contrast sensitivity, only cones and rods contribute to spatial acuity.

Confirmation of Luteinizing Hormone (LH) in Living Human Vitreous and the Effect of LH Receptor Reduction on Murine Electroretinogram.

Luteinizing hormone (LH), produced in the anterior pituitary, has been detected in cadaver eyes and LH receptors (LHRs) have been identified in the retina, with the highest density in cone photoreceptors. Our aim was to confirm the presence of LH in the living, human eye as well as to examine the potential impact of a reduction in LHR signaling on visual processing. Vitreous samples were collected from 40 patients (23 diabetics, 17 non-diabetics) who were undergoing vitrectomies for various indications. LH concentration was quantified in each sample via an electro-chemiluminescence immunoassay and Meso Scale Discovery platform and normalized to total protein. In addition, full-field electroretinography (ERG) was performed on 11 adult LHR knockout heterozygous mice (B6;129X1-Lhcgrtm1Zmlei/J) and 11 wild types using the Celeris-Diagnosys system. The median LH values (pg/mg total protein) for non-diabetics, diabetics without proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) and diabetics with PDR were 40.7, 41.9 and 167.8 respectively. LH levels were significantly higher in diabetics with PDR. In our ERG investigation, heterozygous LHRKOs were found to have significantly reduced amplitudes of a-wave and b-waves at high stimulus intensities with no significant change in a-wave or b-wave amplitudes at lower intensities; this is consistent with a selective impairment of cone-mediated responses. Our findings confirm LH is present in the adult human eye. Our findings also suggest that a reduction in LH receptor signaling negatively impacts visual processing of the cone photoreceptors. Overall, our study results support the theory that LH likely plays a physiologic role in the eye.

Multiplexing Visual Signals in the Suprachiasmatic Nuclei.

The suprachiasmatic nuclei (SCN), the site of the mammalian circadian (daily) pacemaker, contains thousands of interconnected neurons, some of which receive direct retinal input. Here, we study the fast (<1 s) responses of SCN neurons to visual stimuli with a large-scale mathematical model tracking the ionic currents and voltage of all SCN neurons. We reconstruct the SCN network connectivity and reject 99.99% of theoretically possible SCN networks by requiring that the model reproduces experimentally determined receptive fields of SCN neurons. The model shows how the SCN neuronal network can enhance circadian entrainment by sensitizing a population of neurons in the ventral SCN to irradiance. This SCN network also increases the spatial acuity of neurons and increases the accuracy of a simulated subconscious spatial visual task. We hypothesize that much of the fast electrical activity within the SCN is related to the processing of spatial information.

Mapping physiological inputs from multiple photoreceptor systems to dopaminergic amacrine cells in the mouse retina.

In the vertebrate retina, dopamine is synthesized and released by a specialized type of amacrine cell, the dopaminergic amacrine cell (DAC). DAC activity is stimulated by rods, cones, and melanopsin-expressing intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells upon illumination. However, the relative contributions of these three photoreceptor systems to the DAC light-induced response are unknown. Here we found that rods excite dark-adapted DACs across a wide range of stimulation intensities, primarily through connexin-36-dependent rod pathways. Similar rod-driven responses were observed in both ventral and dorsal DACs. We further found that in the dorsal retina, M-cones and melanopsin contribute to dark-adapted DAC responses with a similar threshold intensity. In the ventral retina, however, the threshold intensity for M-cone-driven responses was two log units greater than that observed in dorsal DACs, and melanopsin-driven responses were almost undetectable. We also examined the DAC response to prolonged adapting light and found such responses to be mediated by rods under dim lighting conditions, rods/M-cones/melanopsin under intermediate lighting conditions, and cones and melanopsin under bright lighting conditions. Our results elucidate the relative contributions of the three photoreceptor systems to DACs under different lighting conditions, furthering our understanding of the role these cells play in the visual system.

LED Lights With Hidden Intensity-Modulated Blue Channels Aiming for Enhanced Subconscious Visual Responses.

A new form of light-emitting diode (LED) light suitable for general illumination is proposed to enhance subconscious, nonimage-forming visual responses, which are essential to our well-being. Pulsing light has been shown to reduce photoreceptor adaptation and elicit stronger subconscious visual responses at an indoor illumination level. Using the silent substitution technique, a melanopsin-selective flicker can be added into white light. A linear optimization algorithm was developed to suppress any perceivable fluctuation of light intensity and colors of illuminated objects. Two examples of lights are given to illustrate the potential applications of the proposed multi-LED light for general illumination and therapeutic purposes.

Mechanisms creating transient and sustained photoresponses in mammalian retinal ganglion cells.

Retinal neurons use sustained and transient light responses to encode visual stimuli of different frequency ranges, but the underlying mechanisms remain poorly understood. In particular, although earlier studies in retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) proposed seven potential mechanisms, all seven have since been disputed, and it remains unknown whether different RGC types use different mechanisms or how many mechanisms are used by each type. Here, we conduct a comprehensive survey in mice and rats of 12 candidate mechanisms that could conceivably produce tonic rod/cone-driven ON responses in intrinsically photosensitive RGCs (ipRGCs) and transient ON responses in three types of direction-selective RGCs (TRHR+, Hoxd10+ ON, and Hoxd10+ ON-OFF cells). We find that the tonic kinetics of ipRGCs arises from their substantially above-threshold resting potentials, input from sustained ON bipolar cells, absence of amacrine cell inhibition of presynaptic ON bipolar cells, and mGluR7-mediated maintenance of light-evoked glutamatergic input. All three types of direction-selective RGCs receive input from transient ON bipolar cells, and each type uses additional strategies to promote photoresponse transience: presynaptic inhibition and dopaminergic modulation for TRHR+ cells, center/surround antagonism and relatively negative resting potentials for Hoxd10+ ON cells, and presynaptic inhibition for Hoxd10+ ON-OFF cells. We find that the sustained nature of ipRGCs' rod/cone-driven responses depends neither on melanopsin nor on N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptors, whereas the transience of the direction-selective cells' responses is influenced neither by α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid (AMPA)/kainate receptor desensitization nor by glutamate uptake. For all cells, we further rule out spike frequency adaptation and intracellular Ca2+ as determinants of photoresponse kinetics. In conclusion, different RGC types use diverse mechanisms to produce sustained or transient light responses. Parenthetically, we find evidence in both mice and rats that the kinetics of light-induced mGluR6 deactivation determines whether an ON bipolar cell responds tonically or transiently to light.

Prolonged Inner Retinal Photoreception Depends on the Visual Retinoid Cycle.

In addition to rods and cones, mammals have inner retinal photoreceptors called intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells (ipRGCs), which use the photopigment melanopsin and mediate nonimage-forming visual responses, such as pupil reflexes and circadian entrainment. After photic activation, photopigments must be reverted to their dark state to be light-sensitive again. For rods and to some extent cones, photopigment regeneration depends on the retinoid cycle in the adjacent retinal pigment epithelium (RPE). By contrast, ipRGCs are far from the RPE, and previous work suggests that melanopsin is capable of light-dependent self-regeneration. Here, we used in vitro ipRGC recording and in vivo pupillometry to show that the RPE is required for normal melanopsin-based responses to prolonged light, especially at high stimulus intensities. Melanopsin-based photoresponses of rat ipRGCs were remarkably sustained when a functional RPE was attached to the retina, but became far more transient if the RPE was removed, or if the retinoid cycle was inhibited, or when Müller glia were poisoned. Similarly, retinoid cycle inhibition markedly reduced the steady-state amplitude of melanopsin-driven pupil reflexes in both mice and rats. However, melanopsin photoresponses in RPE-separated rat retinas became more sustained in the presence of an 11-cis-retinal analog. In conclusion, during prolonged illumination, melanopsin regeneration depends partly on 11-cis-retinal from the RPE, possibly imported via Müller cells. Implications for RPE-related eye diseases and the acne drug isotretinoin (a retinoid cycle inhibitor) are discussed. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells (ipRGCs) contain the photopigment melanopsin and drive subconscious physiological responses to light, e.g., pupillary constriction and neuroendocrine regulation. In darkness, each photopigment molecule in ipRGCs, as well as rod/cone photoreceptors, contains 11-cis-retinal (a vitamin A derivative) and light isomerizes it to all-trans-retinal, which activates the photopigment. To make this photopigment excitable again,all-trans-retinal must be reisomerized to 11-cis-retinal. For rods and to some extent cones, this reisomerization occurs in the adjacent retinal pigment epithelium (RPE), but because ipRGCs are far from the RPE, they are thought to regenerate excitable melanopsin exclusively through RPE-independent means. Here, we present electrophysiological and behavioral evidence that ipRGCs depend on the RPE to continuously regenerate melanopsin during intense prolonged photostimulation.

All spiking, sustained ON displaced amacrine cells receive gap-junction input from melanopsin ganglion cells.

Retinal neurons exhibit sustained versus transient light responses, which are thought to encode low- and high-frequency stimuli, respectively. This dichotomy has been recognized since the earliest intracellular recordings from the 1960s, but the underlying mechanisms are not yet fully understood. We report that in the ganglion cell layer of rat retinas, all spiking amacrine interneurons with sustained ON photoresponses receive gap-junction input from intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells (ipRGCs), recently discovered photoreceptors that specialize in prolonged irradiance detection. This input presumably allows ipRGCs to regulate the secretion of neuromodulators from these interneurons. We have identified three morphological varieties of such ipRGC-driven displaced amacrine cells: (1) monostratified cells with dendrites terminating exclusively in sublamina S5 of the inner plexiform layer, (2) bistratified cells with dendrites in both S1 and S5, and (3) polyaxonal cells with dendrites and axons stratifying in S5. Most of these amacrine cells are wide field, although some are medium field. The three classes respond to light differently, suggesting that they probably perform diverse functions. These results demonstrate that ipRGCs are a major source of tonic visual information within the retina and exert widespread intraretinal influence. They also add to recent evidence that ganglion cells signal not only to the brain.

Characterizing and modeling the intrinsic light response of rat ganglion-cell photoreceptors.

Intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells (ipRGCs) mediate both image-forming vision and non-image-forming visual responses such as pupillary constriction and circadian photoentrainment. Five types of ipRGCs, named M1-M5, have been discovered in rodents. To further investigate their photoresponse properties, we made multielectrode array spike recordings from rat ipRGCs, classified them into M1, M2/M4, and M3/M5 clusters, and measured their intrinsic, melanopsin-based responses to single and flickering light pulses. Results showed that ipRGC spiking can track flickers up to ∼0.2 Hz in frequency and that flicker intervals between 5 and 14 s evoke the most spikes. We also learned that melanopsin's integration time is intensity and cluster dependent. Using these data, we constructed a mathematical model for each cluster's intrinsic photoresponse. We found that the data for the M1 cluster are best fit by a model that assumes a large photoresponse, causing the cell to enter depolarization block. Our models also led us to hypothesize that the M2/M4 and M3/M5 clusters experience comparable photoexcitation but that the M3/M5 cascade decays significantly faster than the M2/M4 cascade, resulting in different response waveforms between these clusters. These mathematical models will help predict how each ipRGC cluster might respond to stimuli of any waveform and could inform the invention of lighting technologies that promote health through melanopsin stimulation.