The Impact of Nirmatrelvir-Ritonavir in Reducing Hospitalizations Among High-Risk Patients With SARS-CoV-2 During the Omicron Predominant Era.

BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has caused significant morbidity and mortality in high-risk populations. Several therapeutics have been developed to reduce the risk of complications related to COVID-19, hospitalizations, and death. In several studies, nirmatrelvir-ritonavir (NR) was reported to reduce the risk of hospitalizations and death. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of NR in preventing hospitalizations and death during the Omicron predominant period. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated patients from June 1, 2022, through September 24, 2022. There were a total of 25,939 documented COVID-19 cases. Using propensity matching, we matched 5754 patients treated with NR with untreated patients. RESULTS: Postmatching, the median age of the NR-treated group was 58 years (interquartile range, 43-70 years) and 42% were vaccinated. Postmatching composite outcome of the 30-day hospitalization and mortality in the NR-treated group were 0.9% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.7%-1.2%) versus 2.1% (95% CI: 1.8%-2.5%) in the matched control group, with a difference of -1.2 (-1.7, -0.8), P value <.01. The difference rates (NR vs. control) in 30-day all-cause hospitalizations and mortality were -1.2% (95% CI: -1.6% to -0.7%, P value <.01) and -0.1% (95% CI: -0.2% to 0.0%, P value = 0.29), respectively. We found similar finding across different age groups (≥65 vs. <65) and the vaccinated group. CONCLUSION: We report a significant benefit with the use of NR in reducing hospitalizations among various high-risk COVID-19 groups during the Omicron BA.5 predominant period.

Acceptance, attitudes, and beliefs of Singaporean Chinese toward an ocular implant for glaucoma drug delivery.

PURPOSE: We investigated patients' attitudes and perceptions toward a subconjunctival implant as a novel ocular drug delivery method for glaucoma. METHODS: We recruited 344 Chinese patients with primary open angle or angle closure glaucoma currently on topical antiglaucoma medication for a minimum of six months from specialist glaucoma clinics. Sociodemographic data, and information about patients' general and ocular health were collected. Beliefs about medicines, glaucoma, eye drops, and self-reported adherence were assessed by trained interviewers using validated questionnaires. A description about the implant was provided and patients subsequently were assessed on their understanding and acceptance. RESULTS: Of the 344 Chinese patients enrolled, 216 (62.8%) would accept the implant as a replacement for their current eye drops. Of those who accepted the implant, 99 (45.8%) were willing to accept it at similar costs, while 40 (18.5%) and 20 (9.3%) patients were willing to pay 1.5 and 2 times the cost of their present medication, respectively. Patients who accepted the implant had more severe glaucoma (P = 0.015) and felt that the implant was more helpful than eye drops (P < 0.001). Beliefs toward medicines, glaucoma, eye drops, self-reported adherence, and sociodemographic factors did not have a significant impact on the patients' decisions. CONCLUSIONS: An ocular drug implant would be an acceptable alternative to topical eye drops for subgroups of glaucoma patients.