Creation of an Application to Increase Surgical Resident Operative Case Coverage.

PURPOSE: Studies have shown that the confidence of surgical residents to perform procedures after completing residency can be affected by their volume of operative experiences. Many surgical residencies span multiple hospitals with a multitude of attendings providing additional educational opportunities available via cross-coverage. This study aims to evaluate the use of a mobile application (app) for operative cross-coverage to improve surgical opportunities in a large surgical residency program and decrease the number of uncovered cases. METHODS: An app allowing for uncovered cases to be sent to all surgical residents was used starting March 2022. A survey was completed by residents pre- and postapp implementation. A retrospective chart review was conducted of all general surgery procedures at the 2 major hospital systems 4 months before and after implementation to evaluate resident case coverage. RESULTS: In the preapp survey, 71% (27/38) of residents noted cross-covering 1 or more cases a month with 90% (34/38) reporting, they were unaware of all cases available. In the postapp survey, 100% of residents reported better awareness of available cases, 97% (35/36) reported uncovered cases were more easily accessible, 100% felt the app simplified finding coverage, and 100% wanted to continue the app long-term. On retrospective review, 7210 cases were identified in the preapp and postapp period with an increased volume of cases in the postapp period. After implementation of the case coverage app, there was a significant increase in total case coverage (p = <0.001) as well as a significant increase in coverage of endoscopic (p = 0.007), laparoscopic (p = 0.025), open (p = 0.015) and robotic cases (p = <0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This study shows the impact that technological innovation can play in the education and operative experiences of surgical residents. This can be used to improve operative experiences of residents in various surgical fields in any training program throughout the country.

Resident Perspectives on the Value of Rural General Surgery Rotations: It's Not Just About the Cases.

PURPOSE: Understand the scope of cases that residents participate in during rural general surgery rotations and the value residents and program directors find in such rotations. In turn, our goal is to add to the ongoing conversation the value exposure to rural surgery brings to surgery training. METHODS: Qualitative study analyzed reviews of residents' self-reported case lists and field notes from exit interviews with the site director. RESULTS: Trainees participated in an average of 105 cases during the rotation, including basic and advanced endoscopy along with exposure to a wide array of surgical cases. Residents had exposure to the rural facility and its staff and participated in a busy outpatient surgical clinic, the hospital, and community activities. We received overwhelmingly positive qualitative feedback from residents regarding how this rural rotation advanced their skills, helped prepare them for life after residency, and for some confirmed their plans to practice in a rural location. CONCLUSION: With the decline in the number of rural general surgeons and projected continuance of this trend, it is important to understand how trainees view their residency experiences and how those experiences may be shaping their outlook on career choices. Our single-site, qualitative study showed that a rural general surgery rotation during residency has broad importance and value in general surgery resident training. Having a rural rotation also allowed residents to gain understanding of a rural lifestyle, workflow, and the social fabric including the rural surgeons' connections with their communities.

Perception versus Reality: A Review of Narcotic Prescribing Habits After Common Laparoscopic Surgeries.

INTRODUCTION: Data on how surgeons perceive their habits of prescribing narcotics compared to their actual practice are scarce. This study examines the perception and actual narcotic prescribing habits of surgeons and advanced practitioners. METHODS: Surgical residents, attendings, and advanced practice providers (APPs) were surveyed to assess their perceived prescribing habits at discharge for laparoscopic appendectomy and laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Data on narcotics prescription for patients receiving either of the procedures from January 2017 to August 2020 were extracted from electronic health records. Prescribed narcotics were converted to morphine equivalent doses (MEQs) for comparison. RESULTS: Of the 52 participants, the majority were residents (57.7%). Approximately 90% of residents, 72% of attendings, and 18% of APPs reported regularly prescribing narcotics at discharge. Approximately 67% (889/1332) of patients were discharged with narcotics. Of those, the majority of patients' narcotics were prescribed by surgery residents (71.2%). However, 72% of residents, 80% of attendings, and 72% of APPs were confident on prescribing the correct regimen of narcotics. There were no differences in average daily MEQs among the groups. However, the number of narcotics prescribed was higher among APPs compared to that in the other groups (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Most participants self-reported routinely prescribing narcotics at discharge. Although not the current recommendation, participants felt confident they were prescribing the correct regimen, but were observed to prescribe more than the recommended number of total narcotics which indicates a discrepancy between perception and actual habits of prescribing narcotics. Our findings suggest a need for education in the general surgery residency and continuing medical education setting.

APDS Task Force on Resident Transfers: Guidelines for Program Directors.

OBJECTIVE: Resident attrition from the field of General Surgery has been extensively studied. Attrition from one General Surgery program to the benefit of another has not. General Surgery programs can be negatively affected when a resident decides to leave the program for another. When a resident in a general surgery residency program decides to attempt transfer to another program several decisions must be made. The resident applies for the open position, interviews and then may be offered a position in that program. If an offer is made and the resident accepts, at what point is the resident's current Program Director notified? At what point in the process does the resident leave his/her current program to begin the new program? At what point does the new Program Director obtain a summative evaluation of the resident? Does the resident experience retribution as a result of informing his/her fellow residents and faculty that s/he is leaving? These are all questions that Program Directors struggle with when they find themselves with an unexpected opening to fill. The APDS Task Force on Resident Transfers attempted to answer these and other questions. DESIGN: A 19-question survey was distributed via the APDS to all General Surgery Program Directors who utilize the list serve. The survey asked questions related to the following: acceptable reasons for transfer; timeline for the application, interview and transfer process; retaliation against residents who chose to transfer; and transparency in the transfer process. SETTING: The survey was distributed via e-mail nationwide. PARTICIPANTS: General Surgery Residency Program Directors are participated in the survey. RESULTS: The majority of the 99 respondents agreed to the following guidelines: (1) Program Directors must promote transparency in the transfer process; (2) Program Directors must make a statement against retaliation; (3) personal or family preference is the most acceptable reason for transfer; (4) an established transfer date must be agreeable to both programs; and, (5) a recruitment timeline should be established for both programs. All data are included below. CONCLUSIONS: The reasons that a resident chooses to leave a program and the effect this has on the program and the other residents requires further study. Program Directors should educate residents about the transfer process and that procedure should be available as a written policy. When a resident desires transfer to another program, following these guidelines may make the transition easier for all involved. The APDS supports putting them into practice.

Development and implementation of a sustainable research curriculum for general surgery residents: A foundation for developing a research culture.

BACKGROUND: Different methods to incorporate research training during residency are suggested, however, long-term impact is not studied well. This study reports development of a research curriculum with milestones, a long-term outcome and sustainability, and its impact on the overall departmental research culture. METHODS: The research curriculum that included a research seminar for resident preparation, annual milestones, and structured research mentoring was implemented in our hybrid program in 2012. The research output for five-year period before and after the implementation was evaluated as peer-reviewed publications, presentations, and grant submissions. Further, secondary effects on faculty and medical student research was evaluated. RESULTS: Following implementation, we observed a significant increase in the number of resident presentations (p < 0.05) and higher trends for publications and grant submissions. Medical student research increased significantly in terms of both presentations and publications (p < 0.05). Consequently, we observed a significant improvement in the overall department research productivity. CONCLUSIONS: Our resident research curriculum was associated with improved long-term research productivity. It allowed residents to work closely with faculty and medical students leading to more collaboration resulting in an enhanced scholarly environment.

Assessing the 16 hour intern shift limit: Results of a multi-center, mixed-methods study of residents and faculty in general surgery.

BACKGROUND: The study explores how residents and faculty assess the ACGME's 16-h limit on intern shifts. METHODS: Questionnaire response rates were 76% for residents (N = 291) and 71% for faculty (N = 279) in 13 general surgery residency programs. Results include means, percentage in agreement, and statistical tests for 15 questionnaire items. Semi-structured interviews conducted with 39 residents and 43 faculty were analyzed for main themes. RESULTS: Few view the intern shift limit as a positive change. Views differ (P < 0.01) for residents and faculty on 12 of 15 item means and across PGY levels on all 15 items. Interviews indicate concerns about losses with respect to education and professional development, difficulties when interns transition to their second year, and how intern shifts may be more fatiguing than expected. CONCLUSIONS: The 16-h limit on intern shifts has remained a source of concern and an educational challenge for residents and faculty.

The promise and problems of non-physician practitioners in general surgery education: Results of a multi-center, mixed-methods study of faculty.

BACKGROUND: Nurse Practitioners and Physician Assistants - called non-physician practitioners or NPPs - are common, but little is known about their educational promise and problems. METHODS: General surgery faculty in 13 residency programs were surveyed (N = 279 with a 71% response rate) and interviewed (N = 43) about experiences with NPPs. The survey documents overall patterns and differences by program type and primary service; interviews point to deeper rationales and concerns. RESULTS: NPPs reduce faculty and resident workloads and teach residents. NPPs also reduce resident exposure to educationally valuable activities, and faculty sometimes round, make decisions, and operate with NPPs instead of residents. Interviews indicate that NPPs can overly reduce resident involvement in patient care, diminish resident responsibility and decision making, disrupt team dynamics, and compete for procedures. CONCLUSIONS: NPPs both enhance and hinder surgical education and highlight the need to more clearly articulate learning outcomes for residents and activities necessary to achieve those outcomes.

Impact of triage guidelines on prehospital triage: comparison of guidelines with a statistical model.

BACKGROUND: The American College of Surgeons developed the National Field Triage Decision Scheme (NFTDS) that has been adapted by many trauma centers in the nation, but quantitative evidence of its efficacy is unclear. We compare the NFTDS and state of Ohio guidelines to the "observed" rates and with rates derived using a statistical model. METHODS: We used 4757 trauma records from 2008-2012 available from the state and calculated undertriage (UT) and overtriage (OT) rates. We then simulated the NFTDS and the state guidelines for those years and estimated the corresponding UT and OT rates. We finally compared these rates with those derived from a multivariate logistic regression model. RESULTS: For the state data, both NFTDS and state guidelines produced lower UT rate (∼9%) compared with the observed rate (∼17%), whereas the OT rates were higher (>85%) than the observed rates (∼54%). The statistical model identified novel factors that were not directly available in the NFTDS; change in responsiveness (odds ratio [OR] = 1.924) and complaint in body (OR = 3.140), back (OR = 1.890), chest (OR = 3.191), head (OR = 3.878), and abdomen (OR = 2.966). Although the statistical model performed similar to observed rates, it performed considerably better than NFTDS (UT = 1.93% versus 9.03%; OT = 66.42% versus 87.52%) and state guidelines (UT = 2.18% versus 8.72%; OT = 64.09% versus 86.52%). CONCLUSIONS: The current NFTDS and state's triage guidelines do not appear to achieve the ACS recommendation of <5% UT and <35% OT rates in the state of Ohio. Inclusion of region-specific factors may help enhance the current NFTDS guidelines and aid in the first impression or judgment of the Emergency Medical Services personnel to improve trauma care and reduce cost.

Professionalism in the Twilight Zone: A Multicenter, Mixed-Methods Study of Shift Transition Dynamics in Surgical Residencies.

PURPOSE: Duty hours rules sparked debates about professionalism. This study explores whether and why general surgery residents delay departures at the end of a day shift in ways consistent with shift work, traditional professionalism, or a new professionalism. METHOD: Questionnaires were administered to categorical residents in 13 general surgery programs in 2014 and 2015. The response rate was 76% (N = 291). The 18 items focused on end-of-shift behaviors and the frequency and source of delayed departures. Follow-up interviews (N = 39) examined motives for delayed departures. The results include means, percentages, and representative quotations from the interviews. RESULTS: A minority (33%) agreed that it is routine and acceptable to pass work to night teams, whereas a strong majority (81%) believed that residents exceed work hours in the name of professionalism. Delayed departures were ubiquitous: Only 2 of 291 residents were not delayed for any of 13 reasons during a typical week. The single most common source of delay involved a desire to avoid the appearance of dumping work on fellow residents. In the interviews, residents expressed a strong reluctance to pass work to an on-call resident or night team because of sparse night staffing, patient ownership, an aversion to dumping, and the fear of being seen as inefficient. CONCLUSIONS: Resident behavior is shaped by organizational and cultural contexts that require attention and reform. The evidence points to the stunted development of a new professionalism, little role for shift-work mentalities, and uneven expression of traditional professionalism in resident behavior.

Predicting academic performance in surgical training.

INTRODUCTION: During surgical residency, trainees are expected to master all the 6 competencies specified by the ACGME. Surgical training programs are also evaluated, in part, by the residency review committee based on the percentage of graduates of the program who successfully complete the qualifying examination and the certification examination of the American Board of Surgery in the first attempt. Many program directors (PDs) use the American Board of Surgery In-Training Examination (ABSITE) as an indicator of future performance on the qualifying examination. Failure to meet an individual program's standard may result in remediation or a delay in promotion to the next level of training. Remediation is expensive in terms of not only dollars but also resources, faculty time, and potential program disruptions. We embarked on an exploratory study to determine if residents who might be at risk for substandard performance on the ABSITE could be identified based on the individual resident's behavior and motivational characteristics. If such were possible, then PDs would have the opportunity to be proactive in developing a curriculum tailored to an individual resident, providing a greater opportunity for success in meeting the program's standards. METHODS: Overall, 7 surgical training programs agreed to participate in this initial study and residents were recruited to voluntarily participate. Each participant completed an online assessment that characterizes an individual's behavioral style, motivators, and Acumen Index. Residents completed the assessment using a code name assigned by each individual PD or their designee. Assessments and the residents' 2013 ABSITE scores were forwarded for analysis using only the code name, thus insuring anonymity. Residents were grouped into those who took the junior examination, senior examination, and pass/fail categories. A passing score of ≥70% correct was chosen a priori. Correlations were performed using logistic regression and data were also entered into a neural network (NN) to develop a model that would explain performance based on data obtained from the TriMetrix assessments. RESULTS: A total of 117 residents' TriMetrix and ABSITE scores were available for analysis. They were divided into 2 groups of 64 senior residents and 53 junior residents. For each group, the pass/fail criteria for the ABSITE were set at 70 and greater as passing and 69 and lower as failing. Multiple logistic regression analysis was complete for pass/fail vs the TriMetrix assessments. For the senior data group, it was found that the parameter Theoretical correlates with pass rate (p < 0.043, B = -0.513, exp(B) = 0.599), which means increasing theoretical scores yields a decreasing likelihood of passing in the examination. For the junior data, the parameter Internal Role Awareness correlated with pass/fail rate (p < 0.004, B = 0.66, exp(B) = 1.935), which means that an increasing Internal Role Awareness score increases the likelihood of a passing score. The NN was able to be trained to predict ABSITE performance with surprising accuracy for both junior and senior residents. CONCLUSION: Behavioral, motivational, and acumen characteristics can be useful to identify residents "at risk" for substandard performance on the ABSITE. Armed with this information, PDs have the opportunity to intervene proactively to offer these residents a greater chance for success. The NN was capable of developing a model that explained performance on the examination for both the junior and the senior examinations. Subsequent testing is needed to determine if the NN is a good predictive tool for performance on this examination.

Meeting Increasing Demands for Rural General Surgeons.

Dynamic assessment of the effective surgical workforce recommends 27,300 general surgeons in 2030; 2,525 more than are presently being trained. Rural shortages are already critical and there has been insufficient preparation for this need. A literature review of the factors influencing the choice of rural practice was performed. A systematic search was conducted of PubMed and the Web of Science to identify applicable studies in rural practice, surgical training, and rural general surgery. These articles were reviewed to identify the pertinent reports. The articles chosen for review are directed to four main objectives: 1) description of the challenges of rural practice, 2) factors associated with the choice of rural practice, 3) interventions to increase interest and preparation for rural practice, and 4) present successful rural surgical practice models. There is limited research on the factors influencing surgeons in the selection of rural surgery. The family practice literature suggests that physicians are primed for rural living through early experience, with reinforcement during medical school and residency, and retained through community involvement, and personal and professional satisfaction. However, more research into the factors drawing surgeons specifically to rural surgery, and keeping them in the community, is needed.

Outcomes and charges associated with outpatient inguinal hernia repair according to method of anesthesia and surgical approach.

BACKGROUND: We conducted this study to compare short-term outcomes and charges between methods of hernia repair and anesthesia in the outpatient setting. METHODS: Using New York's state ambulatory surgery databases, we identified discharges for patients who underwent inguinal hernia repair. Patients were grouped by method of hernia repair. We compared hospital-based acute care encounters and total charges across groups. RESULTS: Locoregional anesthesia (5.2%) experienced a similar frequency of hospital-based acute care encounters within 30 days of discharge when compared with patients receiving general (6.0%) or having a laparoscopic procedure (6.0%). Risk-adjusted charges increased across groups (locoregional = $6,845 vs general = $7,839 vs laparoscopic = $11,340, P < .01). CONCLUSION: Open inguinal hernia repair under local anesthesia reduces healthcare charges.

Service vs education: situational and perceptional differences in surgery residency.

OBJECTIVE: This study determined whether situational or perceptional differences exist when trying to define what constitutes "service" and "education" in surgery residency in relation to the Accreditation Council of Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) survey. DESIGN: An institutional review board-approved, single institute, cross-sectional study was conducted through a survey. Participants were asked to rate common resident tasks. Participants were also asked general questions regarding "service" and "education." SETTING: Wright State University surgery program, Dayton, OH. PARTICIPANTS: The study included 69 participants, which included medical students (19), residents (26), nurses/advanced practitioners (14), and attending surgeons (10). RESULTS: A significantly high number of attending surgeons reported that writing a history and physical examination is educational compared with residents and students. Similar results were found regarding talking with patients/families. Drawing blood and starting peripheral intravenous access were universally rated as service tasks. For laparoscopic cholecystectomy, when the resident had done one previously, it was universally thought educational. When the resident had done more, most attending surgeons thought the task educational, but residents and students thought it much less educational. When analyzing only residents, in talking with families, most interns rated this as service, whereas postgraduate years 2 and 3 reported it as more educational and postgraduate years 4 and 5 ranked it equally as service and educational. Similar results were seen in answering nursing phone calls and writing admission orders. Residents (88%) and attending surgeons (90%) agreed that service is part of residency training. Only 40% of residents, however, stated they know what the term "service" means in regard to the ACGME survey. Overall, 80% of attending surgeons and 44% of residents agree that "service" has not been well defined by the ACGME. CONCLUSIONS: Situational and perceptional differences do exist regarding "service" and "education" in our program, and most participants are unclear about the terms. As the definitions are situational and change with the person queried, then should this be the ACGME standard to assess programs and issue citations?

The prevalence of positive drug and alcohol screens in elderly trauma patients.

BACKGROUND: Alcohol and drug abuse are recognized to be significantly prevalent in trauma patients, and are frequent harbingers of injury. The incidence of substance abuse in elderly trauma patients has, however, been limitedly examined. The authors sought to identify the spectrum of positive alcohol and drug toxicology screens in patients ≥65 years admitted to a Level I trauma center. METHODS: Patients ≥65 years old admitted to an American College of Surgeons (ACS) Level I trauma center over a 60--month period were identified from the trauma registry. Demographic data, blood alcohol content (BAC), and urine drug screen (UDS) results at admission were obtained and analyzed. The positive results were compared with individuals below 65 years in different substance categories using Fisher's exact test. RESULTS: In the 5-year period studied, of the 4139 patients ≥65 years, 1302 (31.5%) underwent toxicological substance screening. A positive BAC was present in 11.1% of these patients and a positive UDS in 48.3%. The mean BAC level in those tested was 163 mg/dL and 69% of patients had a level >80 mg/dL. CONCLUSIONS: These data show that alcohol and drug abuse are an issue in patients ≥65 years in our institution, though not as pervasive a problem as in younger populations. Admission toxicology screens, however, are important as an aid to identify geriatric individuals who may require intervention.

Palliative and end-of-life care training during the surgical clerkship.

BACKGROUND: In 2000, the Liaison Committee on Medical Education required that all medical schools provide experiential training in end-of-life care. To adhere to this mandate and advance the professional development of medical students, experiential training in communication skills at the end-of-life was introduced into the third-year surgical clerkship curriculum at Wright State University Boonshoft School of Medicine. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In the 2007-08 academic year, 97 third-year medical students completed six standardized end-of-life care patient scenarios commonly encountered during the third-year surgical clerkship. Goals and objectives were outlined for each scenario, and attending surgeons graded student performances and provided formative feedback. RESULTS: All 97 students, 57.7% female and average age 25.6 ± 2.04 y, had passing scores on the scenarios: (1) Adult Hospice, (2) Pediatric Hospice, (3) Do Not Resuscitate, (4) Dyspnea Management/Informed Consent, (5) Treatment Goals and Prognosis, and (6) Family Conference. Scenario scores did not differ by gender or age, but students completing the clerkship in the first half of the year scored higher on total score for the six scenarios (92.8% ± 4.8% versus 90.5% ± 5.0%, P = 0.024). CONCLUSIONS: Early training in end-of-life communication is feasible during the surgical clerkship in the third-year of medical school. Of all the scenarios, "Conducting a Family Conference" proved to be the most challenging.

Is routine tube thoracostomy necessary after prehospital needle decompression for tension pneumothorax?

BACKGROUND: Thoracic needle decompression is lifesaving in tension pneumothorax. However, performance of subsequent tube thoracostomy is questioned. The needle may not enter the chest, or the diagnosis may be wrong. The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that routine tube thoracostomy is not required. METHODS: A prospective 2-year study of patients aged ≥18 years with thoracic trauma was conducted at a level 1 trauma center. RESULTS: Forty-one patients with chest trauma, 12 penetrating and 29 blunt, had 47 needled hemithoraces for evaluation; 85% of hemithoraces required tube thoracostomy after needle decompression of the chest (34 of 41 patients [83%]). CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing needle decompression who do not require placement of thoracostomy for clinical indications may be assessed using chest radiography, but thoracic computed tomography is more accurate. Air or blood on chest radiography or computed tomography of the chest is an indication for tube thoracostomy.

Comparison of hemodynamic measurements from invasive and noninvasive monitoring during early resuscitation.

BACKGROUND: Measurements obtained from the insertion of a pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) in critically ill and/or injured patients have traditionally assisted with resuscitation efforts. However, with the recent utilization of ultrasound in the intensive care unit setting, transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) has gained popularity. The purpose of this study is to compare serial PAC and TTE measurements and document levels of serum biomarkers during resuscitation. METHODS: Over a 25-month period, critically ill and/or injured patients admitted to a Level I adult trauma center were enrolled in this 48-hour intensive care unit study. Serial PAC and TTE measurements were obtained every 12 hours (total = 5 points/patient). Serial levels of lactate, Δ base, troponin-1, and B-type natriuretic peptide were obtained. Pearson correlation coefficient and intraclass correlation (ICC) assessed relationship and agreement, respectively, between PAC and TTE measures of cardiac output (CO) and stroke volume (SV). Analysis of variance with post hoc pairwise determined differences over time. RESULTS: Of the 29 patients, 69% were male, with a mean age of 47.4 years ± 19.5 years and 79.3% survival. Of these, 25 of 29 were trauma with a mean Injury Severity Score of 23.5 ± 10.7. CO from PAC and TTE was significantly related (Pearson correlations, 0.57-0.64) and agreed with moderate strength (ICC, 0.66-0.70). SV from PAC and TTE was significantly related (Pearson correlations, 0.40-0.58) and agreed at a weaker level (ICC, 0.41-0.62). Tricuspid regurgitation was noted in 80% and mitral regurgitation in 50% to 60% of patients. CONCLUSION: Measurements of CO and SV were moderately strong in correlation and agreement which may suggest PAC measurements overestimate actual values. The significance of tricuspid regurgitation and mitral regurgitation during early resuscitation is unknown.

The prevalence of incidental findings on abdominal computed tomography scans of trauma patients.

BACKGROUND: Abdominal computed tomography scanning (AbdCTS) is the standard of care in the evaluation of blunt trauma patients. The liberal use of AbdCTS coupled with advancing imaging technology often results in the detection of incidental findings. OBJECTIVES: We sought to characterize the incidence and prevalence of such findings, describe the lesions most frequently seen on AbdCTS performed on patients admitted to a Level I trauma center, and develop a plan for follow-up through our performance improvement process. METHODS: AbdCTS reports of all admissions to a Level I trauma center between January 2000 and December 2002 were reviewed. Incidental findings identified were classified into benign anatomic variants, benign pathologic lesions, and pathologic lesions requiring further work-up. RESULTS: A total of 3,113 patients were evaluated by AbdCTS during this time period. There were 1474 incidental findings in 1,103 patients. Seventy-five percent of patients with incidental lesions had no traumatic findings. Benign anatomic variants were present in 1.8%, benign pathologic findings in 27.5%, and pathologic findings requiring work-up in 6.1%. Congenital renal anomalies and duplicate inferior vena cava were the most common benign anatomical findings. Renal and hepatic cysts were the most frequent benign lesions and non-calcified pulmonary nodules and adrenal masses were the pathologic lesions most commonly seen. CONCLUSIONS: Incidental findings are seen in up to 35% of trauma AbdCTS. No concomitant traumatic injuries are present in up to 75% of these patients. Protocols for appropriate intervention or arrangements for follow-up care need to be incorporated into the care of the trauma patients.

Neurologic outcomes with cerebral oxygen monitoring in traumatic brain injury.

BACKGROUND: Optimizing cerebral oxygenation is advocated to improve outcome in head-injured patients. The purpose of this study was to compare outcomes in brain-injured patients treated with 2 types of monitors. METHODS: Patients with traumatic brain injury and a Glasgow Coma Scale score<8 were identified on admission. A polarographic cerebral oxygen/pressure monitor (Licox) or fiberoptic intracranial pressure monitor (Camino) was inserted. An evidence-based algorithm for treatment was implemented. Elements from the prehospital and emergency department records and the first 10 days of intensive care unit (ICU) care were collected. Glasgow Outcome Scores (GOS) were determined every 3 months after discharge. RESULTS: Over a 3-year period, 145 patients were entered into the study; 81 patients in the Licox group and 64 patients in the Camino group. Mortality, hospital length of stay, and ICU length of stay were equivalent in the 2 groups. More patients in the Licox group achieved a moderate/recovered GOS at 3 months than in the Camino Group (79% vs 61%; P = .09). CONCLUSION: Three-month GOS revealed a clinically meaningful 18% benefit in patients undergoing cerebral oxygen monitoring and optimization. Six-month outcomes were also better. Unfortunately, these important differences did not reach significance. Continued study of the benefits of cerebral oxygen monitoring is warranted.