The Impact Of Small Artery Disease (SAD) and Medial Arterial Calcification (MAC) Scores on Chronic Wound and Amputation Healing: Can It Tell Us More?

Plenary Session Presentation at the Vascular and Endovascular Surgical Society 28th Annual Winter Meeting; Sun Valley Resort, Sun Valley, ID January 18 - 21, 2024 OBJECTIVES: In 2021, Ferraresi et al. created a novel scoring system based on the impact of small artery disease (SAD) and medial arterial calcification (MAC) on wound healing. SAD and MAC scores functioned similar to WIfI but with minimal resource expenditure. Despite its potential, few studies have expanded on the original dataset. We aim to validate SAD and MAC's impact on wound healing outcomes and determine their utility in relation to current predictive models. METHODS: Single-institution retrospective review was used to identify amputations for chronic (>1mo) podiatric wounds between 2015-2020. Foot x-ray (MAC) or angiography (SAD) <6 months of index procedure was required. Primary outcomes included major amputation, wound healing, major adverse limb events (MALE), and amputation-free survival (AFS). Statistical analysis included chi-square, one-way ANOVA, non-parametric correlation, Kaplan-Meier, Cox regression, and Akaike (AIC)/ Bayesian Inclusion Criteria (BIC) model comparison. RESULTS: Of 136 limbs, 67 received SAD scores (0-2) and 128 received MAC scores (0-2). SAD cohorts exhibited similar comorbidity profiles with exception of coronary disease, heart failure, and chronic kidney disease. MAC cohorts were notably disparate in prevalence of multiple conditions. High mean SAD/MAC scores were seen in severe (3-vessel) below-ankle disease (p=.001* [SAD], p=.041* [MAC]). Both SAD and MAC correlated with lower mean toe pressure (p=.043* [SAD], p=<.001* [MAC]), while only MAC correlated with higher overall WIfI score (p=.029*). No significant procedural differences were noted. However, higher re-admission rates (73.9% [2] vs. 46.9% [0], p=.014*) and all-cause mortality (65.2% [2] vs. 26.0% [0], p=.002*) were noted with higher MAC. Survival analysis revealed higher one-year major amputation rates (p=.036*), impaired wound healing (p<.001*), and lower amputation-free survival (p=.001*) with increasing MAC severity. Additionally, MAC-2 patients underwent amputation at faster rates than MAC-0 patients (HR 5.25, 95% CI [1.82, 9.77]) with longer times to wound healing (HR 0.21, 95% CI [0.08, 0.53]). Model comparison suggested a combination of WIfI and MAC could improve accuracy of predicted time to major amputation, wound healing, and amputation-free survival. CONCLUSIONS: MAC scoring showed significant promise both as individual predictor and adjunct to current predictive models of long-term wound healing outcomes. Routine use of MAC scoring in CLTI evaluation, especially when non-invasive testing is unavailable, could promote timely referral for intervention and efficient resource utilization in limited-resource or critical care settings. Further investigation is necessary to determine MAC's impact on revascularization and how scoring can be used to guide surgical decision making.

Revascularization of radial artery for ischemic hand with history of hand reimplantation.

Limb reimplantation is widely described, but there are sparse reports of limb ischemia complications. We present the case of a patient with hand reimplantation who developed limb-threatening ischemia 20 years later. The patient is a 37-year-old man with a history of traumatic wrist amputation and reimplantation who presented with fingertip ulcerations. Testing demonstrated ischemic digit pressures and no flow in the palmar arch. The initial angiogram demonstrated radial artery occlusion. Balloon angioplasty had initial success; however, the loss of primary patency prompted repeat angiography with the use of intravascular ultrasound and laser atherectomy. His symptoms and wounds resolved, with normalized digit pressures. His radial artery remains patent after 2 years.

Definition and Perception of Autonomy in Vascular Surgery Training.

BACKGROUND: There is a lack of data evaluating operative autonomy within vascular surgery. This study aims to determine where discrepancies exist in the definition of autonomy between trainees and attending faculty. METHODS: An Institutional Review Board-approved, anonymous survey was e-mailed to vascular trainees and attending faculty at all Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-approved vascular surgery training programs in the United States. Data were compared using chi-square statistical analysis. RESULTS: One-hundred forty-nine responses from vascular surgery trainees (n = 89) and faculty (n = 60) were obtained. The most highly ranked preoperative skill by trainees was Case Planning, at all post-graduate year-levels. Although a majority of trainees believe this skill is expected of them, only 36.1% of attendings responded that they expect all trainee levels to perform this task. Draping/positioning was ranked as the second most important intraoperative task for all post-graduate year-levels by attendings; however, only 32.8% of attendings expect trainees to perform this. Exposure of Critical Structures was ranked as the most important intraoperative task by both trainees and attendings at the Chief and Fellow level. However, responses by both trainees and attendings showed that this is expected <70% of the time. When asked about double-scrubbing independently of other tasks, most trainees assessed double-scrubbing as inherently important to autonomy at all levels of training and within all regions. Only 44.3% of attendings responded that they expect all trainees to double-scrub. Additionally, most trainees in all regions responded that they spend <25% of cases double-scrubbed. CONCLUSIONS: These responses show a discrepancy between the skills that both trainees and attendings deem important to autonomy versus what is being expected of trainees in reality.