Humoral immune response after COVID-19 infection or BNT162b2 vaccine among older adults: evolution over time and protective thresholds.

The objectives of this study were to assess the dynamics of the SARS-CoV-2 anti-RBD-IgG response over time among older people after COVID-19 infection or vaccination and its comparison with indicative levels of protection. Geriatric patients with SARS-CoV-2 serological test results were included and divided into three groups. A vaccine group (n = 34), a group of natural COVID-19 infection (n = 32), and a group who contracted COVID-19 less than 15 days after the first injection (n = 17). Eighty-three patients were included; the median age with IQR was 87 (81-91) years. In the vaccine group at 1 month since the first vaccination, the median titer of anti-RBD-IgG was 620 (217-1874) BAU/ml with 87% of patients above the theoretical protective threshold of 141 BAU/ml according to Dimeglio et al. (J Infec. 84(2):248-88, [7]). Seven months after the first vaccination, this titer decreased to 30 (19-58) BAU/ml with 9.5% of patients > 141 BAU/ml. In the natural COVID-19 infection group, at 1 month since the date of first symptom onset, the median titer was 798 (325-1320) BAU/ml with 86.7% of patients > 141 BAU/ml and fell to 88 (37-385) with 42.9% of patients > 141 BAU/ml at 2 months. The natural infection group was vaccinated 3 months after the infection. Five months after the vaccination cycle, the median titer was 2048 (471-4386) BAU/ml with 83.3% of patients > 141 BAU/ml. This supports the clinical results describing the decrease in vaccine protection over time and suggests that vaccination after infection can maintain significantly higher antibody titer levels for a prolonged period of time.

Novel Therapeutic Targets in Axial Spondyloarthritis.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Axial spondyloarthritis remains an area of significant unmet clinical need with only two immune pathways currently targeted by licenced therapies compared to other immune-mediated inflammatory joint disorders such as rheumatoid arthritis where a multitude of therapeutic options are available. This review will look at emerging therapeutic targets in axial spondyloarthritis beyond the neutralisation of IL-17A and TNF by monoclonal antibodies. RECENT FINDINGS: Several promising targets are in various stages of pre-clinical and clinical development in axial spondyloarthritis. These include small molecule approaches to target transcription factors, epigenetic modification and intracellular modulation of cytokine signalling by kinase inhibition. GM-CSF has also emerged as a potential driver of inflammation. SUMMARY: A number of novel and promising therapeutic options are in various stages of development in axial spondyloarthritis. The Janus kinase inhibitors have shown great promise in other immune-mediated inflammatory disorders and will be an exciting addition to the axial spondyloarthritis field as the first oral disease-modifying agents. GM-CSF blockade also shows great promise since antibodies for neutralising this cytokine are safe in patients and have shown efficacy in other immune-mediated inflammatory diseases.

An audit of the use of hydroxychloroquine in rheumatology clinics.

OBJECTIVE: The aim was to audit the use, indications, complications and patient information regarding HCQ treatment in rheumatology clinics in a tertiary referral centre. METHODS: During a 9-month period, we identified all patients prescribed HCQ and attending rheumatology clinics in one hospital. We established: (i) the indication for HCQ; (ii) the prevalence of HCQ overdosing based on absolute body weight (ABW); (iii) documentation of warning of risk of retinal toxicity; (iv) systemic and ocular co-morbidities; (v) ocular symptoms during treatment; and (vi) reasons for stopping HCQ. RESULTS: We identified 427 patients (104 male and 323 female). The cumulative dose of HCQ was lower in RA (median 365 g; range 6-1752 g) compared with SLE (450 g; 66-1788 g) (P = 0.105). The median duration of HCQ therapy was 4 years (range 0.1-13 years); 28% of patients with RA and 29% with SLE continued HCQ beyond 5 years. After adjusting for ABW and renal function, 10% (31/312) had been prescribed doses exceeding recommendations. Formal documentation of counselling on ocular complications was found in only one-third of patients. Three cases of HCQ retinopathy were identified (all of whom had RA). CONCLUSION: HCQ therapy is being used for >5 years in 29% of patients with rheumatic diseases, with higher than recommended doses in ∼10% of patients. We recommend more rigorous scrutiny of the use of HCQ to reduce the risk of retinopathy.