ABSTRACT
Racist and discriminatory federal, state, and local housing policies significantly contribute to disparities in cardiovascular disease incidence and mortality for individuals that self-identify as Black or African American. Here we highlight three key housing policies - "redlining," zoning, and the construction of highways - which have wrought a powerful, sustained, and destructive impact on cardiovascular health in Black/African American communities. Redlining and highway construction policies have restricted access to quality health care, increased exposure to carcinogens such as PM2.5, and increased exposure to extreme heat. At the root of these policy decisions are longstanding, toxic societal factors including racism, segregation, and discrimination, which also serve to perpetuate racial inequities in cardiovascular health. Here, we review these societal and structural factors and then link them with biological processes such as telomere shortening, allostatic load, oxidative stress, and tissue inflammation. Lastly, we focus on the impact of inflammation on the immune system and the molecular mechanisms by which the inflamed immune microenvironment promotes the formation of atherosclerotic plaques. We propose that racial residential segregation and discrimination increases tissue inflammation and cytokine production, resulting in dysregulated immune signaling, which promotes plaque formation and cardiovascular disease. This framework has the power to link structural racism not only to cardiovascular disease, but also to cancer.
ABSTRACT
The enigma of why some premalignant or pre-invasive breast lesions transform and progress while others do not remains poorly understood. Currently, no radiologic or molecular biomarkers exist in the clinic that can successfully risk-stratify high-risk lesions for malignant transformation or tumor progression as well as serve as a minimally cytotoxic actionable target for at-risk subpopulations. Breast carcinogenesis involves a series of key molecular deregulatory events that prompt normal cells to bypass tumor-suppressive senescence barriers. Kinesin family member C1 (KIFC1/HSET), which confers survival of cancer cells burdened with extra centrosomes, has been observed in premalignant and pre-invasive lesions, and its expression has been shown to correlate with increasing neoplastic progression. Additionally, KIFC1 has been associated with aggressive breast tumor molecular subtypes, such as basal-like and triple-negative breast cancers. However, the role of KIFC1 in malignant transformation and its potential as a predictive biomarker of neoplastic progression remain elusive. Herein, we review compelling evidence suggesting the involvement of KIFC1 in enabling pre-neoplastic cells to bypass senescence barriers necessary to become immortalized and malignant. We also discuss evidence inferring that KIFC1 levels may be higher in premalignant lesions with a greater inclination to transform and acquire aggressive tumor intrinsic subtypes. Collectively, this evidence provides a strong impetus for further investigation into KIFC1 as a potential risk-stratifying biomarker and minimally cytotoxic actionable target for high-risk patient subpopulations.
ABSTRACT
African-American (AA) women are more likely to die from breast cancer (BC), at any age, compared to European-American women. Although breakthroughs in pre-clinical studies have resulted in potentially actionable targets in AA BC, drugs that were rationally designed for these targets have performed poorly in clinical trials. Challenges with interpatient and intratumoral heterogeneity, lack of drug sensitivity and specificity, suboptimal biomarker cut-offs, lack of drug response predictive biomarkers, drug side effects, high costs of drug development, and under-representation of AAs in clinical trials complicate the development of targeted therapies for AA BC patients. Accumulating evidence suggests that racial disparities exist in non-genetic risk factors that can alter genetic and epigenetic programs to promote breast tumorigenesis. Herein, we present a "roadmap" that addresses non-genetic risk factors that are suspected to contribute to the racial disparity in BC mortality. Increased targeting of these non-genetic risk factors may proffer a safer and more economical route to alleviating the racially disparate burden in BC.
Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/ethnology , Breast Neoplasms/genetics , Black or African American/genetics , Alcohol Drinking , Biomarkers , Body Size , Breast/pathology , Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Cultural Characteristics , Diabetes Mellitus/ethnology , Diabetes Mellitus/genetics , Educational Status , Endocrine Disruptors , Fear , Female , Health Status Disparities , Hormone Replacement Therapy , Humans , Hypertension/complications , Hypertension/ethnology , Hypertension/genetics , Insurance, Health , Life Style , Menarche , Middle Aged , Obesity/complications , Obesity/ethnology , Obesity/genetics , Religion , Residence Characteristics , Risk Factors , Sleep , Stress, Psychological , Transportation , White People/geneticsABSTRACT
Purpose Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is the most deadly form of breast cancer (BC) today. TNBC treatment is fraught with challenges because of the extensive interpatient heterogeneity in clinical behavior and scarcity of stratifying biomarkers and actionable targets. Women of African ancestry face a disproportionate burden resulting from this disease, which affects them earlier and more aggressively and has a higher propensity to spread and resist conventional treatments. A much higher proportion of Nigerian patients with BC have TNBC compared with patients with BC in the United States and Europe. Methods This article spotlights Nigeria as an example of a nation wherein genetic and nongenetic spheres of influence intersect to affect the prevalence of this disease, the scale of its challenge, and its toll. Results Studies have illuminated the inherently different tumor biology of Nigerian TNBCs, which show distinct genetic variants and gene expression patterns compared with European or European-American TNBCs. Parallels are apparent between TNBC phenotypes among African Americans and Nigerians, implicating the common thread of shared genetic ancestry between these populations. Reproductive, lifestyle, socioeconomic, and cultural factors also shape TNBC outcomes in Nigeria, as do resource constraints in Nigerian health care and research sectors. Conclusion Increasing our understanding of how these factors contribute to poorer outcomes among Nigerian women may uncover valuable insights and strategies in alleviating the TNBC burden in many countries of the world and help reduce the racial disparity in BC-related outcomes here in the United States. Importantly, this review also highlights collaborative global and local initiatives that converge expertise and resources to advance research on effective management of TNBC in diverse populations.
Subject(s)
Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms/genetics , Biomarkers, Tumor , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Nigeria/epidemiology , Prognosis , Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms/diagnosis , Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms/epidemiology , Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms/etiologyABSTRACT
Rampant inter-patient and intra-tumor heterogeneity present formidable challenges in the clinical management of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and mandate a "divide-and-conquer" approach wherein deep biomarker profiling drives patient segmentation and development of customized treatments. Genomic and proteomic studies have uncovered several TNBC subtypes each of which represents a distinct disease pathobiology and harbors unique actionable targets that may illuminate sensitivities to specific classes of therapeutics. This review details the mind-boggling complexity of TNBC, its ramifications for prognosis and therapeutic response, and discusses what treatments might befit each TNBC subtype. Additionally, focused efforts geared toward translating these findings into the clinic are urged. This review also supports an evidence-based paradigm shift towards inclusion of agents that target the mechanisms that drive intra-tumor heterogeneity, in order to improve long-term outcomes for TNBC patients.
Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Gene Expression Profiling/methods , Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic , Proteomics/methods , Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Female , Genetic Heterogeneity/drug effects , Humans , Molecular Targeted Therapy/methods , Molecular Targeted Therapy/trends , Prognosis , Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms/genetics , Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms/metabolismABSTRACT
Nuclear KIFC1 (nKIFC1) predicts worse outcomes in breast cancer, but its prognostic value within racially distinct triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients is unknown. Thus, nKIFC1 expression was assessed by immunohistochemistry in 163 African American (AA) and 144 White TNBC tissue microarrays (TMAs) pooled from four hospitals. nKIFC1 correlated significantly with Ki67 in White TNBCs but not in AA TNBCs, suggesting that nKIFC1 is not merely a surrogate for proliferation in AA TNBCs. High nKIFC1 weighted index (WI) was associated with significantly worse overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) (Hazard Ratios [HRs] = 3.5, 3.1, and 3.8, respectively; P = 0.01, 0.009, and 0.007, respectively) in multivariable Cox models in AA TNBCs but not White TNBCs. Furthermore, KIFC1 knockdown more severely impaired migration in AA TNBC cells than White TNBC cells. Collectively, these data suggest that nKIFC1 WI an independent biomarker of poor prognosis in AA TNBC patients, potentially due to the necessity of KIFC1 for migration in AA TNBC cells.
Subject(s)
Biomarkers, Tumor/metabolism , Black or African American , Cell Nucleus/metabolism , Kinesins/metabolism , Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms/metabolism , Cell Line, Tumor , Cell Movement , Cell Proliferation , Female , Gene Knockdown Techniques , Humans , Prognosis , Survival Analysis , Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms/pathology , White PeopleABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Clinical studies have revealed a higher risk of breast tumor recurrence in African-American (AA) patients compared to European-American (EA) patients, contributing to the alarming inequality in clinical outcomes among the ethnic groups. However, distinctions in recurrence patterns upon receiving hormone, radiation, and/or chemotherapy between the races remain poorly characterized. METHODS: We compared patterns and rates (per 1000 cancer patients per 1 year) of recurrence following each form of treatment between AA (n = 1850) and EA breast cancer patients (n = 7931) from a cohort of patients (n = 10504) treated between 2005-2015 at Northside Hospital in Atlanta, GA. RESULTS: Among patients who received any combination of adjuvant therapy, AA displayed higher overall rates of recurrence than EA (p = 0.015; HR: 1.699; CI: 1.108-2.606). Furthermore, recurrence rates were higher in AA than EA among stage I (p = 0.031; HR: 1.736; CI: 1.052-2.864) and T1 classified patients (p = 0.003; HR: 2.009; CI: 1.263-3.197). Interestingly, among patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy, AA displayed higher rates of local recurrence than EA (p = 0.024; HR: 7.134; CI: 1.295-39.313). CONCLUSION: Our analysis revealed higher incidence rates of recurrence in AA compared to EA among patients that received any combination of adjuvant therapy. Moreover, our data demonstrates an increased risk of tumor recurrence in AA than EA among patients diagnosed with minimally invasive disease. This is the first clinical study to suggest that neoadjuvant chemotherapy improves breast cancer recurrence rates and patterns in AA.
Subject(s)
Black or African American/statistics & numerical data , Breast Neoplasms/ethnology , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/ethnology , White People/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Breast Neoplasms/therapy , Combined Modality Therapy , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Lymphatic Metastasis , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Grading , Neoplasm Invasiveness , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/pathology , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/therapy , Neoplasm Staging , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies , Survival RateABSTRACT
African Americans (AAs) are more likely than European Americans to develop aggressive breast cancer subtypes, and have higher recurrence and mortality rates; this results in a stark breast-cancer related ethnic disparity in clinical outcomes. In this era of personalized oncology, companion diagnostics (CDx) are transforming the cancer treatment narrative slowly but steadily, by enabling the use of safety and/or efficacy biomarkers to stratify patient populations, and thus ensuring more effective deployment of targeted therapeutics. This parallel co-development of drugs and in vitro diagnostic assays is turning out to be the cornerstone of individualized cancer treatment. In this review, we assert that development of drugs and CDx targeted towards molecular and centrosomal aberrations that occur more frequently in AAs could yield next generation precision medicine tools better informed and inspired by, and more finely attuned to the unique tumor biology of AAs. By understanding more deeply ancestry-associated differences among breast tumors of different ethnicities, and gearing our drug and CDx development efforts to target these distinctions, we might be able to significantly alleviate racial health disparity.