A Neurosurgical Readmissions Reduction Program in an Academic Hospital Leveraging Machine Learning, Workflow Analysis, and Simulation.

BACKGROUND: Predicting 30-day hospital readmissions is crucial for improving patient outcomes, optimizing resource allocation, and achieving financial savings. Existing studies reporting the development of machine learning (ML) models predictive of neurosurgical readmissions do not report factors related to clinical implementation. OBJECTIVES: Train individual predictive models with good performance (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve or AUROC > 0.8), identify potential interventions through semi-structured interviews, and demonstrate estimated clinical and financial impact of these models. METHODS: Electronic health records were utilized with five ML methodologies: gradient boosting, decision tree, random forest, ridge logistic regression, and linear support vector machine. Variables of interest were determined by domain experts and literature. The dataset was split divided 80% for training and validation and 20% for testing randomly. Clinical workflow analysis was conducted using semi-structured interviews to identify possible intervention points. Calibrated agent-based models (ABMs), based on a previous study with interventions, were applied to simulate reductions of the 30-day readmission rate and financial costs. RESULTS: The dataset covered 12,334 neurosurgical intensive care unit (NSICU) admissions (11,029 patients); 1,903 spine surgery admissions (1,641 patients), and 2,208 traumatic brain injury (TBI) admissions (2,185 patients), with readmission rate of 13.13, 13.93, and 23.73%, respectively. The random forest model for NSICU achieved best performance with an AUROC score of 0.89, capturing potential patients effectively. Six interventions were identified through 12 semi-structured interviews targeting preoperative, inpatient stay, discharge phases, and follow-up phases. Calibrated ABMs simulated median readmission reduction rates and resulted in 13.13 to 10.12% (NSICU), 13.90 to 10.98% (spine surgery), and 23.64 to 21.20% (TBI). Approximately $1,300,614.28 in saving resulted from potential interventions. CONCLUSION: This study reports the successful development and simulation of an ML-based approach for predicting and reducing 30-day hospital readmissions in neurosurgery. The intervention shows feasibility in improving patient outcomes and reducing financial losses.

Sleep Patterns of Premedical Undergraduate Students: Pilot Study and Protocol Evaluation.

BACKGROUND: Poor sleep hygiene persists in college students today, despite its heavy implications on adolescent development and academic performance. Although sleep patterns in undergraduates have been broadly investigated, no study has exclusively assessed the sleep patterns of premedical undergraduate students. A gap also exists in the knowledge of how students perceive their sleep patterns compared to their actual sleep patterns. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to address 2 research questions: What are the sleep patterns of premedical undergraduate students? Would the proposed study protocol be feasible to examine the perception of sleep quality and promote sleep behavioral changes in premedical undergraduate students? METHODS: An anonymous survey was conducted with premedical students in the Medical Science Baccalaureate program at an R1: doctoral university in the Midwest United States to investigate their sleep habits and understand their demographics. The survey consisted of both Pittsburg Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) questionnaire items (1-9) and participant demographic questions. To examine the proposed protocol feasibility, we recruited 5 students from the survey pool for addressing the perception of sleep quality and changes. These participants followed a 2-week protocol wearing Fitbit Inspire 2 watches and underwent preassessments, midassessments, and postassessments. Participants completed daily reflections and semistructured interviews along with PSQI questionnaires during assessments. RESULTS: According to 103 survey responses, premedical students slept an average of 7.1 hours per night. Only a quarter (26/103) of the participants experienced good sleep quality (PSQI<5), although there was no significant difference (P=.11) in the proportions of good (PSQI<5) versus poor sleepers (PSQI≥5) across cohorts. When students perceived no problem at all in their sleep quality, 50% (14/28) of them actually had poor sleep quality. Among the larger proportion of students who perceived sleep quality as only a slight problem, 26% (11/43) of them presented poor sleep quality. High stress levels were associated with poor sleep quality. This study reveals Fitbit as a beneficial tool in raising sleep awareness. Participants highlighted Fitbit elements that aid in comprehension such as being able to visualize their sleep stage breakdown and receive an overview of their sleep pattern by simply looking at their Fitbit sleep scores. In terms of protocol evaluation, participants believed that assessments were conducted within the expected duration, and they did not have a strong opinion about the frequency of survey administration. However, Fitbit was found to provide notable variation daily, leading to missing data. Moreover, the Fitbit app's feature description was vague and could lead to confusion. CONCLUSIONS: Poor sleep quality experienced by unaware premedical students points to a need for raising sleep awareness and developing effective interventions. Future work should refine our study protocol based on lessons learned and health behavior theories and use Fitbit as an informatics solution to promote healthy sleep behaviors.

Assessing the Readability of Online Patient Education Materials in Obstetrics and Gynecology Using Traditional Measures: Comparative Analysis and Limitations.

BACKGROUND: Patient education materials (PEMs) can be vital sources of information for the general population. However, despite American Medical Association (AMA) and National Institutes of Health (NIH) recommendations to make PEMs easier to read for patients with low health literacy, they often do not adhere to these recommendations. The readability of online PEMs in the obstetrics and gynecology (OB/GYN) field, in particular, has not been thoroughly investigated. OBJECTIVE: The study sampled online OB/GYN PEMs and aimed to examine (1) agreeability across traditional readability measures (TRMs), (2) adherence of online PEMs to AMA and NIH recommendations, and (3) whether the readability level of online PEMs varied by web-based source and medical topic. This study is not a scoping review, rather, it focused on scoring the readability of OB/GYN PEMs using the traditional measures to add empirical evidence to the literature. METHODS: A total of 1576 online OB/GYN PEMs were collected via 3 major search engines. In total 93 were excluded due to shorter content (less than 100 words), yielding 1483 PEMs for analysis. Each PEM was scored by 4 TRMs, including Flesch-Kincaid grade level, Gunning fog index, Simple Measure of Gobbledygook, and the Dale-Chall. The PEMs were categorized based on publication source and medical topic by 2 research team members. The readability scores of the categories were compared statistically. RESULTS: Results indicated that the 4 TRMs did not agree with each other, leading to the use of an averaged readability (composite) score for comparison. The composite scores across all online PEMs were not normally distributed and had a median at the 11th grade. Governmental PEMs were the easiest to read amongst source categorizations and PEMs about menstruation were the most difficult to read. However, the differences in the readability scores among the sources and the topics were small. CONCLUSIONS: This study found that online OB/GYN PEMs did not meet the AMA and NIH readability recommendations and would be difficult to read and comprehend for patients with low health literacy. Both findings connected well to the literature. This study highlights the need to improve the readability of OB/GYN PEMs to help patients make informed decisions. Research has been done to create more sophisticated readability measures for medical and health documents. Once validated, these tools need to be used by web-based content creators of health education materials.

FrictShoes: Providing Multilevel Nonuniform Friction Feedback on Shoes in VR.

Many haptic feedback methods have been proposed to enhance realism in virtual reality (VR). However, friction on the feet in VR, which renders feedback as if walking on different terrains or ground textures or stepping on objects is still less explored. Herein, we propose a wearable device, FrictShoes a pair of foot accessories, to provide multilevel nonuniform friction feedback to feet. This is achieved by the independent functioning of six brakes on six wheels underneath each FrictShoe, which allows the friction levels of the wheels from each to be either matched or to vary. We conducted a magnitude estimation study to understand users' distinguishability of friction force magnitudes (or levels). Based on the results, we performed an exploratory study to realize how users adjust and map the multilevel nonuniform friction patterns to common VR terrains or ground textures. Finally, a VR experience study was conducted to evaluate the performance of the proposed multilevel nonuniform friction feedback to the feet in VR experiences.