ABSTRACT
Infants with severe primary combined immunodeficiency (SCID) and children post-allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) are extremely susceptible to unusual infections. The lack of generic tools to detect disease-causing viruses among more than 200 potential human viral pathogens represents a major challenge to clinicians and virologists. We investigated retrospectively the causes of a fatal disseminated viral infection with meningoencephalitis in an infant with gamma C-SCID and of chronic gastroenteritis in 2 other infants admitted for HSCT during the same time period. Analysis was undertaken by combining cell culture, electron microscopy and sequence-independent single primer amplification (SISPA) techniques. Caco-2 cells inoculated with fecal samples developed a cytopathic effect and non-enveloped viral particles in infected cells were detected by electron microscopy. SISPA led to the identification of astrovirus as the pathogen. Both sequencing of the capsid gene and the pattern of infection suggested nosocomial transmission from a chronically excreting index case to 2 other patients leading to fatal infection in 1 and to transient disease in the others. Virus-specific, real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction was then performed on different stored samples to assess the extent of infection. Infection was associated with viremia in 2 cases and contributed to death in 1. At autopsy, viral RNA was detected in the brain and different other organs, while immunochemistry confirmed infection of gastrointestinal tissues. This report illustrates the usefulness of the combined use of classical virology procedures and modern molecular tools for the diagnosis of unexpected infections. It illustrates that astrovirus has the potential to cause severe disseminated lethal infection in highly immunocompromised pediatric patients.
Subject(s)
Astroviridae Infections/diagnosis , Astroviridae Infections/virology , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/adverse effects , Severe Combined Immunodeficiency/virology , Transplantation, Homologous/adverse effects , Astroviridae Infections/mortality , Caco-2 Cells , Humans , Infant , Male , RNA, Viral/genetics , Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction , Retrospective Studies , Severe Combined Immunodeficiency/mortality , Severe Combined Immunodeficiency/therapyABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To identify the determinants of antibody responses to adjuvanted split influenza A (H1N1) vaccines in patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases. METHODS: One hundred seventy-three patients (82 with rheumatoid arthritis, 45 with spondylarthritis, and 46 with other inflammatory rheumatic diseases) and 138 control subjects were enrolled in this prospective single-center study. Controls received 1 dose of adjuvanted influenza A/09/H1N1 vaccine, and patients received 2 doses of the vaccine. Antibody responses were measured by hemagglutination inhibition assay before and 3-4 weeks after each dose. Geometric mean titers (GMTs) and rates of seroprotection (GMT≥40) were calculated. A comprehensive medical questionnaire was used to identify the determinants of vaccine responses and adverse events. RESULTS: Baseline influenza A/09/H1N1 antibody levels were low in patients and controls (seroprotection rates 14.8% and 14.2%, respectively). A significant response to dose 1 was observed in both groups. However, the GMT and the seroprotection rate remained significantly lower in patients (GMT 146 versus 340, seroprotection rate 74.6% versus 87%; both P<0.001). The second dose markedly increased antibody titers in patients, with achievement of a similar GMT and seroprotection rate as elicited with a single dose in healthy controls. By multivariate regression analysis, increasing age, use of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) (except hydroxychloroquine and sulfasalazine), and recent (within 3 months) B cell depletion treatment were identified as the main determinants of vaccine responses; tumor necrosis factor α antagonist treatment was not identified as a major determinant. Immunization was well tolerated, without any adverse effect on disease activity. CONCLUSION: DMARDs exert distinct influences on influenza vaccine responses in patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases. Two doses of adjuvanted vaccine were necessary and sufficient to elicit responses in patients similar to those achieved with 1 dose in healthy controls.
Subject(s)
Adjuvants, Immunologic/therapeutic use , Antibodies, Viral/immunology , Antibody Formation/immunology , Antirheumatic Agents/immunology , Influenza A Virus, H1N1 Subtype/immunology , Influenza Vaccines/immunology , Adjuvants, Immunologic/adverse effects , Adult , Antibodies, Viral/blood , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/drug therapy , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/immunology , B-Lymphocytes/drug effects , B-Lymphocytes/immunology , Female , Hemagglutination Inhibition Tests , Humans , Influenza Vaccines/adverse effects , Influenza Vaccines/therapeutic use , Male , Middle Aged , Spondylarthritis/drug therapy , Spondylarthritis/immunology , Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha/antagonists & inhibitorsABSTRACT
Successful control of a viral disease requires knowledge of the different vectors that could promote its transmission among hosts. We assessed the survival of human influenza viruses on banknotes given that billions of these notes are exchanged daily worldwide. Banknotes were experimentally contaminated with representative influenza virus subtypes at various concentrations, and survival was tested after different time periods. Influenza A viruses tested by cell culture survived up to 3 days when they were inoculated at high concentrations. The same inoculum in the presence of respiratory mucus showed a striking increase in survival time (up to 17 days). Similarly, B/Hong Kong/335/2001 virus was still infectious after 1 day when it was mixed with respiratory mucus. When nasopharyngeal secretions of naturally infected children were used, influenza virus survived for at least 48 h in one-third of the cases. The unexpected stability of influenza virus in this nonbiological environment suggests that unusual environmental contamination should be considered in the setting of pandemic preparedness.
Subject(s)
Environmental Microbiology , Influenza A Virus, H1N1 Subtype/physiology , Influenza A Virus, H3N2 Subtype/physiology , Influenza B virus/physiology , Microbial Viability , Desiccation , Mucus/virology , Paper , Time Factors , Virus CultivationABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Sensitive quantitation of cytomegalovirus (CMV) DNA in blood is helpful for the diagnosis of CMV infection or reactivation and the monitoring of transplanted patients. OBJECTIVES: We compared a new PCR assay coupled with an automated extraction system (CMV real-time PCR, Abbott Molecular, Des Plaines, IL, USA) to a previously validated method (ultrasensitive Cobas Amplicor CMV DNA Monitor, Roche Molecular, Indianapolis, IN, USA). RESULTS: Using limiting dilutions of CMV DNA positive plasma, the two assays had a similar detection threshold ranging between 20 and 45 copies/ml. Coefficients of variation of CMV real-time PCR assay varied from 1 to 12% for CMV DNA levels between 10,000 and 20 copies/ml. Viral loads assessed by the two methods on 179 clinical samples showed an overall concordance of 89% and an excellent correlation (R=0.94). Discrepancies were only observed for samples with low CMV DNA levels (<300 copies/ml); 18 samples were positive by CMV real-time PCR only, and 2 samples by ultrasensitive Cobas CMV only. Values obtained by CMV real-time PCR were on average 0.4 log higher than those of ultrasensitive Cobas CMV. Successive samples of transplanted patients with evidence of CMV infection/reactivation revealed that CMV real-time PCR assay was positive earlier and for a longer period of time after treatment initiation. CONCLUSIONS: Although both assays had similar analytical performances, the CMV real-time PCR assay has the advantages of automated extraction and higher dynamic range, and shows a trend for an improved sensitivity that might impact on clinical decisions.
Subject(s)
Cytomegalovirus/genetics , DNA, Viral/blood , Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , Viral Load/methods , Adult , Analysis of Variance , Female , Humans , Plasma/virology , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and SpecificityABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: In addition to the human coronaviruses (HCoVs) OC43 and 229E, which have been known for decades to cause infection in humans, 2 new members of this genus have recently been identified: HCoVs NL63 and HKU1. Their impact as a cause of respiratory tract disease in adults at risk for complications needs to be established. METHODS: We prospectively assessed the clinical impact of coronavirus infection (excluding cases of severe acute respiratory syndrome) among hospitalized adults. All patients with respiratory disease for whom bronchoalveolar lavage was performed were screened by reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction for the presence of all 4 HCoVs. RESULTS: HCoV was identified in 29 (5.4%) of 540 bronchoalveolar lavage fluid specimens from 279 subjects (mean age, 51 years; 63% male). HCoV OC43 was identified most frequently (12 isolates), followed by 229E (7 isolates), NL63 (6 isolates), and HKU1 (4 isolates). In all, 372 (69%) of 540 bronchoalveolar lavage fluid specimens were negative for bacteria, and 2 persons were coinfected with other respiratory viruses. Transplantation was the most common underlying condition. Of the 29 patients who had HCoV identified in their bronchoalveolar lavage fluid specimens, 9 (31%) were hospitalized in the intensive care unit, 22 (76%) presented to the hospital with acute respiratory symptoms, 16 (55%) presented with cough and/or sputum, 13 (45%) presented with dyspnea, 16 (55%) had experienced prior respiratory infection, and 18 (62%) had a new infiltrate that was visible on chest radiograph. The most frequent final diagnosis was a lower respiratory tract infection. CONCLUSIONS: The recently discovered HCoVs NL63 and HKU1 contribute significantly to the overall spectrum of coronavirus infection. Our study also suggests that coronaviruses contribute to respiratory symptoms in most cases.
Subject(s)
Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid/virology , Coronavirus Infections/virology , Coronavirus/isolation & purification , Lung Diseases/virology , Lung Transplantation/adverse effects , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Coronavirus/classification , Coronavirus 229E, Human/isolation & purification , Coronavirus OC43, Human/isolation & purification , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , SwitzerlandABSTRACT
RATIONALE: Lung transplant recipients are particularly at risk of complications from rhinovirus, the most frequent respiratory virus circulating in the community. OBJECTIVES: To determine whether lung transplant recipients can be chronically infected by rhinovirus and the potential clinical impact. METHODS: We first identified an index case, in which rhinovirus was isolated repeatedly, and conducted detailed molecular analysis to determine whether this was related to a unique strain or to re-infection episodes. Transbronchial biopsies were used to assess the presence of rhinovirus in the lung parenchyma. The incidence of chronic rhinoviral infections and potential clinical impact was assessed prospectively in a cohort of 68 lung transplant recipients during 19 mo by screening of bronchoalveolar lavages. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We describe 3 lung transplant recipients with graft dysfunctions in whom rhinovirus was identified by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction in upper and lower respiratory specimens over a 12-mo period. In two cases, rhinovirus was repeatedly isolated in culture. The persistence of a unique strain in each case was confirmed by sequence analysis of the 5'NCR and VP1 gene. In the index case, rhinovirus was detected in the lower respiratory parenchyma. In the cohort of lung transplant recipients, rhinoviral infections were documented in bronchoalveolar lavage specimens of 10 recipients, and 2 presented with a persistent infection. CONCLUSIONS: Rhinoviral infection can be persistent in lung transplant recipients with graft dysfunction, and the virus can be detected in the lung parenchyma. Given the potential clinical impact, chronic rhinoviral infection needs to be considered in lung transplant recipients.
Subject(s)
Common Cold/transmission , Lung Transplantation , Rhinovirus , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Chronic Disease , Female , Humans , Lung/virology , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction , Rhinovirus/isolation & purificationABSTRACT
We assessed the frequency and the potential role of respiratory viruses on disease outcomes in hospitalized patients and lung transplant recipients who underwent a bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) for an acute respiratory infection. BAL specimens (148) were analyzed by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction for the presence of 11 different viruses, as well as Mycoplasma pneumoniae, Chlamydophila pneumoniae, and Legionella pneumophila. Respiratory viruses were identified in 34 of 117 BAL specimens (29%) obtained in patients with a suspected respiratory infection and in only 2 of 31 control subjects (7%) (p < 0.01). M. pneumoniae was identified in five additional cases. Only 30% of cases that were virus positive by molecular methods were also positive by cell culture analysis. Rhinovirus was the most frequently identified virus (56% of cases) followed by respiratory syncytial virus (27%). In lung transplant recipients, the rate of viral infections was 55% in cases with respiratory symptoms compared with only 4% in control subjects (p < 0.001). In these cases, respiratory viral infections were associated with significant lung function abnormalities. By using reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction assays, we frequently identified respiratory viruses in BAL specimens of patients hospitalized with lower respiratory tract infections. These viruses were associated with high morbidity, particularly in lung transplant recipients.
Subject(s)
Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections/diagnosis , Respiratory Tract Infections/diagnosis , Virus Diseases/diagnosis , Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid/microbiology , Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid/virology , Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections/immunology , Humans , Immunocompromised Host , Incidence , Lung Transplantation/immunology , Respiratory Tract Infections/immunology , Respiratory Tract Infections/microbiology , Respiratory Tract Infections/virology , Switzerland , Treatment Outcome , Virus Diseases/immunology , Virus Diseases/virologyABSTRACT
Improved knowledge of the genotypic characteristics of human rhinovirus (HRV) is required, as are nucleic detection assays with the capacity to overcome both the similarities between members of the family Picornaviridae and the wide diversity of different HRV serotypes. The goal of the present study was to investigate the variability and the genotypic diversity of clinical strains circulating in the community. Since most reverse transcription (RT)-PCR assays available cannot differentiate HRV from other members of the family Picornaviridae, we also validated an assay specific for HRV detection. The 5' noncoding regions of 87 different HRV serotypes and clinical isolates were sequenced. On the basis of sequence analysis and phylogenetic determination, we first confirmed that all clinical isolates were HRV. We then validated a real-time RT-PCR assay that was able not only to detect all HRV serotypes and all clinical isolates tested but also to accurately discriminate between rhinovirus and other viruses from the family Picornaviridae. This assay was negative with isolates of coxsackievirus (types A and B), echovirus, enterovirus, parechovirus, and poliovirus, as well as nonpicornaviruses. Among a series of bronchoalveolar lavage specimens, 4% (7 of 161) were positive by culture, whereas 13% (21 of 161) were positive by RT-PCR. In the present study we showed that to specifically identify HRV in clinical specimens, diagnostic assays need to overcome both the diversities and the similarities of picornaviruses. By sequencing the 5' noncoding regions of rhinoviruses recovered from clinical specimens, we designed probes that could specifically detect rhinovirus.
Subject(s)
Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid/virology , Rhinovirus/isolation & purification , 5' Untranslated Regions/chemistry , Base Sequence , Humans , Molecular Sequence Data , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction , Rhinovirus/genetics , Sensitivity and SpecificityABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Acute respiratory viral infections are generally self-limited in healthy subjects but can lead to severe complications in immunocompromised hosts. We report the clinical impact of acute lower respiratory tract viral infections in hospitalized patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Of 1,001 fiberoptic bronchoscopies performed during a period of 5 years, 33 BAL samples were positive for respiratory viruses by cell culture. The main diagnosis, length of hospitalization, response to initial treatment, and the mortality rate at 30 days were analyzed. Spirometry performed before and after infection was compared in lung transplant recipients. RESULTS: The following respiratory viruses were identified in 33 cases: influenza A or B (n = 13), parainfluenza virus 1-3 (n = 7), rhinovirus (n = 5), respiratory syncytial virus (n = 4), and adenovirus (n = 4). All cases were immunocompromised patients who acquired new respiratory symptoms and/or radiologic abnormalities suggesting a pulmonary infection. Twenty-five patients (74%) did not respond to initial broad-spectrum antibiotics, and 11 patients (33%) required intensive care for respiratory failure. The overall mortality rate at 1 month was 24%. In patients with a sole viral pathogen identified in their BAL, the mortality rate was 39%. In lung transplant recipients (n = 10), the mean FEV(1) decreased from 2.2 to 1.9 L/s before and during the infection episode, respectively (p < 0.01); 3 months later, 60% of the patients had still not completely recovered to baseline values. CONCLUSION: Respiratory viruses recovered in BAL samples of immunocompromised patients are associated with severe lower respiratory complications. In lung transplant recipients, we observed a persisting impairment of pulmonary function.
Subject(s)
Hospitalization , Immunocompromised Host , Respiratory Tract Infections/complications , Virus Diseases/complications , Acute Disease , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Cross Infection/diagnosis , Cross Infection/virology , Female , Humans , Lung Transplantation/immunology , Male , Middle Aged , Respiratory Tract Infections/diagnosis , Respiratory Tract Infections/mortality , Respiratory Tract Infections/virology , Survival Rate , Virus Diseases/diagnosis , Virus Diseases/mortality , Virus Diseases/virologyABSTRACT
Early and accurate monitoring of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection in solid-organ transplant recipients is of major importance. We have assessed the potential benefit of an ultrasensitive plasma-based PCR assay for renal transplant recipients. The pp65 CMV antigen (pp65 Ag) assay using leukocytes was employed as a routine test for the monitoring of CMV in 23 transplant recipients. We compared the pp65 antigenemia with the CMV load quantified by an ultrasensitive PCR (US-PCR) with a limit of detection of 20 CMV DNA copies/ml of plasma. CMV infection was detected in 215 (67%) of 321 plasma samples by the US-PCR compared with 124 (39%) of 321 samples by the pp65 Ag assay. The US-PCR assay permitted the detection of CMV infection episodes following transplantation a median of 12 days earlier than the pp65 Ag assay. Moreover, during CMV infection episodes, DNA detection by the US-PCR was consistently positive, whereas false negative results were frequently observed with the pp65 Ag assay. We found a good correlation between the two assays, and the peak viral loads were significantly higher in patients with CMV-related complications (median, 5000 DNA copies/ml) than in those without symptoms (1160 DNA copies/ml) (P = 0.048). In addition, patients that did not require preemptive therapy based on the results of the pp65 assay had CMV loads significantly lower (median, 36 DNA copies/ml) than those that needed treatment (median, 4703 DNA copies/ml) (P < 0.001). These observations provided cutoff levels that could be applied in clinical practice. The ultrasensitive plasma-based PCR detected CMV infection episodes earlier and provided more consistent results than the pp65 Ag assay. This test could improve the monitoring of CMV infection or reactivation in renal transplant recipients.
Subject(s)
Cytomegalovirus Infections/diagnosis , Kidney Transplantation/adverse effects , Postoperative Complications/virology , Cytomegalovirus/genetics , Cytomegalovirus/isolation & purification , Cytomegalovirus Infections/blood , Cytomegalovirus Infections/epidemiology , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Monitoring, Physiologic/methods , Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , Postoperative Complications/blood , Postoperative Period , Regression Analysis , Sensitivity and Specificity , Time FactorsABSTRACT
Cytomegalovirus (CMV) DNA amplification assays in plasma have shown limited sensitivity compared to the detection of pp65 antigen in leukocytes. Our goal was to increase the sensitivity of a commercial CMV DNA PCR quantitative assay. After modification, the new assay was able to reproducibly detect 20 CMV DNA copies/ml of plasma. We compared this new ultrasensitive PCR assay with the standard PCR and the pp65 test for CMV detection and quantification in 22 consecutive allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell recipients. CMV infection or reactivation was detected in 84 of 319 (26%) samples by the ultrasensitive PCR assay compared to 38 of 319 (12%) samples by the pp65 assay (P < 0.01). All samples positive by the pp65 assay were positive by the ultrasensitive PCR, and CMV episodes were detected on average 4 days earlier and 7 days later than the first and the last pp65-positive test, respectively. In addition, during CMV episodes, the ultrasensitive assay identified positive samples that were inconsistently detected by the pp65 assay. The ultrasensitive assay was also much more sensitive than the standard PCR, with 26 versus 12% of CMV DNA-positive samples (P < 0.01). This assay improved the monitoring of CMV infection or reactivation in hematopoietic allogeneic stem cell recipients.