Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Bioorg Med Chem Lett ; 30(14): 127214, 2020 07 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32527538

ABSTRACT

A strategy to conformationally restrain a series of GlyT1 inhibitors identified potent analogs that exhibited slowly interconverting rotational isomers. Further studies to address this concern led to a series of azetidine-based inhibitors. Compound 26 was able to elevate CSF glycine levels in vivo and demonstrated potency comparable to Bitopertin in an in vivo rat receptor occupancy study. Compound 26 was subsequently shown to enhance memory in a Novel Object Recognition (NOR) behavioral study after a single dose of 0.03 mg/kg, and in a contextual fear conditioning (cFC) study after four QD doses of 0.01-0.03 mg/kg.


Subject(s)
Azetidines/pharmacology , Glycine Plasma Membrane Transport Proteins/antagonists & inhibitors , Memory/drug effects , Azetidines/chemical synthesis , Azetidines/chemistry , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , HEK293 Cells , Humans , Molecular Structure , Structure-Activity Relationship
2.
Front Mol Neurosci ; 12: 21, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30792627

ABSTRACT

Augmentation of cyclic nucleotide signaling through inhibition of phosphodiesterase (PDE) activity has long been understood to enhance memory. Efforts in this domain have focused predominantly on PDE4, a cAMP-specific phosphodiesterase implicated in consolidation. But less is known about the function of other PDEs expressed in neuroanatomical regions critical to memory. The PDE1 isoforms are the only PDEs to regulate neuronal cAMP and cGMP levels in a Ca2+/Calmodulin (CaM) dependent manner. Here, we show that knock-down of PDE1B in hippocampus of adult mice enhances contextual and spatial memory without effect on non-cognitive behaviors. Pharmacological augmentation of memory in rats was observed with a selective inhibitor of PDE1 dosed before and immediately after training, but not with drug dosed either 1 h after training or before recall. Our data clearly demonstrate a role for the PDE1B isoforms as negative regulators of memory, and they implicate PDE1 in an early phase of consolidation, but not retrieval. Inhibition of PDE1B is a promising therapeutic mechanism for treating memory impairment.

3.
PLoS One ; 9(5): e97758, 2014.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24879013

ABSTRACT

Parkinson's disease (PD) is the most common motor neurodegenerative disorder. Olfactory dysfunction is a prevalent feature of PD. It often precedes motor symptoms by several years and is used in assisting PD diagnosis. However, the cellular and molecular bases of olfactory dysfunction in PD are not known. The fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster, expressing human alpha-synuclein protein or its mutant, A30P, captures several hallmarks of PD and has been successfully used to model PD in numerous studies. First, we report olfactory deficits in fly expressing A30P (A30P), showing deficits in two out of three olfactory modalities, tested--olfactory acuity and odor discrimination. The remaining third modality is odor identification/naming. Second, oxidative stress is an important environmental risk factor of PD. We show that oxidative stress exacerbated the two affected olfactory modalities in younger A30P flies. Third, different olfactory receptor neurons are activated differentially by different odors in flies. In a separate experiment, we show that the odor discrimination deficit in A30P flies is general and not restricted to a specific class of chemical structure. Lastly, by restricting A30P expression to dopamine, serotonin or olfactory receptor neurons, we show that A30P expression in dopamine neurons is necessary for development of both acuity and discrimination deficits, while serotonin and olfactory receptor neurons appeared not involved. Our data demonstrate olfactory deficits in a synuclein fly PD model for exploring olfactory pathology and physiology, and for monitoring PD progression and treatment.


Subject(s)
Drosophila melanogaster , Olfactory Perception , Parkinson Disease/genetics , Parkinson Disease/physiopathology , alpha-Synuclein/genetics , Aging/physiology , Animals , Discrimination, Psychological , Disease Models, Animal , Dopaminergic Neurons/pathology , Humans , Motor Activity , Oxidative Stress , Parkinson Disease/metabolism , Parkinson Disease/pathology
4.
Nat Neurosci ; 10(12): 1578-86, 2007 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17982450

ABSTRACT

In humans and many other animals, memory consolidation occurs through multiple temporal phases and usually involves more than one neuroanatomical brain system. Genetic dissection of Pavlovian olfactory learning in Drosophila melanogaster has revealed multiple memory phases, but the predominant view holds that all memory phases occur in mushroom body neurons. Here, we demonstrate an acute requirement for NMDA receptors (NMDARs) outside of the mushroom body during long-term memory (LTM) consolidation. Targeted dsRNA-mediated silencing of Nmdar1 and Nmdar2 (also known as dNR1 or dNR2, respectively) in cholinergic R4m-subtype large-field neurons of the ellipsoid body specifically disrupted LTM consolidation, but not retrieval. Similar silencing of functional NMDARs in the mushroom body disrupted an earlier memory phase, leaving LTM intact. Our results clearly establish an anatomical site outside of the mushroom body involved with LTM consolidation, thus revealing both a distributed brain system subserving olfactory memory formation and the existence of a system-level memory consolidation in Drosophila.


Subject(s)
Association Learning/physiology , Brain/cytology , Memory/physiology , Neurons/physiology , Receptors, N-Methyl-D-Aspartate/physiology , Analysis of Variance , Animals , Animals, Genetically Modified , Association Learning/drug effects , Behavior, Animal , Conditioning, Classical , Drosophila , Drosophila Proteins/genetics , Maze Learning , Memory/drug effects , Mushroom Bodies/drug effects , Mushroom Bodies/physiology , Odorants , RNA, Double-Stranded/pharmacology , Receptors, N-Methyl-D-Aspartate/genetics , Time Factors
5.
PLoS Biol ; 5(10): e264, 2007 Oct 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17914903

ABSTRACT

Molecular and cellular studies have begun to unravel a neurobiological basis of olfactory processing, which appears conserved among vertebrate and invertebrate species. Studies have shown clearly that experience-dependent coding of odor identity occurs in "associative" olfactory centers (the piriform cortex in mammals and the mushroom body [MB] in insects). What remains unclear, however, is whether associative centers also mediate innate (spontaneous) odor discrimination and how ongoing experience modifies odor discrimination. Here we show in naïve flies that Galphaq-mediated signaling in MB modulates spontaneous discrimination of odor identity but not odor intensity (concentration). In contrast, experience-dependent modification (conditioning) of both odor identity and intensity occurs in MB exclusively via Galphas-mediated signaling. Our data suggest that spontaneous responses to odor identity and odor intensity discrimination are segregated at the MB level, and neural activity from MB further modulates olfactory processing by experience-independent Galphaq-dependent encoding of odor identity and by experience-induced Galphas-dependent encoding of odor intensity and identity.


Subject(s)
Drosophila/physiology , Odorants , Animals , GTP-Binding Proteins/physiology , Olfactory Pathways , Signal Transduction
6.
Curr Biol ; 15(7): 603-15, 2005 Apr 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15823532

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Molecular and electrophysiological properties of NMDARs suggest that they may be the Hebbian "coincidence detectors" hypothesized to underlie associative learning. Because of the nonspecificity of drugs that modulate NMDAR function or the relatively chronic genetic manipulations of various NMDAR subunits from mammalian studies, conclusive evidence for such an acute role for NMDARs in adult behavioral plasticity, however, is lacking. Moreover, a role for NMDARs in memory consolidation remains controversial. RESULTS: The Drosophila genome encodes two NMDAR homologs, dNR1 and dNR2. When coexpressed in Xenopus oocytes or Drosophila S2 cells, dNR1 and dNR2 form functional NMDARs with several of the distinguishing molecular properties observed for vertebrate NMDARs, including voltage/Mg(2+)-dependent activation by glutamate. Both proteins are weakly expressed throughout the entire brain but show preferential expression in several neurons surrounding the dendritic region of the mushroom bodies. Hypomorphic mutations of the essential dNR1 gene disrupt olfactory learning, and this learning defect is rescued with wild-type transgenes. Importantly, we show that Pavlovian learning is disrupted in adults within 15 hr after transient induction of a dNR1 antisense RNA transgene. Extended training is sufficient to overcome this initial learning defect, but long-term memory (LTM) specifically is abolished under these training conditions. CONCLUSIONS: Our study uses a combination of molecular-genetic tools to (1) generate genomic mutations of the dNR1 gene, (2) rescue the accompanying learning deficit with a dNR1+ transgene, and (3) rapidly and transiently knockdown dNR1+ expression in adults, thereby demonstrating an evolutionarily conserved role for the acute involvement of NMDARs in associative learning and memory.


Subject(s)
Association Learning/physiology , Drosophila melanogaster/genetics , Memory/physiology , Receptors, N-Methyl-D-Aspartate/metabolism , Smell/genetics , Amino Acid Sequence , Animals , Base Sequence , Cells, Cultured , Cloning, Molecular , Drosophila melanogaster/physiology , Immunohistochemistry , Molecular Sequence Data , Mushroom Bodies/metabolism , Mutation/genetics , Receptors, N-Methyl-D-Aspartate/genetics , Sequence Analysis, DNA , Smell/physiology , Transgenes/genetics , Xenopus
7.
Curr Biol ; 13(21): 1900-4, 2003 Oct 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14588247

ABSTRACT

Olfaction can elicit a rich perceptual experience. It is not known, however, whether olfactory information is decomposed into various components and processed in distinct perceptual centers as in other sensory systems, such as vision, where neural representations of different visual sensations are segregated in different cortical regions, despite the fact that multiple structures of the primary olfactory cortex receive projections from the olfactory bulb. Here, we use Drosophila as a model to investigate whether different olfactory information may be processed in separate brain structures. Organizations of the peripheral olfactory system are remarkably similar from mammals to insects. As in vertebrates, the olfactory pathway in Drosophila follows similar convergence and divergence, and multiple high-order structures in the Drosophila brain, including the mushroom body (MB) and lateral horn (LH) of the protocerebrum, receive olfactory input. We specifically blocked neurotransmission in the MB while leaving the LH unaffected and examined its effect on olfactory avoidance and attraction behaviors. We show that blocking MB activity disrupted responses to attractive, but not repulsive, odors, and this finding suggests that attractive and repulsive olfactory information may be separately processed in higher olfactory centers of the Drosophila brain.


Subject(s)
Brain Mapping , Brain/physiology , Mushroom Bodies/physiology , Odorants , Smell/physiology , Animals , Crosses, Genetic , Drosophila , Gene Expression Profiling , Microscopy, Fluorescence , Transgenes
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...