ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Whether wedge resection is oncological suitable for ground glass opacity (GGO)-dominant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) ≤2 cm is still debatable. The aim of this study is to investigate the short-term and long-term outcomes of intentional wedge resection and segmentectomy for those patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a real-world study from one of the largest thoracic surgery centers in XX. Patients who underwent intentional wedge resection or segmentectomy for ≤2 cm CTR(consolidation-to-tumor)≤0.5 NSCLC were consecutively included between December 2009 and December 2018. Data were prospectively collected and retrospectively reviewed. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to balance baseline characteristics. Long-term outcomes, including overall survival (OS), recurrence-free survival (RFS) and lung cancer-specific survival (LCSS), were analyzed using Cox proportional model. RESULTS: A total of 1209 patients were included (497 in the wedge resection group, 712 in the segmentectomy group). Compared to segmentectomy, wedge resection had a significantly lower rate of complications (3.8% vs. 7.7%, P=0.008), a shorter operating time (65min vs. 114min, P<0.001), and a shorter postoperative stay (3d vs. 4d, P<0.001). The median follow-up was 70.1 months. The multivariate Cox model indicated that wedge resection had survival outcomes that were similar to segmentectomy in terms of 5-year OS (98.8% vs. 99.6%, HR=1.98, 95%CI: 0.59-6.68, P=0.270), 5-year RFS (98.8% vs. 99.5%, HR=1.88, 95%CI: 0.56-6.31, P=0.307) and 5-year LCSS (99.9% vs. 99.6%, HR=1.76, 95%CI: 0.24-13.15, P=0.581). CONCLUSION: Intentional wedge resection is an appropriate choice for ≤2 cm GGO-dominant NSCLC.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The impact of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection on postoperative recovery of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is need to be understood, thereby informing the optimal timing of surgical decision-making during the COVID-19 pandemic for NSCLC patients. This study reports the postoperative outcomes of surgical NSCLC patients with preoperative SARS-CoV-2 infection. METHOD: This single-center retrospective cohort study included 241 NSCLC patients who underwent lobectomy or sub-lobectomy between December 1, 2022 and February 14, 2023. Surgical outcomes of patients with preoperative SARS-CoV-2 infection (stratified by the time from diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection to surgery) were compared with those without preoperative SARS-CoV-2 infection. The primary outcomes were total postoperative complications and postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs), the secondary outcomes included operation time, total postoperative drainage and time, length of hospital stay (LOS), 30-day and 90-day postoperative symptoms. RESULTS: This study included 153 (63.5%) patients with preoperative SARS-CoV-2 infection and 88 (36.5%) patients without previous SARS-CoV-2 infection. In patients with a preoperative SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis, the incidence of total postoperative complications (OR, 3.00; 95% CI, 1.12-8.01; p = 0.028) and PPCs (OR, 4.20; 95% CI, 1.11-15.91; p = 0.035) both increased in patients infected having surgery within 2 weeks compared with non-infection before surgery. However, patients who underwent lung resection more than 2 weeks after SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis had a similar risk of postoperative complications and surgical outcomes with those non-infection before surgery. CONCLUSION: This is the first study to provide evidence regarding the optimum timing of lung resection surgery and assessing early outcomes after surgery in NSCLC patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection. Our study documents that the SARS-CoV-2 infection did not complicate surgical procedures for lung cancer, and suggest that lung surgery should be postponed at least 2 weeks after SARS-CoV-2 infection for NSCLC patients.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Pulmonary sarcomatoid carcinoma (PSC) is a rare type of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Metastases are often detected at the first diagnosis. Despite high rates of distant metastasis, there is insufficient data describing the characteristics of PSC metastasis. METHODS: We performed a Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database-based analysis of clinicopathological features and prognosis of distant metastasis in PSC patients. Data queried for this analysis included PSC patients in the database between 2010 and 2016. RESULTS: A total of 934 patients met the criteria for inclusion in the analysis and included, at the time of diagnosis, 512 (54.8%) patients with metastasis, including bone (n=152; 16.3%), brain (n=108; 11.6%), liver (n=70; 7.5%), lung (n=142; 15.2%) metastases. Binary logistic regression showed that patients with giant cell carcinoma [odds ratio (OR) 4.023, 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.113-7.661, P<0.001] and spindle cell carcinoma (OR 3.151, 95% CI: 1.699-5.843, P<0.001) were associated with metastasis. Log-rank test and Kaplan-Meier plots indicated poor prognosis in metastatic patients [the 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival (OS) rates were 14.1%, 5.5%, and 4.8%, respectively]. Multivariable analysis showed younger and chemotherapy as improved prognostic factors of PSC patients with single metastasis site. CONCLUSIONS: The SEER database-based analysis revealed the clinical features of distant metastasis of PSC and showed that different histological types posed distinct metastasis potential. Besides, age and chemotherapy were the independent prognostic factors of PSC patients with single metastasis site.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: To investigate the overall performance of Raman Spectroscopy (RS) in the diagnosis of lung cancer. METHODS: We systematic searched databases including PubMed, EMBASE, CNKI and Web of science for studies up to May 2020 with no start date limited. Then we extracted data of true positives, true negatives, false positives and false negatives from the included studies to calculate the pooled sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive and negative likelihood ratios (LRs), and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), with 95% confidence intervals to evaluate the diagnostic value of Raman spectroscopy. We plotted the summary receiver operator characteristics (SROC) and the area under the curve (AUC) to evaluate the overall performance of Raman spectroscopy. Quality assessments and Publication bias were evaluated by QUADAS-2 checklist and Stata software version 12.0. RESULTS: Totally, 12 studies were included in our meta-analysis. The pooled diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of Raman Spectroscopy in lung cancer were 0.90 (95% CI, 0.87-0.92, P<0.05) and 0.76 (95% CI, 0.72-0.79, P<0.05). The pooled PLR and NLR were 5.87 (95% CI, 3.45-9.97) and 0.14 (95% CI, 0.10-0.22) respectively. And the AUC of SROC curve was 0.9453. DISCUSSION: Raman spectroscopy had excellent accuracy with high sensitivity and considerable specificity in the diagnosis of lung cancer.
