The application of electrospinning used in meniscus tissue engineering.

Meniscus is a fibrocartilaginous organ to redistribute stress and enhance the stability of knee joint. Meniscus injury is common and still a formidable challenge to orthopedic surgeons. Surgical techniques and allograft transplantation were primary approaches to meniscus repair, but with intrinsic limitations in clinical practice. Tissue engineering is the most promising method to repair meniscus at present. Electrospinning is a method to fabricate fibers in small scale. With different materials and parameters, electrospinning materials could have different mechanical properties, porosity, and orientation, which could mimic architectural features and mechanical properties of native meniscus. Therefore, electrospinning materials could be used in meniscus regeneration and curing. This review gave a brief introduction of meniscus structure, injury, treatment and the application of electrospinning fibers in meniscus tissue engineering and curing. Besides that, we summarized materials commonly used in electrospinning to fabricate meniscus scaffolds, and discussed the form of electrospinning fibers used such as scaffold, substitute and patch. Finally, the function of electrospinning fibers, for example, carrying drugs, providing mechanical properties were described. The potential applications of electrospinning fibers in meniscus therapy were proposed.

Fabrication and In Vitro Study of Tissue-Engineered Cartilage Scaffold Derived from Wharton's Jelly Extracellular Matrix.

The scaffold is a key element in cartilage tissue engineering. The components of Wharton's jelly are similar to those of articular cartilage and it also contains some chondrogenic growth factors, such as insulin-like growth factor I and transforming growth factor-ß. We fabricated a tissue-engineered cartilage scaffold derived from Wharton's jelly extracellular matrix (WJECM) and compared it with a scaffold derived from articular cartilage ECM (ACECM) using freeze-drying. The results demonstrated that both WJECM and ACECM scaffolds possessed favorable pore sizes and porosities; moreover, they showed good water uptake ratios and compressive moduli. Histological staining confirmed that the WJECM and ACECM scaffolds contained similar ECM. Moreover, both scaffolds showed good cellular adherence, bioactivity, and biocompatibility. MTT and DNA content assessments confirmed that the ACECM scaffold tended to be more beneficial for improving cell proliferation than the WJECM scaffold. However, RT-qPCR results demonstrated that the WJECM scaffold was more favorable to enhance cellular chondrogenesis than the ACECM scaffold, showing more collagen II and aggrecan mRNA expression. These results were confirmed indirectly by glycosaminoglycan and collagen content assessments and partially confirmed by histology and immunofluorescent staining. In conclusion, these results suggest that a WJECM scaffold may be favorable for future cartilage tissue engineering.