Aspiration Thrombectomy Versus Stent-Retriever Thrombectomy for the First-Pass Therapy of Intracranial Atherosclerosis-Related Large Vessel Occlusion: A Post Hoc Analysis of The Endovascular Treatment With Versus Without Tirofiban for Patients with Large Vessel Occlusion Stroke Trial.

BACKGROUND: This study sought to scrutinize the clinical outcomes associated with first-pass mechanical thrombectomy strategies in the management of intracranial atherosclerosis (ICAS)-related large vessel occlusion (LVO). METHODS: Within this post-hoc analysis of the The Endovascular Treatment With vs Without Tirofiban for Patients with Large Vessel Occlusion Stroke (RESCUE BT) trial, we compared data pertaining to patients with ICAS-LVO situated in the anterior circulation who underwent initial therapeutic interventions utilizing either aspiration thrombectomy or stent-retriever thrombectomy. The analysis encompassed the assessment of intraprocedural recanalization, rescue procedures involving balloon angioplasty or stenting, 48-hour reocclusion rates, occurrences of cerebral hemorrhagic complications, and 90-day Modified Rankin Scale scores. RESULTS: Among the 948 patients encompassed in the RESCUE BT trial, a total of 230 patients with ICAS-LVO in the anterior circulation were enrolled in the study. Of these, 111 underwent aspiration thrombectomy as the first-pass therapy, while 119 patients underwent stent-retriever thrombectomy as the initial intervention. The difference in first pass recanalization rates between aspiration thrombectomy and stent-retriever thrombectomy was not statistically significant (17.1% vs. 14.3%, P = 0.555), and mechanical thrombectomy success rates (90.1% vs. 90.8%, P = 0.864), the use of balloon angioplasty or stenting for rescue therapy (54.6% vs. 45.9%, P = 0.189; 23.4% vs. 25.2%, P = 0.752), and favorable 90-day Modified Rankin Scale outcomes (53.2% vs. 40.3%, P = 0.051) showed no statistically significant differences. CONCLUSIONS: Both aspiration thrombectomy and stent-retriever thrombectomy can be considered as primary therapeutic options for patients presenting with ICAS-LVO in the anterior circulation.

Risk factors for decompressive craniectomy after endovascular treatment in acute ischemic stroke.

Endovascular treatment (EVT) is safe and effective for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) caused by large artery occlusion in the anterior circulation. However, some patients require decompressive craniectomy (DC), despite having undergone a timely EVT. This study aimed to evaluate the risk factors for subsequent DC after EVT. This retrospective cohort study comprised 138 patients who received EVT between April 2015 and June 2019 at our center. The need for subsequent DC was defined as cerebral edema or/and hemorrhagic transformation caused by large ischemic infarction, with a ≥ 5-mm midline shift and clinical deterioration after EVT. The relationship between risk factors and DC after EVT was assessed via univariate and multivariable logistic regression. Thirty (21.7%) patients required DC. These patients tended to have atrial fibrillation (P = 0.037), sedation (P = 0.049), mechanical ventilation (P = 0.008), poorer collateral circulation (P = 0.003), a higher baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score (P < 0.001), heavier thrombus burden (P < 0.001), a lower baseline Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Score (ASPECTS) (P < 0.001), and unsuccessful recanalization (P < 0.001). In the multivariate analysis, higher baseline NIHSS score [odds ratio (OR), 1.17; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.03-1.32], heavier thrombus burden [OR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.02-1.79], baseline ASPECTS ≤ 8 [OR, 7.41; 95% CI, 2.43-22.66], and unsuccessful recanalization [OR, 7.49; 95% CI, 2.13-26.36] were independent risk factors for DC after EVT. DC remains an essential treatment for some AIS patients after EVT, especially those with higher baseline NIHSS scores, heavier thrombus burden, baseline ASPECTS ≤ 8, and unsuccessful recanalization.

Thirty-Day Outcomes of the Enterprise Stent in Treating Hypoperfusion of Symptomatic Intracranial Stenosis.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the 30-day outcomes of using the Enterprise stent to treat patients with hypoperfusion of symptomatic severe intracranial stenosis. METHODS: Patients with symptomatic severe intracranial stenosis (70%-99%) who underwent Enterprise stent intervention between August 2014 and November 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. The 30-day primary outcomes included the success rate of stenting and the incidence of complications, including ischemic stroke, cerebral hemorrhage, and death. The 30-day complication rates of patients with different lesion locations and classifications of Mori morphology were compared. RESULTS: Sixty-eight patients were treated using 70 Enterprise stents. The success rate was 100%. The 30-day complication rate was 4.4%. The rates of ischemic stroke, cerebral hemorrhage, and death were 1.5%, 2.9%, and 0%, respectively. No significant difference was found in the 30-day complication rate between patients with different lesion locations and classifications of Mori morphology (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Enterprise stents were relatively safe in treating patients with hypoperfusion of symptomatic severe intracranial stenosis.