Difference in hematocrit and plasma albumin levels as an additional biomarker in the diagnosis of infectious disease.

INTRODUCTION: In clinical practice, it has been observed that patients with severe infections show changes to their hematocrit (HCT) and serum albumin (ALB) levels. This study aimed to evaluate whether the difference of HCT and ALB (HCT-ALB) levels can be used as an additional biomarker for fast diagnosis of severe infections. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This was a retrospective case-control study which included adult patients with severe infections, patients with non-infective conditions and healthy individuals. A total of 7,117 individuals were recruited in Yunnan Province, China, from January 2012 to January 2018, and were divided into three groups: 1,033 patients with severe infections (group 1); 1,081 patients with non-infective conditions (group 2); and 5,003 healthy individuals from the general population (group 3). The potential diagnostic threshold of HCT-ALB for severe infectious patients was determined by the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Group 3 was used as the reference to draw the ROC curves of the HCT-ALB value in group 1 or group 2. RESULTS: HCT-ALB values in each group were significantly different. We found that the area under the ROC curve (AUC) of group 1 reached 0.87 (95% CI: 0.86-0.89), whereas the AUC of group 2 was 0.60 (95% CI: 0.58-0.62). To reach a higher specificity of 99.0% (95% CI: 98.8-99.3%, and with sensitivity of 37.5%, 95% CI: 34.5-40.5%), a HCT-ALB value of 10.25 was recommended as the standard for diagnosis of severe infection. CONCLUSIONS: The HCT-ALB value was increased in patients with infectious disease. The measurement of the HCT-ALB value (> 10.25) might be useful in the fast diagnosis of infectious disease.

Hematocrit and plasma albumin levels difference may be a potential biomarker to discriminate preeclampsia and eclampsia in patients with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy.

BACKGROUND: We evaluated whether alterations of hemoglobin (HB), hematocrit (HCT), serum albumin level (ALB), and the difference of HCT and ALB can be used in the diagnosis of preeclampsia and eclampsia in patients with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP). METHODS: A total of 509 individuals were recruited and divided into 4 groups: Group 1, 170 healthy non-pregnant women; Group 2, 125 normal pregnant women; Group 3, 105 pregnant women diagnosed with gestational and chronic hypertension; Group 4, 109 pregnant women diagnosed as having preeclampsia and eclampsia. Data of HB, HCT, ALB, globulin (GLB) were collected at the time of a prenatal examination during the third trimester. RESULTS: Alterations in the HCT and the ALB levels in these groups were significantly different. Group 4 had a higher mean HCT-ALB value (P<0.01), but lower ALB and GLB values compared with the other three groups. We used Groups 2 and 3 as the respective reference to draw the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves of HCT-ALB in Group 4, and found that the threshold values of maximum index corresponding were 12.95 and 12.65 (sensitivity>57.0%, specificity>98.9%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The value of HCT-ALB>12.65 might be used as a potential biomarker for the auxiliary diagnosis of preeclampsia and eclampsia in HDP.

Lung-protective Ventilation in Patients with Brain Injury: A Multicenter Cross-sectional Study and Questionnaire Survey in China.

BACKGROUND: Over the years, the mechanical ventilation (MV) strategy has changed worldwide. The aim of the present study was to describe the ventilation practices, particularly lung-protective ventilation (LPV), among brain-injured patients in China. METHODS: This study was a multicenter, 1-day, cross-sectional study in 47 Intensive Care Units (ICUs) across China. Mechanically ventilated patients (18 years and older) with brain injury in a participating ICU during the time of the study, including traumatic brain injury, stroke, postoperation with intracranial tumor, hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy, intracranial infection, and idiopathic epilepsy, were enrolled. Demographic data, primary diagnoses, indications for MV, MV modes and settings, and prognoses on the 60th day were collected. Multivariable logistic analysis was used to assess factors that might affect the use of LPV. RESULTS: A total of 104 patients were enrolled in the present study, 87 (83.7%) of whom were identified with severe brain injury based on a Glasgow Coma Scale ≤8 points. Synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation (SIMV) was the most frequent ventilator mode, accounting for 46.2% of the entire cohort. The median tidal volume was set to 8.0 ml/kg (interquartile range [IQR], 7.0-8.9 ml/kg) of the predicted body weight; 50 (48.1%) patients received LPV. The median positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) was set to 5 cmH2O (IQR, 5-6 cmH2O). No PEEP values were higher than 10 cmH2O. Compared with partially mandatory ventilation, supportive and spontaneous ventilation practices were associated with LPV. There were no significant differences in mortality and MV duration between patients subjected to LPV and those were not. CONCLUSIONS: Among brain-injured patients in China, SIMV was the most frequent ventilation mode. Nearly one-half of the brain-injured patients received LPV. Patients under supportive and spontaneous ventilation were more likely to receive LPV. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.org NCT02517073 https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02517073.