Continuous Erector Spinae Plane Block Using Programmed Intermittent Bolus Regimen versus Intravenous Patient-Controlled Opioid Analgesia Within an Enhanced Recovery Program After Open Liver Resection in Patients with Coagulation Disorder: A Randomized, Controlled, Non-Inferiority Trial.

Purpose: Postoperative pain after open hepatectomy is significant. Preoperative coagulopathy limits the use of epidural analgesia, the gold standard for pain control in open abdominal surgery. Erector spinae plane block (ESPB) is a novel regional anesthesia technique that has been shown to provide effective analgesia in abdominal surgery. In this study, we compared the analgesic efficacy of patient-controlled continuous ESPB (CESPB) with hydromorphone patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) after right subcostal incision hepatectomies in hepatocellular carcinoma patients with preoperative coagulopathy. Patients and Methods: In this randomized, controlled, unblinded, and noninferiority trial, 120 patients were randomized to receive either CESPB or PCIA as primary postoperative analgesia together with parecoxib (40mg Q12 h IV) for 3 days after surgery. The primary outcome was the average cough-elicited pain numeric rating scales (NRS) recorded at the seven follow-up time points of 20:00 on the day of surgery and 9:00 and 15:00 on the postoperative day 1 to day 3 (POD1 to POD3). Results: The average cough-elicited pain NRS score was 2.402 in the CESPB group and 2.676 in the PCIA group. The mean difference (95% CI) was -0.274 (-0.620 to 0.072), which demonstrated the noninferiority of CESPB to PCIA. Patients in the CESPB group had less intraoperative opioid consumption, a lower incidence of moderate-to-severe pain and PONV at POD3, and early resumption of oral intake. Conclusion: CESPB provides analgesic efficacy noninferior to opioid PCIA in the context of multimodal analgesia after right subcostal incision open hepatectomy.

Tacrolimus-based versus cyclosporine-based immunosuppression in hepatitis C virus-infected patients after liver transplantation: a meta-analysis and systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Most liver transplant recipients receive calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs), especially tacrolimus and cyclosporine, as immunosuppressant agents to prevent rejection. A controversy exists as to whether the outcomes of hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infected liver transplant patients differ based on the CNIs used. This meta-analysis compares the clinical outcomes of tacrolimus-based and cyclosporine-based immunosuppression, especially cases of HCV recurrence in liver transplant patients with end-stage liver disease caused by HCV infection. METHODS: Related articles were identified from the Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Controlled Trials Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) in the Cochrane Library, Medline, and Embase. Meta-analyses were performed for the results of homogeneous studies. RESULTS: Nine randomized or quasi-randomized controlled trials were included. The total effect size of mortality (RR = 0.98, 95% CI: 0.77-1.25, P = 0.87) and graft loss (RR = 1.05, 95% CI: 0.83-1.33, P = 0.67) showed no significant difference between the two groups irrespective of duration of immunosuppressant therapy after liver transplantation. In addition, the HCV recurrence-induced mortality (RR = 1.11, 95% CI: 0.66-1.89, P = 0.69), graft loss (RR = 1.62, 95% CI: 0.64-4.07, P = 0.31) and retransplantation (RR = 1.40, 95% CI: 0.48-4.09, P = 0.54), as well as available biopsies, confirmed that histological HCV recurrences (RR =  0.92, 95% CI: 0.71-1.19, P = 0.51) were similar. CONCLUSION: These results suggested no difference in posttransplant HCV recurrence-induced mortality, graft loss and retransplantation, as well as histological HCV recurrence in patients treated with tacrolimus-based and cyclosporine-based immunosuppresion.