Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
2.
Dermatol Surg ; 49(4): 322-329, 2023 04 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36763849

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors (MPNSTs) are clinically aggressive soft tissue sarcomas that can present as cutaneous or subcutaneous based tumors that are commonly associated with neurofibromatosis type 1. Historically, these tumors have poor outcomes. Previously, no study has compared survival of cutaneous versus subcutaneous MPNSTs. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to investigate the difference in overall survival (OS) among cutaneous MPNSTs, subcutaneous MPNSTs of the head and neck, and subcutaneous MPNSTs of the trunk and extremities. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Nine hundred eighteen patients were included in this retrospective study using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End-Results (SEER-9) database with primary cutaneous or subcutaneous MPNSTs from 1975 to 2016. OS was calculated using cox proportional hazard models for each group. RESULTS: No significant difference was revealed in OS between cutaneous or subcutaneous MPNSTs, regardless of location. Factors associated with decreased OS included advanced age, higher grade, and nondefinitive surgical modality. CONCLUSION: This study results implies that unlike other soft tissue sarcomas, cutaneous presentation does not improve OS in patients with MPNSTs compared with their subcutaneous counterparts.


Subject(s)
Nerve Sheath Neoplasms , Neurofibrosarcoma , Sarcoma , Soft Tissue Neoplasms , Humans , Neurofibrosarcoma/pathology , Nerve Sheath Neoplasms/pathology , Retrospective Studies , Soft Tissue Neoplasms/surgery
4.
Cancers (Basel) ; 13(22)2021 Nov 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34831014

ABSTRACT

The use of BRAF and MEK inhibitors for patients with BRAF-mutant melanoma is limited as patients relapse on treatment as quickly as 6 months due to acquired resistance. We generated trametinib and dabrafenib resistant melanoma (TDR) cell lines to the MEK and BRAF inhibitors, respectively. TDR cells exhibited increased viability and maintenance of downstream p-ERK and p-Akt as compared to parental cells. Receptor tyrosine kinase arrays revealed an increase in p-IGF1R and p-IR in the drug resistant cells versus drug sensitive cells. RNA-sequencing analysis identified IGF1R and INSR upregulated in resistant cell lines compared to parental cells. Analysis of TCGA PanCancer Atlas (skin cutaneous melanoma) showed that patients with a BRAF mutation and high levels of IGF1R and INSR had a worse overall survival. BMS-754807, an IGF1R/IR inhibitor, suppressed cell proliferation along with inhibition of intracellular p-Akt in TDR cells. Dual inhibition of IGF1R and INSR using siRNA reduced cell proliferation. The combination of dabrafenib, trametinib, and BMS-754807 treatment reduced in vivo xenograft tumor growth. Examining the role of IGF1R and IR in mediating resistance to BRAF and MEK inhibitors will expand possible treatment options to aid in long-term success for BRAF-mutant melanoma patients.

5.
Cancers (Basel) ; 12(2)2020 02 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32092958

ABSTRACT

Melanoma is the most lethal form of skin cancer. Melanoma is usually curable with surgery if detected early, however, treatment options for patients with metastatic melanoma are limited and the five-year survival rate for metastatic melanoma had been 15-20% before the advent of immunotherapy. Treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors has increased long-term survival outcomes in patients with advanced melanoma to as high as 50% although individual response can vary greatly. A mutation within the MAPK pathway leads to uncontrollable growth and ultimately develops into cancer. The most common driver mutation that leads to this characteristic overactivation in the MAPK pathway is the B-RAF mutation. Current combinations of BRAF and MEK inhibitors that have demonstrated improved patient outcomes include dabrafenib with trametinib, vemurafenib with cobimetinib or encorafenib with binimetinib. Treatment with BRAF and MEK inhibitors has met challenges as patient responses began to drop due to the development of resistance to these inhibitors which paved the way for development of immunotherapies and other small molecule inhibitor approaches to address this. Resistance to these inhibitors continues to push the need to expand our understanding of novel mechanisms of resistance associated with treatment therapies. This review focuses on the current landscape of how resistance occurs with the chronic use of BRAF and MEK inhibitors in BRAF-mutant melanoma and progress made in the fields of immunotherapies and other small molecules when used alone or in combination with BRAF and MEK inhibitors to delay or circumvent the onset of resistance for patients with stage III/IV BRAF mutant melanoma.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL