3D evaluation of the effect of disinfectants on dimensional accuracy and stability of two elastomeric impression materials.

The aim of this study was to determine and compare the dimensional changes of polyether and vinyl polyether siloxane impression materials under immersion disinfection with two different disinfectants in three time periods. Impressions were obtained from an edentulous master model. Sodium hypochlorite (5.25%) and glutaraldehyde (2%) were used for disinfection and measurements were done 30 min later after making impression before disinfection, after required disinfection period (10 min), and after 24 h storage at room temperature. Impressions were scanned using 3D scanner with 10 microns accuracy and 3D software was used to evaluate the dimensional changes with superimpositioning. Positive and negative deviations were calculated and compared with master model. There was no significant difference between two elastomeric impression materials (p>0.05). It was concluded that dimensional accuracy and stability of two impression materials were excellent and similar.

Finite-Element Analysis of a New Designed Miniplate which is Used via Intraoral Approach to the Mandible Angle Fracture: Comparison of the Different Fixation Techniques.

The mandible is the largest facial bone as well as the most commonly fractured bone in the maxillofacial region. Despite numerous studies conducted to identify optimal treatment modalities and plates configurations for intraoral and transoral approaches, no definitive conclusion has been reached. This study used finite element analysis (FEA) to assess 4 scenarios for treatment of an angle fracture (6-hole noncompression miniplate; 6-hole single plate/Champy's technique, 3D strut plate; 2 parallel 4-hole noncompression miniplates). Analysis included segmental displacement and Von Mises Stress evaluations of a 3D reconstruction of a human mandible. Von Mises Stress values for plates did not vary significantly among treatment groups. Moreover, no significant differences were observed in cumulative displacement of segments subjected to vertical and horizontal loads, with all treatment configurations demonstrating clinical acceptability.

Digital evaluation of the accuracy of impression techniques and materials in angulated implants.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate the accuracy of 2 different impression techniques and 3 different impression materials in models simulating parallel and angulated implants. METHODS: Three master models simulating partial edentulous mandible with 2 implants at the sites of second premolars (parallel) and second molars with different angulations (parallel, 10° or 20° angulated) were fabricated. Two different impression techniques [splinted direct (D), indirect (I)] and 3 different monophase impression materials [polyether (PE), vinyl polysiloxane (VPS), vinyl polyether silicone (VPES)] were used for each master model and a total of 180 impressions were made (n=10). Master model and casts were scanned by a modified laser scanner and data were transferred to VRMesh software. Master model and duplicate cast scans were digitally aligned observing the superposition of anatomic markers. Angular and coronal deviations between master and duplicated copings were calculated and data were statistically analyzed. RESULTS: Mean angular and coronal deviations were in a range of 0.205-0.359° and 22.56-33.33µm, respectively. Statistical analysis revealed that the angulation of implant affected both coronal and angular deviations of the impression copings (P<0.05). According to statistical analyses, for parallel implants, the accuracy of impression materials and techniques were ranging as VPS-D=PE-D>VPS-I=PE-I>VPES-D>VPES-I from most accurate to the least. For 10° and 20° angulated implants the most accurate material and technique was VPS-D whereas the least accurate combination was VPES-I (P<0.05). CONCLUSION: Angulation, impression technique and material were found to be effective on the accuracy of implant impressions. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Clinicians may prefer VPS impression material and splinted direct technique for impressions of both parallel and up to 20° angulated implants.