The gender composition of the members of the editorial board of toxicology journals: Assessment of gender equality.

In many areas of medicine, gender equality has not yet been fully adopted despite recent developments. The inequality of gender in various areas of medicine is still debated. In this study, we analysed the gender composition of the editorial boards of toxicology journals in the Science Citation Index-Expanded (SCI-E) databases and the factors affecting this composition. The genders of the participants were determined by the data obtained from the official websites of the journals in September 2023. We analysed the journal metrics and publisher properties using Mann-Whitney U, Fisher's exact, Chi-square tests and Spearman's correlation coefficient. We used logistic regression analysis to reveal the independent factors related to gender parity. The representation rates of women were 28.62% on all editorial boards and 23.33% in editor-in-chief positions. The 'Neuroscience' (OR, 2.46 95%CI, 1.68-3.60, p < 0.001), 'Reproductive Biology'(OR, 2.05 95%CI, 1.22-3.42, p = 0.006) and 'Public, Environmental & Occupational Health'(OR, 1.49 95%CI, 1.18-1.88, p = 0.001) as a coverage category, the United States as a journal country (OR, 1.21, 95%CI, 1.04-1.40, p = 0.001), 5-year-IF≥3.6(OR, 1.54, 95%CI, 1.27-1.86, p < 0.001), 5-year H index≥29 (OR, 1.23, 95%CI, 1.01-1.49, p = 0.037) were the independent factors for gender parity. However, 'Oncology' (OR, 0.08 95%CI, 0.01-0.55, p = 0.011), 'Biochemistry, Molecular Biology' (OR, 0.62 95%CI, 0.44-0.86, p = 0.005) and 'Pharmacology & Pharmacy' (OR, 0.69 95%CI, 0.59-0.82, p < 0.001) as a coverage category, Japan as a publisher country (OR, 0.52 95%CI, 0.35-0.77, p = 0.001), and Switzerland as a journal country (OR, 0.61, 95%CI, 0.46-0.81, p = 0.001) were related to gender disparity. Greater endeavours are needed to reduce gender discrimination in toxicology. Toxicology authorities should continuously improve existing policies by optimising the analysis of objective information to eliminate barriers for toxicologists in terms of gender equality.

Clinical Significance of Pleural Lactate Measurement in Critically Ill Patients with Parapneumonic Pleural Effusion.

OBJECTIVE: Pleural fluid pH measurement is recommended for tube thoracostomy decisions in complicated parapneumonic pleural effusions. However, pleural fluid pH may be affected by blood pH in critically ill patients with common systemic acid-base disorders. We aimed to investigate the use of pleural fluid lactate to distinguish culture-positive parapneumonic effusions from other pleural effusions. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This prospective observational study included 121 eligible patients (51 female and 70 male). All patients with pleural effusion who underwent thoracentesis were assessed. Pleural fluid lactate was measured by a blood gas analyzer. RESULTS: Of the 121 patients, 30 (24.8%) were transudate and 91 (75.2%) were exudate. Of the 91 patients with exudative pleural effusion, 61 were diagnosed as culture-negative parapneumonic, 13 as culture-positive parapneumonic, 9 as malignant, and 8 as other exudative effusion. There was a strong positive linear association between serum pH and pleural fluid pH (R = 0.77, P < .001). The post hoc tests for pleural fluid lactate revealed there was a significant difference between culture-positive parapneumonic versus culture-negative parapneumonic groups (P = .004), culture-positive parapneumonic versus transudative effusion groups (P < .001), culture-negative parapneumonic versus transudative effusion groups (P = .008) and lastly; malignant effusion versus transudative effusion groups (P = .001). Receiver operating characteristics curve analysis for culture-positive parapneumonic indicated a cutoff of 4.55 mmol/L for pleural fluid lactate to have a sensitivity of 76.9% and a specificity of 84.3% (positive predictive value: 37%, negative predictive value: 96.8%). CONCLUSION: A cutoff of 4.55 mmol/L of pleural fluid lactate can be used as a useful tool to distinguish culture-positive parapneumonic effusions from other effusions in critically ill patients.

Combined Effects of Prone Positioning and Airway Pressure Release Ventilation on Oxygenation in Patients with COVID-19 ARDS.

Objective: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) can cause acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) support and prone positioning are essential treatments for severe COVID-19 ARDS. We aimed to determine the combined effect of prone position and airway pressure release ventilation (APRV) modes on oxygen improvement in mechanically-ventilated patients with COVID-19. Methods: This prospective observational study included 40 eligible patients (13 female, 27 male). Of 40 patients, 23 (57.5%) were ventilated with APRV and 17 (42.5%) were ventilated with controlled modes. A prone position was applied when the PaO2/FiO2 ratio <150 mmHg despite IMV in COVID-19 ARDS. The numbers of patients who completed the first, second, and third prone were 40, 25, and 15, respectively. Incident barotrauma events were diagnosed by both clinical findings and radiological images. Results: After the second prone, the PaO2/FiO2 ratio of the APRV group was higher compared to the PaO2/FiO2 ratio of the control group [189 (150-237)] vs. 127 (100-146) mmHg, respectively, (P=0.025). Similarly, after the third prone, the PaO2/FiO2 ratio of the APRV group was higher compared to the PaO2/FiO2 ratio of the control group [194 (132-263)] vs. 83 (71-136) mmHg, respectively, (P=0.021). Barotrauma events were detected in 13.0% of the patients in the APRV group and 11.8% of the patients in the control group (P=1000). The 28-day mortality was not different in the APRV group than in the control group (73.9% vs. 70.6%, respectively, P=1000). Conclusion: Using the APRV mode during prone positioning improves oxygenation, especially in the second and third prone positions, without increasing the risk of barotrauma. However, no benefit on mortality was detected.

Vaccination status of COVID-19 patients followed up in the ICU in a country with heterologous vaccination policy: A multicenter national study in Turkey.

OBJECTIVE: Vaccination against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-2) prevents the development of serious diseases has been shown in many studies. However, the effect of vaccination on outcomes in COVID-19 patients requiring intensive care is not clear. METHODS: This is a retrospective multicenter study conducted in 17 intensive care unit (ICU) in Turkey between January 1, 2021, and December 31, 2021. Patients aged 18 years and older who were diagnosed with COVID-19 and followed in ICU were included in the study. Patients who have never been vaccinated and patients who have been vaccinated with a single dose were considered unvaccinated. Logistic regression models were fit for the two outcomes (28-day mortality and in-hospital mortality). RESULTS: A total of 2968 patients were included final analysis. The most of patients followed in the ICU during the study period were unvaccinated (58.5%). Vaccinated patients were older, had higher Charlson comorbidity index (CCI), and had higher APACHE-2 scores than unvaccinated patients. Risk for 28-day mortality and in-hospital mortality was similar in across the year both vaccinated and unvaccinated patients. However, risk for in-hospital mortality and 28-day mortality was higher in the unvaccinated patients in quarter 4 adjusted for gender and CCI (OR: 1.45, 95% CI: 1.06-1.99 and OR: 1.42, 95% CI: 1.03-1.96, respectively) compared to the vaccinated group. CONCLUSION: Despite effective vaccination, fully vaccinated patients may be admitted to ICU because of disease severity. Unvaccinated patients were younger and had fewer comorbid conditions. Unvaccinated patients have an increased risk of 28-day mortality when adjusted for gender and CCI.

Gender distribution of editorial board members in critical care journals: Assessment of gender parity.

PURPOSE: To reveal factors related to gender parity on editorial boards of critical care journals indexing in SCI-E. METHODS: The genders were defined according to data obtained from journals' websites between 01-30 September 2022. Publisher properties and journal metrics were analyzed by using Chi-square, Fisher exact, Mann-Whitney U tests, and Spearman's correlation coefficient. Logistic regression analysis was used to reveal independent factors. RESULTS: Women's representation on editorial boards was 23.6%. The USA (OR, 0.04, 95% CI, 0.01-0.15, p < 0.001) and Netherlands (OR, 0.04, 95% CI, 0.01-0.16, p < 0.001) as publisher's countries, an IF >5 (OR, 0.25, 95% CI, 0.17-0.38, p < 0.001), publication duration <30 years (OR, 0.09, 95% CI, 0.06-0.12, p < 0.001), multidisciplinary perspective of editorial policy (OR, 0.46, 95% CI, 0.32-0.65, p < 0.001), journals categorized also in nursing (OR, 0.38, 95% CI, 0.22-0.66, p < 0.001), and being a section editor (OR, 0.49, 95% CI, 0.32-0.74, p = 0.001) were associated with gender parity. Europe as a journal continent (OR, 36.71, 95% CI, 8.39-160.53, p < 0.001) was related to gender disparity. CONCLUSIONS: Further efforts are needed to expand diversity policies in critical care medicine.

Dexmedetomidine may reduce the risk of acute kidney injury development in critically ill patients during colistin therapy.

INTRODUCTION: Colistin is considered as a last resort therapy for multidrug-resistant gram-negative organisms. It is widely used despite the significant risk of nephrotoxicity. Experimental studies showed the nephroprotective effect of dexmedetomidine, a sedative agent, against colistin toxicity. This study was performed to show the possible nephroprotective effect of dexmedetomidine among critically ill patients who received colistin. METHODS: Adult (>17 years) patients who were admitted to our surgical and medical intensive care unit (ICU) from March 2018 through March 2021, and who received colistin were included. Patients who receive Colistin therapy or intensive care unit follow-up of <72 h (discharge or death) and Acute kidney injury (AKI) or need hemodialysis prior to colistin therapy at the same hospitalization were excluded. AKI risk factors were examined by grouping patients with and without AKI. Patients, receiving colistin concomitantly with dexmedetomidine were also evaluated. RESULTS: Of the 139 patients included, 27 (17.8%) patients received dexmedetomidine. Sixty-five patients (47%) had AKI, at a median 5 (4-7) days after the initiation of colistin. Older age, lower baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate, and vasopressor use were associated with a higher risk of AKI, while dexmedetomidine use was associated with a lower risk. In the multivariate regression model, dexmedetomidine use was independently associated with a lower risk of AKI development (OR 0.20 95% CI 0.07-0.59, p = 0.003). CONCLUSION: In respect to these findings, dexmedetomidine may provide protection against AKI during colistin therapy in critically ill patients.

Amikacin-induced acute kidney injury in mechanically ventilated critically ill patients with sepsis.

In this retrospective cohort study, we aimed to evaluate the incidence, risk factors and outcomes of amikacin-induced acute kidney injury (AKI) in critically ill patients with sepsis. A total of 311 patients were included in the study. Of them, 83 (26.7%) had amikacin-induced AKI. In model 1, the multivariable analysis demonstrated concurrent use of colistin (OR 25.51, 95%CI 6.99-93.05, p< 0.001), presence of septic shock during amikacin treatment (OR 4.22, 95%CI 1.76-10.11, p=0.001), and Charlson Comorbidity Index (OR 1.14, 95%CI 1.02-1.28, p=0.025) as factors independently associated with an increased risk of amikacin-induced AKI. In model 2, the multivariable analysis demonstrated concurrent use of at least one nephrotoxic agent (OR 1.95, 95%CI 1.10-3.45; p=0.022), presence of septic shock during amikacin treatment (OR 3.48, 95%CI 1.61-7.53; p=0.002), and Charlson Comorbidity Index (OR 1.12, 95%CI 1.01-1.26; p=0.037) as factors independently associated with an increased risk of amikacin-induced AKI. In conclusion, before amikacin administration, the risk of AKI should be considered, especially in patients with multiple complicated comorbid diseases, septic shock, and those receiving colistin therapy.

The effect of frailty on the development of acute kidney injury in critically-ill geriatric patients with COVID-19.

BACKGROUND: Acute kidney injury is strongly associated with mortality in critically ill patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); however, age-related risk factors for acute kidney injury are not clear yet. In this study, it was aimed to evaluate the effects of clinical factors on acute kidney injury development in an elderly COVID-19 patients. METHODS: Critically ill patients (≥65years) with COVID-19 admitted to the intensive care unit were included in the study. Primary outcome of the study was the rate of acute kidney injury, and secondary outcome was to define the effect of frailty and other risk factors on acute kidney injury development and mortality. RESULTS: A total of 132 patients (median age 76 years, 68.2% male) were assessed. Patients were divided into two groups as follows: acute kidney injury (n = 84) and nonacute kidney injury (n = 48). Frailty incidence (48.8% vs. 8.3%, p < 0.01) was higher in the acute kidney injury group. In multivariate analysis, frailty (OR, 3.32, 95% CI, 1.67-6.56), the use of vasopressors (OR, 3.06 95% CI, 1.16-8.08), and the increase in respiratory support therapy (OR, 2.60, 95% CI, 1.01-6.6) were determined to be independent risk factors for acute kidney injury development. The mortality rate was found to be 97.6% in patients with acute kidney injury. DISCUSSION: Frailty is a risk factor for acute kidney injury in geriatric patients with severe COVID-19. The evaluation of geriatric patients based on a frailty scale before intensive care unit admission may improve outcomes.

Incidence of and risk factors for postintubation hypotension in critically ill patients with COVID-19. / Incidência e fatores de risco para hipotensão pós-intubação em pacientes críticos com COVID-19.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the incidence of risk factors for postintubation hypotension in critically ill patients with COVID-19. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of 141 patients with COVID-19 who were intubated in the intensive care unit. Postintubation hypotension was defined as the need for any vasopressor dose at any time within the 60 minutes following intubation. Patients with intubation-related cardiac arrest and hypotension before intubation were excluded from the study. RESULTS: Of the 141 included patients, 53 patients (37.5%) had postintubation hypotension, and 43.6% of the patients (n = 17) were female. The median age of the postintubation hypotension group was 75.0 (interquartile range: 67.0 - 84.0). In the multivariate analysis, shock index ≥ 0.90 (OR = 7.76; 95%CI 3.14 - 19.21; p < 0.001), albumin levels < 2.92g/dL (OR = 3.65; 95%CI 1.49 - 8.96; p = 0.005), and procalcitonin levels (OR = 1.07, 95%CI 1.01 - 1.15; p = 0.045) were independent risk factors for postintubation hypotension. Hospital mortality was similar in patients with postintubation hypotension and patients without postintubation hypotension (92.5% versus 85.2%; p = 0.29). CONCLUSION: The incidence of postintubation hypotension was 37.5% in critically ill COVID-19 patients. A shock index ≥ 0.90 and albumin levels < 2.92g/dL were independently associated with postintubation hypotension. Furthermore, a shock index ≥ 0.90 may be a practical tool to predict the increased risk of postintubation hypotension in bedside scenarios before endotracheal intubation. In this study, postintubation hypotension was not associated with increased hospital mortality in COVID-19 patients.

OBJETIVO: Avaliar a incidência de fatores de risco para hipotensão pósintubação em pacientes críticos com COVID-19. METÓDOS: Foi realizado um estudo retrospectivo com 141 pacientes com COVID-19 que foram intubados na unidade de terapia intensiva. Hipotensão pós-intubação foi definida como a necessidade de qualquer dose de vasopressor a qualquer momento em até 60 minutos após a intubação. Pacientes com parada cardiorrespiratória relacionada à intubação e hipotensão antes da intubação foram excluídos do estudo. RESULTADOS: Dos 141 pacientes incluídos, 53 pacientes (37,5%) e 43,6% dos pacientes (n = 17) eram do sexo feminino. A idade mediana do grupo com hipotensão pós-intubação foi de 75 anos (amplitude interquartil: 67,0 - 84,0). Na análise multivariada, índice de choque ≥ 0,90 (RC = 7,76; IC95% 3,14 - 19,21; p < 0,001), níveis de albumina < 2,92g/dL (RC = 3,65; IC95% 1,49 - 8,96; p = 0,005) e níveis de procalcitonina (RC = 1,07, IC95% 1,01 - 1,15; p = 0,045) foram fatores de risco independentes para hipotensão pós-intubação. A mortalidade hospitalar foi semelhante em pacientes com hipotensão pós-intubação e pacientes sem hipotensão pós-intubação (92,5% versus 85,2%; p = 0,29). CONCLUSÃO: A incidência de hipotensão pós-intubação foi de 37,5% em pacientes críticos com COVID-19. Um índice de choque ≥ 0,90 e níveis de albumina < 2,92g/ dL foram independentemente associados à hipotensão pós-intubação. Além disso, índice de choque ≥ 0,90 pode ser uma ferramenta do leito antes da intubação endotraqueal. Neste estudo, a hipotensão pós-intubação não esteve associada ao aumento da mortalidade hospitalar em pacientes com COVID-19.

Use of a modified surgical APGAR score for prediction of postoperative complications in emergency surgery: An observational retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: The surgical Apgar score (SAS) was defined by Gawande et al. in 2007. It has been shown that this scoring system was highly effective for predicting the incidence of post-operative complications and mortality. In this study, we aimed to define a new, modified SAS (mSAS) for predicting the incidence of post-operative complications and mortality in emergency surgery. We also wanted to quantify the effectiveness of this modified scoring system, comprising of the duration of the operation in addition to the three intraoperative parameters of the SAS score. METHODS: Five hundred and seventy-nine patients who underwent emergency surgery were enrolled in this retrospective obser-vational study. At the end of the operation, the SAS was calculated from the data obtained from the examination of the patients and the mSAS was calculated by adding the duration of the operation to data used in the calculation of the SAS (Surgical duration >8 h; -4 points; 7.01-8 h; -3 points; 5.01-7 h; -2 points; 3.01-5 h; -1 points; 0-3 h; 0 points added). RESULTS: There was a statistically significant relationship between the mSAS and the total number of complications (as operative time [OT] increased, the number of complications increased) (r=0.360; p=0.001). The compliance levels of the SAS and mSAS were 98.4% and they have been found as statistically significant (ICC: 0.984; p=0.001; p<0.01). CONCLUSION: We suggest that the OT should be included as a simple, objective and practical indication of the SAS risk score in major operations. The mSAS was an independent predictor of post-operative mortality and complications. With the widespread use of electronic medical record systems and the effective use of pre-operative medical data, the mSAS can be used as an easy and new scoring system to predict prognosis.

COVID-19 Pneumonia After SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination with CoronaVac: A Case Series from Turkey.

Coronavirus disease 2019 is a novel viral infection that has caused a pandemic globally. Many kinds of vaccine development studies were conducted to prevent the spread and deaths. The CoronaVac is the most commonly used vaccine in Turkey. Phase 3 trials from various countries revealed that CoronaVac efficacy ranged from 50.7% to 91.25% but increased in moderate or severe cases to 100%. Additionally, it was remarkable owing to high seroconversion rates achieving up to 100%. After the vaccine campaign began in Turkey, critically ill patients continued to admit to our center's intensive care unit though they had been vaccinated with 2 doses of CoronaVac. The clinical course of these patients revealed that they are still at high risk of severe disease and death. Therefore, we aimed to share these patients' clinical characteristics and disease course, laboratory, and radiologic data.

The Predictive Values of Respiratory Rate Oxygenation Index and Chest Computed Tomography Severity Score for High-Flow Nasal Oxygen Failure in Critically Ill Patients with Coronavirus Disease-2019.

Background: The prediction of high-flow nasal oxygen (HFNO) failure in patients with coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) having acute respiratory failure (ARF) may prevent delayed intubation and decrease mortality. Aims: To define the related risk factors to HFNO failure and hospital mortality. Study Design: Retrospective cohort study. Methods: To this study, 85 critically ill patients (≥18 years) with COVID-19 related acute kidney injury who were treated with HFNO were enrolled. Treatment success was defined as the de-escalation of the oxygenation support to the conventional oxygen therapies. HFNO therapy failure was determined as the need for invasive mechanical ventilation or death. The patients were divided into HFNO-failure (HFNO-F) and HFNO-success (HFNO-S) groups. Electronic medical records and laboratory data were screened for all patients. Respiratory rate oxygenation (ROX) index on the first hour and chest computed tomography (CT) severity score were calculated. Factors related to HFNO therapy failure and mortality were defined. Results: This study assessed 85 patients (median age 67 years, 69.4% male) who were divided into two groups as HFNO success (n = 33) and HFNO failure (n = 52). The respiratory rate oxygenation (ROX) was measured at 1 hour and the computed tomography (CT) score indicated HFNO failure and intubation, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic of 0.695 for the ROX index and 0.628 for the CT score. A ROX index of <3.81 and a CT score of >15 in the first hour of therapy were the predictors of HFNO failure and intubation. Age, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score, arterial blood gas findings "(i.e., partial pressure of oxygen [PaO2], PaO2 [fraction of inspired oxygen]/SO2 [oxygen saturation] ratio)", and D-dimer levels were also associated with HFNO failure; however, based on logistic regression analysis, a calculated ROX on the first hour of therapy of <3.81 (odds ratio [OR] = 4.78, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.75-13.02, P = 0.001) and a chest CT score of >15 (OR = 2.83, 95% CI = 1.01-7.88, P = <0.001) were the only independent risk factors. In logistic regression analysis, a ROX calculated on the first hour of therapy of <3.81 (OR = 4.78, [95% CI = 1.75-13.02], P = 0.001) and a chest CT score of >15 (OR 2.83, 95% CI = 1.01-7.88, P = <0.001) were the independent risk factors for the HFNO failure. The intensive care unit and hospital mortality rates were 80.2% and 82.7%, respectively, in the HFNO failure group. Conclusion: The early prediction of HFNO therapy failure is essential considering the high mortality rate in patients with HFNO therapy failure. Using the ROX index and the chest CT severity score combined with the other clinical parameters may reduce mortality. Additionally, multi-centre observational studies are needed to define the predictive value of ROX and chest CT score not only for COVID-19 but also other causes of ARF.

Clinical outcomes of in-hospital cardiac arrest in a tertiary hospital and factors related to 28-day survival: A retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: The primary aim was to define factors related to the return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) after in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA), and the secondary aim was to determine factors related to 28-day mortality in patients admitted to intensive care unit (ICU) after ROSC. METHODS: In this retrospective study, we included the patients who suffered from IHCA in a tertiary hospital between July 2016 and April 2019. Pre- and post-resuscitation characteristics of the patients and event characteristics were defined to reveal the independent factors associated with ROSC and 28-day survival. RESULTS: A total of 254 patients (median age 73 years, 58.3% males) underwent cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). The ROSC rate was 45.7%. Of all, 51 patients (median age, 63 years, 54.9% males) were admitted to in-hospital ICUs. The 28-day survival rate was 31.4%. The independent risk factors were chronic kidney disease (odds ratio [OR], 3.18, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.37-7.19, P = 0.007), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (OR, 2.84, 95% CI, 1.23-6.61, P = 0.015), asystole as an initial rhythm (OR, 2.94, 95% CI, 1.27-6.79, P = 0.012), multi-trauma-related complications (OR, 21.11, 95% CI, 4.71-94.69, P < 0.001), and septic shock (OR, 4.10; 95% CI, 1.16-14.54, P = 0.029) for ROSC; and a cerebral performance category score >2 (OR, 20.86, 95% CI, 2.74-158.65, P = 0.003), Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score >14 (OR, 7.58, 95% CI, 1.06-54.23, P = 0.044) for 28-day mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Independent risk factors related to ROSC and 28-day mortality were defined in the study. However, further studies are needed to devise new strategies for increased hospital discharge with preserved neurologic functions.

Incidência e fatores de risco para hipotensão pós-intubação em pacientes críticos com COVID-19 / Incidence of and risk factors for postintubation hypotension in critically ill patients with COVID-19

RESUMO Objetivo: Avaliar a incidência de fatores de risco para hipotensão pósintubação em pacientes críticos com COVID-19. Metódos: Foi realizado um estudo retrospectivo com 141 pacientes com COVID-19 que foram intubados na unidade de terapia intensiva. Hipotensão pós-intubação foi definida como a necessidade de qualquer dose de vasopressor a qualquer momento em até 60 minutos após a intubação. Pacientes com parada cardiorrespiratória relacionada à intubação e hipotensão antes da intubação foram excluídos do estudo. Resultados: Dos 141 pacientes incluídos, 53 pacientes (37,5%) e 43,6% dos pacientes (n = 17) eram do sexo feminino. A idade mediana do grupo com hipotensão pós-intubação foi de 75 anos (amplitude interquartil: 67,0 - 84,0). Na análise multivariada, índice de choque ≥ 0,90 (RC = 7,76; IC95% 3,14 - 19,21; p < 0,001), níveis de albumina < 2,92g/dL (RC = 3,65; IC95% 1,49 - 8,96; p = 0,005) e níveis de procalcitonina (RC = 1,07, IC95% 1,01 - 1,15; p = 0,045) foram fatores de risco independentes para hipotensão pós-intubação. A mortalidade hospitalar foi semelhante em pacientes com hipotensão pós-intubação e pacientes sem hipotensão pós-intubação (92,5% versus 85,2%; p = 0,29). Conclusão: A incidência de hipotensão pós-intubação foi de 37,5% em pacientes críticos com COVID-19. Um índice de choque ≥ 0,90 e níveis de albumina < 2,92g/ dL foram independentemente associados à hipotensão pós-intubação. Além disso, índice de choque ≥ 0,90 pode ser uma ferramenta do leito antes da intubação endotraqueal. Neste estudo, a hipotensão pós-intubação não esteve associada ao aumento da mortalidade hospitalar em pacientes com COVID-19.

ABSTRACT Objective: To evaluate the incidence of risk factors for postintubation hypotension in critically ill patients with COVID-19. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of 141 patients with COVID-19 who were intubated in the intensive care unit. Postintubation hypotension was defined as the need for any vasopressor dose at any time within the 60 minutes following intubation. Patients with intubation-related cardiac arrest and hypotension before intubation were excluded from the study. Results: Of the 141 included patients, 53 patients (37.5%) had postintubation hypotension, and 43.6% of the patients (n = 17) were female. The median age of the postintubation hypotension group was 75.0 (interquartile range: 67.0 - 84.0). In the multivariate analysis, shock index ≥ 0.90 (OR = 7.76; 95%CI 3.14 - 19.21; p < 0.001), albumin levels < 2.92g/dL (OR = 3.65; 95%CI 1.49 - 8.96; p = 0.005), and procalcitonin levels (OR = 1.07, 95%CI 1.01 - 1.15; p = 0.045) were independent risk factors for postintubation hypotension. Hospital mortality was similar in patients with postintubation hypotension and patients without postintubation hypotension (92.5% versus 85.2%; p = 0.29). Conclusion: The incidence of postintubation hypotension was 37.5% in critically ill COVID-19 patients. A shock index ≥ 0.90 and albumin levels < 2.92g/dL were independently associated with postintubation hypotension. Furthermore, a shock index ≥ 0.90 may be a practical tool to predict the increased risk of postintubation hypotension in bedside scenarios before endotracheal intubation. In this study, postintubation hypotension was not associated with increased hospital mortality in COVID-19 patients.

COVID-19: vaccination vs. hospitalization.

OBJECTIVE: Vaccination is the most efficient way to control the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, but vaccination rates remain below the target level in most countries. This multicenter study aimed to evaluate the vaccination status of hospitalized patients and compare two different booster vaccine protocols. SETTING: Inoculation in Turkey began in mid-January 2021. Sinovac was the only available vaccine until April 2021, when BioNTech was added. At the beginning of July 2021, the government offered a third booster dose to healthcare workers and people aged > 50 years who had received the two doses of Sinovac. Of the participants who received a booster, most chose BioNTech as the third dose. METHODS: We collected data from 25 hospitals in 16 cities. Patients hospitalized between August 1 and 10, 2021, were included and categorized into eight groups according to their vaccination status. RESULTS: We identified 1401 patients, of which 529 (37.7%) were admitted to intensive care units. Nearly half (47.8%) of the patients were not vaccinated, and those with two doses of Sinovac formed the second largest group (32.9%). Hospitalizations were lower in the group which received 2 doses of Sinovac and a booster dose of BioNTech than in the group which received 3 doses of Sinovac. CONCLUSION: Effective vaccinations decreased COVID-19-related hospitalizations. The efficacy after two doses of Sinovac may decrease over time; however, it may be enhanced by adding a booster dose. Moreover, unvaccinated patients may be persuaded to undergo vaccination.

Is serum magnesium level associated with atrial fibrillation in the mixed medical/surgical intensive care unit setting?

Background: Although low serum magnesium level is a a relatively common problem in mixed medical/surgical intensive care units (ICUs), its association with new-onset atrial fibrillation (NOAF) has been studied to a lesser extent. We aimed to investigate the effect of magnesium levels on the development of NOAF in critically ill patients admitted to the mixed medical/surgical ICU. Methods: A total of 110 eligible patients (45 female, 65 male) were included in this case-control study. The age and sex-matched control group (n = 110) included patients with no atrial fibrillation from admission to discharge or death. Results: The incidence of NOAF was 2.4% (n = 110) between January 2013 and June 2020. At NOAF onset or the matched time point, median serum magnesium levels were lower in the NOAF group than in the control group (0.84 [0.73-0.93] vs. 0.86 [0.79-0.97] mmol/L; p = 0.025). At NOAF onset or the matched time point, 24.5% (n = 27) in the NOAF group and 12.7% (n = 14) in the control group had hypomagnesemia (p = 0.037). Based on Model 1, multivariable analysis demonstrated magnesium level at NOAF onset or the matched time point (OR: 0.07; 95%CI: 0.01-0.44; p = 0.004), acute kidney injury (OR: 1.88; 95%CI: 1.03-3.40; p = 0.039), and APACHE II (OR: 1.04; 95% CI: 1.01-1.09; p = 0.046) as factors independently associated with an increased risk of NOAF. Based on Model 2, multivariable analysis demonstrated hypomagnesemia at NOAF onset or the matched time point (OR: 2.52; 95% CI: 1.19-5.36; p = 0.016) and APACHE II (OR: 1.04; 95%CI: 1.01-1.09; p = 0.043) as factors independently associated with an increased risk of NOAF. In multivariate analysis for hospital mortality, NOAF was an independent risk factor for hospital mortality (OR: 3.22; 95% CI: 1.69-6.13, p<0.001). Conclusion: The development of NOAF in critically ill patients increases mortality. Critically ill patients with hypermagnesemia should be carefully evaluated for risk of NOAF.

New-onset atrial fibrillation in critically ill patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).

Background: Mortality in critically ill patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is high, therefore, it is essential to evaluate the independent effect of new-onset atrial fibrillation (NOAF) on mortality in patients with COVID-19. We aimed to determine the incidence, risk factors, and outcomes of NOAF in a cohort of critically ill patients with COVID-19. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study on patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) with a diagnosis of COVID-19. NOAF was defined as atrial fibrillation that was detected after diagnosis of COVID-19 without a prior history. The primary outcome of the study was the effect of NOAF on mortality in critically ill COVID-19 patients. Results: NOAF incidence was 14.9% (n = 37), and 78% of patients (n = 29) were men in NOAF positive group. Median age of the NOAF group was 79.0 (interquartile range, 71.5-84.0). Hospital mortality was higher in the NOAF group (87% vs 67%, respectively, P = .019). However, in multivariate analysis, NOAF was not an independent risk factor for hospital mortality (OR 1.42, 95% CI 0.40-5.09, P = .582). Conclusions: The incidence of NOAF was 14.9% in critically ill COVID-19 patients. Hospital mortality was higher in the NOAF group. However, NOAF was not an independent risk factor for hospital mortality in patients with COVID-19.

Clinical characteristics and risk factors for 28-day mortality in critically ill patients with COVID-19: a retrospective cohort study

Background: To date, the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused more than 2.6 million deaths all around the world. Risk factors for mortality remain unclear. The primary aim was to determine the independent risk factors for 28-day mortality. Materials and methods: In this retrospective cohort study, critically ill patients (≥ 18 years) who were admitted to the intensive care unit due to COVID-19 were included. Patient characteristics, laboratory data, radiologic findings, treatments, and complications were analyzed in the study. Results: A total of 249 patients (median age 71, 69.1% male) were included in the study. 28-day mortality was 67.9% (n = 169). The median age of deceased patients was 75 (66­81). Of them, 68.6% were male. Cerebrovascular disease, dementia, chronic kidney disease, and malignancy were significantly higher in the deceased group. In the multivariate analysis, sepsis/septic shock (OR, 15.16, 95% CI, 3.96­58.11, p < 0.001), acute kidney injury (OR, 4.73, 95% CI, 1.55­14.46, p = 0.006), acute cardiac injury (OR, 9.76, 95% CI, 1.84­51.83, p = 0.007), and chest CT score higher than 15 (OR, 4.49, 95% CI, 1.51-13.38, p = 0.007) were independent risk factors for 28-day mortality. Conclusion: Early detection of the risk factors and the use of chest CT score might improve the outcomes in patients with COVID-19.

Management of an Organ Donation Process in COVID-19 Pandemic: First Case of Turkey.

The first case of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) was defined as unexplained pneumonia on December 8, 2019, and then it rapidly caused a pandemic and affected transplantation rates negatively. Organ donation processes got more complex because the exclusion of the disease in a short period became more difficult than normal. The exclusion of the disease is vital not only for recipients but also for the medical staff, transplantation teams, and intensive care professionals to reduce the transmission risk. The main steps for diagnosis of COVID-19 are investigation of symptoms, recollection of travel and physical contact history, and testing using the real time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test. Although it has limitations such as false negative results, RT-PCR is the most accurate method to detect COVID-19, and it is mandatory before donation processes in many countries. In this case report, we aim to share our experience about the first organ donation during the COVID-19 pandemic in Turkey.