Safety and Efficacy of Efruxifermin in Combination With a GLP-1 Receptor Agonist in Patients With NASH/MASH and Type 2 Diabetes in a Randomized Phase 2 Study.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: In phase 2 studies, efruxifermin, an Fc-FGF21 analog, significantly reduced steatohepatitis and fibrosis in patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis, now called metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH), for which there is no approved treatment. Type 2 diabetes (T2D) and obesity are prevalent among patients with MASH and increasingly treated with glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs). This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of efruxifermin in patients with MASH, fibrosis, and T2D taking a GLP-1RA. METHODS: Cohort D was a double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2b study in adults with T2D and MASH with fibrosis (F1-F3) on stable GLP-1RA therapy randomized (2:1) to receive efruxifermin 50 mg or placebo, once weekly for 12 weeks. The primary endpoint was safety and tolerability of efruxifermin added to a stable dose of GLP-1RA. Secondary endpoints included changes in hepatic fat fraction (HFF), markers of liver injury and fibrosis, and metabolic parameters. RESULTS: Adults (N = 31) with T2D and MASH fibrosis (F1-F3) on a stable GLP-1RA (semaglutide, 48.4%; dulaglutide, 45.2%; liraglutide, 6.5%) received efruxifermin 50 mg (n = 21) or placebo (n = 10) for 12 weeks. The addition of efruxifermin to a GLP-1RA appeared safe and well-tolerated. The most frequent efruxifermin-related adverse events were mild to moderate gastrointestinal events. One patient receiving efruxifermin discontinued due to nausea, and another withdrew consent. There were no treatment-related serious adverse events. After 12 weeks, efruxifermin reduced HFF by 65% (P < .0001 vs placebo) compared with a 10% reduction for placebo (GLP-1RA alone). Efruxifermin also improved noninvasive markers of liver injury, fibrosis, glucose, and lipid metabolism while maintaining GLP-1RA-mediated weight loss. CONCLUSIONS: The tolerability profile of efruxifermin added to GLP-1RA appeared comparable to that of either drug alone, while also significantly reducing HFF and noninvasive markers of fibrosis in patients with MASH and T2D. Liver health in patients already on a GLP-1RA may be further improved by addition of efruxifermin. CLINICALTRIALS: gov, Number: NCT05039450.

Safety and efficacy of once-weekly efruxifermin versus placebo in non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (HARMONY): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2b trial.

BACKGROUND: Fibroblast growth factor 21 (FGF21) regulates metabolism and protects cells against stress. Efruxifermin is a bivalent Fc-FGF21 analogue that replicates FGF21 agonism of fibroblast growth factor receptor 1c, 2c, or 3c. The aim of this phase 2b study was to assess its efficacy and safety in patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) and moderate (F2) or severe (F3) fibrosis. METHODS: HARMONY is a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 96-week, phase 2b trial that was initiated at 41 clinics in the USA. Adults with biopsy-confirmed NASH, defined by a non-alcoholic fatty liver disease activity score (NAS) of 4 or higher and scores of 1 or higher in each of steatosis, ballooning, and lobular inflammation, with histological stage F2 or F3 fibrosis, were randomly assigned (1:1:1), via an interactive response system, to receive placebo or efruxifermin (28 mg or 50 mg), subcutaneously once weekly. Patients, investigators, pathologists, site staff, and the sponsor were masked to group assignments during the study. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with improvement in fibrosis of at least 1 stage and no worsening of NASH, based on analyses of baseline and week 24 biopsies (liver biopsy analysis set [LBAS]). A sensitivity analysis evaluated the endpoint in the full analysis set (FAS), for which patients with missing biopsies were considered non-responders. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04767529, and is ongoing. FINDINGS: Between March 22, 2021, and Feb 7, 2022, 747 patients were assessed for eligibility and 128 patients (mean age 54·7 years [SD 10·4]; 79 [62%] female and 49 male [38%]; 118 [92%] white; and 56 [41%] Hispanic or Latino) were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive placebo (n=43), efruxifermin 28 mg (n=42; two randomised patients were not dosed because of an administrative error), or efruxifermin 50 mg (n=43). In the LBAS (n=113), eight (20%) of 41 patients in the placebo group had an improvement in fibrosis of at least 1 stage and no worsening of NASH by week 24 versus 15 (39%) of 38 patients in the efruxifermin 28 mg group (risk ratio [RR] 2·3 [95% CI 1·1-4·8]; p=0·025) and 14 (41%) of 34 patients in the efruxifermin 50 mg group (2·2 [1·0-5·0]; p=0·036). Based on the FAS (n=128), eight (19%) of 43 patients in the placebo group met this endpoint versus 15 (36%) of 42 in the efruxifermin 28 mg group (RR 2·2 [95% CI 1·0-4·8]; p=0·033) and 14 (33%) of 43 in the efruxifermin 50 mg group (1·9 [0·8-4·3]; p=0·123). The most frequent efruxifermin-related adverse events were diarrhoea (16 [40%] of 40 patients in the efruxifermin 28 mg group and 17 [40%] of 43 patients in efruxifermin 50 mg group vs eight [19%] of 43 patients in the placebo group; all events except one were grade 1-2) and nausea (11 [28%] patients in the efruxifermin 28 mg group and 18 [42%] patients in the efruxifermin 50 mg group vs ten [23%] patients in the placebo group; all grade 1-2). Five patients (two in the 28 mg group and three in the 50 mg group) discontinued due to adverse events. Serious adverse events occurred in four patients in the 50 mg group; one was defined as drug related (ulcerative esophagitis in a participant with a history of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease). No deaths occurred. INTERPRETATION: Efruxifermin improved liver fibrosis and resolved NASH over 24 weeks in patients with F2 or F3 fibrosis, with acceptable tolerability, supporting further assessment in phase 3 trials. FUNDING: Akero Therapeutics.

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase IIa trial of efruxifermin for patients with compensated NASH cirrhosis.

Background & Aims: Efruxifermin has shown clinical efficacy in patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) and F1-F3 fibrosis. The primary objective of the BALANCED Cohort C was to assess the safety and tolerability of efruxifermin in patients with compensated NASH cirrhosis. Methods: Patients with NASH and stage 4 fibrosis (n = 30) were randomized 2:1 to receive efruxifermin 50 mg (n = 20) or placebo (n = 10) once-weekly for 16 weeks. The primary endpoint was safety and tolerability of efruxifermin. Secondary and exploratory endpoints included evaluation of non-invasive markers of liver injury and fibrosis, glucose and lipid metabolism, and changes in histology in a subset of patients who consented to end-of-study liver biopsy. Results: Efruxifermin was safe and well-tolerated; most adverse events (AEs) were grade 1 (n = 7, 23.3%) or grade 2 (n = 19, 63.3%). The most frequent AEs were gastrointestinal, including transient, mild to moderate diarrhea, and/or nausea. Significant improvements were noted in key markers of liver injury (alanine aminotransferase) and glucose and lipid metabolism. Sixteen-week treatment with efruxifermin was associated with significant reductions in non-invasive markers of fibrosis including Pro-C3 (least squares mean change from baseline [LSMCFB] -9 µg/L efruxifermin vs. -3.4 µg/L placebo; p = 0.0130) and ELF score (-0.4 efruxifermin vs. +0.4 placebo; p = 0.0036), with a trend towards reduced liver stiffness (LSMCFB -5.7 kPa efruxifermin vs. -1.1 kPa placebo; n.s.). Of 12 efruxifermin-treated patients with liver biopsy after 16 weeks, 4 (33%) achieved fibrosis improvement of at least one stage without worsening of NASH, while an additional 3 (25%) achieved resolution of NASH, compared to 0 of 5 placebo-treated patients. Conclusions: Efruxifermin appeared safe and well-tolerated with encouraging improvements in markers of liver injury, fibrosis, and glucose and lipid metabolism following 16 weeks of treatment, warranting confirmation in larger and longer term studies. Lay summary: Cirrhosis resulting from non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), the progressive form of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, represents a major unmet medical need. Currently there are no approved drugs for the treatment of NASH. This proof-of-concept randomized, double-blind clinical trial demonstrated the potential therapeutic benefit of efruxifermin treatment compared to placebo in patients with cirrhosis due to NASH. Clinical Trial Number: NCT03976401.

Efruxifermin in non-alcoholic steatohepatitis: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2a trial.

Preclinical and clinical data suggest that fibroblast growth factor 21 (FGF21) is anti-fibrotic, improves metabolic status and has potential to treat non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). We assessed the safety and efficacy of efruxifermin, a long-acting Fc-FGF21 fusion protein, for the treatment of NASH. BALANCED was a randomized, placebo-controlled study in patients with NASH conducted at 27 centers in the United States (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03976401 ). Eighty patients, stratified by hepatic fat fraction (HFF) and fibrosis stage, were randomized using a centrally administered minimization algorithm 1:1:1:1 to receive placebo (n = 21) or efruxifermin 28 mg (n = 19), efruxifermin 50 mg (n = 20) or efruxifermin 70 mg (n = 20) via weekly subcutaneous injection for 16 weeks. The primary endpoint-absolute change from baseline in HFF measured as magnetic resonance imaging-proton density fat fraction at week 12-was met. For the full analysis set, the least squares mean absolute changes (one-sided 97.5% confidence interval) from baseline in HFF were -12.3% (-infinity (-inf), -10.3), -13.4% (-inf, -11.4) and -14.1% (-inf, -12.1) in the 28-, 50- and 70-mg groups, respectively, versus 0.3% (-inf, 1.6) in the placebo group, with statistically significant differences between efruxifermin groups and placebo (P < 0.0001 each). Overall, 70 of 79 patients who received the study drug (89%) experienced at least one treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE), with the majority grade 1-2 (64 (81%)), five (6%) grade 3 and one grade 4. The most commonly reported drug-related TEAEs were grade 1-2 gastrointestinal (36 (46%)). Treatment with efruxifermin significantly reduced HFF in patients with F1-F3 stage NASH, with an acceptable safety profile.

Efficacy and safety 48 weeks after switching from efavirenz to rilpivirine using emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate-based single-tablet regimens.

BACKGROUND: Due to ongoing neuropsychiatric adverse events in some efavirenz (EFV)-treated patients, a switch to an alternative non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor may be considered. Rilpivirine (RPV) has been coformulated as a single-tablet regimen (STR) with emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (FTC/TDF), and the components have demonstrated noninferior efficacy to EFV+FTC/TDF, good tolerability profile, and high adherence. After discontinuation, EFV has an extended inductive effect on cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 that, after switching, may reduce RPV exposures and adversely impact clinical outcomes. OBJECTIVE: This study examines the clinical implications of reduced RPV exposures with concomitant FTC/TDF and declining EFV exposures when patients, intolerant to EFV, switch from EFV/FTC/TDF to RPV/FTC/TDF. METHODS: This 48-week, phase 2b, open-label, multicenter study evaluated the efficacy and safety of switching from EFV/FTC/TDF (≥3 months duration) to RPV/FTC/TDF. Virologic suppression (HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL), safety, and EFV and RPV pharmacokinetics were assessed. RESULTS: At weeks 12 and 24, all 49 dosed subjects remained suppressed on RPV/FTC/TDF. At week 48, 46 (93.9%) subjects remained suppressed and virologic failure occurred in 2/49 (4.1%) subjects with no emergence of resistance. EFV concentrations were above the 90th percentile for inhibitory concentration (IC90) for several weeks after EFV discontinuation, and RPV exposures were in the range observed in phase 3 studies by approximately 2 weeks post switch. No subjects discontinued the study due to an adverse event. CONCLUSIONS: Switching from EFV/FTC/TDF to RPV/FTC/ TDF was a safe, efficacious option for virologically suppressed HIV-infected patients with EFV intolerance wishing to remain on an STR.

Antiviral activity, safety, and pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics of tenofovir alafenamide as 10-day monotherapy in HIV-1-positive adults.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the antiviral activity, safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics of short-term monotherapy with tenofovir alafenamide (TAF), a next-generation tenofovir (TFV) prodrug. DESIGN: A phase 1b, randomized, partially blinded, active- and placebo-controlled, dose-ranging study. METHODS: Treatment-naive and experienced HIV-1-positive adults currently off antiretroviral therapy were randomized to receive 8, 25, or 40 mg TAF, 300 mg tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF), or placebo, each once daily for 10 days. RESULTS: Thirty-eight subjects were enrolled. Baseline characteristics were similar across dose groups. Significant reductions in plasma HIV-1 RNA from baseline to day 11 were observed for all TAF dose groups compared with placebo (P < 0.01), with a median decrease of 1.08-1.73 log10 copies per milliliter, including a dose-response relationship for viral load decrease up to 25 mg. At steady state, 8, 25, and 40 mg TAF yielded mean TFV plasma exposures [area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUCtau)] of 97%, 86%, and 79% lower, respectively, as compared with the TFV exposures observed with 300 mg TDF. For 25 and 40 mg TAF, the mean intracellular peripheral blood mononuclear cell tenofovir diphosphate AUCtau was ∼7-fold and ∼25-fold higher, relative to 300 mg TDF. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with 300 mg TDF, TAF demonstrated more potent antiviral activity, higher peripheral blood mononuclear cell intracellular tenofovir diphosphate levels, and lower plasma TFV exposures, at approximately 1/10th of the dose. This may translate into greater antiviral efficacy, a higher barrier to resistance, and an improved safety profile relative to TDF, supporting further investigation of TAF dosed once daily in HIV-infected patients.

Co-formulated elvitegravir, cobicistat, emtricitabine, and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate versus ritonavir-boosted atazanavir plus co-formulated emtricitabine and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate for initial treatment of HIV-1 infection: a randomised, double-blind, phase 3, non-inferiority trial.

BACKGROUND: The HIV integrase strand transfer inhibitor elvitegravir (EVG) has been co-formulated with the CYP3A4 inhibitor cobicistat (COBI), emtricitabine (FTC), and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) into a once-daily, single tablet. We compared EVG/COBI/FTC/TDF with a ritonavir-boosted (RTV) protease inhibitor regimen of atazanavir (ATV)/RTV+FTC/TDF as initial therapy for HIV-1 infection. METHODS: This phase 3, non-inferiority study enrolled treatment-naive patients with an HIV-1 RNA concentration of 5000 copies per mL or more and susceptibility to atazanavir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive EVG/COBI/FTC/TDF or ATV/RTV+FTC/TDF plus matching placebos, administered once daily. Randomisation was by a computer-generated random sequence, accessed via an interactive telephone and web response system. Patients, and investigators and study staff who gave treatments, assessed outcomes, or analysed data were masked to the assignment. The primary endpoint was HIV RNA concentration of 50 copies per mL or less after 48 weeks (according to the US FDA snapshot algorithm), with a 12% non-inferiority margin. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01106586. FINDINGS: 1017 patients were screened, 715 were enrolled, and 708 were treated (353 with EVG/COBI/FTC/TDF and 355 with ATV/RTV+FTC/TDF). EVG/COBI/FTC/TDF was non-inferior to ATV/RTV+FTC/TDF for the primary outcome (316 patients [89·5%] vs 308 patients [86·8%], adjusted difference 3·0%, 95% CI -1·9% to 7·8%). Both regimens had favourable safety and tolerability; 13 (3·7%) versus 18 (5·1%) patients discontinued treatment because of adverse events. Fewer patients receiving EVG/COBI/FTC/TDF had abnormal results in liver function tests than did those receiving ATV/RTV+FTC/TDF and had smaller median increases in fasting triglyceride concentration (90 µmol/L vs 260 µmol/L, p=0·006). Small median increases in serum creatinine concentration with accompanying decreases in estimated glomerular filtration rate occurred in both study groups by week 2; they generally stabilised by week 8 and did not change up to week 48 (median change 11 µmol/L vs 7 µmol/L). INTERPRETATION: If regulatory approval is given, EVG/COBI/FTC/TDF would be the first integrase-inhibitor-based regimen given once daily and the only one formulated as a single tablet for initial HIV treatment. FUNDING: Gilead Sciences.

Co-formulated elvitegravir, cobicistat, emtricitabine, and tenofovir versus co-formulated efavirenz, emtricitabine, and tenofovir for initial treatment of HIV-1 infection: a randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trial, analysis of results after 48 weeks.

BACKGROUND: The integrase inhibitor elvitegravir (EVG) has been co-formulated with the CYP3A4 inhibitor cobicistat (COBI), emtricitabine (FTC), and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) in a single tablet given once daily. We compared the efficacy and safety of EVG/COBI/FTC/TDF with standard of care-co-formulated efavirenz (EFV)/FTC/TDF-as initial treatment for HIV infection. METHODS: In this phase 3 trial, treatment-naive patients from outpatient clinics in North America were randomly assigned by computer-generated allocation sequence with a block size of four in a 1:1 ratio to receive EVG/COBI/FTC/TDF or EFV/FTC/TDF, once daily, plus matching placebo. Patients and study staff involved in giving study treatment, assessing outcomes, and collecting and analysing data were masked to treatment allocation. Eligibility criteria included screening HIV RNA concentration of 5000 copies per mL or more, and susceptibility to efavirenz, emtricitabine, and tenofovir. The primary endpoint was HIV RNA concentration of fewer than 50 copies per mL at week 48. The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01095796. FINDINGS: 700 patients were randomly assigned and treated (348 with EVG/COBI/FTC/TDF, 352 with EFV/FTC/TDF). EVG/COBI/FTC/TDF was non-inferior to EFV/FTC/TDF; 305/348 (87·6%) versus 296/352 (84·1%) of patients had HIV RNA concentrations of fewer than 50 copies per mL at week 48 (difference 3·6%, 95% CI -1·6% to 8·8%). Proportions of patients discontinuing drugs for adverse events did not differ substantially (13/348 in the EVG/COBI/FTC/TDF group vs 18/352 in the EFV/FTC/TDF group). Nausea was more common with EVG/COBI/FTC/TDF than with EFV/FTC/TDF (72/348 vs 48/352) and dizziness (23/348 vs 86/352), abnormal dreams (53/348 vs 95/352), insomnia (30/348 vs 49/352), and rash (22/348 vs 43/352) were less common. Serum creatinine concentration increased more by week 48 in the EVG/COBI/FTC/TDF group than in the EFV/FTC/TDF group (median 13 µmol/L, IQR 5 to 20 vs 1 µmol/L, -6 to 8; p<0·001). INTERPRETATION: If regulatory approval is given, EVG/COBI/FTC/TDF would be the only single-tablet, once-daily, integrase-inhibitor-based regimen for initial treatment of HIV infection. FUNDING: Gilead Sciences.

Randomized, phase 2 evaluation of two single-tablet regimens elvitegravir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate versus efavirenz/emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate for the initial treatment of HIV infection.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the safety and efficacy of two, single-tablet regimens for the initial treatment of HIV infection. DESIGN: Phase 2, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, multicenter, active-controlled study. METHODS: Antiretroviral treatment-naive adults with a screening HIV-1 RNA at least 5000 copies/ml and a CD4 cell count more than 50 cells/µl were randomized 2: 1 to receive fixed-dose combination tablets of elvitegravir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (EVG/COBI/FTC/TDF; N = 48) or efavirenz/emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (EFV/FTC/TDF; n = 23) for 48 weeks. The primary endpoint was proportion of participants with HIV-1 RNA less than 50 copies/ml at week 24. RESULTS: Participants receiving EVG/COBI/FTC/TDF exhibited a more rapid decline in HIV-1 RNA and a greater proportion suppressed viral load to less than 50 copies/ml than participants receiving EFV/FTC/TDF. Both EVG/COBI/FTC/TDF and EFV/FTC/TDF resulted in high rates of viral suppression and increases in CD4 cell count. Ninety and 83% of participants suppressed HIV-1 RNA to less than 50 copies/ml both at the 24-week and 48-week visits for EVG/COBI/FTC/TDF and EFV/FTC/TDF, respectively. Once-daily administration of EVG/COBI/FTC/TDF provided a mean EVG trough concentration 10-fold over its protein binding-adjusted IC(95) across study visits. EVG/FTC/TDF/GS-9350 was generally well tolerated with a lower rate of drug-related central nervous system (17%) and psychiatric (10%) adverse events versus EFV/FTC/TDF (26 and 44%, respectively). Decreases in estimated glomerular filtration rate occurred within the first few weeks of dosing in participants receiving EVG/COBI/FTC/TDF, remained within the normal range and did not progress at week 24 or 48; no participant experienced a clinical adverse event or discontinued study drug due to changes in serum creatinine or renal function. CONCLUSION: Once-daily EVG/COBI/FTC/TDF achieved and maintained a high rate of virologic suppression with fewer central nervous system and psychiatric adverse events compared to a current standard-of-care regimen of EFV/FTC/TDF.

The effect of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate on whole-body insulin sensitivity, lipids and adipokines in healthy volunteers.

BACKGROUND: Certain antiretrovirals are known to affect lipid and glucose homeostasis. The aim of this study was to assess the effect on insulin sensitivity (determined by peripheral glucose uptake using a hyperinsulinaemic euglycaemic clamp) of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) administration compared with placebo for 2 weeks in HIV-1-seronegative healthy male volunteers. Changes in lipids, adiponectin, leptin, plasminogen activator inhibitor 1 (PAI-1) and the adhesion molecules E-selectin and P-selectin were also assessed. METHODS: This was a single-centre, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study that used a two-sequence, two-period cross-over design. A total of 19 HIV-negative males were recruited to the study and randomized 1:1 to receive either 2 weeks of TDF (300 mg once daily) followed by 2 weeks of placebo or placebo initially followed by tenofovir. Clamps were performed at baseline, after 2 weeks and after 4 weeks. RESULTS: All three clamps were completed by 16 participants. During the euglycaemic clamp, there were no significant changes in insulin sensitivity after 2 weeks of TDF administration compared with placebo or baseline. There was a significant reduction in the mean total cholesterol (9.4%) and low-density lipoprotein (LDL; 8.1%) cholesterol following 2 weeks of TDF compared with placebo. Levels of adiponectin, leptin, PAI-1, P-selectin and E-selectin were not significantly altered. CONCLUSIONS: TDF use for 2 weeks does not affect insulin sensitivity, as assessed by the hyperinsulinaemic euglycaemic clamp in HIV-negative male volunteers. TDF use resulted in modest, but statistically significant, reductions in total and LDL cholesterol.

Pharmacokinetics and dosing recommendations of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate in hepatic or renal impairment.

BACKGROUND: Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate is the prodrug of the acyclic nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitor tenofovir that is indicated for use in the treatment of HIV. Tenofovir is eliminated as unchanged drug in the urine, with a significant component of active tubular secretion. The aim of this study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of tenofovir in subjects with renal or hepatic impairment, both of which are common in HIV-infected individuals. PATIENTS AND METHODS: HIV seronegative and otherwise healthy subjects with varying degrees of renal or hepatic function were recruited, and tenofovir pharmacokinetics were evaluated over 48 hours (hepatic impairment study) and 96 hours (renal impairment study) following a single tenofovir disoproxil fumarate 300 mg dose. Subjects with hepatic dysfunction were categorised based upon Child-Pugh-Turcotte score, and subjects with renal impairment were categorised based upon their calculated creatinine clearance (CL(CR)) using the Cockcroft-Gault method. RESULTS: As expected for a renally eliminated drug, subjects with and without hepatic impairment displayed similar tenofovir systemic exposures without evidence of substantial alterations in drug disposition, and therefore no dosage adjustments were warranted in these patients. In contrast, in subjects with renal impairment, two distinct groups were observed: (i) subjects with CL(CR)>/=50 mL/min in whom tenofovir pharmacokinetics were similar to subjects with normal renal function; and (ii) subjects with CL(CR) <50 mL/min (moderate or severe impairment) in which tenofovir renal clearance was substantially reduced and thus drug exposures increased. Subjects with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) demonstrated no extrarenal route of tenofovir elimination. Simulations of once-daily or modified dosing regimens demonstrated the need for tenofovir disoproxil fumarate dose-interval adjustment to prevent unnecessary drug accumulation. In patients with ESRD, high-flux haemodialysis efficiently removed tenofovir, with an elimination rate of 134 mL/min and an extraction coefficient of 54%. CONCLUSION: No tenofovir disoproxil fumarate dose adjustment is warranted in the setting of hepatic impairment. Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate 300 mg every 48 hours in individuals with moderate renal impairment and twice weekly corresponding to every 72-96 hours in those with severe renal impairment is recommended in order to target steady-state tenofovir exposures consistent with those observed in subjects with normal renal function receiving tenofovir disoproxil fumarate 300 mg once daily. For subjects receiving thrice-weekly 4-hour maintenance haemodialysis sessions, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate 300 mg administered every 7 days after a haemodialysis session is recommended. HIV-infected patients with significant end-organ dysfunction should be monitored in accordance with clinical practice, including close management of their viral suppression and clinical chemistries.

Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and an optimized background regimen of antiretroviral agents as salvage therapy: impact on bone mineral density in HIV-infected children.

OBJECTIVE: Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, a nucleotide analog HIV reverse transcriptase inhibitor with demonstrated activity against nucleoside-resistant HIV, is approved for use in adults but not children. Metabolic bone abnormalities have been seen in young animals given high-dose tenofovir and HIV-infected adults that were treated with oral tenofovir disoproxil fumarate. However, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate is being used in children despite a lack of bone safety data. We hypothesized that, given the higher rate of bone turnover that is associated with normal skeletal growth, the potential for TDF-related bone toxicity may be greater in children than in adults. METHODS: Fifteen highly antiretroviral-experienced HIV-infected children who were 8 to 16 years of age (mean +/- SD: 12 +/- 2) and required a change in therapy received tenofovir disoproxil fumarate 175 to 300 mg/m2 per day (adult dose equivalent) as part of highly active antiretroviral therapy for up to 96 weeks. Bone mineral density of the lumbar spine, femoral neck, and total hip by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry and blood and urine markers of bone metabolism were measured at 0, 24, 48, 72, and 96 weeks. RESULTS: Median z score (SD score compared with age, gender, and ethnicity-matched control subjects) of the lumbar spine, femoral neck, and total hip were decreased from baseline at 24 weeks and 48 weeks and then stabilized. Lumbar spine bone mineral apparent density (which estimates volumetric bone mineral density independent of bone size) z scores also decreased at 24 weeks. Absolute decreases in bone mineral density were observed in 6 children; the mean age of these children was significantly younger than the bone mineral density stable group (10.2 +/- 1.1 vs 13.2 +/- 1.8 years). The change in lumbar spine bone mineral density correlated with decreases in HIV plasma RNA during treatment. Metabolic markers of bone formation and resorption were variable. Two children in whom tenofovir disoproxil fumarate was discontinued because of bone loss that exceeded protocol allowances demonstrated partial or complete recovery of bone mineral density by 96 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate use in children seems to be associated with decreases in bone mineral density that, in some children, stabilize after 24 weeks. Increases in bone markers and calcium excretion suggest that tenofovir disoproxil fumarate may stimulate bone resorption. Bone turnover is higher in children than in older adolescents and adults because of skeletal growth, potentially explaining the greater effect seen in young children. Decreases in bone mineral density correlate with decreases in viral load and young age, suggesting that young responders may be at greater risk for bone toxicity.

Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and an optimized background regimen of antiretroviral agents as salvage therapy for pediatric HIV infection.

OBJECTIVES: Highly active antiretroviral therapy has altered the course of HIV infection among children, but new antiretroviral agents are needed for treatment-experienced children with drug-resistant virus. Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (DF) is a promising agent for use in pediatric salvage therapy, because of its tolerability, efficacy, and resistance profile. We designed this study to provide preliminary pediatric safety and dosing information on tenofovir DF, while also providing potentially efficacious salvage therapy for heavily treatment-experienced, HIV-infected children. METHODS: Tenofovir DF, alone and in combination with optimized background antiretroviral regimens, was studied among 18 HIV-infected children (age range: 8.3-16.2 years) who had progressive disease with > or = 2 prior antiretroviral regimens, in a single-center, open-label trial. Tenofovir DF monotherapy for 6 days was followed by the addition of individualized antiretroviral regimens. Subjects were monitored with HIV RNA reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction, flow cytometry, and routine laboratory studies; monitoring for bone toxicity included measurement of lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD) with dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry. Subjects were monitored through 48 weeks. RESULTS: Two subjects developed grade 3 elevated hepatic transaminase levels during monotherapy and were removed from the study. The remaining 16 subjects had a median of 4 antiretroviral agents (range: 3-5 agents) added to tenofovir DF. HIV plasma RNA levels decreased from a median pretreatment level of 5.4 log10 copies per mL (range: 4.1-5.9 log10 copies per mL) to 4.21 log10 copies per mL at week 48 (n = 15), with 6 subjects having < 400 copies per mL, including 4 with < 50 copies per mL. The overall median increases in CD4+ T cell counts were 58 cells per mm3 (range: -64 to 589 cells per mm3) at week 24 and 0 cells per mm3 (range: -274 to 768 cells per mm3) at week 48. The CD4+ cell responses among the virologic responders were high and sustained. The major toxicity attributed to tenofovir DF was a >6% decrease in BMD for 5 of 15 subjects evaluated at week 48, necessitating the discontinuation of tenofovir DF therapy for 2; all 5 subjects experienced >2 log10 copies per mL decreases in HIV plasma RNA levels. CONCLUSIONS: Tenofovir DF-containing, individualized, highly active antiretroviral therapy regimens were well tolerated and effective among heavily treatment-experienced, HIV-infected children. Loss of BMD may limit tenofovir DF use among prepubertal patients.

Effect of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of total, R-, and S-methadone.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the potential effect of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (DF) on the pharmacokinetics of methadone. DESIGN: Phase I, open-label, fixed-sequence, pharmacokinetic drug-drug interaction study. SETTING: Clinical research center. SUBJECTS: Fourteen volunteers receiving stable methadone maintenance therapy who were not infected with the human immunodeficiency virus. INTERVENTION: Tenofovir DF was added to the subjects' methadone regimens. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The pharmacokinetics of total, R-, and S-methadone were evaluated at baseline and after 2 weeks of daily tenofovir DF coadministration with a light meal. Steady-state tenofovir DF pharmacokinetics were evaluated at day 15. Bioequivalence testing was conducted of total, R-, and S-methadone area under the serum or plasma concentration-time curve during the 24-hour dosing interval at steady state (AUCss) and maximum concentration in serum or plasma (Cmax). Subjects were evaluated for changes in methadone pharmacodynamics by the Short Opiate Withdrawal Scale (SOWS) and pupillary diameter measurements at frequent intervals. Coadministration with tenofovir DF did not affect the pharmacokinetics of methadone. Geometric mean R-methadone systemic exposures, AUCss and Cmax, differed by 5% or less when methadone was dosed with tenofovir DF. Similar results were observed for S-methadone and for total methadone. Both AUCss and Cmax met the strict criteria for bioequivalence between the two study periods for total, R-, and S-methadone, indicating a lack of drug interaction when tenofovir DF was coadministered with methadone. No significant changes in SOWS scores or pupillary diameter measurements occurred, and no notable clinical adverse events were reported. CONCLUSION: Tenofovir DF pharmacokinetics were comparable to previously reported values of tenofovir DF in HIV-infected patients. Coadministration of methadone with tenofovir DF did not alter the pharmacokinetics or pharmacodynamics of total, R-, or S-methadone. Tenofovir DF may be given as part of a once-daily antiretroviral regimen in patients receiving methadone maintenance therapy.

Single-dose and steady-state pharmacokinetics of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate in human immunodeficiency virus-infected children.

Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (DF) is a potent nucleotide analog reverse transcriptase inhibitor approved for the treatment of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected adults. The single-dose and steady-state pharmacokinetics of tenofovir were evaluated following administration of tenofovir DF in treatment-experienced HIV-infected children requiring a change in antiretroviral therapy. Using increments of tenofovir DF 75-mg tablets, the target dose was 175 mg/m(2); the median administered dose was 208 mg/m(2). Single-dose pharmacokinetics were evaluated in 18 subjects, and the geometric mean area under the concentration-time curve from 0 h to infinity (AUC(0- infinity )) was 2,150 ng. h/ml and the geometric mean maximum concentration (C(max)) was 266 ng/ml. Subsequently, other antiretrovirals were added to each patient's regimen based upon treatment history and baseline viral resistance results. Steady-state pharmacokinetics were evaluated in 16 subjects at week 4. The steady-state, geometric mean AUC for the 24-h dosing interval was 2,920 ng. h/ml and was significantly higher than the AUC(0- infinity ) after the first dose (P = 0.0004). The geometric mean C(max) at steady state was 302 ng/ml. Tenofovir DF was generally very well tolerated. Steady-state tenofovir exposures in children receiving tenofovir DF-containing combination antiretroviral therapy approached values seen in HIV-infected adults (AUC, approximately 3,000 ng. h/ml; C(max), approximately 300 ng/ml) treated with tenofovir DF at 300 mg.