Factors associated with quality of life in patients receiving palliative radiotherapy for bone metastases: a secondary cross-sectional analysis of data from a prospective multicenter observational study.

OBJECTIVE: To identify factors significantly associated with quality of life (QOL) and determine if these associations are strong enough to predict certain aspects of QOL without measuring them. METHODS: We conducted an exploratory secondary analysis of baseline data of 224 patients (enrolled between December 2020 and March 2021) from a previously published prospective observational study on radiotherapy for bone metastases at 26 centres. Using univariable linear regression, we assessed the association between patient/treatment factors and QOL scale scores as measured by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QOL Questionnaire Core 15-Palliative (QLQ-C15-PAL) and the EORTC QOL Questionnaire Bone Metastases module (QLQ-BM22). RESULTS: Age and sex were not significantly associated with QOL. Worse performance status, higher pain scores, and opioid and single-fraction use were significantly associated with most QOL scales; these four factors were associated with worse global QOL, worse functioning status, and more severe symptoms. The coefficients of determination for most QOL scales were less than 0.2, indicating that most of the variability in QOL scores was not explained by any of the explanatory variables. CONCLUSION: Performance status, pain intensity, and opioid and single-fraction use were significantly associated with most QOL scales. However, the associations were not strong enough to estimate QOL. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: To date, the association between treatment factors and QOL in patients with bone metastases has not been fully studied. We identified the factors that were significantly associated with QOL and found that these associations were not strong enough to predict QOL.

Clinical Value of Serum p53 Antibody in the Diagnosis and Prognosis of Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Identifying useful biomarkers is central to selecting optimal therapeutic strategies for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Serum p53 antibody (S-p53Ab), squamous cell carcinoma antigen (SCC-Ag), and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) were investigated to evaluate the significance of single and combined tumor markers in determining the diagnosis and prognosis of ESCC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Serum samples were obtained preoperatively from 133 patients with histologically-confirmed ESCC, including 32 patients with stage I (24.1%). Levels of S-p53Ab were assessed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, using a new version of a highly specific, quantitative kit. The cut-off value for S-p53Ab was 1.3 U/ml. RESULTS: S-p53Ab was detected in 39.1% (52 out of 133) of patients with ESCC, including 40.0% (20 out of 50) of patients with early-stage ESCC. Positive rates for S-p53Ab, CEA, and SCC-Ag among patients with stage I ESCC (n=32) were 40.6%, 12.5%, and 31.3%, respectively. Positivity for S-p53Ab was not associated with positivity for CEA or SCC-Ag (p=0.249 and 0.747, respectively). The positive rate for diagnosis of ESCC increased from 39.1% to 65.4% when S-p53Ab was combined with SCC-Ag in this study. We found no significant correlation between the presence of S-p53Ab in ESCC and overall survival. Conversely, Cox regression analysis revealed that the International Union Against Cancer/TNM classification and systemic inflammation score were independent prognostic factors for ESCC in this series (hazard ratio(HR)=3.811, 95% confidence interval(CI)=1.548-9.378, p=0.004; and HR=2.218; 95% CI=1.087-4.523, p=0.029, respectively). Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed significant differences between patients with elevated S-p53Ab and SCC-Ag and patients with elevated levels of only one or neither of these factors (p=0.009). CONCLUSION: The diagnostic rate with S-p53Ab was better than that with SCC-Ag and CEA in patients with early-stage ESCC. Combined detection of S-p53Ab and SCC-Ag can markedly improve diagnostic sensitivity and may permit more accurate stratification of patients with ESCC.

Clinical significance of the C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratio for the prognosis of patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

The aim of the present study was to investigate the prognostic value of the C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratio (CAR) and compare it with other inflammation-based prognostic scores (Glasgow prognostic score, modified Glasgow prognostic score, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio, prognostic nutritional index and prognostic index) in patients with esophageal squamous cell cancer (ESCC). A database of 116 patients with primary ESCC who underwent treatment at the Division of Surgical Oncology at Nagasaki University Hospital between January 2007 and August 2014 was retrospectively reviewed and the correlations between CAR and overall survival (OS) were investigated. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses were used to assess independent prognostic factors. The area under the curve (AUC) was used to compare the prognostic value of different scores. According to the receiver operator characteristics analysis, the recommended cut-off value for CAR was 0.042, with an AUC of 0.678 (sensitivity 31.1%, specificity 66.7%). Thus, patients were dichotomized into low (<0.042) and high (≥0.042) CAR groups. On multivariate analysis, CAR was found to be significantly associated with OS in patients with ESCC [hazard ratio (HR)=2.350; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.189-4.650; P=0.014], as was tumor-node-metastasis stage (HR=3.059; 95% CI: 1.422-6.582; P=0.004). In addition, CAR had a higher AUC value (0.678) compared with several other systemic inflammation-based prognostic scores (P<0.001). This study suggested that CAR is a novel and promising inflammation-based prognostic score in patients with ESCC. Due to its simplicity, affordability and availability, CAR may be important for improving clinical decision-making and may contribute to more rational study design and analyses.