Effects of Different Voice Rest on Vocal Function After Microlaryngeal Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the results of a voice handicap index (VHI) scale and acoustic parameters in patients who underwent microlaryngeal surgery followed by either short-duration (voice rest for <7 days) or long-duration (≥7 days) voice rest. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS: The PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched for articles published before March 1, 2021. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that measured the voice outcomes of patients after different durations and extents of postoperative voice restriction were included in the meta-analysis. RESULTS: Four RCTs comprising 112 patients were included in the quantitative meta-analysis. Compared with the long-duration voice rest group, the short-duration group exhibited comparable VHI scores (mean difference [MD], -7.01; 95% CI, -16.12 to 2.09; p = 0.13), maximum phonation time (MD, -2.58; 95% CI, -5.42 to 0.26; p = 0.07), and acoustic variables of jitter (MD, -1.25; 95% CI, -3.43 to 0.94; p = 0.26) and shimmer (MD, -0.79; 95% CI, -2.08 to 0.51; p = 0.24). Subgroup analysis for benign pathology and cold instruments studies demonstrated significantly better VHI scores (MD, -14.45; 95% CI, -26.19 to -2.72; p = 0.02 and MD, -15.98; 95% CI, -28.52 to -3.44; p = 0.01, respectively) in the short-duration group. CONCLUSIONS: The limited evidence does not demonstrate benefit in voice outcomes from long-duration voice rest and suggests potential unfavorable effects on compliance and quality of life, providing a rationale for short-duration voice rest after microlaryngeal surgery. More studies are required to determine the optimal duration and extent of postoperative voice rest. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 1 Laryngoscope, 133:154-161, 2023.

Association between Dysphagia and Frailty in Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Increasing bodies of epidemiological evidence indicate potential associations between dysphagia and the risk of frailty in older adults. We hypothesized that older adults with symptoms of dysphagia might have a higher prevalence of frailty or prefrailty than those without dysphagia. METHODS: We systematically searched the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases for relevant studies published through 20 April 2022. Cross-sectional and longitudinal studies that examined the associations between dysphagia and the existence of frailty or prefrailty in community-dwelling, facility-dwelling, or hospitalized adults aged 50 years or older were synthesized. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to evaluate study quality. RESULTS: The meta-analysis comprised 12 cohorts, including 5,503,543 non-frailty participants and 735,303 cases of frailty or prefrailty. Random-effect meta-analysis demonstrated a significant association between dysphagia and the risk of frailty and prefrailty (OR, 3.24; 95% CI, 2.51-4.20). In addition, we observed consistent results across the subgroups and heterogeneity assessments. CONCLUSIONS: We propose including dysphagia assessment as a critical factor in the cumulative deficit model for identifying frailty in older adults. Understanding dysphagia and the potential role of nutritional supplements in older adults may lead to improved strategies for preventing, delaying, or mitigating frailty.