Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med ; 55(5): 618-626, 2019 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31058475

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Symptoms of diabetic hands have been gradually elucidated, however the interventions for these hand problems are typically underemphasized. Few studies have discussed intervention effects on sensorimotor problems in hands, which prevent diabetic patients from executing their daily routines and lower their quality of life (QoL). AIM: This study has investigated the effects of task-based biofeedback training compared with home-based programs on sensorimotor function and QoL in diabetic patients with neuropathic hands. DESIGN: A single blind randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Outpatient clinic at a university hospital. POPULATION: Thirty-eight patients with diabetic hand neuropathy whose sensorimotor functions were impaired based on screening with a pinch-holding-up activity (PHUA) test. METHODS: Participants were randomly assigned to either a computerized evaluation and re-education biofeedback (CERB) (N.=20) or a home-based (tendon gliding exercise in conjunction with resistive exercise) (N.=18) group. The primary outcome was sensorimotor control of a hand using the PHUA test. Secondary outcomes included changes in Semmes-Weinstein monofilament, two-point discrimination, the Purdue Pegboard test and a self-reported QoL questionnaire. The measurements were conducted before and after a 6-week treatment program. RESULTS: The CERB group significantly improved efficiency in pinch force output during the PHUA test by reducing the percentage of maximum pinch strength (change from 34.5±11.66 to 30.7±10.16%, P=0.001), and there was a statistically significant between-group difference (P=0.00, 95% CI: -12.59 to -3.34, F=9.42). The CERB group showed superior treatment effects as compared to the control group on the two-point discrimination results (P=0.01) as well as the pin insertion subtests in the Purdue pegboard test (P=0.01). The QoL results also revealed significant between-group differences in several items of the Diabetes-39 (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that a task-based biofeedback training program provides superior benefits for restoration of hand sensorimotor functioning in diabetic patients as compared to a home-based program combining tendon gliding exercise and resistive exercise. CLINICAL REHABILITATION IMPACT: Using task-based biofeedback training as one of the rehabilitation strategies may be an effective approach for restoration of sensory function, precision pinch performance, hand dexterity, and QoL for patients with diabetes-related neuropathy.


Subject(s)
Biofeedback, Psychology/methods , Diabetes Mellitus , Diabetic Neuropathies/rehabilitation , Exercise Therapy/methods , Hand/physiopathology , Sensation , Activities of Daily Living , Aged , Diabetic Neuropathies/physiopathology , Disability Evaluation , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pinch Strength , Quality of Life , Single-Blind Method , Surveys and Questionnaires
2.
J Diabetes Investig ; 9(1): 179-185, 2018 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28267271

ABSTRACT

AIMS/INTRODUCTION: The purpose of the present study was to identify whether there are differences in hand dexterity, hand functional performance and quality of life between diabetes patients with mononeuropathy and polyneuropathy of their hands to further present the importance regarding the impacts of diabetic neuropathic deficits on patients' functional capacity. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The neurological deficits of 127 patients with type 2 diabetes were examined by electrophysiological tests for the median and ulnar nerves, and were stratified into the diabetic mononeuropathy, diabetic polyneuropathy and non-diabetic neuropathy groups by sensory amplitude of these nerves. The Purdue pegboard test, Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire, and Diabetes-39 were carried out to understand patients' hand dexterity, functional hand performance and quality of life, respectively. RESULTS: The results showed significant differences in all subtests of the Purdue pegboard test among the three groups. Furthermore, aesthetics, patient's satisfaction of the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire and diabetes control, sexual functioning, energy, and mobility of the Diabetes-39 also showed significant differences among the three groups. CONCLUSIONS: The present study shows the patients with polyneuropathy suffer from more negative impacts on hand functional performance and quality of life than those with mononeuropathy and without neuropathy. These findings might assist both patients and clinicians in better realizing the impacts of neuropathic hands, and planning suitable strategies of intervention or health education to prevent declines in hand functions.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/complications , Diabetic Neuropathies/physiopathology , Diabetic Neuropathies/psychology , Hand/physiopathology , Motor Activity , Adult , Aged , Diabetic Neuropathies/etiology , Female , Hand/innervation , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neural Conduction , Quality of Life
3.
Qual Life Res ; 24(1): 213-21, 2015 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25017499

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To comprehend the associations among the dexterity and functional performance of the hands and quality of life in diabetic patients with neuropathic hands, via objective- and patient-perceived measurements. METHODS: The study participants were 144 diabetes patients who received objective evaluations, including the Purdue pegboard test, electrophysiological testing in sensory amplitude of the median nerve, and self-administrated measurements, including the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHQ) and Diabetes-39 (D-39). Pearson's and Spearman's correlation tests were conducted to assess the relationships among hand neuropathy, hand dexterity and functions, and quality of life. RESULTS: The results show that the amplitude of the sensory nerve action potential of the median nerve was positively correlated with hand dexterity (r = 0.28-0.43; p < 0.01) and the total score of MHQ (r = 0.24-0.33; p < 0.01). Objective hand dexterity had mild to moderate relationships with most of the MHQ results, but only weak associations with some dimensions of the D-39 results. The MHQ results were negatively correlated with the D-39 scores, with mild to moderate relationships in the domains of energy/mobility and anxiety. CONCLUSIONS: In comparison with diabetic feet, neuropathic diabetic hands are an easily neglected problem, with insufficient empirical evidence in the literature to indicate its impact on functional performance and quality of life. This study showed that lesions related to neural functioning in the diabetic hand may negatively influence dexterity and functional hand performance and thus also affect the quality of life.


Subject(s)
Diabetic Neuropathies/physiopathology , Diagnostic Self Evaluation , Disability Evaluation , Hand/physiopathology , Quality of Life , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Blood Glucose/analysis , Female , Glycated Hemoglobin/analysis , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Self Report , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...