ABSTRACT
Although vaccination is efficacious and prevents infection in the general population, there is limited data about Coronavirus disease-19 (Covid-19) occurrence after vaccination in cancer patients. It was aimed to evaluate the efficacy of BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) and CoronaVac vaccines against Covid-19 in patients with cancer. In this single-center, retrospective, cross-sectional, and descriptive study, the data of cancer patients referred to the medical oncology clinic of a university hospital were analyzed. The sample of the study consisted of cancer patients who had Covid-19 or were vaccinated against Covid-19. A total number of 2578 patients were included in the study. Of the patients, 2000 have never been infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus and 578 patients have had a positive reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) for Covid-19. It was found that 2094 patients (81.2%) were fully vaccinated, and 484 patients (18.8%) did not receive full-dose vaccination. A statistically significant difference in Covid-19 occurrence was found between the patients who had full-dose vaccination or not (p = 0.000). In in-group comparisons of full-dose vaccinated patients, while no difference was observed between two doses of BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) and three doses of CoronaVac (p = 0.432), a statistically significant difference was observed between all other groups (p < 0.005). When the data of 578 patients who experienced Covid-19 was analyzed, a statistically significant difference was observed between the groups who were full-dose vaccinated and those who were not (p = 0.000). It is recommended that this vulnerable patient group should be prioritized in vaccination programs, and full-dose vaccination (at least two doses of vaccines) should be completed as soon as possible.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Neoplasms , Vaccines , BNT162 Vaccine , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19 Vaccines , Cross-Sectional Studies , Humans , Neoplasms/complications , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to identify the possible relationship of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)-related arterial vasoconstriction with urotensin-2 (UT-2), which has a high potential as an endogenic vasoconstrictor. METHODS: We assigned the patients to 1 of 3 groups. Patients in group 1 received a bolus of 5-FU, those in group 2 a continuous infusion (CI) of 5-FU, and those in group 3 no 5-FU, which was also a control group. Pre- and post-treatment UT-2 levels and brachial arterial diameters were measured and recorded in all patients. RESULTS: 132 patients were included in the study. Pre- and post-treatment brachial artery diameters were similar in all groups: in group 1 (3.28 ± 0.52 vs. 3.25 ± 0.44 mm, p = 0.740), in group 2 (3.57 ± 0.47 vs. 3.46 ± 0.45 mm, p = 0.441) and in the control group (3.51 ± 0.52 vs. 3.25 ± 0.44 mm, p = 0.818). Pre- and post-treatment UT-2 levels were significantly different in each group: in group 1 (39.5 ± 30.9 vs. 56.7 ± 27.1 ng/ml, p = 0.0001), in group 2 (37.7 ± 33.7 vs. 62.5 ± 37.7 ng/ml, p = 0.0001) and in the control group (52.9 ± 40.2 vs. 60.8 ± 40.7 ng/ml, p = 0.006). CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that UT-2 has a high potential as a vasoconstrictor agent in our bodies and its level increases through a bolus or CI 5-FU. Increased UT-2 levels are likely to play a role in 5-FU-related cardiac toxicity pathogenesis.