Efficacy and safety of supraclavicular and pectoralis nerve blocks as primary peri-procedural analgesia for cardiac electronic device implantation: A pilot study.

BACKGROUND: Cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) are routinely implanted using intravenous drugs for sedation. However, some patients are poor candidates for intravenous sedation. OBJECTIVE: We present a case series demonstrating the safety and efficacy of a novel, ultrasound-guided nerve block technique that allows for pre-pectoral CIED implantation. The targets are the supraclavicular nerve (SCN) and pectoral nerve (PECS1). METHODS: We enrolled 20 patients who were planned for new CIED implantation. Following US-localization of the SCN and PECS1, local anesthetic (LA) was instilled at least 30-60 min pre-procedure. Successful nerve block was determined if < 5 mL of intraprocedural LA was used, along with lack of sensation with skin and deep tissue pinprick. Optional sedation was offered to patients' pre-procedure if discomfort was reported. RESULTS: Seventeen patients (85%) had a successful periprocedural nerve block, with only three patients exceeding 5 mL of LA. SCN and PECS1 success occurred in 19 (95%) and 18 (90%) patients, respectively. The overall success of nerve block by fulfilling all the criteria was demonstrated in 17 out of 20 patients (85%). Patients who reported no pain (VAS score = 0) were distributed as follows: 13 patients (65%) in the immediate post-procedure interval, 18 patients (90%) at the 1 h post-implant interval, and 14 patients (70%) at the 24 h post- implant interval. The median cumulative VAS score was 0 (IQR = 0 - 1). There were no reported significant adverse effects. CONCLUSION: SCN and PECS1 nerve blocks are safe and effective for patients undergoing CIED implantation to minimize or eliminate the use of intravenous sedation.

Automated Quantification of Abnormal QRS Peaks From High-Resolution ECGs Predicts Late Ventricular Arrhythmias in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: A 5-Year Prospective Multicenter Study.

Background Patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) are at risk of ventricular arrhythmia (VA) attributed to abnormal electrical activation arising from myocardial fibrosis and myocyte disarray. We sought to quantify intra-QRS peaks (QRSp) in high-resolution ECGs as a measure of abnormal activation to predict late VA in patients with HCM. Methods and Results Prospectively enrolled patients with HCM (n=143, age 53±14 years) with prophylactic implantable cardioverter-defibrillators had 3-minute, high-resolution (1024 Hz), digital 12-lead ECGs recorded during intrinsic rhythm. For each precordial lead, QRSp was defined as the total number of peaks detected in the QRS complex that deviated from a smoothing filtered version of the QRS. The VA end point was appropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy during 5-year prospective follow-up. After 5 years, 21 (16%) patients had VA. Patients who were VA positive had greater QRSp (6.0 [4.0-7.0] versus 4.0 [2.0-5.0]; P<0.01) and lower left ventricular ejection fraction (57±11 versus 62±9; P=0.038) compared with patients who were VA negative, but had similar established HCM risk metrics. Receiver operating characteristic analysis revealed that QRSp discriminated VA (area under the curve=0.76; P<0.001), with a QRSp ≥4 achieving 91% sensitivity and 39% specificity. The annual VA rate was greater in patients with QRSp ≥4 versus QRSp <4 (4.4% versus 0.98%; P=0.012). In multivariable Cox regression, age <50 years (hazard ratio [HR], 2.53; P=0.009) and QRSp (HR per QRS peak, 1.41; P=0.009) predicted VA after adjusting for established HCM risk metrics. In patients aged <50 years, the annual VA rate was 0.0% for QRSp <4 compared with 6.9% for QRSp ≥4 (P=0.012). Conclusions QRSp predicted VA in patients with HCM who were eligible for an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator after adjusting for established HCM risk metrics, such that each additional QRS peak increases VA risk by 40%. QRSp <4 was associated with a <1% annual VA risk in all patients, and no VA risk among those aged <50 years. This novel ECG metric may improve patient selection for prophylactic implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy by identifying those with low VA risk. These findings require further validation in a lower risk HCM cohort. Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT02560844.

Hemodynamically Tolerated Ventricular Tachycardia With Mildly Impaired Ejection Fraction: Do These Patients Have VT/VF Recurrence and ICD Therapies?

BACKGROUND: Patients with hemodynamically tolerated ventricular tachycardia (VT) and minimally reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) remain a group that presents a prognostic and therapeutic dilemma. METHODS: We studied patients from our implanted cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) database who received ICDs for hemodynamically tolerated VT and mildly reduced LVEF (36%-49%) at time of implant between May 2015 and December 2019. Time to appropriate ICD therapy was assessed. Clinical features associated with recurrent VT/ventricular fibrillation (VF) with ICD therapies were explored using binary logistic regression. RESULTS: Among 2037 ICDs placed between May 2015 and December 2019, 64 subjects met the inclusion criteria. The mean age of the study group was 68 ± 12 years, and 58 (90.6%) subjects were male. Average ejection fraction was 40% ± 4.4 (range 36%-49%). Twenty-two (34%) subjects received antitachycardia pacing (ATP) for VT at 229 ± 265 days after ICD placement. Fifteen (23%) subjects received appropriate ICD shocks 305 ± 321 days after implant. The rate of recurrent VT/VF among the 37 patients with ICD therapy was 195 ± 39 beats per minute (bpm). This was significantly more rapid than initial presenting VT rates before ICD placement (183 ± 27 bpm) (P = 0.048). Multivariate analysis showed no factors independently associated with recurrent VT/VF. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with mildly impaired LV function and hemodynamically tolerated VT receive appropriate ICD therapies over the 3 years following implant. This patient group warrants further investigation, as their recurrent VT/VF rates can be much more rapid, and 23% go on to receive appropriate ICD shocks.

A Novel Nerve Block Technique for a Patient Undergoing Cardiac Device Implantation.

A woman with type 1 myotonic dystrophy received an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator using a novel combination of ultrasound-guided supraclavicular nerve and pectoral nerve blocks. The entire procedure was completed without any procedural sedation or local anesthetic, and the patient did not experience any pain during or after the procedure. (Level of Difficulty: Advanced.).

Canadian Heart Rhythm Society Task Force Report on Physician Training and Maintenance of Competency for Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Device Therapies: Executive Summary.

Physicians engaged in cardiovascular implantable electronic device (CIED)-related practice come from diverse training backgrounds with variable degrees of CIED implant training. The objective of the Canadian Heart Rhythm Society Task Force on CIED Implant Training was to establish a common structure and content for training programs in CIED implantation, related activities and maintenance of competency. This executive summary presents the essence of the report with key recommendations included, with the complete version made available in a linked supplement. The goals are to ensure that future generations of CIED implanters are better prepared for continuously evolving CIED practice and quality care for all Canadians.

A case report of inappropriate inhibition of ventricular pacing due to a unique pacemaker electrogram storage feature.

BACKGROUND: Modern permanent pacemakers (PPMs) have individual features designed to identify cardiac rhythm abnormalities and improve their performance. Inappropriate pacing inhibition may be an undesired outcome from these features and cause symptoms in patients who require frequent pacing, leading to dizziness, and syncope. Inappropriate inhibition can be difficult to identify in circumstances that are intermittent and difficult to reproduce. CASE SUMMARY: A 57-year-old female underwent a mitral valve replacement (MVR) for severe mitral stenosis. One month following MVR, she presented with symptomatic third-degree atrioventricular block, and a dual-chamber PPM (Advisa™, Medtronic, Minneapolis, USA) was implanted and programmed DDD 50-130 b.p.m. At the 3-month follow-up, she reported frequent episodes of lightheadedness. She was found to have intermittent ventricular pacing inhibition on a 48-h Holter monitor due to an internal function of the Advisa™ series of PPMs that attempts to store an electrogram (EGM) every 1 h and 30 s. During the EGM storage, an amplified signal from the storage capacitor can result in oversensing by the ventricular channel and inappropriate pacing inhibition. DISCUSSION: To rectify the issue, the ventricular lead sensitivity value was increased from 0.9 mV to 1.2 mV. No instances of inappropriate ventricular pacing inhibition were noted on follow-up. To our knowledge, this is a rare case of inappropriate ventricular pacing inhibition caused by a combination of PPM self-adjusting sensitivity algorithm and oversensing every 1 h and 30 s from an amplified storage capacitor. Physicians should be aware of this possible complication and differentiate it from device or lead malfunction.

Canadian Registry of Electronic Device Outcomes: remote monitoring outcomes in the Abbott battery performance alert-a multicentre cohort.

AIMS: Cardiac implantable electronic devices with device advisories have the potential of device malfunction. Remote monitoring (RM) of devices has been suggested to allow the identification of abnormal device performance and permit early intervention. We sought to describe the outcomes of patients with and without RM in devices subject to the Abbott Premature Battery Depletion (PBD) advisory with data from a Canadian registry. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients with an Abbott device subject to the PBD advisory from nine implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) implanting centres in Canada were included in the registry. The use of RM was identified from baseline and follow-up data in the registry. The primary outcome was detection of PBD and all-cause mortality. A total of 2666 patients were identified with a device subject to the advisory. In all, 1687 patients (63.2%) had RM at baseline. There were 487 deaths during follow-up. At a mean follow-up of 5.7 ± 0.7 years, mortality was higher in those without a remote monitor compared with RM at baseline (24.7% vs. 14.5%; P < 0.001). Pre-mature battery depletion was identified in 36 patients (2.1%) with RM vs. 7 (0.7%) without RM (P = 0.004). Time to battery replacement was significantly reduced in patients on RM (median 5 vs. 13 days, P = 0.001). CONCLUSION: The use of RM in patients with ICD and cardiac resynchronization therapy under advisory improved detection of PBD, time to device replacement, and was associated with a reduction in all-cause mortality. The factors influencing the association with mortality are unknown and deserve further study.

Canadian Registry of Electronic Device Outcomes (CREDO): The Abbott ICD Premature Battery Depletion Advisory, a Multicentre Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Premature or rapid battery depletion may compromise the performance and reliability of an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD), potentially resulting in harm or death to patients. We sought to describe the outcomes and clinical management of devices included in the Abbott ICD Premature Battery Depletion Advisory, using data from a Canadian registry. METHODS: This prospective observational study includes patients with an Abbott device subject to the advisory, from 9 centres in Canada. The incidence and outcomes related to device revision owing to premature battery depletion were identified and adjudicated by a committee. RESULTS: There were 2678 patients enrolled with a device subject to the advisory. Devices were implanted between 2010 and 2017; follow-up time was 5.7 ± 0.7 years. Device revision occurred in 222 patients (8.3%). Revision for premature battery depletion occurred in 43 patients (1.6%). Devices were revised at physician discretion on notice of the advisory in 16 patients (0.6%), and at patient request in 5 patients (0.2%). A total of 63 (2.4%) devices reached routine end of battery life. A further 95 (3.5%) patients underwent revision for other reasons. There were no reported major complications or adverse events with device revision owing to the advisory. There were no deaths attributed to premature battery depletion. CONCLUSIONS: The rate of premature battery depletion associated with the Abbott ICD Premature Battery Depletion Advisory is low. There were no clinically adverse events identified that were associated with the battery performance of devices under advisory.

CONTEXTE: L'épuisement prématuré ou rapide de la pile pourrait compromettre le rendement et la fiabilité d'un défibrillateur cardioverteur implantable (DCI), et risque d'être dommageable ou mortel pour les patients. Nous avons voulu décrire les issues et la gestion clinique des dispositifs mentionnés dans l'avis d'Abbott sur l'épuisement prématuré de la pile de DCI, en utilisant des données tirées d'un registre canadien. MÉTHODOLOGIE: L'étude observationnelle prospective a été menée auprès de patients porteurs d'un dispositif Abbott faisant l'objet de l'avis, dans neuf établissements au Canada. La fréquence des révisions de dispositif dues à l'épuisement prématuré de la pile et les issues qui y sont associées ont été recensées et évaluées par un comité. RÉSULTATS: Ont été inscrits à l'étude 2 678 patients porteurs d'un dispositif faisant l'objet de l'avis. Les dispositifs avaient été mis en place entre 2010 et 2017; la durée du suivi avait été de 5,7 ± 0,7 ans. Une révision de dispositif a été effectuée chez 222 patients (8,3 %). Elle a été motivée par un épuisement prématuré de la pile chez 43 patients (1,6 %). Une révision de dispositif a été faite à la discrétion du médecin, après réception de l'avis, chez 16 patients (0,6 %) et à la demande de cinq patients (0,2 %). Au total, la pile de 63 (2,4 %) dispositifs avait atteint la fin de sa durée de vie habituelle. D'autres raisons ont entraîné une révision chez 95 autres patients (3,5 %). Aucune complication majeure et aucun effet indésirable n'ont été signalés avec les dispositifs révisés par suite de l'avis. Il n'y a eu aucun décès attribué à un épuisement prématuré de la pile. CONCLUSIONS: Le taux d'épuisement prématuré de la pile de DCI associé à l'avis d'Abbott est faible. Il n'y a pas eu d'incidents cliniques jugés liés au rendement de la pile des dispositifs faisant l'objet de l'avis.

Remote-only monitoring for patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices: a before-and-after pilot study.

BACKGROUND: Outcomes for patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices are better when follow-up incorporates remote monitoring technology in addition to in-clinic visits. For patients with implantable devices, we sought to determine the feasibility, safety and associated health care utilization of remote-only follow-up, along with its effects on patients' quality of life and costs. METHODS: This multicentre before-and-after pilot study involved patients with new or existing pacemakers or implantable cardioverter defibrillators. The "before" phase of the study spanned the period October 2015 to February 2017; the "after" phase spanned the period October 2016 to February 2018. The exposure was remote-only follow-up in combination with Remote View, a service that facilitates access to device data, allowing device settings to be viewed remotely to facilitate remote programming. Outcomes at 12 months were feasibility (adherence to remote monitoring), safety (rate of adverse events) and health care utilization (remote and in-clinic appointments). We also assessed quality of life, using 3 validated scales, and costs, taking into account both health care system and patient costs. RESULTS: A total of 176 patients were enrolled. Adherence (defined as at least 1 successful remote transmission during follow-up) was 87% over a mean follow-up of 11.7 (standard deviation 2.2) months. There was a reduction in in-clinic visits at specialized sites among patients with both implantable defibrillators (26 v. 5, p < 0.001, n = 48) and pacemakers (42 v. 10, p < 0.001, n = 51). There was no significant change in visits to community sites for patients with defibrillators (13 v. 17, p = 0.3, n = 48). The composite rate of death, stroke, cardiovascular hospitalization and device-related hospitalization was 7% (n = 164). No adverse events were linked to the intervention. There was no change in quality-of-life scales between baseline and 12 months. Health care costs were reduced by 31% for patients with defibrillators and by 44% for those with pacemakers. INTERPRETATION: This pilot study showed the feasibility of remote-only follow-up, with no increase in adverse clinical outcomes and no effect on quality of life, but with reductions in costs and health care utilization. These results support progression to a larger-scale study of whether superior effectiveness and reduced cost can be achieved, with preservation of safety, through use of remote-only follow-up. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, no. NCT02585817.

Safety of Lead Repair Compared to Lead Revision for Visible Lead Insulation Defects in Patients With Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices.

BACKGROUND: Cardiac implantable electronic devices deliver life-sustaining therapy and may be prone to hardware degeneration over time. Functioning transvenous endocardial leads with visible insulation breaks are amenable to lead revision (LRV) or lead repair (LRP), with medical adhesive. The latter is a less invasive and more cost-effective strategy. However, data are sparse on the overall safety of such an approach. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of patients with lead insulation defects managed by either LRV or LRP with medical adhesive. The data analyzed were from January 2010 to January 2021. All-cause mortality, and both early and late complications, was ascertained for all cases. RESULTS: A total of 57 cases were identified, with a mean age (standard deviation) of 75 (±11.8) years; 18 (31.6%) were women. A total of 35 patients (62.5%) underwent LRV for an insulation defect, and 21 (37.5%) underwent LRP. There was no statistical difference in the rate of early and late complications between the 2 groups over a mean follow-up period of 1.15 (±0.78) years [3 (8%)] LRV vs 1 (5%) LRP, P = 0.88). One death was identified in each group, unrelated to either the device or a device-related procedure. There was no association between device type and the likelihood of LRP vs LRV as an attempted strategy (χ2 = 2.25, P = 0.53). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that the use of a lead-repair strategy, with silicone adhesive glue and an anchoring sleeve, is not associated with an increased rate of early or late complications, compared with lead revision in the management of visible lead insulation defects with stable lead function.

INTRODUCTION: Les dispositifs cardiaques électroniques implantables offrent un traitement essentiel au maintien de la vie, mais peuvent subir une détérioration de leur matériel au fil du temps. Le fonctionnement des sondes endocavitaires transveineuses ayant des ruptures visibles de l'isolant se prête à la révision de sonde (RVS) ou à la réparation de sonde (RPS) au moyen d'un adhésif médical. Cette dernière stratégie est moins invasive et plus efficiente. Toutefois, les données sur l'innocuité générale d'une telle approche sont rares. MÉTHODES: Il s'agit d'une étude de cohorte rétrospective de patients dont les sondes montrent des défaillances de l'isolant prises en charge par RVS ou par RPS au moyen d'un adhésif médical. Les données analysées s'échelonnaient de janvier 2010 à janvier 2021. La mortalité toutes causes confondues ainsi que les complications précoces et tardives étaient établies pour tous les cas. RÉSULTATS: Nous avons trouvé un total de 57 cas, dont l'âge moyen (écart type) était de 75 (± 11,8) ans; 18 (31,6 %) étaient des femmes. Au total, 35 patients (62,5 %) avaient subi une RVS en raison d'une défaillance de l'isolant, et 21 (37,5 %) avaient subi une RPS. Il n'y avait aucune différence statistique dans le taux de complications précoces et tardives entre les deux groupes durant une période moyenne de suivi 1,15 (± 0,78) an [3 (8 %)] RVS vs un (5 %) RPS, P = 0,88. Dans chaque groupe, nous avons noté 1 décès non associé au dispositif ou à une intervention liée au dispositif. Il n'y avait aucune association entre le type de dispositif et la probabilité de tentative d'une stratégie de RPS vs d'une stratégie de RVS (χ2 = 2,25, P = 0,53). CONCLUSIONS: Les résultats de cette étude montrent que l'utilisation d'une stratégie de RPS au moyen d'un adhésif de silicone et d'une douille d'ancrage n'est pas associée à un taux plus élevé de complications précoces ou tardives que la RVS dans la prise en charge des défaillances visibles de l'isolant de la sonde lors de fonctionnement stable de la sonde.

Para-Hisian Pacing During Sinus Rhythm: Establishing Threshold Values to Distinguish Nodal From Septal Pathway Conduction.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to identify minimum threshold values below which conduction over the atrioventricular (AV) node would be unexpected. BACKGROUND: Para-Hisian pacing is used to evaluate for the presence of a septal accessory pathway (AP); however, threshold values to differentiate nodal from AP conduction are unknown. METHODS: The authors performed high- and low-output para-Hisian pacing during sinus rhythm to capture the His and para-Hisian ventricular myocardium (H+V) and para-Hisian ventricular myocardium (V) alone, respectively. The change in stimulation (stim)-to-atrial electrogram interval after loss of His bundle capture in patients with (AP+) and without (AP-) a septal AP was evaluated. Stim-to-proximal coronary sinus (PCS) and stim-to-high right atrium (HRA) intervals were measured and within-patient differences (△) for V and H+V capture were calculated. RESULTS: A total of 23 AP+ and 45 AP- patients were evaluated. The difference in stimulus to earliest atrial signal in the high right atrial catheter seen with the loss of His bundle capture (△-stim-HRA) (21 ms; interquartile range [IQR]: 3 to 43 ms vs. 64 ms; IQR: 56 to 73 ms; p < 0.001) and difference in stimulus to earliest atrial signal in the proximal coronary sinus catheter seen with the loss of His Bundle capture (△-stim-PCS) (11 ms; IQR: 0 to 30 ms vs. 61 ms; IQR: 52 to 72 ms; p < 0.001) were shorter in AP+ patients. The shortest △-stim-PCS and △-stim-HRA in AP- patients were 37 ms and 32 ms, respectively, whereas the longest corresponding intervals in AP+ patients were 51 ms and 75 ms, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: A △-stim-PCS <37 ms or △-stim-HRA <32 ms confirmed the presence of a septal AP, whereas a value >51 ms for △-stim-PCS or >75 ms for △-stim-HRA excluded it. Alternatively, the minimum △-stim-PCS with loss of His capture compatible with AV nodal conduction in isolation was 37 ms, and a △-stim-PCS >51 ms effectively ruled out the presence of a septal AP.

A simple maneuver to determine if septal accessory pathway ablation requires a left atrial approach.

INTRODUCTION: Septal accessory pathway (AP) ablation can be challenging due to the complex anatomy of the septal region. The decision to access the left atrium (LA) is often made after failure of ablation from the right. We sought to establish whether the difference between ventriculo-atrial (VA) time during right ventricular (RV) apical pacing versus the VA during tachycardia would help establish the successful site for ablation of septal APs. METHODS: Intracardiac electrograms of patients with orthodromic reciprocating tachycardia (ORT) using a septal AP with successful catheter ablation were reviewed. The ∆VA was the difference between the VA interval during RV apical pacing and the VA interval during ORT. The difference in the VA interval during right ventricular entrainment and ORT (StimA-VA) was also measured. RESULTS: The median ∆VA time was significantly less in patients with a septal AP ablated on the right side compared with patients with a septal AP ablated on the left side (12 ± 19 vs. 56 ± 10 ms, p < .001). The StimA-VA was significantly different between the two groups (22 ± 14 vs. 53 ± 9 ms, p < .001). The ∆VA and StimA-VA were always ≤ 40 ms in patients with non-decremental septal APs ablated from the right side and always greater than 40 ms in those with septal APs ablated from the left. CONCLUSION: ΔVA and StimA-VA values identified with RV apical pacing in the setting of ORT involving a septal AP predict when left atrial access will be necessary for successful ablation.

Double chamber cross-talk, the ultimate double-cross.

Cross-talk is a well-described phenomenon in a dual-chamber cardiovascular implantable electronic device. Far-field ventricular events are more commonly sensed in the atrial channel, the reverse is uncommon, and seeing both at the same time has never been reported. We present a case of double cross-talk in a dual-chamber Medtronic ® implantable cardioverter-defibrillator. In this report, we decipher an unusual device response to the cross-talk and describe the programming changes required to resolve it.

Performance of a novel active fixation quadripolar left ventricular lead for cardiac resynchronization therapy: Attain Stability Quad Clinical Study results.

INTRODUCTION: The Medtronic Attain Stability Quad lead is a quadripolar left ventricular (LV) lead with an active fixation helix assembly designed to fixate the lead within the coronary sinus and pace nonapical regions of the LV. The primary objective of this study was to determine the safety and effectiveness of this novel active fixation quadripolar LV lead. METHODS: Patients with standard indications for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) were enrolled. All patients were followed at 3 and 6 months post-implant and every 6 months thereafter until study closure. Pacing capture thresholds (PCTs) were measured at implant and each follow-up and adverse events (AEs) were recorded upon occurrence. RESULTS: Of the 440 patients who underwent implant procedures, placement of the Attain Stability Quad lead was successful in 426 (96.8%). LV lead-related complications occurred in 10 patients (2.3%), including LV lead dislodgement in three patients (0.7%). The percentage of patients with at least one LV pacing vector with a PCT ≤2.5 V at a 6-month follow-up was 96.3%. The LV lead was successfully fixated to the prespecified pacing location in 97.4% of cases. CONCLUSIONS: This large, multinational study of the Attain Stability Quad lead demonstrated a high rate of implant success with a low complication rate. The active fixation mechanism allowed precise placement of the pacing electrodes at the desired target region with good PCTs and a very low dislodgement rate.

Incremental Value of Implantable Cardiac Device Diagnostic Variables Over Clinical Parameters to Predict Mortality in Patients With Mild to Moderate Heart Failure.

Background Heart failure remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality. Clinical prediction models provide suboptimal estimates of mortality in this population. We sought to determine the incremental value of implantable device diagnostics over clinical prediction models for mortality. Methods and Results RAFT (Resynchronization/Defibrillation for Ambulatory Heart Failure Trial) patients with implanted devices capable of device diagnostic monitoring were included, and demographic and clinical parameters were used to compute Meta-Analysis Global Group in Chronic Heart Failure (MAGGIC) heart failure risk scores. Patients were classified according to MAGGIC score into low (0-16), intermediate (17-24), or high (>24) risk groups. Mortality was evaluated from 6 months postimplant in accordance with the RAFT protocol. In a subset of 1036 patients, multivariable analysis revealed that intermediate and high MAGGIC scores, fluid index, atrial fibrillation, and low activity flags were independent predictors of mortality. A device-integrated diagnostic parameter that included a fluid index flag and either a positive atrial fibrillation flag or a positive activity flag was able to significantly differentiate higher from lower risk for mortality in the intermediate MAGGIC cohort. The effect was more pronounced in the high-risk MAGGIC cohort, in which device-integrated diagnostic-positive patients had a shorter time to death than those who were device-integrated diagnostic negative. Conclusions Device diagnostics using a combination of fluid index trends, atrial fibrillation burden, and patient activity provide significant incremental prognostic value over clinical heart failure prediction scores in higher-risk patients. This suggests that combining clinical and device diagnostic parameters may lead to models with better predictive power. Whether this risk is modifiable with early medical intervention would warrant further studies. Clinical Trial Registration URL : http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT00251251.

Comparison of Ajmaline and Procainamide Provocation Tests in the Diagnosis of Brugada Syndrome.

OBJECTIVES: The authors studied the response rates and relative sensitivity of the most common agents used in the sodium-channel blocker (SCB) challenge. BACKGROUND: A type 1 Brugada electrocardiographic pattern precipitated by an SCB challenge confers a diagnosis of Brugada syndrome. METHODS: Patients undergoing an SCB challenge were prospectively enrolled across Canada and the United Kingdom. Patients with no prior cardiac arrest and family histories of sudden cardiac death or Brugada syndrome were included. RESULTS: Four hundred twenty-five subjects underwent SCB challenge (ajmaline, n = 331 [78%]; procainamide, n = 94 [22%]), with a mean age of 39 ± 15 years (54% men). Baseline non-type 1 Brugada ST-segment elevation was present in 10%. A total of 154 patients (36%) underwent signal-averaged electrocardiography, with 41% having late potentials. Positive results were seen more often with ajmaline than procainamide infusion (26% vs. 4%, p < 0.001). On multivariate analysis, baseline non-type 1 Brugada ST-segment elevation (odds ratio [OR]: 6.92; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.15 to 15.2; p < 0.001) and ajmaline use (OR: 8.76; 95% CI: 2.62 to 29.2; p < 0.001) were independent predictors of positive results to SCB challenge. In the subgroup undergoing signal-averaged electrocardiography, non-type 1 Brugada ST-segment elevation (OR: 9.28; 95% CI: 2.22 to 38.8; p = 0.002), late potentials on signal-averaged electrocardiography (OR: 4.32; 95% CI: 1.50 to 12.5; p = 0.007), and ajmaline use (OR: 12.0; 95% CI: 2.45 to 59.1; p = 0.002) were strong predictors of SCB outcome. CONCLUSIONS: The outcome of SCB challenge was significantly affected by the drug used, with ajmaline more likely to provoke a type 1 Brugada electrocardiographic pattern compared with procainamide. Patients undergoing SCB challenge may have contrasting results depending on the drug used, with potential clinical, psychosocial, and socioeconomic implications.

Cardiac resynchronization is pro-arrhythmic in the absence of reverse ventricular remodelling: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Aims: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) has been shown to reduce mortality and heart failure (HF) hospitalization but its effects on the rate of ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) appears to be neutral. We hypothesize that CRT with LV epicardial stimulation is inherently pro-arrhythmic and increases VA rates in the absence of reverse ventricular remodelling while conferring an anti-arrhythmic effect in mechanical responders. Methods and results: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we considered retrospective cohort, prospective cohort, and randomized controlled trials comparing VA rates between cardiac resynchronization therapy-defibrillator (CRT-D) non-responders, CRT-D responders and those with implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) only. Studies were eligible if they defined CRT-D responders using a discrete left ventricular volumetric value as assessed by any imaging modality. Studies were identified through searching electronic databases from their inception to July 2017. We identified 2579 citations, of which 23 full-text articles were eligible for final analysis. Our results demonstrated that CRT-D responders were less likely to experience VA than CRT-D non-responders, relative risk (RR) 0.49 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.41-0.58, P < 0.01] and also less than patients with ICD only: RR 0.59 (95% CI 0.50-0.69, P < 0.01). However, CRT-D mechanical non-responders had a greater likelihood of VA compared with ICD only, RR 0.76 (95% CI 0.63-0.92, P = 0.004). Conclusion: CRT-D non-responders experienced more VA than CRT-D responders and also more than those with ICD only, suggesting that CRT with LV epicardial stimulation may be inherently pro-arrhythmic in the absence of reverse remodelling.