Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 52
Filter
1.
Cureus ; 16(5): e60346, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38883024

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: A test method is proposed for identifying potential selection bias risk in single prospective controlled clinical therapy trials that can be applied by trial reviewers. METHODS: The method is described in detail and was tested on eight randomised controlled trials (RCTs) with reported negative Berger-Exner test results as negative and on eight prospective, controlled cohort studies as positive controls. All 16 studies were identified by systematic literature search. RESULTS: The test method yielded negative results for all RCTs and positive results for six out of the eight cohort studies. CONCLUSION: All test results remained within the expected limits for both study types, suggesting a reasonably high accuracy for correctly identifying selection bias risk. However, the method does not provide the possibility to establish whether such bias risk has actually altered trial outcomes. Instead, a positive test result may provide an empirical basis for rating a trial as of high selection bias risk during trial appraisal.

2.
Cureus ; 16(4): e58961, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38800247

ABSTRACT

Aim This study aims to establish the test sensitivity and specificity of the I2-point estimate for testing selection bias in meta-analyses under the condition of large versus small trial sample size and large versus small trial number in meta-analyses and to test the null hypotheses that the differences are not statistically significant. Material and methods Simulation trials were generated in MS Excel (Microsoft Corp., Redmond, WA), each consisting of a sequence of subject ID (accession) numbers representing trial subjects, a random sequence of allocation to group A or B, and a random sequence of a simulated baseline variable ("age") per subject, ranging from 50 to 55. These simulation trials were included in five types of meta-analyses with large/small numbers of trials, as well as trials with large and small sample sizes. Half of the meta-analyses were artificially biased. All meta-analyses were tested using the I2-point estimate. The numbers of true positive (TP), false positive (FP), false negative (FN), and true negative (TN) test results were established. From these, the test sensitivity and specificity were computed for each of the meta-analysis types and compared. Results All non-biased meta-analyses yielded true negative, and all biased meta-analyses yielded true positive test results, regardless of trial number and trial sample size. No false positive or false negative test results were observed. Accordingly, test sensitivities and specificities of 100% for all meta-analysis types were established, and thus, both null hypotheses failed to be rejected. Conclusion The results suggest that trial number and sample size in a baseline variable meta-analysis do not affect the test accuracy of the I2-point estimate.

3.
Front Med (Lausanne) ; 11: 1307815, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38756938

ABSTRACT

Objectives: To explore whether systematic review conclusions generated from Cochrane's second version of its Risk of Bias tool (RoB 2) for trial appraisal differ when the Composite Quality Score, Version 2.B (CQS-2B) is used instead and to develop a testable hypothesis based on these findings. Methods: PubMed was searched for one single systematic review. From the review's accepted trials, data concerning effect estimates and overall bias risk according to the RoB 2 tool were extracted. All trial reports were appraised again using the CQS-2B. Datasets were stratified according to overall bias risk (RoB 2) or corroboration (C-) level (CQS-2B). The effect estimates from trials with 'low bias risk' (RoB 2) and with highest C-level (CQS-2B) were pooled separately. These pooled effect estimates were statistically and all clinical conclusions qualitatively compared. Results: The pooled effect estimates for trials with 'low bias risk' (RoB 2) were -0.07, 95% CI: -0.10 to -0.04 (I2 = 0.0%) and for the highest C-levels (CQS-2B) 0.08, 95% CI: -0.12 to -0.04 (I2 = 57.0%). The difference was statistically not significant (p = 0.70). Contrary to the RoB 2 tool, no clinical conclusions in line with the CQS-2B were made, because the effect estimates were judged to be erroneously overestimated, due to high risk of bias. Conclusion: A testable hypothesis was generated suggesting that trial appraisal using the CQS-2B may provide more conservative conclusions based on similar data than with the RoB 2 tool.

5.
BMC Oral Health ; 24(1): 128, 2024 Jan 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38273293

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Assessing health-related quality of life has become integral to people living with HIV (PLHIV) follow-up. However, there is a lack of data regarding the impact of oral health on quality of life, known as Oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) among PLHIV compared to HIV-negative individuals in Rwanda. AIM: The study aimed to assess OHRQoL among PLHIV compared to HIV-negative counterparts in Kigali, Rwanda. METHODS: The Oral Health Impact Profile short version (OHIP-14) questionnaire was interviewer-administered to 200 PLHIV and 200 HIV-negative adults (≥ 18 years old) at an HIV clinic of Kigali Teaching Hospital (CHUK). Socio-demographic characteristics, including age, sex, occupation, and socioeconomic status (SES) of participants, were collected using a survey questionnaire. A 4-point Likert scale was used to assess the frequency of oral impacts for all 14 items within 7 domains of the OHIP tool. The descriptive statistics were used to see frequencies and percentages of OHRQoL among PLHIV and HIV-negative persons, respectively. The Chi-square test was used to determine the association of OHRQoL with caries (DMFT) and periodontal disease (CPITN) among PLHIV compared to HIV-negative individuals. RESULTS: The results revealed a higher prevalence of PLHIV with poor OHRQoL than HIV-negative individuals in 5 domains and almost all items of OHIP-14 except for the OHIP 3 (found it uncomfortable to eat any foods because of problems with teeth or mouth) and OHIP-14 (being totally unable to function because of problems with teeth or mouth). The findings showed statistically significant results (p ≤ 0.05) for the OHIP1 item "trouble pronouncing any word," with a prevalence of 2.5% (n = 11) and 2.25% (n = 9) in PLHIV and HIV-negative, respectively. Also, PLHIV had a significantly higher prevalence, 2.75% (n = 11) for the OHIP 13 item "life not satisfying due to teeth and mouth problems compared to HIV-negative individuals 2% (8) p ≤ 0.05. Moreover, dental caries was significantly associated with poor OHRQoL among PLHIV and HIV-negative adults and for all 14 items of the OHIP tool. Periodontal disease was not significantly associated with OHRQoL among PLHIV and HIV-negative adults. CONCLUSION: This study revealed poor OHRQoL among PLHIV compared to HIV-negative adults. There is a need for further longitudinal studies to investigate the OHRQoL in Rwanda, especially among PLHIV. It is essential to include oral health care as one of the components of the medical health care programs for PLHIV in Rwanda.


Subject(s)
Dental Caries , HIV Infections , Periodontal Diseases , Adult , Humans , Adolescent , Quality of Life , Dental Caries/epidemiology , Dental Caries/complications , Cross-Sectional Studies , Rwanda/epidemiology , Oral Health , Periodontal Diseases/epidemiology , Surveys and Questionnaires , HIV Infections/complications , HIV Infections/epidemiology
6.
Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med ; 15(1): e1-e8, 2023 Oct 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37916724

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:  Oral health-related quality of life (OHRQol) is described as the effect of oral conditions on the overall functioning and well-being of individuals. AIM:  This study sought to determine the validity of a modified-child oral health impact profile (M-COHIP) among adolescents living with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection (ALHIV) and HIV-undiagnosed adolescents and establish the factors influencing OHRQoL among adolescents in central Johannesburg. SETTING:  Schools and HIV wellness centre in central Johannesburg. METHODS:  An interviewer-administered questionnaire was applied, followed by an oral examination. RESULTS:  A total of 504 adolescents were included in the study. The overall mean decayed teeth for permanent dentition was 1.6 (standard deviation [s.d.]: 1.99) and caries prevalence was 62.2% (n = 309). The tool's Cronbach's alpha was 0.88. The item-rest correlations were from 0.6 to 0.85 for all items. The initial exploratory factor analysis explained 76% of the total variance. The overall M-COHIP score was 59.6 (18.2). The overall modified-COHIP scores for those not in care (schools) were higher [62.88] than those of ALHIV. The poor M-COHIP scores were associated with reporting toothache, having active decay, poor oral health-self-rating, and being selected from the school site (p  0.005). CONCLUSION:  The validation study supports the use of the tool as a reliable and valid measure of OHRQoL. Future research can investigate the extent to which the tool is effective in measuring treatment outcomes and patient satisfaction.Contribution: The validated tool will be beneficial in the African context for programme assessments and overall measure of quality-of-life impacts from oral conditions.


Subject(s)
HIV Infections , Quality of Life , Humans , Adolescent , Cross-Sectional Studies , Reproducibility of Results , Psychometrics , South Africa/epidemiology , Surveys and Questionnaires , Oral Health , HIV Infections/epidemiology
7.
PLoS One ; 18(10): e0293039, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37883391

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Dental therapy is a category of mid-level oral health professional that was introduced to address inequities in oral health service provision in South Africa within a constrained human resource for health context. However, low numbers of registered dental therapists and attrition threaten this strategy. AIM: This study explored reasons for this attrition, building on the Hertzberg Two-Factor Theory. METHODS: Through a qualitative exploratory study design, in-depth interviews were conducted with former dental therapists to explore their reasons for leaving the profession. They were recruited using snowball sampling. All interviews were audio recorded, transcribed verbatim, and coded in NVIVO12. A team of researchers applied thematic analysis to agree on themes and sub-themes, guided by Hertzberg's ideas of intrinsic and extrinsic factors. FINDINGS: All 14 former dental therapists interviewed expressed their passion for the profession, even though their motivations to join the profession varied. Many of their reasons for leaving aligned with extrinsic and intrinsic factors defined in Hertzberg's Two-Factor Theory. However, they also spoke about a desire for a professional identity that was recognized and respected within the oral health profession, health system, and communities. This is a novel study contribution. CONCLUSION: Dental therapist attrition in South Africa is mainly caused by job dissatisfaction and motivation issues resulting from health system level factors. While the Hertzberg Two-Factor Theory helped identify extrinsic and intrinsic factors at an individual level, we used the Human Resources for Health System Development Analytical Framework to identify solutions for dental therapist production, deployment, and retention. Addressing these issues will enhance retention and accessibility to oral health services in the country.


Subject(s)
Allied Health Personnel , Career Mobility , Humans , Qualitative Research , South Africa
8.
Front Med (Lausanne) ; 10: 1201517, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37663665

ABSTRACT

Aim: To establish the inter-rater reliability of the Composite Quality Score (CQS-2) and to test the null hypothesis that it did not differ significantly from that of the first CQS version (CQS-1). Materials and methods: Four independent raters were selected to rate 45 clinical trial reports using CQS-1 and CQS-2. The raters remained unaware of each other's participation in this study until all rating had been completed. Each rater received only one rating template at a time in a random sequence for CQS-1 and CQS-2 rating. Raters completed each template and sent these back to the principal investigator. Each rater received their next template 2 weeks after submission of the completed previous template. The inter-rater reliabilities for the overall appraisal score of the CQS-1 and the CQS-2 were established by using the Brennan-Prediger coefficient (BPC). The coefficients of both CQS versions were compared by using the two-sample z-test. During secondary analysis, the BPCs for every criterion and each corroboration level for both CQS versions were established. Results: The BPC for the CQS-1 was 0.85 (95% CI: 0.64-1.00) and for the CQS-2 it was 1.00 (95% CI: 0.94-1.00), suggesting a very high inter-rater reliability for both. The difference between the two CQS versions was statistically not significant (p = 0.17). The null hypothesis was accepted. Conclusion: The CQS-2 is still under development, This study shows that it is associated with a very high inter-rater reliability, which did not statistically significantly differ from that of the CQS-1. The promising results of this study warrant further investigation in the applicability of the CQS-2 as an appraisal tool for prospective controlled clinical therapy trials.

9.
Front Med (Lausanne) ; 10: 1176219, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37396894

ABSTRACT

Objectives: The objective of this study was to revise CQS-2/Criterion II concerning allocation concealment appraisal for prospective, controlled clinical therapy trials. Methods: Meta-analyses of trials with inadequate allocation concealment were tested for in-between trial heterogeneity (I2 > 0) due to imbalances in baseline variables. Meta-analyses with positive test results were used as a basis to deduce criteria for adequate allocation concealment. The CQS-2/Criterion II was reformulated in line with the findings. Result: One suitable meta-analysis was identified. Two forest plots with data from five and four trials with inadequate/unclear allocation concealment were selected for testing. In addition, a total of five trials with adequate allocation concealment were identified. The meta-analysis test results were positive, and keywords for the judgment of adequate allocation concealment were extracted verbatim from the text of the meta-analysis. The extracted keywords indicated "central allocation" as the main criterion for adequate allocation concealment. Criterion II of the CQS-2 was revised accordingly. Conclusion: Criterion II of the CQS-2 trial appraisal tool was revised. The revised appraisal tool was specified as version CQS-2B.

10.
Front Med (Lausanne) ; 10: 1201951, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37448798

ABSTRACT

Systematic reviews of prospective controlled clinical therapy trials are one of the most important sources of information in modern medicine. Besides the systematic search for and statistical pooling of current clinical trial data for a particular type of therapy, systematic reviews also have the task of appraising the quality of trial results. The quality of trial results may be diminished by low internal trial validity, due to systematic error (bias). A high risk of bias may likely cause the reported trial results to be diverted from the actual true therapeutic effect and thus render it unsuitable for clinical guidance. According to the Cochrane Collaboration, the risk of bias in clinical therapy trials should be assessed using its Risk of Bias tool, Version 2 (RoB 2). However, the tool has been established to have poor inter-rater reliability, with a limited empirical evidence base and described as complex and demanding. Against this background, the composite quality score (CQS) has been developed as a possible alternative trial appraisal tool, characterised by high epistemic rigour, empirical evidence base, inter-rater reliability and ease of use. This article presents the current evidence of the CQS and its limitations.

11.
PLoS One ; 18(4): e0276245, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37023108

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Dental caries is among the most frequent oral conditions in People Living with HIV/AIDS (PLWHA). There is a lack of baseline information on dental caries prevalence and associated risk factors among PLWHA in comparison to HIV uninfected people in Rwanda. OBJECTIVE: This study was conducted to determine the prevalence of dental caries and associated risk factors among PLWHA and HIV uninfected adults at an HIV clinic of Kigali Teaching Hospital (CHUK) in Kigali, Rwanda. METHODS: A comparative cross-sectional study was conducted among 200 PLWHA and 200 HIV uninfected adults aged 18 years and above attending an HIV clinic of CHUK. An oral examination was performed by a calibrated examiner. Dental caries were assessed using the WHO Decayed (D), Missing (M), and Filled Teeth (F) index (DMFT). Descriptive statistics, Chi-square, t-tests, and multiple binary logistic regression were used to analyze data. RESULTS: Overall, a higher prevalence (50.5%) of PLWHA had experienced dental caries (DMFT>0) compared to HIV uninfected counterparts (40.5%) (p = 0.045). The prevalence of Decayed teeth (D) was also higher (23.5%) among PLWHA compared to HIV uninfected persons (13.6%) (p = 0.011). The Mean(SD) DMFT scores among PLWHA and HIV uninfected participants were 2.28 (3.68) and 1.29 (2.21) respectively (p = 0.001). After performing multiple binary logistic regression analysis, the predictors of dental caries in PLWHA were being female (OR = 2.33; 95%CI = 1.14-4.75), frequent dental visits (OR = 4.50; 95% CI = 1.46-13.86) and detectable RNA viral load (OR = 4.50; 95% CI = 1.46-13.86). In HIV uninfected participants, the middle age range (36-45 years), and frequent dental visits were significantly associated with dental caries (OR = 6.61; 95%CI = 2.14-20.37) and (OR = 3.42; 95%CI: 1.337-8.760) respectively. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of dental caries was higher in PLWHA than in HIV uninfected counterparts. The reported higher prevalence of caries in PLWHA was associated with being female, detectable viral load, and frequent dental visits. Therefore, there is a need for effective oral health interventions specific to PLWHA in Rwanda to raise awareness of the risk of dental caries and provide preventive oral health services among this population. To ensure timely oral health care amongPLWHA, there is a need for an effort from policymakers and other stakeholders to integrate oral health care services within the HIV treatment program in Rwanda.


Subject(s)
Dental Caries , HIV Infections , Middle Aged , Humans , Adult , Female , Male , Prevalence , Cross-Sectional Studies , Dental Caries/epidemiology , Dental Caries/complications , Rwanda/epidemiology , Risk Factors , HIV Infections/complications , HIV Infections/epidemiology , DMF Index
12.
Rev Recent Clin Trials ; 18(1): 28-33, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36600618

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Current evidence appraisal concepts, such as the Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach and Cochrane's Risk of Bias (RoB) tool, rely on assumptions related to the classic problem of inductive reasoning and may suffer from insufficient inter-rater reliability. DISCUSSION: The Composite Quality Score (CQS) has emerged as a possible trial appraisal tool that does not rely on inductive assumptions and has been shown to be of potentially very high inter-rater reliability. CONCLUSION: Although the current CQS concept is still under development, its current evidence is encouraging and justifies further study. This article presents the rationale and currently available research concerning the CQS and shows where further research is required.


Subject(s)
Problem Solving , Humans , Bias , Prospective Studies , Reproducibility of Results , Controlled Clinical Trials as Topic
13.
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol ; 51(3): 462-468, 2023 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36546537

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Dental therapists are mid-level oral healthcare providers introduced in 1977 to the South African health system to improve access to oral health services. There has, however, been anecdotal evidence of their unusually high rate of attrition that is cause for concern. AIM AND OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to determine the demographic profile and attrition rate among members of the South African Dental Therapy profession. METHODS: A retrospective time series review of records of all dental therapists who were previously registered and who are still registered with the Health Professions Council of South Africa (HPCSA) between 1977 and 2019 was conducted. RESULTS: A total of 1232 dental therapists were registered from 1977 to 2019. The majority (64%) were Africans. Most practicing dental therapists were based in KwaZulu-Natal (44%) and Gauteng (27%), which are the provinces where dental therapists are trained. The overall attrition rate between 1977 and 2019 was 40%, with a figure of 9% for the last 10 years of the study (2010 to 2019). CONCLUSION: This study has provided the first evidence of the high attrition rate of dental therapists in South Africa. The high attrition warrants further investigation to address the loss of valuable human resources from an already overburdened and under-resourced public oral health sector.


Subject(s)
Oral Health , Humans , South Africa/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies
14.
PLoS One ; 17(12): e0279645, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36584067

ABSTRACT

AIM: To conduct a survey of current meta-epidemiological studies to identify additional trial design characteristics that may be associated with significant over- or underestimation of the treatment effect and to use such identified characteristics as a basis for the formulation of new CQS appraisal criteria. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrieved eligible studies from two systematic reviews on this topic (latest search May 2015) and searched the databases PubMed and Embase for further studies from June 2015 -March 2022. All data were extracted by one author and verified by another. Sufficiently homogeneous estimates from single studies were pooled using random-effects meta-analysis. Trial design characteristics associated with statistically significant estimates from single datasets (which could not be pooled) and meta-analyses were used as a basis to formulate new or amend existing CQS criteria. RESULTS: A total of 38 meta-epidemiological studies were identified. From these, seven trial design characteristics associated with statistically significant over- or underestimation of the true therapeutic effect were found. CONCLUSION: One new criterion concerning double-blinding was added to the CQS, and the original criteria for concealing the random allocation sequence and for minimum sample size were amended.


Subject(s)
Prospective Studies , Epidemiologic Studies , PubMed
15.
Int J Paediatr Dent ; 31(2): 231-237, 2021 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32419236

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Few studies have investigated an association between CD4 counts, viral load (VL), WHO staging, and caries among HIV-positive (HIV+) children on HAART therapy (>12 months). AIM: To determine the strength of association between CD4 counts, WHO staging, VL, and dental caries. DESIGN: This cross-sectional analytical study comprised of 355 HIV + children, aged 4-12 years, attending a hospital in Johannesburg, South Africa. Demographic and clinical data such as decayed (d,D), missing (m,M), filled teeth (f,F) [dmft/DMFT], CD4 counts, and WHO staging were collected. Correlation and regression analyses were done to test for associations. RESULTS: Caries prevalence for this cohort of children was 57%. The dmft score for the primary dentition was 4.36 (SD 4.87) and DMFT for secondary dentition was 0.58 (SD 1.49). Pearson's correlation analyses showed significant association between VL and CD4 count (P = .003) and VL and WHO stage (P = .007). Weak associations were noted between caries (d, D) and VL, CD4 count, and WHO stage of disease for correlation and regression analyses. CONCLUSION: There appears to be no substantial evidence of any significant association between the presence of caries among HIV + children and CD4 counts, viral load, and WHO clinical stage of the disease.


Subject(s)
Dental Caries , HIV Infections , CD4 Lymphocyte Count , Child , Child, Preschool , Cross-Sectional Studies , DMF Index , Dental Caries/epidemiology , HIV Infections/complications , HIV Infections/drug therapy , Humans , Prevalence , South Africa/epidemiology , Viral Load , World Health Organization
16.
PLoS One ; 14(10): e0222568, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31618211

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: There are inconsistent reports on the prevalence of oral conditions and their associated factors among adolescents living with HIV (ALHIV). The current inconsistencies may hinder the development of clear guidelines on the prevention and treatment of oral conditions among ALHIV. This study provides an update on oral conditions and their associated factors in a cohort of South African ALHIV and receiving routine HIV treatment services at a Johannesburg HIV wellness clinic. METHODS: Decayed Teeth (DT), Decayed Missing and Filled Teeth (DMFT) and Oral HIV/AIDS Research Alliance case definitions were used for caries examination and reporting of the Oral Mucosal Lesions (OML) respectively. Data analyses were stratified by the study main outcomes; chi-squared tests were performed to determine the associations; and multiple logistic regressions were also used to identify associated factors after adjusting for other exposure variables. In addition to fitting logistic regressions, we explored the data for potential confounders and effect modifiers. RESULTS: A total of 407 ALHIV were assessed, of which 51.0% were females. The mean age of the ALHIV was 14.75 years (SD 2.43) while the median age of their parents was 43 years (IQR 37-48 years). Regardless of sex, age group and other socio-demographic characteristics, participants had high count of dental caries (DMFT>0). The overall prevalence of dental caries was 56.76% (n = 231) with mean DT score of 2.0 (SD 2.48) and mean DMFT score of 2.65 (SD 3.01). Dental caries prevalence (DT>0) was significantly associated with the HIV clinical markers. HIV RNA viral loads more than 1000 copies/ml and CD4 cell counts less than 200 count cells/mm3, increased the likelihood of having dental decay among ALHIV (p<0.05). ALHIV at WHO staging III, IV had higher caries prevalence ranging from 70% to 75% (p<0.05). The prevalence of dental caries was directly related to the presence of oral mucosal lesions (p<0.05). The prevalence of OML was 22%, with linear gingival erythema (13.8%) accounting for most of the OML. Multiple logistic regression modelling suggested that dental caries experience (DMFT>0), age category 13-15 years, WHO staging of IV and viral load of more than 1000 copies/ml significantly predicted the outcome of oral lesions as assessed using the OHARA case definitions (p<0.05). The odds of developing dental caries was also 1.5 times more among ALHIV who brush their teeth less frequently and those who reported more frequent eating of sugar sweetened diets (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: There is high prevalence of dental caries and OML among ALHIV in Johannesburg. The reported prevalence was associated with high HIV RNA viral loads, shorter duration on antiretroviral treatment and high WHO staging of HIV disease on crude analysis. Additionally, caries experience contributed to the prevalence of OML. Our study acknowledges the protective effect of HIV treatment and positive oral health practices on the presence of oral conditions among ALHIV in Johannesburg.


Subject(s)
Dental Caries/epidemiology , HIV Infections/complications , HIV/isolation & purification , Mouth Diseases/epidemiology , Oral Hygiene/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adult , Age Factors , Anti-Retroviral Agents/therapeutic use , Caregivers/statistics & numerical data , Child , Cross-Sectional Studies , Dental Caries/etiology , Female , HIV/genetics , HIV Infections/drug therapy , HIV Infections/virology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Mouth Diseases/etiology , Mouth Diseases/pathology , Mouth Mucosa/pathology , Prevalence , RNA, Viral/isolation & purification , Socioeconomic Factors , South Africa/epidemiology , Viral Load , Young Adult
17.
Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med ; 11(1): e1-e12, 2019 Jul 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31368323

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) is influenced by cultural and societal context. Existing OHRQoL children measurement tools have been conceptualised in high-income countries. Probing whether the factors influencing OHRQoL are context-reliant in the African setting is necessary and is the purpose of the current review. AIM: To investigate if the factors influencing OHRQoL are context-reliant. METHODS: Seven databases were searched using search terms ('oral health'; and 'quality of life', 'health-related quality of life', 'patient-reported outcomes', 'well-being'; and 'child*', 'adolescents', 'teen*', 'youth'; and 'determinants', 'factors', 'predictors'; and 'oral health quality of life tools/instruments/scales'; and 'Africa*'). Abstracts identified were exported to a reference software manager. Three of the authors used specific selection criteria to review, firstly, 307 abstracts and, secondly, 30 full papers. Data were extracted from these papers using a pre-designed data extraction form, after which quantitative synthesis of data was performed. RESULTS: Key factors influencing OHRQoL followed an existing conceptual framework where environmental and individual factors in the form of socio-economic status (SES), area of residence and children psyche status, and the presence of any oral condition other than dental caries were reported among child populations in Africa. CONCLUSION: There is preliminary evidence to suggest an association between individual factors such as children's psyche and oral problems, excluding dental caries, and environmental determinants such as area of residence and SES in children's OHRQoL in African children. The finding that dental caries was not a key factor in child-oral health is unexpected. There seemed to be a contextual viewpoint underpinning the current OHRQoL frameworks and OHRQoL was context-reliant.


Subject(s)
Oral Health , Quality of Life/psychology , Social Determinants of Health , Adolescent , Africa , Child , Dental Caries/psychology , Female , Humans , Male , Social Class
18.
Health SA ; 24: 1056, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31934405

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of dental caries and its effect on the oral-health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) of children with special needs (CSNs) have not been established in South Africa. AIM: The study aimed to assess how caregivers of CSNs who attended Down Syndrome Association outreach sites in Johannesburg, South Africa, perceived the contribution of OHRQoL to the quality of life of these children. SETTING: The study was conducted at Down Syndrome Association (DSA) outreach sites in Johannesburg. These sites cater for children with several types of disabilities including cerebral palsy, hydrocephalus, autism, epilepsy and developmental delays. The association schedules and facilitates support group meetings for the caregivers of children with Down syndrome and other disabilities. These meetings are held at the outreach sites that are located at different district hospitals and community health centres in Johannesburg and are co-facilitated by the association's outreach coordinator together with a team of physiotherapists, occupational therapists and speech therapists. METHODS: This cross-sectional study was composed of a convenient sample of 150 caregiver and child pairs from five outreach sites during January - June 2015. The short-form Parent-Caregiver Perception Questionnaire (P-CPQ) was used. The caries status of the children was assessed using the decayed, missing and filled teeth (dmft/DMFT) indices (whereby dmft or DMFT stands for decayed missing filled teeth in primary dentition [dmft] and in permanent dentition [DMFT]) based on World Health Organization guidelines. RESULTS: The mean age of the caregivers was 39.52 years (standard deviation [SD] 9.26) and 8.72 years (SD 6.07) for the children. The mean P-CPQ score was 12.88 (SD 12.14). All the caregivers stated that dental caries had a negative impact on the OHRQoL of the CSNs. However, 60% of caregivers stated that an oral condition had no impact on the child's overall well-being. The majority (56.7%) of the caregivers rated their children's overall oral health status as average and only 12% reported the oral health status to be poor. There was a high prevalence of untreated caries among the CSNs regardless of the type of disability. CONCLUSION: All the caregivers stated that dental caries had a negative impact on the OHRQoL of the CSNs. However, they appeared to have contradictory perceptions of the oral health needs or status of their children.

19.
Health SA Gesondheid (Print) ; 24: 1-7, 2019. ilus
Article in English | AIM (Africa) | ID: biblio-1262545

ABSTRACT

Background: The prevalence of dental caries and its effect on the oral-health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) of children with special needs (CSNs) have not been established in South Africa. Aim: The study aimed to assess how caregivers of CSNs who attended Down Syndrome Association outreach sites in Johannesburg, South Africa, perceived the contribution of OHRQoL to the quality of life of these children. Setting: The study was conducted at Down Syndrome Association (DSA) outreach sites in Johannesburg. These sites cater for children with several types of disabilities including cerebral palsy, hydrocephalus, autism, epilepsy and developmental delays. The association schedules and facilitates support group meetings for the caregivers of children with Down syndrome and other disabilities. These meetings are held at the outreach sites that are located at different district hospitals and community health centres in Johannesburg and are co-facilitated by the association's outreach coordinator together with a team of physiotherapists, occupational therapists and speech therapists. Methods: This cross-sectional study was composed of a convenient sample of 150 caregiver and child pairs from five outreach sites during January ­ June 2015. The short-form Parent-Caregiver Perception Questionnaire (P-CPQ) was used. The caries status of the children was assessed using the decayed, missing and filled teeth (dmft/DMFT) indices (whereby dmft or DMFT stands for decayed missing filled teeth in primary dentition [dmft] and in permanent dentition [DMFT]) based on World Health Organization guidelines. Results: The mean age of the caregivers was 39.52 years (standard deviation [SD] 9.26) and 8.72 years (SD 6.07) for the children. The mean P-CPQ score was 12.88 (SD 12.14). All the caregivers stated that dental caries had a negative impact on the OHRQoL of the CSNs. However, 60% of caregivers stated that an oral condition had no impact on the child's overall well-being. The majority (56.7%) of the caregivers rated their children's overall oral health status as average and only 12% reported the oral health status to be poor. There was a high prevalence of untreated caries among the CSNs regardless of the type of disability. Conclusion: All the caregivers stated that dental caries had a negative impact on the OHRQoL of the CSNs. However, they appeared to have contradictory perceptions of the oral health needs or status of their children


Subject(s)
Caregivers , Child , Dental Caries , Oral Health , Quality of Life , South Africa
20.
PLoS One ; 12(11): e0186682, 2017.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29117240

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The accuracy of radiographic methods for dental age estimation is important for biological growth research and forensic applications. Accuracy of the two most commonly used systems (Demirjian and Willems) has been evaluated with conflicting results. This study investigates the accuracies of these methods for dental age estimation in different populations. METHODS: A search of PubMed, Scopus, Ovid, Database of Open Access Journals and Google Scholar was undertaken. Eligible studies published before December 28, 2016 were reviewed and analyzed. Meta-analysis was performed on 28 published articles using the Demirjian and/or Willems methods to estimate chronological age in 14,109 children (6,581 males, 7,528 females) age 3-18 years in studies using Demirjian's method and 10,832 children (5,176 males, 5,656 females) age 4-18 years in studies using Willems' method. The weighted mean difference at 95% confidence interval was used to assess accuracies of the two methods in predicting the chronological age. RESULTS: The Demirjian method significantly overestimated chronological age (p<0.05) in males age 3-15 and females age 4-16 when studies were pooled by age cohorts and sex. The majority of studies using Willems' method did not report significant overestimation of ages in either sex. Overall, Demirjian's method significantly overestimated chronological age compared to the Willems method (p<0.05). The weighted mean difference for the Demirjian method was 0.62 for males and 0.72 for females, while that of the Willems method was 0.26 for males and 0.29 for females. CONCLUSION: The Willems method provides more accurate estimation of chronological age in different populations, while Demirjian's method has a broad application in terms of determining maturity scores. However, accuracy of Demirjian age estimations is confounded by population variation when converting maturity scores to dental ages. For highest accuracy of age estimation, population-specific standards, rather than a universal standard or methods developed on other populations, need to be employed.


Subject(s)
Age Determination by Teeth/methods , Radiography, Panoramic/methods , Tooth/physiology , Adolescent , Child , Child, Preschool , Databases, Factual , Female , Humans , Male , PubMed , Publications , Tooth/diagnostic imaging
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL