Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
1.
Hong Kong Med J ; 28(2): 161-168, 2022 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35400644

ABSTRACT

Breast cancer (BC) is the most common cancer among women in Hong Kong. The Food and Health Bureau commissioned The University of Hong Kong (HKU) to conduct the Hong Kong Breast Cancer Study (HKBCS) with the aim of identifying relevant risk factors for BC in Hong Kong and developing a locally validated BC risk assessment tool for Hong Kong Chinese women. After consideration of the most recent international and local scientific evidence including findings of the HKBCS, the Cancer Expert Working Group on Cancer Prevention and Screening (CEWG) has reviewed and updated its BC screening recommendations. Existing recommendations were preserved for women at high risk and slightly changed for women at moderate risk. The following major updates have been made concerning recommendations for other women in the general population: Women aged 44 to 69 with certain combinations of personalised risk factors (including presence of history of BC among first-degree relative, a prior diagnosis of benign breast disease, nulliparity and late age of first live birth, early age of menarche, high body mass index and physical inactivity) putting them at increased risk of BC are recommended to consider mammography screening every 2 years. They should discuss with their doctors on the potential benefits and harms before undergoing mammography screening. A risk assessment tool for local women (eg, one developed by HKU) is recommended to be used for estimating the risk of developing BC with regard to the personalised risk factors described above.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Early Detection of Cancer , Breast Neoplasms/diagnosis , Breast Neoplasms/prevention & control , Female , Hong Kong/epidemiology , Humans , Male , Mammography , Mass Screening , Risk Assessment
2.
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) ; 29(9): 568-575, 2017 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28499791

ABSTRACT

AIMS: Almost all patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations will develop resistance to first-line EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). The management of oligoprogression on EGFR TKI is controversial. Irradiating progressing tumours may potentially eradicate the resistant clone and allow continuation of EGFR TKI, but the clinical data remain sparse. We aimed to assess the effect of radiotherapy on survival outcomes in patients with oligoprogression in a matched-cohort study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective matched-cohort study comparing patients with EGFR mutation-positive stage IV non-small cell lung cancer receiving radiotherapy versus chemotherapy for progression. Patients in the radiotherapy group received radiotherapy (mainly stereotactic ablative radiotherapy) for oligoprogression, whereas the chemotherapy group received only systemic chemotherapy upon progression. Key prognostic factors including gender, age, performance status, time to first progression and mutation subtypes were matched. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients with oligoprogression (radiotherapy group) were identified, and a matched chemotherapy group with the same number of patients was generated. The median duration of follow-up was 24.3 and 34 months for the radiotherapy and chemotherapy groups, respectively. The median overall survival of the radiotherapy group was significantly longer than the chemotherapy group, 28.2 versus 14.7 months (P = 0.026). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 7.0 and 4.1 months after radiotherapy and chemotherapy, respectively (P = 0.0017). The use of radiotherapy was an independent predictive factor of overall survival and PFS in multivariate analysis. Only one patient had ≥grade 3 toxicity after radiotherapy. The frequency of secondary T790M mutation and subsequent Osimertinib exposure were similar in both groups. CONCLUSION: Radiotherapy may effectively extend EGFR TKI therapy for patients with oligoprogression on TKI. Improved PFS and overall survival were observed, although potential biases should not be overlooked. Further randomised studies are warranted.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/drug therapy , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/radiotherapy , ErbB Receptors/genetics , Lung Neoplasms/drug therapy , Lung Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/pathology , Cohort Studies , Disease-Free Survival , Female , Humans , Lung Neoplasms/pathology , Male , Middle Aged , Mutation , Research Design , Retrospective Studies , Survival Analysis
3.
J Geriatr Oncol ; 4(1): 71-7, 2013 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24071494

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: This study aims to identify a sub-group of older patients who experience a higher level of symptoms of distress during cancer therapy. The symptoms that had the greatest impact on the patients' performance status and quality of life (QoL) are also identified. METHODS: This cross-sectional study used secondary data from a convenience sample of 120 patients, 65years of age and older, receiving cancer therapy. The measuring instruments used included the Symptom Distress Scale, the Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) and the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G). Hierarchical cluster analysis was used to categorize the patients into groups. RESULTS: The patients had multiple symptoms, with a mean number of 5±3 symptoms per patient. Mood disturbance was the most prevalent (87%), while nausea (28%) was the least prevalent. Approximately 28% and 72% of the patients fell into the high-symptom and low-symptom groups, respectively. The high-symptom group reported significantly lower mean KPS scores, and FACT-G sub-scale and total scores (p<0.01). Impaired mobility had the strongest standardized coefficients in the KPS (-0.63; p<0.01), the FACT-G functional (-0.49; p<0.05) and the physical (-0.45; p<0.05) sub-scales. Concentration difficulties had the strongest standardized coefficients (-0.47; p<0.01) in the FACT-G total. CONCLUSION: Most of the older patients in this study reported suffering from a multitude of symptoms, with mood disturbance being the most prevalent. The older patients in the high-symptom group had a significantly lower performance status and QoL compared to the patients in the low-symptom group.


Subject(s)
Neoplasms/therapy , Stress, Psychological/etiology , Aged , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Mood Disorders/etiology , Nausea/etiology , Neoplasms/psychology , Quality of Life
4.
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) ; 22(1): 70-8, 2013 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22805171

ABSTRACT

This paper describes the prevalence of mood disturbance, sleep disturbance, fatigue and pain (MSFP), either alone or in combination in patients receiving cancer therapy, and determines its impact and whether it is a predictor for functional status and the impairment of quality of life (QoL). This is a cross-sectional study using secondary data from a sample of 214 patients being treated by chemotherapy or radiotherapy. In all, 87%, 68%, 66% and 38% of the patients reported MSFP respectively. Co-occurrence of any three and all of the four symptoms, were reported separately at rates of 29% and 31%. Patients with all four symptoms recorded significantly lower Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) scores (mean 77.7 ± 12.9) and QoL scores (mean subscales scores 9.0-17.6) than those with none or up to any three of the symptoms (P < 0.001). Regression of the KPS and QoL scores against the MSFP revealed an increase in the explained variance of 25%, 43%, 27%, 37% and 41% respectively for KPS, physical, emotional, functional and total QoL. The results suggest that MSFP are highly prevalent, whether alone or in combination, in patients receiving cancer therapy, and may negatively influence the patient's functional status and QoL during cancer therapy.


Subject(s)
Fatigue/epidemiology , Mood Disorders/epidemiology , Neoplasms/therapy , Pain/epidemiology , Sleep Wake Disorders/epidemiology , Adult , Aged , Cross-Sectional Studies , Fatigue/etiology , Female , Health Status , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Mood Disorders/etiology , Neoplasms/complications , Pain/etiology , Prevalence , Quality of Life , Regression Analysis , Sleep Wake Disorders/etiology , Young Adult
6.
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) ; 16(4): 283-9, 2004 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15214653

ABSTRACT

AIM: To assess the clinical outcome of breast cancer patients with immediate autologous breast reconstruction and post-mastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) as primary treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-five women with breast cancer treated with immediate autologous breast reconstruction and post-mastectomy radiotherapy as primary treatment between 1995 and 2001 in Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern Hospital of Hong Kong were retrospectively studied. Radiation doses of 50 Gy (in 2 Gy daily fraction) were given to the reconstructed breasts, except one who was given 45 Gy (in 1.8 Gy daily fraction). Nine women (36%) were treated without bolus, whereas the other 16 women (64%) were treated with 0.5 cm thick bolus on alternate days. The main outcome measures include local control, treatment complications and cosmetic outcome. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 3.7 years (range: 1.0-6.6 years). Two women (8%), who were treated without bolus, developed chest wall recurrences. The overall 5-year, actuarial, local failure-free rate and disease-specific survival rate were 89.8% and 77.9%, respectively. Apart from mild acute skin reactions, no significant acute radiotherapy side-effects were observed. No flap necrosis or flap loss was seen. The cosmesis of the reconstructed breasts were rated as good to excellent in 85% of the surviving patients. There was no observed adverse effect on cosmesis by adding bolus on alternate days. CONCLUSION: PMRT after immediate autologous tissue-flap breast reconstruction is well tolerated and is not associated with increased incidence of complications. Adding 0.5 cm bolus on alternate days might improve local control without causing adverse cosmetic effect. The concern of adverse effects of radiotherapy should not exclude the choice of immediate breast reconstruction in suitable patients.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Breast Neoplasms/surgery , Mammaplasty , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/radiotherapy , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/surgery , Adult , Breast Neoplasms/mortality , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/mortality , Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/pathology , Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/radiotherapy , Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/surgery , Clinical Trials as Topic , Disease-Free Survival , Female , Hong Kong/epidemiology , Humans , Mastectomy , Medical Records , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/mortality , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/pathology , Neoplasm Staging , Postoperative Period , Radiation Dosage , Radiotherapy, Adjuvant , Retrospective Studies , Survival Analysis
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...