Tooth morphology, internal fit, occlusion and proximal contacts of dental crowns designed by deep learning-based dental software: A comparative study.

OBJECTIVES: This study compared the tooth morphology, internal fit, occlusion, and proximal contacts of dental crowns automatically generated via two deep learning (DL)-based dental software systems with those manually designed by an experienced dental technician using conventional software. METHODS: Thirty partial arch scans of prepared posterior teeth were used. The crowns were designed using two DL-based methods (AA and AD) and a technician-based method (NC). The crown design outcomes were three-dimensionally compared, focusing on tooth morphology, internal fit, occlusion, and proximal contacts, by calculating the geometric relationship. Statistical analysis utilized the independent t-test, Mann-Whitney test, one-way ANOVA, and Kruskal-Wallis test with post hoc pairwise comparisons (α = 0.05). RESULTS: The AA and AD groups, with the NC group as a reference, exhibited no significant tooth morphology discrepancies across entire external or occlusal surfaces. The AD group exhibited higher root mean square and positive average values on the axial surface (P < .05). The AD and NC groups exhibited a better internal fit than the AA group (P < .001). The cusp angles were similar across all groups (P = .065). The NC group yielded more occlusal contact points than the AD group (P = .006). Occlusal and proximal contact intensities varied among the groups (both P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Crowns designed by using both DL-based software programs exhibited similar morphologies on the occlusal and axial surfaces; however, they differed in internal fit, occlusion, and proximal contacts. Their overall performance was clinically comparable to that of the technician-based method in terms of the internal fit and number of occlusal contact points. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: DL-based dental software for crown design can streamline the digital workflow in restorative dentistry, ensuring clinically-acceptable outcomes on tooth morphology, internal fit, occlusion, and proximal contacts. It can minimize the necessity of additional design optimization by dental technician.

Comparative analysis of flexural strength of 3D printed and milled 4Y-TZP and 3Y-TZP zirconia.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: The mechanical properties of 3 dimensionally (3D) printed zirconia have been reported to be comparable with those of milled zirconia, except for the flexural strength. However, most previous studies tested 3 mol% yttria-stabilized tetragonal zirconia polycrystal (3Y-TZP), making it necessary to study 3D printed zirconia with 4 mol% yttria content (4Y-TZP). PURPOSE: The purpose of this in vitro study was to compare the flexural strength of 3D printed 4Y-TZP with 3Y-TZP materials and milled 4Y-TZP. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 80 disk specimens (Ø15×1.5 mm) were fabricated and divided into 4 groups (n=20) using the fabrication method and yttria content: milled 3Y-TZP (Katana HT; Kuraray Noritake), 3D printed 3Y-TZP (TZ-3Y-E; Tosoh), milled 4Y-TZP (Katana STML; Kuraray Noritake), and 3D printed 4Y-TZP (3DMAT; Genoss). The biaxial flexural strength was determined with a piston-on-3-ball test (n=15). The flexural strength of each specimen was measured, and the Weibull modulus (m) and characteristic strength (σ0) were estimated from the fracture load distribution. Two intact and fractured specimens were examined with scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The crystalline phase of the specimens in each group was identified through X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis (n=5). A 1-way ANOVA was used to compare the flexural strength among different groups. Subsequently, pairwise comparisons were conducted with the Tukey post hoc method (α=.05). RESULTS: The flexural strength of 3D printed 4Y-TZP was significantly higher than that of milled 4Y-TZP (P<.001). In contrast, the flexural strength of 3D printed 3Y-TZP was significantly lower than that of milled 3Y-TZP (P<.001). X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis revealed that the tetragonal phase was the dominant phase in all groups, with the identification of some cubic phase peaks. CONCLUSIONS: Three dimensionally printed 4Y-TZP showed significantly higher flexural strength than milled 4Y-TZP and exhibited a clinically acceptable flexural strength exceeding 800 MPa.

Time efficiency, occlusal morphology, and internal fit of anatomic contour crowns designed by dental software powered by generative adversarial network: A comparative study.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the time efficiency, occlusal morphology, and internal fit of dental crowns designed using generative adversarial network (GAN)-based dental software compared to conventional dental software. METHODS: Thirty datasets of partial arch scans for prepared posterior teeth were analyzed. Each crown was designed on each abutment using GAN-based software (AI) and conventional dental software (non-AI). The AI and non-AI groups were compared in terms of time efficiency by measuring the elapsed work time. The difference in the occlusal morphology of the crowns before and after design optimization and the internal fit of the crown to the prepared abutment were also evaluated by superimposition for each software. Data were analyzed using independent t tests or Mann-Whitney test with statistical significance (α=.05). RESULTS: The working time was significantly less for the AI group than the non-AI group at T1, T5, and T6 (P≤.043). The working time with AI was significantly shorter at T1, T3, T5, and T6 for the intraoral scan (P≤.036). Only at T2 (P≤.001) did the cast scan show a significant difference between the two groups. The crowns in the AI group showed less deviation in occlusal morphology and significantly better internal fit to the abutment than those in the non-AI group (both P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: Crowns designed by AI software showed improved outcomes than that designed by non-AI software, in terms of time efficiency, difference in occlusal morphology, and internal fit. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: The GAN-based software showed better time efficiency and less deviation in occlusal morphology during the design process than the conventional software, suggesting a higher probability of optimized outcomes of crown design.

Feasibility of software-based assessment for automated evaluation of tooth preparation for dental crown by using a computational geometric algorithm.

The purpose of this study was to propose the concept of software-based automated evaluation (SAE) of tooth preparation quality using computational geometric algorithms, and evaluate the feasibility of SAE in the assessment of abutment tooth preparation for single-unit anatomic contour crowns by comparing it with a human-based digitally assisted evaluation (DAE) by trained human evaluators. Thirty-five mandibular first molars were prepared for anatomical contour crown restoration by graduate students. Each prepared tooth was digitized and evaluated in terms of occlusal reduction and total occlusal convergence using SAE and DAE. Intra-rater agreement for the scores graded by the SAE and DAE and inter-rater agreement between the SAE and DAE were analyzed with the significance level (α) of 0.05. The evaluation using the SAE protocol demonstrated perfect intra-rater agreement, whereas the evaluation using the DAE protocol showed moderate-to-good intra-rater agreement. The evaluation values of the SAE and DAE protocols showed almost perfect inter-rater agreement. The SAE developed for tooth preparation evaluation can be used for dental education and clinical skill feedback. SAE may minimize possible errors in the conventional rating and provide more reliable and precise assessments than the human-based DAE.

Splinting or Nonsplinting Adjacent Implants? A Retrospective Study Up to 15 Years: Part I-Biologic and Mechanical Complication Analysis.

PURPOSE: To analyze the biologic and mechanical complications of splinted and nonsplinted implant restorations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 423 patients (n = implants: 888) were included in the study. Biologic and mechanical complications that occurred for 15 years were analyzed using the multivariable Cox regression model, and the significant effect of the splinting of prostheses and other risk factors were evaluated. RESULTS: Biologic complications occurred in 38.7% of implants: 26.4% of nonsplinted implants (NS) and 45.4% of splinted implants (SP). Mechanical complications occurred in 49.2% of implants: 59.3% NS and 43.9% SP. Implants splinted with both mesial and distal adjacent implants (SP-mid) had the highest risk of peri-implant diseases. As the number of implants splinted increased, the risk of mechanical complications decreased. Long crown lengths increased the risk of both biologic and mechanical complications. CONCLUSION: Splinted implants had a higher risk of biologic complications and lower risk of mechanical complications. The implant splinted to both adjacent implants (SP-mid) had the highest risk of biologic complications. The greater the number of implants splinted, the lower the risk of mechanical complications. Long crown lengths increased the risk of both biologic and mechanical complications. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2023;38:435-442. doi: 10.11607/jomi.10053.

Splinting or Nonsplinting Adjacent Implants? A Retrospective Study Up to 15 Years: Part II-Success and Survival Rate Analysis.

PURPOSE: To analyze the success and survival of splinted and nonsplinted implants. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 423 patients (n = implants: 888) were included in the study. The success and survival of implants for 15 years were analyzed using a multivariable Cox regression model, and the significant effect of the splinting of prostheses and other risk factors were evaluated. RESULTS: The cumulative success rate was 34.2%: 33.2% in nonsplinted (NS) and 34.8% in splinted implants (SP). The cumulative survival rate was 92.9% (94.1%, NS; 92.3%, SP). Whether to splint was not related to the success and survival of implants. The smaller the implant diameter, the lower the survival rate. The crown length and implant length were significantly associated only with NS implants: The longer the crown length and the shorter the implant length, the greater the risk of implant failure. The emergence angle (EA) and the emergence profile (EP) had a significant effect on only the SP implants: EA3 showed a higher risk than EA1, and EP2 and EP3 had a higher risk of implant failure. CONCLUSION: Crown length and implant length affected only the nonsplinted implants: The higher the crown length and the shorter the implant length, the greater the risk of implant failure. A significant effect for emergence contour was found only in SP implants: the implants restored with prostheses with EA ≥ 30 degrees on both the mesial and distal sides, and convex EP on at least one side had higher risks of failure. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2023;38:443-450. doi: 10.11607/jomi.10054.

Mechanical complications of implant-supported restorations with internal conical connection implants: A 14-year retrospective study.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Internal conical connections have become the primary choice for implant-supported restorations. However, studies that identified the risk indicators for mechanical complications and diagnosed the prognosis of the implant-supported restorations are lacking. PURPOSE: The purpose of this retrospective clinical study was to evaluate the incidence and consequences of mechanical complications in components of internal conical connection implants and to analyze the risk indicators. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 428 patients with 898 internal conical connection implants were included in the study, and mechanical complications over the 14-year observation period were evaluated. The Cox proportional hazard regression model was used to analyze significant effects on mechanical complications, which were presented as hazard ratio and 95% confidence interval. RESULTS: Mechanical complications occurred in 430 (47.9%) implants and 248 (57.9%) patients: screw loosening (46.4% of implants, 56.8% of patients); screw fracture (2.6% of implants, 4.4% of patients); abutment fracture (11.4% of implants, 21.3% of patients); and implant fracture (3.5% of implants, 5.4% of patients). Implant restorations replacing molars showed the highest risk for mechanical complication (hazard ratio 12.82; 95% confidence interval 2.73-60.31) and for fracture of all components. Men had a higher risk of mechanical complication than women (hazard ratio 2.00; 95% confidence interval 1.55-2.59), and the risk of fracture was higher in all components. With increased splinted implants, the risk of mechanical complication (hazard ratio 0.67; 95% confidence interval 0.49-0.93) and component fracture (hazard ratio 0.73; 95% confidence interval 0.29-0.89) decreased. Gold screws had a lower risk of screw loosening (hazard ratio 0.74; 95% confidence interval 0.58-0.94) than titanium screws, but a higher risk of fracture (hazard ratio 3.45; 95% confidence interval 1.42-8.36). The smaller the implant diameter, the higher the risk of implant fracture (hazard ratio 0.01; 95% confidence interval 0.00-0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Abutments were most frequently fractured among the components of internal conical connection type implants. Molar implant-supported restorations and male patients had higher risks of mechanical complications, and as the number of splinted implants in a prosthesis increased, the risk decreased. Gold screws showed less risk of screw loosening and higher risk of fracture than titanium screws. Narrow-diameter implants had a higher risk of fracture.

Clinical Outcomes of Implant-Assisted Removable Partial Dentures According to Implant Strategic Position.

PURPOSE: To retrospectively analyze the success of implant-assisted removable partial dentures (IARPDs) according to three types of strategic positions in distal extension areas of Kennedy Class I and II arches. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The data included 102 arches in 95 patients with Kennedy Class I/II arches treated with IARPDs with implants in three strategic positions: Type 1a, assisted by P-1a implants on the anterior area adjacent to the abutment tooth; Type 1b, assisted by P-1b implants on the anterior area apart from the abutment tooth with or without P-1a; Type 2, assisted by P-2a implants on the posterior area adjacent to the natural tooth or P-2b implants on the posterior area apart from the abutment tooth to modify from Kennedy Class I /II to Class III. The success was defined as the IARPDs without abutment tooth-related, denture-related, and implant-related complications. Kaplan-Meier curves and the multivariable Cox regression model were used to analyze the success of IARPDs and implants. RESULTS: The overall success rate of IARPD treatment was 66.7%; 77.8% in Type 1a, 60.0% in Type 1b, and 68.0% in Type 2. There was no significant effect of treatment type on success rate of IARPDs. However, there was significant differences at the level of implant supporting IARPDs: 83.3% in Type 1a implants, 62.6% in Type 1b implants, and 73.2% in Type 2 implants. The implants of IARPD's adjacent to the natural tooth abutments (P-1a and P-2a) had higher success rates than those away from the natural tooth abutments. CONCLUSIONS: Within the limitations of this study, there was no significant difference in the prosthodontic complications of IARPDs depending on the treatment type. However, the success of implants of IARPD is associated with the strategic position. Strategic implant abutments adjacent to the natural tooth had higher success rates than those away from the natural teeth abutments.

A retrospective comparison of clinical outcomes of implant restorations for posterior edentulous area: 3-unit bridge supported by 2 implants vs 3 splinted implant-supported crowns.

PURPOSE: To compare the clinical outcomes of two types of implant restoration for posterior edentulous area, 3-unit bridge supported by 2 implants and 3 implant-supported splinted crowns. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The data included 127 implant-supported fixed restorations in 85 patients: 37 restorations of 3-unit bridge supported by 2 implants (2-IB), 37 restorations of 3 implant-supported splinted crowns (3-IC), and 53 single restorations (S) as controls. Peri-implantitis and mechanical complications that occurred for 14 years were analyzed by multivariable Cox regression model. Kaplan-Meier curves and the multivariable Cox regression model were used to analyze the success and survival of implants. RESULTS: Peri-implantitis occurred in 28.4% of 2-IB group, 37.8% of 3-IC group, and 28.3% of S control group with no significant difference. According to the implant position, middle implants (P2) of the 3-IC group had the highest risk of peri-implantitis. The 3-IC group showed a lower mechanical complication rate (7.2%) than the 2-IB (16.2%) and S control group (20.8%). The cumulative success rate was 52.8% in S (control) group, 62.2% in 2-IB group, and 60.4% in 3-IC group. The cumulative survival rate was 98.1% in S (control) group, 98.6% in 2-IB group, and 95.5% in 3-IC group. There was no significant difference in the success and survival rate according to the restoration type. CONCLUSION: The restoration type was not associated with the success and survival of implants. The risk of mechanical complications was reduced in 3 implant-supported splinted crowns. However, the middle implants of the 3 implant-supported splinted crowns had a higher risk of peri-implantitis.

Alternative approach to salvaging an implant with a fractured screw fragment: A clinical report.

Managing fractures of implant abutment screws is challenging because of the uncertainty associated with the removal of the fractured screw fragments. In case of unsuccessful retrieval of the fractured fragment with known techniques, removal and replacement of the implant becomes traumatic and financially burdensome to the patient. This clinical report describes a conservative solution for the management of nonretrievable fractured screws by reconnecting the prostheses to the existing implants by using cut screws. This alternative, cost-effective method obviates the need for surgery and has proved successful and satisfactory for patients.

Association of prosthetic features and peri-implantitis: A cross-sectional study.

OBJECTIVE: To identify the influence of prosthetic features through a comprehensive analysis with other known risk factors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 169 patients (n = implants: 349) was retrospectively included in the present study. Peri-implantitis was diagnosed based on peri-implant bone loss and probing depth. Using radiographs taken 1 and 5 years following prosthesis insertion, the following features were determined: peri-implant marginal bone loss (MBL), emergence angle (EA), emergence profile (EP) and crown/implant ratio (CIR). The splinted position of prosthesis was also recorded. Multivariable generalized estimating equation was used to analyse the influence of each feature on the prevalence of peri-implantitis. The final prediction model was constructed by Cox proportional hazard regression analysis. RESULTS: The EA showed a significant correlation with MBL. A statistically greater prevalence of peri-implantitis was observed if EA ≥ 30 degrees, when EP is convex and in middle implant splinted with both mesial and distal adjacent implants in bone-level implant. A similar correlation was not observed in tissue-level implants. CIR had no significant effect on the prevalence of peri-implantitis. CONCLUSION: Over-contoured implant prosthesis is a critical local confounder for peri-implantitis. The implant splinted to both mesial and distal adjacent implant has a higher risk of peri-implantitis.

Comparison of CAD/CAM abutment and prefabricated abutment in Morse taper internal type implant after cyclic loading: Axial displacement, removal torque, and tensile removal force.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) abutment and prefabricated abutment in Morse taper internal connection type implants after cyclic loading. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was conducted with internal type implants of two different manufacturers (Group Os, De). Fourteen assemblies were prepared for each manufacturer group and divided into 2 groups (n=7): prefabricated abutments (Os-P, De-P) and CAD/CAM abutments (Os-C, De-C). The amount of axial displacement and the removal torque values (RTVs) were measured before and after cyclic loading (106 cycles, 3 Hz with 150 N), and the tensile removal force to dislodge the abutments was measured after cyclic loading. A repeated measures ANOVA and a pattern analysis based on the logarithmic regression model were conducted to evaluate the effect of cyclic loading on the axial displacement. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test and the Mann-Whitney test was conducted for comparison of RTV reduction% and tensile removal forces. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between CAD/CAM abutments and prefabricated abutments in axial displacement and tensile removal force; however, significantly greater RTV reduction% after cyclic loading was observed in CAD/CAM abutments. The correlation among the axial displacement, the RTV, and the tensile removal force was not significant. CONCLUSION: The use of CAD/CAM abutment did not significantly affect the amount of axial displacement and tensile removal force, but presented a significantly greater removal torque reduction% than prefabricated abutments. The connection stability due to the friction at the abutment-implant interface of CAD/CAM abutments may not be different from prefabricated abutment.

Comparison of implant component fractures in external and internal type: A 12-year retrospective study.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare the fracture of implant component behavior of external and internal type of implants to suggest directions for successful implant treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data were collected from the clinical records of all patients who received WARANTEC implants at Seoul National University Dental Hospital from February 2002 to January 2014 for 12 years. Total number of implants was 1,289 and an average of 3.2 implants was installed per patient. Information about abutment connection type, implant locations, platform sizes was collected with presence of implant component fractures and their managements. SPSS statistics software (version 24.0, IBM) was used for the statistical analysis. RESULTS: Overall fracture was significantly more frequent in internal type. The most frequently fractured component was abutment in internal type implants, and screw fracture occurred most frequently in external type. Analyzing by fractured components, screw fracture was the most frequent in the maxillary anterior region and the most abutment fracture occurred in the maxillary posterior region and screw fractures occurred more frequently in NP (narrow platform) and abutment fractures occurred more frequently in RP (regular platform). CONCLUSION: In external type, screw fracture occurred most frequently, especially in the maxillary anterior region, and in internal type, abutment fracture occurred frequently in the posterior region. placement of an external type implant rather than an internal type is recommended for the posterior region where abutment fractures frequently occur.