ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) and inhalational anesthesia techniques on tissue oxygenation in cardiac surgery. We compared the effects of midazolam-based TIVA and sevoflurane-based (SEVO) inhalation anesthesia maintenance on intraoperative central and regional tissue oxygenation parameters. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 104 adult patients who were scheduled for elective isolated coronary bypass surgery were included in the study. All patients were divided into two groups: the TIVA group consisted of total intravenous anesthesia maintenance patients (n=52) and the SEVO group consisted of patients with inhalation anesthesia with sevoflurane maintenance (n=52). Tissue oxygenation values were observed with left-right cerebral and somatic left forearm Near-Infrared Spectroscopy (NIRS) sensors. The hemodynamic parameters, NIRS StO2, central (ScvO2) and peripheral venous oxygen saturations of the patients were recorded at six intraoperative time points. RESULTS: The effects of midazolam-based TIVA and sevoflurane-based inhalation anesthesia maintenance on intraoperative central and peripheral tissue oxygenation parameters were compared and it was found that in the left forearm NIRS StO2 and ScvO2 values were higher in the SEVO group than the TIVA group. Although not significantly different, forearm regional venous oxygen saturation was also higher in the SEVO group. CONCLUSIONS: The effects of anesthetic drugs on regional tissue oxygenation can become important in critical patients and challenging surgeries. Sevoflurane-based anesthesia provides better tissue oxygenation than TIVA in patients undergoing coronary bypass surgery.
