Prescribing Practices and Barriers of Biologics for Chronic Rhinosinusitis Amongst Otolaryngologists.

OBJECTIVE(S): Biologics for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis (CRSwNP) are an evolving therapeutic option, but there are limited data on physician experiences in prescribing them. The goal of this study was to gain a better understanding of these experiences including prescribing practices, patient factors which guide prescriber decision, and physician and patient-reported issues which might limit cost-effectiveness of these therapies. METHODS: A survey was distributed to attending otolaryngologists using the Canadian Society of Otolaryngology (CSOHNS) email distribution and eSurvey program. Responses were tabulated for the entire cohort and compared between rhinologists and non-rhinologists where appropriate. Frequencies and proportions were expressed as a percentage of total respondents. Fisher's exact test was used for statistical analysis between groups. RESULTS: Seventy-nine total survey responses were recorded representing a response rate of 43%. Significantly more rhinologists reported prescribing biologic medications on their own (100% vs. 50%; p < 0.001) and a higher proportion (1 to 10% vs. <1%) of their patients were on biologics compared with non-rhinologists (p = 0.023). Rhinologists were more likely to consider poor response to medical therapies, need for rescue steroids, and comorbid type 2 conditions in their decision to pursue biologics than non-rhinologists, but they also experienced poorer assistance from patient support programs and less availability to medications. CONCLUSION: Rhinologists are more comfortable with prescribing and managing biologics for CRSwNP compared with non-rhinologist colleagues. Clinicians prescribing biologic medications for CRSwNP should be familiar with guidelines, indications, and potential adverse events. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: N/A Laryngoscope, 2024.

Endoscopic sinus surgery outcomes in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis and immunoglobulin deficiencies.

BACKGROUND: Patients with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) and immunoglobulin deficiencies (ID) have more recalcitrant sinonasal disease and a subset of these patients undergo surgical management for their CRS. However, there is a paucity of literature on the surgical outcomes in this patient population and appropriate treatment algorithms for CRS in patients with ID. The objective of this study was to better elucidate the outcomes of endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) in patients with ID in terms of disease-specific quality-of-life scores and the need for revision surgery. METHODS: A case-control study was performed comparing adult patients with ID and healthy controls that had undergone ESS for CRS. Patients were matched based on age, sex, CRS phenotype, and preoperative Lund-Mackay score. The revision surgery rates, time to revision surgery, and changes in sinonasal outcome tests (SNOT-22) were evaluated. RESULTS: Thirteen patients with CRS and ID were matched to 26 control patients with CRS. The revision surgery rate for cases and controls was 31% and 12%, respectively, but there was no statistical difference (p > 0.05). There was a clinically meaningful reduction in SNOT-22 scores in both groups from the preoperative to postoperative period [mean of 12 points in patients with ID (p = 0.323) and 25 points in controls (p < 0.001)], however, there was again no significant difference between cases and controls (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Our data suggests that patients with ID have clinically meaningful improvement in SNOT-22 scores after ESS but may have higher revision rates than immunocompetent patients with CRS. ID are rare disease entities, thus most attempts at studying this cohort would be limited by sample size. Further homogenous data on immunoglobulin deficient patients is required for future meta-analysis to better understand the impact of ESS in patients with ID.

Quality Indicators for the Diagnosis and Management of Menière's Disease.

OBJECTIVE: Menière's disease (MD) is a clinical disorder that often provides challenges in diagnosis and management. High-quality evidence to guide care providers is sparse, which can result in significant practice variations. Quality indicators (QIs) are one method that can be used to standardize and measure accepted care practices to improve healthcare quality and patient outcomes. Here, we developed practical, high-yield QIs that serve to measure and inform the quality of care provided to patients with MD. STUDY DESIGN: Modified RAND Corporation University of California, Los Angeles appropriateness methodology for QI development. SETTING: Multicenter nine-member expert panel. PATIENTS: NA. INTERVENTIONS: NA. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Final QIs deemed appropriate measures of quality care with agreement by the expert panel. RESULTS: Twenty-seven candidate indicators were identified after literature review. After the first round of evaluations, the panel agreed on three candidate indicators as appropriate QIs. A subsequent expert panel meeting provided a platform to discuss disagreements. Two agreed-upon QIs were revised during this discussion before final evaluations. The expert panel ultimately agreed upon five QIs as appropriate measures of high-quality care after completing final evaluations and reviewing updated literature. The five quality indicators measure audiometric documentation, minimization of electrocochleography, use of intratympanic dexamethasone, use of intratympanic gentamycin, and rate of labyrinthectomy/vestibular neurectomy in refractory MD patient. CONCLUSIONS: This study proposes five QIs that cover key aspects of care for MD, such as accurate diagnosis and management options including initial destructive therapies. These QIs can serve multiple purposes, the most important of which is to galvanize quality improvement initiatives.

Quality Indicators for the Diagnosis and Management of Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss.

OBJECTIVE: Sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL) is an ideal entity for quality indicator (QI) development, providing treatment challenges resulting in variable or substandard care. The American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery recently updated their SSNHL guidelines. With SSNHL demonstrating a large burden of illness, this study sought to leverage the updated guidelines and develop QIs that support quality improvement initiatives at an individual, institutional, and systems level. METHODS: Candidate indicators (CIs) were extracted from high-quality SSNHL guidelines that were evaluated using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II tool. Each CI and its supporting evidence were summarized and reviewed by a nine-member expert panel based on validity, reliability, and feasibility of measurement. Final QIs were selected from CIs using the modified RAND Corporation-University of California, Los Angeles appropriateness methodology. RESULTS: Fifteen CIs were identified after literature review. After the first round of evaluations, the panel agreed on 11 candidate indicators as appropriate QIs with 2 additional CIs suggested for consideration. An expert panel meeting provided a platform to discuss areas of disagreement before final evaluations. The expert panel subsequently agreed upon 11 final QIs as appropriate measures of high-quality care for SSNHL. CONCLUSION: The 11 proposed QIs from this study are supported by evidence and expert consensus, facilitating measurement across a wide breadth of quality domains. With the recently updated SSNHL guidelines, and a greater focus on quality improvement opportunities, these QIs may be used by healthcare providers for targeted quality improvement initiatives.

Medical and surgical treatment outcomes in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis and immunodeficiency: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Immunodeficiency is a risk factor for recalcitrant chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). Currently, there is no consensus on effective treatment modalities for immunodeficient CRS patients. This review aims to evaluate the existing evidence on the treatment outcomes and its limitations in patients with CRS and immunodeficiency. METHODS: MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) were searched from inception to April 2019 for studies reporting measurable medical or surgical treatment outcomes for adult patients with CRS and underlying primary or secondary immunodeficiency. RESULTS: Of the 2459 articles screened, 13 studies met the inclusion criteria: 2 prospective double-blind placebo-controlled trials, 2 prospective case-control studies, 2 prospective cohort studies, and 7 case series. The high degree of study heterogeneity precluded a meta-analysis. Antibiotic monotherapy was not linked with significant improvement in clinical, radiographic, or endoscopic outcomes. Immunoglobulin replacement therapy may potentially reduce the frequency of acute or chronic sinusitis in patients with primary immunodeficiency (PID) but may not improve their sinonasal symptoms. Outcomes from endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) were reported in 8 studies, which found that surgery was linked with improvement in symptoms, disease-specific quality of life, endoscopy scores, and radiographic scores. The average reported ESS revision rate was 14%. CONCLUSION: Patients with CRS and immunodeficiency likely benefit from ESS based on the available evidence. Data supporting medical therapy in this targeted population is limited overall, but there may be a potential role for immunoglobulin therapy in patients with PID and CRS.

Quality indicators for the diagnosis and management of pediatric tonsillitis.

INTRODUCTION: Pediatric tonsillitis is encountered frequently across specialties, and while high quality guidelines exist, there is persistent evidence of care which is not evidence based, including antibiotic overprescribing and surgical practice variability. Quality indicators (QIs) can be utilized for initiatives to improve the quality of care and subsequent patient outcomes. We sought to develop pediatric tonsillitis QIs that are applicable across specialties and that cover aspects of both diagnosis and the spectrum of management options. METHODS: A guideline-based approach to QI development was employed. Candidate indicators (CIs) were extracted from international guidelines deemed high quality by two reviewers and evaluated by an eleven-member expert panel consisting of otolaryngology - head & neck surgeons, a pediatrician and a family physician. The final QIs were selected utilizing a modified RAND/UCLA appropriateness methodology. RESULTS: Twenty-six CIs were identified after initial literature review. After the first round of evaluations, the panel agreed on thirteen candidate indicators as appropriate QIs. A subsequent expert panel meeting provided a platform to discuss areas of disagreement, discuss any recently published research, and to brainstorm additional CIs not identified from the guideline extraction. Following the second round of evaluations, the expert panel agreed upon sixteen QIs as appropriate measures of high-quality care. CONCLUSIONS: This study proposes sixteen QIs developed through a multidisciplinary lens to guide practitioners in the diagnosis and management of pediatric tonsillitis. These QIs can be used to improve transparency, accountability, and provide objective data to assist future quality improvement initiatives.

Surgical outcomes in aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease without aspirin desensitization.

BACKGROUND: Aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease (AERD) represents a severe endotype of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis. Although aspirin desensitization (AD) has emerged as an effective therapeutic option, the natural history of AERD without AD remains unclear. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted of AERD patients who underwent endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) without AD between 2010 and 2019. The primary outcomes were revision surgery rate and time to revision surgery. Secondary outcomes included changes in 22-item Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) scores and Lund-Kennedy endoscopy scores (LKES). A subgroup analysis was performed for patients on monoclonal antibody therapy (MAT). RESULTS: Of 141 patients, 37 (26.2%) underwent revision ESS with a median time to revision of 3.3 (interquartile range [IQR], 2.2-4.9) years. The probability of remaining free of revision surgery at 1, 3, and 5 years was: 98.2% (95% confidence interval [CI], 95.7-100.0%), 78.8% (95% CI, 70.2-88.4%), and 44.8% (95% CI, 32.4-62.1%), respectively. SNOT-22 scores decreased by 34 (IQR, 18-52) points at 6 months and 27 (IQR, 20-46) points at 1 year postoperatively. In the revision cohort, the decrease in SNOT-22 score was not sustained at 1 year postoperatively. No difference was found in time to revision compared with those without MAT (p = 0.23). CONCLUSION: A significant proportion of AERD patients benefit from ESS and medical therapy alone without AD. This study presents preliminary results on the impact of MAT on surgical outcomes as it is limited by the small sample size. Further research on the use of MAT in AERD is needed.

Nasal nitric oxide as a long-term monitoring and prognostic biomarker of mucosal health in chronic rhinosinusitis.

BACKGROUND: Nasal nitric oxide (nNO) is a potential biomarker of chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS), and correlates well with endoscopic and radiologic severity of disease. However, the long-term profile of nNO as a biomarker is not established in the literature. The objectives of our study were to examine whether nNO can maintain this correlation in a 5-year follow-up after endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) and to investigate whether nNO value can be used to prognosticate revision rates in patients with CRS. METHODS: We enrolled CRS patients 5 years after initial ESS at our institution. Patients underwent initial ESS at our institution between January 2013 and January 2015. Patients prospectively had the following measurements at baseline, 1 month, 6 months, and 5 years post-ESS: nNO levels, Lund-Kennedy Endoscopy Score (LKES), and 22-item Sino-Nasal Outcome Test-22 (SNOT-22) score. We also compared the nNO levels between patients who underwent revision ESS and those who did not. RESULTS: There were 32 patients included in the study with 8 patients undergoing revision ESS during the 5-year follow-up. nNO levels were elevated at 1 month, 6 months, and 5 years post-ESS compared to baseline. A significant negative correlation between nNO and LKES was found at 5 years post-ESS. nNO levels were significantly reduced at baseline and 6 months post-ESS in the revision cohort compared to the nonrevision cohort despite having comparable radiologic severity. CONCLUSION: nNO may serve as a noninvasive long-term biomarker to monitor sinus disease severity and to prognosticate results in patients with CRS. This has implications for potential integration into clinical practice.

Quality Indicators for the Diagnosis and Management of Acute Bacterial Rhinosinusitis.

BACKGROUND: Acute bacterial rhinosinusitis (ABRS) is a highly prevalent disease that is treated by a variety of specialties, including but not limited to, family physicians, emergency physicians, otolaryngology-head and neck surgeons, infectious disease specialists, and allergy and immunologists. Unfortunately, despite high-quality guidelines, variable and substandard care continues to be demonstrated in the treatment of ABRS. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to develop ABRS-specific quality indicators (QIs) to evaluate the diagnosis and management that reduces symptoms, improves quality of life, and prevents complications. METHODS: A guideline-based approach, proposed by Kötter et al., was used to develop QIs for ABRS. Candidate indicators (CIs) were extracted from 4 guiding documents and evaluated using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II (AGREE II) tool. Each CI and its supporting evidence was summarized and reviewed by an expert panel based on validity, reliability, and feasibility of measurement. Final QIs were selected from CIs utilizing the modified RAND/University of California at Los Angeles appropriateness methodology. RESULTS: Twenty-nine CIs were identified after literature review and evaluated by our panel. Of these, 5 CIs reached consensus as being appropriate QIs, with 1 requiring additional discussion. After a second round of evaluations, the panel selected 7 QIs as appropriate measures of high-quality care. CONCLUSION: This study proposes 7 QIs for the diagnosis and management of patients with ABRS. These QIs can serve multiple purposes, including documenting the quality of care; comparing institutions and providers; prioritizing quality improvement initiatives; supporting accountability, regulation, and accreditation; and determining pay for performance initiatives.

Impact of Septal Deviation on Recurrent Chronic Rhinosinusitis after Primary Surgery: A Matched Case-Control Study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of untreated deviated nasal septum (DNS) on recalcitrant chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) among patients undergoing revision endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS). STUDY DESIGN: Case-control study. SETTING: Tertiary academic center. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of 489 patients undergoing revision ESS for CRS at a tertiary academic center. Patients undergoing septoplasty were matched to nonseptoplasty controls based on age and sex. Preoperative Lund-Mackay score (LMS) was compared between cohorts. Linear regression was used to identify predictors of LMS and ostiomeatal complex (OMC) obstruction. RESULTS: Thirty-six matched pairs (72 patients) were selected for analysis: 36 undergoing septoplasty and revision ESS and 36 undergoing revision ESS alone. Compared with nonseptoplasty controls, the septoplasty group had a significantly higher average LMS (17.8 vs 14.6, P = .02) and a greater rate of OMC obstruction (89% vs 61%, P < .01). The septoplasty group also had significantly higher opacification scores in the maxillary (1.5 vs 1.2, P = .03) and posterior ethmoid (1.8 vs 1.4, P = .02) sinuses. On multivariable analysis, DNS was an independent predictor of LMS ( P = .02) and OMC obstruction ( P < .01). CONCLUSION: Untreated DNS is associated with radiographic markers of CRS severity among patients undergoing revision ESS and may contribute to the multifactorial pathogenesis of persistent CRS.

Endotypes of chronic rhinosinusitis.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: In contrast to the phenotypic classification of chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS), endotyping categorizes disease variants based on their underlying pathophysiologic mechanisms. Defining CRS endotypes may provide information on the risk for disease progression, recurrence and comorbid conditions, as well as identify suitable therapeutic targets. With the emergence of biologics, endotyping may enable personalized pharmacotherapy for recalcitrant CRS. The purpose of this review is to briefly summarize the pathophysiology and endotypes of CRS, and highlight the biologics that target mediators of CRS. RECENT FINDINGS: CRS is due to dysregulated immunologic responses to external stimuli, which induces inflammatory mediators. The linkage between innate lymphoid cells, adaptive CD4 T helper and CD8 + cytotoxic T cells has led to proposed endotypes that are based around immune response deviation into type 1, type 2 and type 3 responses. Cluster analysis has attempted to define endotypes, accounting for clinical characteristics, molecular and cellular biomarkers, and treatment response. Biologics targeting epithelial-derived cytokines and immunoglobulin E, as well as mediators of type 1, type 2 and type 3 inflammation, are being investigated in CRS. SUMMARY: Although there have been significant advances made in the understanding of the pathomechanisms of CRS, there currently remains a lack of full characterization of CRS endotypes.

Wait times for endoscopic sinus surgery influence patient-reported outcome measures in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis who fulfill appropriateness criteria.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies on the impact of wait times for endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) in medically recalcitrant chronic rhinosinusitis (rCRS) have not examined its influence on the 5 distinct symptoms domains of the 22-item Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22), and have not applied evidence-based surgical indications. Our primary study objective was to investigate the impact of ESS wait times on postoperative SNOT-22 global and symptom domain scores in patients with rCRS deemed "appropriate" surgical candidates. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of adult patients with rCRS undergoing ESS, categorized as "appropriate" surgical candidates. Primary outcome measure was change in SNOT-22 global/symptom domain score (preoperative - 6-month postoperative). Correlational analyses were performed between wait time and change in SNOT-22 global and symptom domain scores. For significant negative correlations, the threshold wait time to generate a worsening in health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) equivalent to the mean clinically important difference (MCID) was calculated. RESULTS: A total of 104 patients with a mean ± standard deviation (SD) wait time of 310.8 ± 155.9 days were analyzed. Postoperative SNOT-22 global and symptom domain scores significantly improved postoperatively. Wait time for ESS was negatively correlated with change in SNOT-22 global, rhinologic, extranasal rhinologic, and ear/facial domain scores (p < 0.05), and a wait time threshold of 287, 452, 421, and 381 days corresponded to a decrease equivalent to the MCID, respectively. CONCLUSION: We identified less improvement in HRQoL after ESS with increasing surgical wait time. Moreover, prolonged wait times may result in less improvement in disease-specific symptoms, but do not appear to worsen psychological or sleep dysfunction.

Quality indicators for the diagnosis and management of chronic rhinosinusitis.

BACKGROUND: Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) has been identified as a high-priority disease category for quality improvement. To this end, this study aimed to develop CRS-specific quality indicators (QIs) to evaluate diagnosis and management that relieves patient discomfort, improves quality of life, and prevents complications. METHODS: A guideline-based approach, proposed in 2012 by Kötter et al. was used to develop QIs for CRS. Candidate indicators (CIs) were extracted from 3 practice guidelines and 1 international consensus statement on the diagnosis and management of CRS. Guidelines were evaluated using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II (AGREE II) tool. Each CI and its supporting evidence was summarized and reviewed by an expert panel based on validity, reliability, and feasibility of measurement. Final QIs were selected from CIs utilizing the modified RAND Corporation-University of California, Los Angeles (RAND/UCLA) appropriateness methodology. RESULTS: Thirty-nine CIs were identified after literature review and evaluated by our panel. Of these, 9 CIs reached consensus as being appropriate QIs, with 4 requiring additional discussion. After a second round of evaluations, the panel selected 9 QIs as appropriate measures of high-quality care. CONCLUSION: This study proposes 9 QIs for the diagnosis and management of patients with CRS. These QIs can serve multiple purposes, including documenting the quality of care; comparing institutions and providers; prioritizing quality improvement initiatives; supporting accountability, regulation, and accreditation; and determining pay-for-performance initiatives.

Endoscopic management of maxillary sinus inverted papilloma attachment sites to minimize disease recurrence.

BACKGROUND: Inverted papillomas (IPs) are benign neoplasms, most commonly arising from the mucosal lining of the maxillary sinus. IPs can have single or multifocal sites of attachment. Although pedicle location is an important factor to consider in surgical planning, it is less clear whether the location or number of IP attachment sites hold any prognostic value. Herein, we aimed to determine the prognostic significance of the number and location of attachment sites of IPs originating from the maxillary sinus when managed by a pure endoscopic approach. METHODS: This was a single-center, single-surgeon retrospective chart review. Patients with maxillary sinus IPs who were managed by endoscopic approaches only, from January 1, 2010 to June 30, 2016, were identified. Demographic data, operative technique, number and location of IP attachment sites, follow-up duration, recurrence, and presence of malignant transformation were captured. RESULTS: Twenty-eight maxillary IP patients (61% males) were included, with a mean age of 54.9 (standard deviation (SD): 16.5) years. Approximately 36% of patients were referred from other institutions for management of recurrent IPs after failing previous surgical treatment. All patients were managed with an endoscopic approach, and all required an endoscopic medial maxillectomy to facilitate access to the maxillary sinus. At a mean follow-up of 31.1 (SD: 22.6) months, there were no recurrences identified. IPs with single (46%) and multifocal (54%) attachments were predominately to the medial and lateral walls. Maxillary IPs with multifocal attachments most frequently involved 2-3 walls of the sinus. Osteitis (36%) was commonly seen. CONCLUSION: IPs originating from the maxillary sinus frequently had multifocal attachments, but this did not impact disease recurrence. Despite the surgical challenges of accessing all of the maxillary sinus walls, IPs originating from the maxillary sinus can be effectively managed via a pure endoscopic approach.

The personal financial burden of chronic rhinosinusitis: A Canadian perspective.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies describe the financial burden of chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) from the perspective of third-party payers, but, to our knowledge, none analyze the costs borne by patients (i.e., out-of-pocket expenses [OOPE]). Furthermore, this burden has not been previously investigated in the context of a publicly funded health care system. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to characterize the financial impact of CRS on patients, specifically by evaluating its associated OOPEs and the perceived financial burden. The secondary aim was to determine the factors predictive of OOPEs and perceived burden. METHODS: Patients with CRS at a tertiary care sinus center completed a self-administered questionnaire that assessed their socioeconomic characteristics, disease-specific quality of life (22-item Sino-Nasal Outcome Test [SNOT-22]), workdays missed due to CRS, perceived financial burden, and direct medical and nonmedical OOPEs over a 12-month period. Total OOPEs were calculated from the sum of direct medical and nonmedical OOPEs. Regression analyses determined factors predictive of OOPEs and the perceived burden. RESULTS: A total of 84 patients completed the questionnaires. After accounting for health insurance coverage and the median direct medical, direct nonmedical, and total OOPEs per patient over a 12-month period were Canadian dollars (CAD) $336.00 (2011) [U.S. $339.85], CAD $129.87 [U.S. $131.86], and CAD $607.10 [U.S. $614.06], respectively. CRS resulted in an average of 20.6 workdays missed over a 12-month period. Factors predictive of a higher financial burden included younger age, a greater number of previous sinus surgeries, <80% health insurance coverage, residing out of town, and higher SNOT-22 scores. CONCLUSION: Total OOPEs incurred from the treatment of CRS may amount to CAD $607.10 [U.S. $614.06] per patient per year, within the context of a single-payer health care system. Managing clinicians should be aware of patient groups with a greater perceived financial burden and consider counseling them on strategies to offset expenses, including obtaining travel grants, using telemedicine for follow-up assessments, providing drug samples, and streamlining diagnostic testing with medical visits.

Understanding the Connection between Cognitive Impairment and Mobility: What Can Be Gained from Neuropsychological Assessment?

The ability of neuropsychological tests to predict rehabilitation outcome is unclear, particularly when other ratings of cognition are available. Neuropsychological test scores and functional ratings of cognition (Functional Independence Measure (FIM) Cognition score) were used to predict improvement in patient mobility and self-care skill, as measured by the FIM Motor score. Regression models used both raw neuropsychology test scores and age-adjusted scores. Retrospective chart review was performed for patients on an inpatient rehabilitation unit and referred for neuropsychological assessment. The group included 126 subjects (average age 64.2 ± 17.1 years) and a variety of medical diagnoses. Neuropsychological tests included the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS). After forcing the Admission FIM Cognition score into the model, RBANS scores and duration of rehabilitation predicted FIM Motor improvements (F = 11.42, p < 0.0001). Raw neuropsychological test scores performed better than the model with age-adjusted test scores. FIM Cognition alone did not predict FIM Motor improvements. Neuropsychological tests, combined with duration of rehabilitation, predicted mobility gains for patients undergoing inpatient rehabilitation beyond what was predicted by another, readily available, assessment of cognition. Neuropsychology raw scores performed better than age-adjusted scores, raising questions about the standard use of demographic adjustments for predicting real-world function.

Nasal nitric oxide as a marker of sinus mucosal health in patients with nasal polyposis.

BACKGROUND: Reduced nasal nitric oxide (nNO) has been shown in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) but its clinical significance remains uncertain. The objective of this study was to measure nNO changes in patients undergoing endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) for CRS and to explore its relationship to clinical measures of sinus mucosal health postoperatively. METHODS: This was a prospective study of CRS patients undergoing ESS. Patients had the following measurements at baseline and at 1 and 6 months post-ESS: nNO levels, Lund-Kennedy Endoscopy Score (LKES), and 22-item Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) score. Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism 6. RESULTS: Thirty-nine patients were enrolled, of these 84.6% had CRS with nasal polyps. Baseline Lund-Mackay computed tomography (CT) score was 16.9 ± 5.1. There was a statistically significant increase in nNO levels from baseline to 1 month and 6 months postoperatively (p < 0.0001). The SNOT-22 and LKES followed a similar trend with a significant and sustained improvement at 1 month and 6 months post-ESS (p < 0.0001). Subgroup analysis revealed that changes in nNO were driven by the polyp cohort because nonpolyp patients had no significant changes in their nNO postoperatively. No correlation was found between nNO levels and SNOT-22. However, a significant negative correlation was found between nNO and LKES (p < 0.0001), suggesting healthier sinus mucosa was associated with higher nNO levels. CONCLUSION: This is the first study to show that nNO levels may be a marker of sinus mucosal health following ESS in patients with polyps. This has important implications for nNO in its potential etiologic role in mediating ongoing sinus inflammation.

State of the art: a systematic review of the surgical management of aspirin exacerbated respiratory disease.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic sinus surgery is an important modality to the armamentarium of the otolaryngologist managing chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). Within the spectrum of CRS, there exists a subset of patients who are recalcitrant to conventional treatment strategies, including those with aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease (AERD). Although surgery is frequently undertaken in this group, there has been no general consensus on the efficacy or optimal extent of surgery. METHODS: Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, a systematic review of published studies was conducted. Inclusion criteria included original publications of adult patients with AERD undergoing surgery, cohorts of greater than five subjects, a minimum follow-up of 3 months, and measurable clinical outcomes. An electronic search was performed using OVID MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Web of Science. RESULTS: Sixteen studies met the criteria for analysis. For our primary objective, sinus surgery appeared to improve patient-reported quality of life (QoL) and symptom profile in AERD. Overall, most studies reported a decrease in radiographic grading, endoscopy scores, and asthma severity. Compared with aspirin-tolerant asthmatic patients, AERD patients may have worse objective measures of disease severity both pre- and postoperatively; however, patient-reported QoL and symptom improvement may be similar after sinus surgery. Finally, this review showed that patients with AERD required revision surgeries sooner and more frequently compared with other subtypes of CRS. We also discussed the role of maximal surgical techniques and additional benefit of postoperative adjunctive therapies in the management of this disease entity. CONCLUSION: The state of the art in the management of AERD patients suggests that surgery does play an important role in helping establish symptomatic control. In the future, more rigorous studies evaluating the comprehensiveness of surgery and postoperative adjuncts are required to understand their impact on long-term patient outcomes.

Association of screen time use and language development in Hispanic toddlers: a cross-sectional and longitudinal study.

This study examined the association between screen media use, media content, and language development among 119 Hispanic infants and toddlers. Children and their caregivers were recruited through an urban, Early Head Start program. Duration and content of screen media exposure was measured through a 24-hour recall questionnaire, and language development was measured at baseline and at 1-year follow up. Children in the sample spent an average of 3.29 hours engaged with screen media (median 2.5 hours per day). In both cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses, children who watched over 2 hours of television per day had increased odds of low communication scores. Whereas child-directed media was associated with low language scores, adult-directed media was not. Our findings support the mounting literature on the deleterious impacts of screen media in toddler's language development. Guidance and alternatives to screen media use should be available to families in pediatric practices and early childhood centers.

The inferior turbinate flap in skull base reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: As the indications for expanded endonasal approaches continue to evolve, alternative reconstructive techniques are needed to address increasingly complex surgical skull base defects. In the absence of the nasoseptal flap, we describe our experience with the posterior pedicle inferior turbinate flap (PPITF) in skull base reconstruction. DESIGN: Case series. SETTING: Academic tertiary care centre. METHODS: Patients who underwent reconstruction of the skull base with the PPITF were identified. Medical records were reviewed for demographic, presentation, treatment, follow-up, surgical and outcomes data. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Flap survival, adequacy of seal, and complications. RESULTS: Two patients with residual/recurrent pituitary adenomas met the inclusion criteria. The nasoseptal flap was unavailable in each case due to a prior septectomy. Salvage of the original nasoseptal flap was not possible, as it did not provide adequate coverage of the resultant defect due to contraction from healing. All PPITFs healed uneventfully and covered the entire defect. No complications were observed in the early post-operative period. Endoscopic techniques and limitations of the PPITF are also discussed. CONCLUSIONS: Our clinical experience supports the PPITF to be a viable alternative for reconstruction of the skull base in the absence of the nasoseptal flap.