[Retrospective analysis of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for multiple myeloma after myeloablative conditioning with 8 Gy of total body irradiation].

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) is a curative treatment option for multiple myeloma (MM), but few patients are eligible due to its high risk of treatment-related toxicity and relapse. Here, we report the feasibility and efficacy of allo-SCT after myeloablative conditioning with 8 Gy of total body irradiation (TBI) for reducing relapse of MM. We retrospectively analyzed data from 30 consecutive patients who received allo-SCT for MM after 8 Gy of TBI at Japanese Red Cross Medical Center between 2012 and 2021. Median age at allo-SCT was 47 (range 31-61) years. Stem-cell sources were peripheral blood from an HLA-matched related donor (MRD, n=5), bone marrow from an HLA-matched unrelated donor (MUD, n=5), bone marrow from an HLA-mismatched unrelated donor (MMUD, n=13), and cord blood (n=7). All patients received conditioning with 8 Gy of TBI combined with Flu/Mel (n=28) or others (n=2). Five-year PFS and 5-year OS were 36.7% and 46.2%, respectively. Sixteen patients died during the observation period (12 of primary disease and 4 of treatment-related toxicity). Patients with VGPR or better before allo-SCT had significantly better PFS (p=0.009) and OS (p=0.01) than others. Patients who received MMUD cells tended to have better PFS than those with other cell sources. Our report showed that allo-SCT for MM after 8 Gy of TBI is feasible, and the better PFS of MMUD suggests graft-versus-myeloma effects.

Prognostic value of the "dynamic" R2-ISS in patients with multiple myeloma undergoing anti-CD38 antibody-based triplet therapies.

To retrospectively analyze whether the second revision of the international staging system (R2-ISS) influenced prognosis at treatment initiation in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) receiving anti-CD38 antibody-based triplet treatments. High-risk chromosomal abnormalities were examined from diagnosis to treatment initiation and considered positive if detected once. R2-ISS was recalculated at the initiation of treatment and defined as "dynamic R2-ISS." Data from 150 patients who underwent the defined treatments were analyzed. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 19.5 months, and the median overall survival (OS) was 36.5 months. Dynamic R2-ISS significantly stratified prognoses for both PFS and OS. The median PFS for patients with dynamic R2-ISS IV was 3.3 months, and the median OS was 11.7 months, indicating extremely poor outcomes. Although the Revised International Staging System (R-ISS) calculated at the initiation of treatment significantly stratified treatment outcomes, the patients classified as R-ISS could be further stratified by R2-ISS to provide better prognostic information. Dynamic R2-ISS showed potential as a prognostic tool in patients with MM who are treated with anti-CD38 antibody-based triplet therapies.

Cytomegalovirus Reactivation during Elotuzumab Therapy in Patients with Multiple Myeloma.

INTRODUCTION: Some treatments are associated with cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation (CMVRA) in patients with multiple myeloma (MM). However, no reports exist on the association between elotuzumab and CMVRA. Therefore, we assessed the incidence of CMVRA in patients with MM who received elotuzumab therapy. METHODS: The medical records of 85 patients who underwent elotuzumab therapy were included in the retrospective analysis for CMV positivity. RESULTS: Thirty patients were tested for CMV antigenemia during elotuzumab therapy, and 16 were positive for CMV antigenemia; the cumulative incidence rate of CMVRA 6 months after elotuzumab initiation was 18.4%. The history of allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) was significantly more common in the CMVRA group (31.2%) than that of the group without CMVRA (8.7%). However, even among patients who did not undergo allo-HSCT, the cumulative incidence rate of CMVRA at 6 months was 15.1%. During CMVRA, the symptoms included fever in 8 cases, while retinitis was observed in 1 case. Five patients required antiviral therapy and CMV antigenemia resolved in all but 1 case. CONCLUSION: Although the patient population was heterogeneous, CMVRA cannot be underestimated during elotuzumab therapy, and evaluation of CMVRA, especially in symptomatic cases, is clinically important.

Cytomegalovirus infection during daratumumab therapy in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma.

The introduction of daratumumab has improved treatment outcomes for multiple myeloma (MM). However, infectious complications are a concern in patients receiving daratumumab. Although some reports have explored the association between daratumumab and cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection, most of these have focused on relapsed or refractory cases, and few describe patients with newly diagnosed MM (NDMM). In this study, we retrospectively analyzed CMV infections in 53 patients with NDMM who received daratumumab as induction therapy. CMV infection was defined as CMV antigenemia positivity. The median age at treatment initiation was 71 years (range, 50-82 years), and 50.9% of the patients were female. The median duration of daratumumab administration was 10.0 months (range, 0.3-63.8 months). Nine patients developed CMV infection, and the cumulative incidence rate at six months was 18.1% (95% confidence interval: 8.9-30.1%). One patient experienced CMV retinitis and required antiviral therapy, while the remaining eight patients did not require treatment and could be managed through observation. Few cases of CMV infection during daratumumab treatment for NDMM required treatment. However, the incidence of CMV infection was not negligible, suggesting that regular monitoring for CMV is worth considering to ensure more appropriate management during daratumumab treatment.

Real-World Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Multiple Myeloma Administered With Elotuzumab-Based Treatment.

Objective Elotuzumab is used to treat relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma (MM). However, the optimal patient selection and sequencing in MM therapy are less clear. Therefore, this retrospective cohort study assessed the clinical outcomes of patients with MM who underwent elotuzumab-based therapy. Methods We reviewed the medical records of 85 patients with relapsed/refractory MM who received elotuzumab for the first time. Participants were divided into progressive disease (PD group) and those without PD (non-PD group) at elotuzumab treatment initiation, and each group was analyzed separately. Survival rates were calculated using Kaplan-Meier curves and compared using log-rank tests. Results The median follow-up period was 33.6 (range: 0.5-72.0) months. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of PD and non-PD groups at elotuzumab therapy initiation were 5.3 months and not reached (NR), respectively (P < 0.0001), and 26.8 months and NR, respectively. Patients with triple-class refractory disease in both groups had worse PFS and OS. Twenty-one patients in the non-PD group received elotuzumab as post-hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, whose PFS and OS were NR (95% CI, 21.4 months-NR) and NR (95% CI, NR-NR), respectively. Conclusions Elotuzumab exhibited limited therapeutic efficacy in patients with triple-class refractory MM but better treatment outcomes in situations with adequate disease control and post-transplant treatment.

Real-world clinical outcomes in patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma receiving VTD-PACE treatment in the era of monoclonal antibodies.

Bortezomib (Velcade), thalidomide, dexamethasone, platinum (cisplatin), adriamycin (doxorubicin), cyclophosphamide, and etoposide (VTD-PACE) are commonly used as salvage treatment for patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). However, its outcomes in the era of monoclonal antibodies remain unclear. Therefore, this retrospective cohort study assessed the clinical outcomes of 60 patients with RRMM (median four prior treatment lines) administered VTD-PACE. The median follow-up period was 11.1 months, during which they received a median of two cycles of VTD-PACE. The overall response rate (ORR) was 66.7%; ORRs of 53.1 and 82.1% were noted in patients with ≥ 4 and ≤ 3 prior lines (P = 0.027), respectively. The median overall survival (OS) was 17 months, with a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 9.8 months. Using the 3-month time point after VTD-PACE treatment as a landmark, 54 patients were still alive. Landmark analysis was conducted for PFS and OS of patients who received or did not receive HSCT or CART after VTD-PACE treatment. Patients who underwent subsequent hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) or chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (CART) following VTD-PACE showed a trend of longer PFS and OS than those who did not undergo subsequent HSCT or CART. The median OS in patients with and without renal dysfunction was 10.7 months and 21.5 months, respectively (P = 0.0091). Therefore, VTD-PACE is useful as a bridging therapy for HSCT or CART, as a response can be expected regardless of organ damage, disease risk, or history of anti-CD38 antibody use.