Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
5.
Ann Thorac Surg ; 103(2): 373-380, 2017 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28109347

ABSTRACT

Strategies to value physician work continue to evolve. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons and The Society of Thoracic Surgeons National Database have an increasingly important role in this evolution. An understanding of the Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) system (American Medical Association [AMA], Chicago, IL) and the Relative Value Scale Update Committee (RUC) is necessary to comprehend how physician work is valued. In 1965, with the dawn of increasingly complex medical care, immense innovation, and the rollout of Medicare, the need for a common language describing medical services and procedures was recognized as being of critical importance. In 1966, the AMA, in cooperation with multiple major medical specialty societies, developed the CPT system, which is a coding system for the description of medical procedures and medical services. The RUC was created by the AMA in response to the passage of the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1989, legislation of the United States of America Federal government that mandated that the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services adopt a relative value methodology for Medicare physician payment. The role of the RUC is to develop relative value recommendations for the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. These recommendations include relative value recommendations for new procedures or services and also updates to relative value recommendations for previously valued procedures or services. These recommendations pertain to all physician work delivered to Medicare beneficiaries and propose relative values for all physician services, including updates to those based on the original resource-based relative value scale developed by Hsaio and colleagues. In so doing, widely differing work and services provided can be reviewed and comparisons of their relative value (to each other) can be established. The resource-based relative value scale assigns value to physician services using relative value units (RVUs), which consist of three components: work RVU, practice expense RVU, and malpractice RVU, also known as professional liability insurance RVU. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services retains the final decision-making authority on the RVUs associated with each procedure or service. The purpose of this article is to discuss the role that the CPT codes and the RUC play in the valuation of physician work and to provide an example of how the methodology for valuation of physician work continues to evolve.


Subject(s)
Medicare/legislation & jurisprudence , Physicians/economics , Physicians/legislation & jurisprudence , Reimbursement Mechanisms/economics , Societies, Medical , Humans , United States
6.
Ann Thorac Surg ; 100(4): 1143-7, 2015 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26434423

ABSTRACT

The United States Congress recently passed the bill titled H.R.2: the Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015 (MACRA) to repeal the Sustainable Growth Rate (SGR). The SGR, part of the Balanced Budget Act of 1997, was passed to attempt to control the rate of growth for Medicare spending for physician services. As a result, all physicians were annually subject to the aggregate cuts in compensation depending on rate of economic growth in the country, requiring Congress to pass legislation each year to defer the scheduled pay cuts. Will MACRA, however, truly be a reprieve to providers from the threat of annual cuts in reimbursement of between 21% and 30%, or will it result in a Pyrrhic victory for both providers and patients after the financial impact of the repeal has been realized and the quality of health care delivery and true access to care for our seniors have been evaluated? This article from The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Workforce on Health Policy, Advocacy, and Reform attempts to summarize MACRA and considers its impact on the specialty of cardiothoracic surgery.


Subject(s)
Budgets/legislation & jurisprudence , Medicare/economics , Medicare/legislation & jurisprudence , Physicians/economics , Reimbursement Mechanisms/legislation & jurisprudence , Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, U.S. , Fees, Medical , Health Services Accessibility , Humans , Quality of Health Care , Thoracic Surgery/economics , United States
7.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg ; 145(4): 976-983, 2013 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23497944

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Surgery Database has been linked to the Social Security Death Master File to verify "life status" and evaluate long-term surgical outcomes. The objective of this study is explore practical applications of the linkage of the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Surgery Database to Social Securtiy Death Master File, including the use of the Social Securtiy Death Master File to examine the accuracy of the Society of Thoracic Surgeons 30-day mortality data. METHODS: On January 1, 2008, the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Surgery Database began collecting Social Security numbers in its new version 2.61. This study includes all Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Surgery Database records for operations with nonmissing Social Security numbers between January 1, 2008, and December 31, 2010, inclusive. To match records between the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Surgery Database and the Social Security Death Master File, we used a combined probabilistic and deterministic matching rule with reported high sensitivity and nearly perfect specificity. RESULTS: Between January 1, 2008, and December 31, 2010, the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Surgery Database collected data for 870,406 operations. Social Security numbers were available for 541,953 operations and unavailable for 328,453 operations. According to the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Surgery Database, the 30-day mortality rate was 17,757/541,953 = 3.3%. Linkage to the Social Security Death Master File identified 16,565 cases of suspected 30-day deaths (3.1%). Of these, 14,983 were recorded as 30-day deaths in the Society of Thoracic Surgeons database (relative sensitivity = 90.4%). Relative sensitivity was 98.8% (12,863/13,014) for suspected 30-day deaths occurring before discharge and 59.7% (2120/3551) for suspected 30-day deaths occurring after discharge. CONCLUSIONS: Linkage to the Social Security Death Master File confirms the accuracy of data describing "mortality within 30 days of surgery" in the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Surgery Database. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons and Social Security Death Master File link reveals that capture of 30-day deaths occurring before discharge is highly accurate, and that these in-hospital deaths represent the majority (79% [13,014/16,565]) of all 30-day deaths. Capture of the remaining 30-day deaths occurring after discharge is less complete and needs improvement. Efforts continue to encourage Society of Thoracic Surgeons Database participants to submit Social Security numbers to the Database, thereby enhancing accurate determination of 30-day life status. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons and Social Security Death Master File linkage can facilitate ongoing refinement of mortality reporting.


Subject(s)
Databases, Factual/statistics & numerical data , Mortality , Social Security/statistics & numerical data , Thoracic Surgery/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Reproducibility of Results , Societies, Medical , United States
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...