Addition of Ezetimibe to Intensive Lipid-Lowering Therapy Is Associated With a Lower Incidence of Heart Failure in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome.

BACKGROUND: This study investigated whether intensive lipid-lowering therapy with pitavastatin and ezetimibe lowers the incidence of heart failure (HF) events in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). METHODS AND RESULTS: In the HIJ-PROPER study, 1,734 patients with ACS were randomly assigned to either pitavastatin plus ezetimibe therapy (n=864) or pitavastatin monotherapy (n=857). We examined the incidence of HF between these 2 groups over a 3.9-year period after ACS. The primary endpoint of the study was hospitalization for HF. The mean low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels during the follow-up period were 65.1 mg/dL in the pitavastatin plus ezetimibe group and 84.6 mg/dL in the pitavastatin monotherapy group. The incidence of HF hospitalization was significantly lower in the pitavastatin plus ezetimibe group than in the pitavastatin monotherapy group (19 [2.2%] vs. 40 [4.7%] patients; hazard ratio 0.47, 95% confidence interval 0.27-0.81; P<0.005). This trend was consistent after multivariable analysis using multiple models. CONCLUSIONS: Intensive lipid-lowering therapy with pitavastatin and ezetimibe is associated with a lower incidence of hospitalization for HF in patients with ACS.

Increased Left Ventricular End-Diastolic Volume Index Is Associated With Increased Adverse Events After MitraClip Implantation.

This study investigated the association between the left ventricular end-diastolic volume index (LVEDVI) and the incidence of adverse clinical events in patients after MitraClip implantation. In this retrospective, observational study, 123 patients who underwent the MitraClip procedure were enrolled. Participants were divided into 2 groups according to the LVEDVI cut-off level, calculated using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, to predict the primary end point and the occurrence of cardiovascular events was compared between the groups. The primary end point was all-cause mortality and hospitalization because of heart failure. The receiver operating characteristic curve analysis for the composite primary end point revealed an LVEDVI cut-off point of 118 ml/m2. Based on this threshold, 61 patients (49.6%) were categorized into the LVEDVI <118 ml/m2 group, whereas 62 (50.4%) fell into the LVEDVI ≥118 ml/m2 group. Over a median follow-up period of 336 days (interquartile range 80 to 667), the primary end points occurred in 15 and 26 patients in the LVEDVI <118 and LVEDVI ≥118 ml/m2 groups, corresponding to incidence rates of 24.6% and 41.9%, respectively. Patients in the LVEDVI ≥118 ml/m2 group demonstrated a significantly higher risk of adverse clinical events than those in the LVEDVI <118 ml/m2 group (hazard ratio 2.24, 95% confidence interval 1.17 to 4.28, p = 0.01). This trend persisted even after adjusting for several confounders (p = 0.02). In conclusion, increased LVEDVI values were associated with increased adverse clinical events after MitraClip implantation in patients with severe mitral valve regurgitation.

Semi-urgent pulmonary vein isolation using cryoballoon for haemodynamically unstable atrial fibrillation storm in a patient with low cardiac output syndrome: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation and heart failure are common coexisting conditions requiring hospitalisation for heart failure and death. Pulmonary vein isolation is a well-established option for symptomatic atrial fibrillation and for atrial fibrillation concomitant with heart failure with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction. Recently, pulmonary vein isolation using cryoballoon showed non-inferiority to radiofrequency ablation with respect to the treatment of patients with drug-refractory paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. However, the effectiveness of acute-phase rhythm control by semi-urgent pulmonary vein isolation using cryoballoon in patients with haemodynamically unstable atrial fibrillation storm accompanied with low cardiac output syndrome is unclear. Herein, we present a case in which semi-urgent pulmonary vein isolation using cryoballoon was effective for acute-phase rhythm control against drug-resistant and haemodynamically unstable repetitive atrial fibrillation tachycardia accompanied with low cardiac output syndrome. CASE PRESENTATION: A 57-year-old man was hospitalised for New York Heart Association functional class 4 heart failure with atrial fibrillation tachycardia and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction of 20% accompanied with low cardiac output syndrome-induced liver damage. The haemodynamics collapsed during atrial fibrillation tachycardia, which had become resistant to intravenous amiodarone and repeated electrical cardioversions. In addition to atrial fibrillation, atrial tachycardia and common-type atrial flutter appeared on day 3. Multiple organ failure progressed gradually due to haemodynamically unstable atrial fibrillation tachycardia storm accompanied with low cardiac output syndrome. On day 4, to focus on treatment of heart failure and multiple organ failure, semi-urgent rescue pulmonary vein isolation using cryoballoon to atrial fibrillation and cavotricuspid isthmus ablation to common-type atrial flutter were performed for acute-phase rhythm control. Soon after the ablation procedure, atrial fibrillation and common-type atrial flutter were lessened, and sinus rhythm was restored. A stable haemodynamics was successfully achieved with the improvement of hepatorenal function. The patient was discharged on day 77 without complications. CONCLUSIONS: This case demonstrates that acute-phase rhythm control by semi-urgent pulmonary vein isolation using cryoballoon could be a treatment option in patients with haemodynamically unstable atrial fibrillation tachycardia storm accompanied with low cardiac output syndrome, which is refractory to cardioversion and drug therapy.

Safety and Efficacy of Low-Dose Prasugrel as Part of Triple Therapy With Aspirin and Oral Anticoagulants in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention　- From the TWMU-AF PCI Registry.

BACKGROUND: Using the standard maintenance dose of prasugrel (10 mg/day) as part of triple therapy with aspirin and an oral anticoagulant (OAC) is not recommended in the current guidelines because it increases the risk of bleeding compared with clopidogrel. However, the safety and efficacy of low-dose prasugrel (3.75 mg/day) as part of triple therapy has not been reported. Methods and Results: We registered 816 consecutive patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) from January 2011 to June 2016 at 8 hospitals in Japan. We examined the clinical outcomes of patients who received either low-dose prasugrel (n=57) or clopidogrel (n=451) as part of triple therapy after PCI. The incidences of bleeding (TIMI major and minor) and major adverse cerebrocardiovascular events (MACCE; all-cause death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, unplanned revascularization, and stroke) were evaluated. The cumulative 1-year incidence of bleeding was not significantly different (prasugrel 5.6% vs. clopidogrel 8.1%, log-rank P=0.55). In addition, the cumulative 1-year incidence of MACCE was also not significantly different (prasugrel 11.5% vs. clopidogrel 12.3%, log-rank P=0.88). CONCLUSIONS: Low-dose prasugrel, as part of triple therapy, did not increase the risk of bleeding compared with clopidogrel. Therefore, it can be an alternative to clopidogrel for patients with AF undergoing PCI.