ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Peritumoral edema (PE) identified on T2-weighted breast MRI is a factor for poor prognosis in breast cancer. PURPOSE: To assess the prognostic value of residual PE (rPE) in patients with PE positive breast cancer prior to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) who subsequently underwent curative surgery. STUDY TYPE: Retrospective. POPULATION: In total, 128 patients with nonmetastatic invasive breast cancer who underwent breast MRI before and after NACT. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: Axial precontrast 2D fast spin echo T2W fat-suppressed sequence. Axial dynamic 3D gradient echo T1W fat-suppressed sequence. ASSESSMENT: PE was diagnosed when a signal intensity as high as water was detected surrounding the tumor on a T2-weighted breast MRI. PE was qualitatively evaluated by three readers with more than 20 years of experience in interpreting breast field imaging findings. Residual cancer burden (RCB) were assessed post-NACT. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated as the endpoints of this study. STATISTICAL TESTS: Chi-square test; Kaplan-Meier method, log-rank test, and Cox proportional hazard model. A P-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Pre-PE was observed in 64 out of 128 patients. Of these, rPE was observed in 21. In the log-rank test, breast cancer with rPE had significantly worse RFS and OS than that without rPE. Cox proportional hazard analysis identified rPE as a significant prognostic factor for recurrence (hazard ratio, 11.6; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.05-43.8) and death (hazard ratio, 17.8; 95% CI, 3.30-96.3). Breast cancer with rPE had significant worse RFS and OS than that without rPE in RCB class II, and significant worse OS in pathological complete response, class I and class II in the log-rank test. DATA CONCLUSION: rPE on a T2-weighted breast MRI was a significant factor for breast cancer recurrence and death in patients with pre-PE-positive breast cancer treated with NACT. TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 2.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: CA15-3 is often elevated in breast cancer recurrence and rarely in ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). We report a case of DCIS with elevated CA15-3 levels, which was diagnosed after over 2 years of follow-up. CASE PRESENTATION: A 74-year-old woman presented with a left-sided breast mass and pain. Redness, swelling, and induration were observed in the left breast. Ultrasonography revealed a non-mass lesion in the left 3 o'clock position, skin thickening, and axillary lymphadenopathy. Serum CA15-3 levels were markedly high at 640 U/mL, suggesting inflammatory breast cancer. However, biopsies showed no malignancy. We diagnosed chronic mastitis with elevated CA15-3 levels and followed up with magnetic resonance imaging and a biopsy, as needed. Finally, DCIS was diagnosed 27 months after the first visit. She underwent a left mastectomy and a sentinel lymph node biopsy; DCIS had spread 6.5 cm and was immunohistochemically positive for CA15-3. No metastasis was found in the lymph nodes, but incidental Hodgkin lymphoma was observed. Postoperative normalization of CA15-3 levels indicated that she had DCIS with elevated CA15-3 levels. The patient underwent chemotherapy for Hodgkin lymphoma postoperatively, and there was no evidence of recurrence 1 year after surgery. CONCLUSION: High CA15-3 levels can also be observed in DCIS, indicating that CA15-3 should not be used solely in breast cancer staging.
ABSTRACT
The expression of basal marker could be a significant factor for poor prognosis in early stage breast cancer. We evaluated the prognostic value of basal marker in each breast cancer subtype. According to immunohistochemistry assay, CK5/6-posi- tive and/or EGFR-positive was defined as basal marker-positive. A total of 497 consecutive, non-metastatic invasive breast cancers were evaluated, and 166 cases(33%)were defined as basal marker-positive. Overall, basal marker expression was not a significant prognostic factor for breast cancer recurrence. However, according to Cox regression analysis, basal markerpositivity was significantly associated with poor recurrence-free survival in 63 cases with TNBC(hazard ratio: 2.9, 95% confidence interval: 1.5-5.8, p=0.001). Therefore, evaluation of basal marker expression could be useful for the risk estimation of recurrence in TNBC.
Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Biomarkers, Tumor , Humans , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local , Prognosis , Receptor, ErbB-2ABSTRACT
Unlike early stage breast cancer, metastatic breast cancer (MBC) is generally considered incurable except for a small number of patients with oligometastatic disease. The goal of treatment of MBC should be the prolongation of life and improvement of symptoms and quality of life. The prognoses of patients with MBC, however, have been improved with the introduction of newer, more effective agents. Therefore, the clinical question arises whether MBC patients can be cured with these new therapeutic agents. However, there are a couple of problems in tackling this question, including the duration of follow-up and the presence of strong adjuvant therapy. Firstly, most trials in MBC have a relatively short follow-up; long-term surveillance (>3-5 years) is exceptional, so little is known about the definitive outcome and the exact proportion of long-term survivors. Secondly, most of the patients have received pre- or postoperative adjuvant therapy. The cancer cells at metastatic sites are considered to be relatively resistant to the agents used in metastatic settings. Promisingly, a number of novel therapeutic agents including antibody-drug conjugates, irreversible small molecule HER2-tyrosine inhibitors, and HER2 dimerization inhibitors show promise in the treatment of HER2-overexpressing MBC, as well as PARP-1 [poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1] inhibitors for triple-negative breast cancer.