Investigation of the efficacy of the change ratio of brain natriuretic peptide for predicting the cardiac effects of chemoradiotherapy on esophageal cancer.

The aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) as a predictor of radiological effects on the heart. A total of 41 patients with esophageal cancer who underwent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) were retrospectively investigated. The BNP levels were measured on the first day of CRT (pre-CRT) and the last day of CRT (post-CRT), and the median concentration of BNP and dosimetric parameters of the heart were calculated. The change ratio of BNP was calculated as follows: [(BNP post-CRT) - (BNP pre-CRT)]/(BNP pre-CRT). The comparison of BNP pre-CRT with post-CRT was performed using a Wilcoxon signed-rank test. The relationship between dosimetric parameters and change ratio was analyzed using Spearman's correlation coefficient. The median levels of BNP of pre-CRT and post-CRT were 10 and 22 pg/ml, respectively, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.0001). Significant correlations (all P<0.05) were observed between the change ratio and mean dose, V5, V10, V20, and V30. Of the cohort, 14 patients developed acute-to-subacute cardiac events, such as pericardial effusion, cardiomegaly, acute exacerbation of chronic heart failure, and a decreased ejection fraction. The change ratios of BNP, V5, V10, V20, and V30 were significantly higher in patients who experienced cardiac events compared with those who did not. The results of this study showed that BNP measurement, particularly the change ratio of BNP pre- and post-CRT, may be a useful cardiac event predictor in addition to dosimetric parameters.

High-signal venous sinuses on MR angiography: discrimination between reversal of venous flow and arteriovenous shunting using arterial spin labeling.

PURPOSE: It is sometimes difficult to differentiate between high signals originating from a reverse flow on magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) and occult arteriovenous shunting. We attempted to determine whether arterial spin labeling (ASL) can be used to discriminate reversal of venous flow from arteriovenous shunting for high-signal venous sinuses on MR angiography. METHODS: Two radiologists evaluated the signals of the venous sinus on MRA and ASL obtained from 364 cases without arteriovenous shunting. In addition, the findings on MRA were compared with those on ASL in an additional 13 patients who had dural arteriovenous fistula (DAVF). RESULTS: In the 364 cases (728 sides) without arteriovenous shunting, a high signal due to reverse flow in the cavernous sinuses (CS) was observed on 99 sides (13.6%) on MRA and none on ASL. Of these cases, a high signal in the sigmoid sinus, transverse sinus, and internal jugular vein was seen on 3, 3, and 8 sides, respectively. All of these venous sinuses showed a high signal from the reverse flow on MRA images. CONCLUSION: ASL is a simple and useful MR imaging sequence for differentiating between reversal of venous flow and CS DAVF. In the sigmoid and transverse sinus, ASL showed false-positives due to the reverse flow from the jugular vein, which may be a limitation of which radiologists should be aware.