Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Oncol Pharm Pract ; 20(6): 417-25, 2014 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24243919

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of abiraterone, cabazitaxel, and enzalutamide compared to placebo for treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A decision-tree model compared three treatment options for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients over 18 months from a societal perspective in 2012 USD. Chance nodes included baseline pain as a severity indicator, significant adverse effects (neutropenia, cardiac events, or seizures), and survival. Probabilities, survival rates, and health utilities were from clinical trials (COU-AA, TROPIC, and AFFIRM) and other published studies. Survival of enzalutamide was adjusted to match placebo groups across trials. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses, acceptability curves and net benefit calculations were performed. RESULTS: Abiraterone was the most cost-effective of the treatments ($123.4 K/quality-adjusted life year) compared to placebo, enzalutamide was $437.6 K/quality-adjusted life year compared to abiraterone, and cabazitaxel was $351.9 K/quality-adjusted life year compared to enzalutamide. Enzalutamide and cabazitaxel were not cost-effective compared to placebo at $154.3 K/quality-adjusted life year and $163.2 K/quality-adjusted life year, respectively. Acceptability curves showed abiraterone was cost-effective 29.3% of the time with a willingness to pay threshold of $100 K. The model was sensitive to changes in cost of the drugs, life expectancy, and survival rate. Sensitivity analysis shows that enzalutamide can become the most cost-effective option if the price of the medication decreased by 26% and other drug costs remained the same. CONCLUSION: Based on the cost-effective analysis, and survival adjustments necessary to match placebo groups, we would recommend abiraterone for treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer despite not quite falling under the usually accepted willingness to pay threshold. Further analysis should examine comparative survival across the three drugs.


Subject(s)
Androstenes/therapeutic use , Phenylthiohydantoin/analogs & derivatives , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/drug therapy , Taxoids/therapeutic use , Androstenes/economics , Antineoplastic Agents/economics , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Benzamides , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Decision Trees , Drug Costs , Financing, Personal/economics , Humans , Male , Models, Economic , Neoplasm Metastasis , Nitriles , Phenylthiohydantoin/economics , Phenylthiohydantoin/therapeutic use , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/economics , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/pathology , Quality-Adjusted Life Years , Survival Rate , Taxoids/economics
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL