Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Hand (N Y) ; 17(2): 346-353, 2022 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32506966

ABSTRACT

Background: Benign tumors of the hand present in a wide array of histological subtypes and compose most of the bony tissue tumors in the hand. This study evaluates the characteristics and treatment of benign bone tumors in light of one institution's experience. Methods: Histologically confirmed benign tumors of the hand were retrospectively identified using International Classification of Diseases codes from 1992 to 2015. A medical chart review was conducted to collect patient characteristics and tumor epidemiology and treatment. Results: A total of 155 benign bone tumors were identified. The median age of patients at the time of surgery was 39.9 ± 12.8 years. All bone tumors were located in the digits, and most were treated by intralesional curettage (n = 118, 76%). Pathologic fractures occurred in 79 bone tumors (51%). Conclusion: Enchondromas (n = 118, 76%) were the most common bone tumor in this series, whereas giant cell tumors were the most destructive and also had the highest recurrence rate (40%). Awareness of tumor features may help physicians with diagnosis, and awareness of recurrence rates is important when counseling patients.


Subject(s)
Bone Neoplasms , Chondroma , Adult , Bone Neoplasms/pathology , Bone Neoplasms/surgery , Chondroma/pathology , Chondroma/surgery , Curettage , Humans , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
2.
Hand (N Y) ; 17(3): 519-528, 2022 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32666834

ABSTRACT

Background: Benign soft-tissue tumors of the hand are more common than both their benign bone and malignant soft-tissue counterparts. This study evaluates the characteristics and treatment of benign soft tissue tumors in light of 1 institution's experience. Methods: Histologically confirmed benign soft-tissue tumors of the hand were retrospectively identified using International Classification of Disease codes from 1992 to 2015. A medical chart review was conducted to collect patient demographics, tumor epidemiology, and treatment. Results: A total of 199 soft-tissue tumors were identified. The median patient age at time of treatment was 47.4 ± 14.7 years in age. The majority of tumors were located in the digits (n = 168, 84%) and treated by excision (n = 191, 96%). Localized type tenosynovial giant cell tumors (n = 71, 36%) were the most common and had the highest rates of recurrence (8.5%) in this series. Other frequent histologies included hemangioma, schwannoma, and glomus tumors. Conclusion: Awareness and understanding of tumor characteristics may help physicians with diagnosis and treatment. There is an extensive variety of tumors, but the principles of clinical and imaging diagnosis are common to all of them. Marginal excision for the treatment pain, improvement of function, and cosmetic correction applies to all these tumors independent of the histology.


Subject(s)
Giant Cell Tumor of Tendon Sheath , Soft Tissue Neoplasms , Giant Cell Tumor of Tendon Sheath/diagnosis , Giant Cell Tumor of Tendon Sheath/epidemiology , Giant Cell Tumor of Tendon Sheath/surgery , Hand/pathology , Hand/surgery , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Soft Tissue Neoplasms/epidemiology , Soft Tissue Neoplasms/surgery
4.
J Am Acad Orthop Surg ; 29(6): e297-e307, 2021 Mar 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32932303

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to describe patient characteristics, treatment, and oncologic outcomes of soft-tissue sarcomas (STSs) of the hand. METHODS: Sixty-nine STSs of the hand in adult patients treated at a tertiary referral center were retrospectively included. We describe patient and tumor characteristics along with oncologic outcomes. RESULTS: Epithelioid sarcoma (23%) was the most common histologic subtype, followed by synovial sarcoma (15%). Of all tumors, 17 (25%) were grade I, 22 (32%) were grade II, and 30 (44%) were grade III. The 5-year disease-free survival for epithelioid sarcomas was 75% with a disease survival of 100%, along with a metastatic rate of 15%. Of the patients with a synovial sarcoma, 40% developed metastases, and the 5-year disease-free survival was 68% and the 5-year disease survival was 73%. CONCLUSION: Hand STSs are aggressive tumors with a high metastatic potential. Even with adequate oncologic treatment, long-term clinical follow-up (10 years) in these tumors is advised. The treating surgical oncologist should not be deceived by their smaller size.


Subject(s)
Sarcoma , Soft Tissue Neoplasms , Adult , Hand , Humans , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies , Sarcoma/therapy , Soft Tissue Neoplasms/surgery
5.
Eur J Surg Oncol ; 45(7): 1281-1287, 2019 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30922734

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Soft tissue sarcoma (STS) of the hand are prone to unplanned excisions, altering oncologic outcomes. The aim of this study is to compare STS of the hand with initial treatment at an oncology center versus those initially treated at a non-oncology center. Additionally, we evaluated what factors were associated with oncologic outcomes. METHODS: We retrospectively identified patients with a STS of the hand using ICD-9 codes along with an institutional oncologic database. We included all adult patients with a non-metastatic STS of the hand (n = 64) with a median follow up of 4.0 years (IQR:1.7-10.0). RESULTS: Eight-three percent (n = 53) of tumors had an unplanned excision, of which one was treated at the oncology center. Patients treated primarily at an oncology center were older (57.6 vs. 43.6 years), had fewer operations and tended to have a larger tumors (median 4.7 cm vs. 3.0 cm) compared to those initially treated at a non-oncology center. The 5-year survival for patients treated at an oncology center was 60% compared to 89% in those initially treated at a non-oncology center. Worse disease-free survival was associated with positive final margins and subfascial tumors. CONCLUSION: Tumors with primary treatment at an oncology center were larger and presented in older patients, having worse overall survival compared to those initially treated at a non-oncology center. Initial treatment at a non-oncology center did not influence the oncologic outcomes, but lead to more re-excisions and amputations. Final tumor margins and tumor depth determined oncologic outcomes.


Subject(s)
Amputation, Surgical/methods , Cancer Care Facilities , Hand/surgery , Margins of Excision , Sarcoma/surgery , Soft Tissue Neoplasms/surgery , Adult , Aged , Biopsy , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant , Disease-Free Survival , Female , Humans , Lung Neoplasms/epidemiology , Lung Neoplasms/secondary , Male , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Neoplasm Grading , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/epidemiology , Proportional Hazards Models , Radiotherapy, Adjuvant , Reoperation/methods , Retrospective Studies , Sarcoma/epidemiology , Sarcoma/pathology , Sarcoma/secondary , Soft Tissue Neoplasms/pathology , Survival Rate , Synovectomy/methods
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...