Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Urologiia ; (2): 26-33, 2018 May.
Article in Russian | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29901291

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Traditionally, evaluation of the split renal function is performed using nephroscintigraphy. However, as shown in several studies, there might be quite significant inaccuracy in the interpretation of dynamic nephroscintigraphy results. But due to the lack of alternative methods for evaluation of split renal function, nephroscintigraphy remains the method of choice. AIM: To investigate the feasibility of digital analysis of contrast-enhanced MSCT imaging for evaluation of the split renal function. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a prospective study conducted at the R.M. Fronshteyn Clinic of Urology from November 2015 to February 2017. The study comprised 31 patients with urolithiasis (n=7), hydronephrosis (n=9), kidney cancer (n=14) and urinary bladder tumor (n=1). During the preoperative period, the patients underwent contrast-enhanced MSCT, 3D-reconstruction, and digital analysis. The obtained data were compared with the results of dynamic nephroscintigraphy. RESULTS: Contrast-enhanced MSCT findings were not inferior to data obtained with dynamic nephroscintigraphy regarding information content (p<0.004). CONCLUSIONS: The new method of digital processing of three-dimensional contrast-enhanced MSCT allows for concomitant assessment of both the anatomical features of the kidney and renal function that may help to improve the accuracy of surgical planning to choose the optimal extension of the intervention.


Subject(s)
Contrast Media/administration & dosage , Hydronephrosis , Kidney Neoplasms , Kidney , Tomography, Spiral Computed , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Hydronephrosis/diagnostic imaging , Hydronephrosis/physiopathology , Kidney/diagnostic imaging , Kidney/physiopathology , Kidney Function Tests , Kidney Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Kidney Neoplasms/physiopathology , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/physiopathology , Urolithiasis
2.
Urologiia ; (2): 75-82, 2018 May.
Article in Russian | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29901298

ABSTRACT

RELEVANCE: Erectile dysfunction (ED) associated with radical prostatectomy (RP) affects 25-75% of patients and has a significant negative impact on their quality of life AIM: To analyze the maintenance of erectile function after RP depending on the type of endoscopic access and nerve-sparing. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study comprised 231 patients with localized prostate cancer, who underwent surgery between February 2015 and February 2016. Surgery was performed using one of three approaches: laparoscopic, extraperitoneoscopic or robot-assisted. Nerve-sparing surgery was chosen were based on the Briganti nomogram (low risk of extraprostatic extension), Partins table, and taking into account the patients desire to maintain EF. EF and the quality of life were evaluated using the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) questionnaire and the QoL (Quality of Life) scale. RESULTS: Nerve-sparing RP was performed in 153 patients. Nerve-sparing RP did not differ significantly from non-nerve sparing RP with regard to operative time (p=0.064) and blood loss (p=0.073). According to the pathomorphological study, the prostatic capsule was intact, and surgical margins were negative in all cases. The incidence of significant ED and complete loss of erectile function was greater in patients after non-nerve sparing RP compared with nerve sparing RP [(5.0 (0-10.0) vs. 6.5 (0.8-19,0) points according to the IIEF-5 scale, p=0.271)]; 96.2% versus 72.2% (p<0.001). Nerve-sparing RP had a statistically significant better effect on the quality of life: 1.63+/-1.16 points against 1.88+/-1.02 points (p=0.035). CONCLUSION: The best outcomes were observed in patients undergoing robot-assisted RP. Nerve-sparing RP resulted in a lower rate of ED. This advantage without compromising the completeness of resection allows us to consider nerve-sparing RP as an appropriate and validated modality of preventing erectile dysfunction in properly selected patients.


Subject(s)
Erectile Dysfunction , Postoperative Complications , Prostatectomy/adverse effects , Retrospective Studies , Robotic Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Erectile Dysfunction/etiology , Erectile Dysfunction/physiopathology , Erectile Dysfunction/prevention & control , Humans , Incidence , Male , Postoperative Complications/physiopathology , Postoperative Complications/prevention & control , Prostatic Neoplasms/physiopathology , Prostatic Neoplasms/surgery
3.
Urologiia ; (6): 142-148, 2016 Dec.
Article in Russian | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28248060

ABSTRACT

In recent years, the number of organ-sparing operations for renal tumors has been increasing steadily due to comparable oncological outcomes and the desire to preserve functioning renal parenchyma. Another technique, which is becoming increasingly popular, is so-called zero ischemia partial nephrectomy, which allows bleeding to be controlled during the operation without clamping the renal artery, thus avoiding renal ischemic injury. One of the most interesting and promising instruments for partial nephrectomy is a laser radiation. It combines good cutting and coagulating properties, thus enabling partial nephrectomy to be carried out without vascular clamping. This literature review presents the physical basis of laser technology and evidence from published clinical studies on using of various types of laser radiation for partial nephrectomy. The prospects for further development of the technique are discussed.


Subject(s)
Kidney Neoplasms/surgery , Laser Therapy/methods , Lasers, Gas/therapeutic use , Nephrectomy/methods , Organ Sparing Treatments/methods , Humans
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL