ABSTRACT
Background The escalating overload and saturation of emergency services, primarily caused by non-urgent cases overwhelming the system, have spurred a critical necessity for innovative solutions that can effectively differentiate genuine emergencies from situations that could be managed through alternative means, such as using AI chatbots. This study aims to evaluate and compare the accuracy in differentiating between a medical emergency and a non-emergency of three of the most popular AI chatbots at the moment. Methods In this study, patient questions from the online forum r/AskDocs on Reddit were collected to determine whether their clinical cases were emergencies. A total of 176 questions were reviewed by the authors, with 75 deemed emergencies and 101 non-emergencies. These questions were then posed to AI chatbots, including ChatGPT, Google Bard, and Microsoft Bing AI, with their responses evaluated against each other and the authors' responses. A criteria-based system categorized the AI chatbot answers as "yes," "no," or "cannot determine." The performance of each AI chatbot was compared in both emergency and non-emergency cases, and statistical analysis was conducted to assess the significance of differences in their performance. Results In general, AI chatbots considered around 12-15% more cases to be an emergency than reviewers, while they considered a very low number of cases as non-emergency compared to reviewers (around 35% fewer cases). Google Bard detected the most true emergency cases (87%) and true non-emergency cases (36%). However, no real difference in performance between the three AI chatbots was found in detecting true emergencies (p-value = 0.35) and non-emergency cases (p-value = 0.16). Conclusions These AI systems require further refinement to identify emergency situations accurately, but they could potentially be an innovative tool for emergency care and improving patient outcomes. The integration of AI chatbots like ChatGPT, Google Bard, and Microsoft Bing Chat offers a promising avenue to mitigate ED strain and enhance emergency management.
Subject(s)
Humans , Shock, Cardiogenic/diagnosis , Shock, Cardiogenic/etiology , Shock, Cardiogenic/therapy , Cardiac Output, Low/complications , Cardiovascular Agents/administration & dosage , Myocardial Reperfusion , Heart Transplantation , Coronary Care Units , Hypovolemia/therapy , Electrocardiography/methods , Acute Coronary Syndrome/etiologyABSTRACT
Timely care is an important dimension of health care quality, but the impact of delays in care on lung cancer outcomes is unclear. Quantifying the impact of delays in cancer treatment on survival is necessary to inform resource allocation, quality improvement initiatives, and lung cancer guidelines. Review of the available literature demonstrated significant heterogeneity between studies in terms of the impact of delay. Frequently paradoxical results were reported, with delay being associated with improved survival in patients with advanced disease. However, significant methodologic flaws were identified in many studies, which probably is the reason for the paradoxical results. The most significant methodologic limitations identified were incorrectly controlling for final pathologic stage (a mediator in the causal chain from delay to survival), failure to control for confounding by acuity of cancer presentation, and failure to consider effect measure modification. The effect of delay on survival probably varies by stage. The impact of delays is lowest for subcentimeter nodules, probably highest in stage II disease, and low in patients who are only eligible for palliative care. Precise quantification of the impact of delay is not currently possible. Given the available evidence, quality metrics for the timeliness of lung cancer care should focus on local barriers to care. These metrics should be carefully designed to take into account clinical-radiographic stage at initial presentation.
Subject(s)
Lung Neoplasms , Time-to-Treatment/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Lung Neoplasms/pathology , Lung Neoplasms/therapy , Neoplasm Staging , Survival AnalysisABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Systematic endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS)-guided lung cancer staging starts with hilar N3 nodes, proceeding sequentially to mediastinal N3, N2, and N1 nodes, with sampling of all enlarged nodes (size, ≥ 5 mm) by EBUS. However, procedure time is limited by patient comfort when moderate sedation is used. It is unclear if EBUS staging should start with hilar N3 nodes or whether starting with mediastinal N3 nodes suffices. Knowing the probability of hilar N3 nodes with PET-CT scan negative findings harboring occult metastasis can inform this decision. RESEARCH QUESTION: What proportion of patients with hilar N3 nodes showing negative PET-CT scan findings have malignancy by EBUS? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: This retrospective observational, single-center cohort study included consecutive patients with clinical-radiographic T1-3, N0-3, M0 non-small cell lung cancer undergoing systematic EBUS staging with biopsy of hilar N3 nodes with negative PET-CT scan findings. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with malignant hilar N3 nodes showing negative PET-CT scan findings. Based on expert opinion, a threshold probability of malignancy of less than 5% was considered sufficient to skip hilar N3 nodes. We used the binomial exact test to compare the observed proportion vs threshold probability of 5%. RESULTS: Of 1,737 consecutive patients undergoing EBUS staging, 1,567 showed negative PET-CT scan findings of the hilar N3 nodes. These nodes were enlarged by EBUS and were sampled in 739 patients. Malignancy was found in the hilar N3 nodes of 5 of 739 patients (0.68%; 95% CI, 0.22%-1.57%). The proportion was significantly less than the threshold probability (P < .001). Patients with positive PET scan results of the mediastinal N3 nodes were at higher risk of having occult hilar N3 nodal metastasis (P = .003), found in 3 of 46 patients (6.5%; 95% CI, 1.4%-17.9%) with positive PET scan results of the mediastinal N3 nodes. INTERPRETATION: When using moderate sedation, because time is limited, it is reasonable to start with the mediastinal N3 nodes if the hilar and mediastinal N3 nodes show negative PET scan results. Patients with positive PET scan findings of the mediastinal N3 nodes probably should undergo hilar N3 node sampling.
Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/pathology , Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration/methods , Endosonography/methods , Lung Neoplasms/pathology , Lymphatic Metastasis/pathology , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Staging , Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Registry trials have found radial endobronchial ultrasound (r-EBUS) sensitivity to vary between institutions, suggesting that in clinical practice, r-EBUS sensitivity may be lower than reported in clinical trials. We performed a meta-analysis to update the estimates of r-EBUS sensitivity and to explore factors contributing to heterogeneity of results. METHODS: A systematic review using PubMed was performed through July 2018 to determine the sensitivity of r-EBUS for lung cancer, and to construct a summary receiver operating characteristic curve. The DerSimonian and Laird method was used to weight results. Subgroup analysis and meta-regression was used to identify sources of heterogeneity. Study quality was assessed using the QUADAS tool, and publication bias was tested using funnel plots. RESULTS: Fifty-one studies with a total of 7,601 patients were included. r-EBUS pooled sensitivity was 0.72 (95% CI, 0.70-0.75), and area under the sROC curve was 0.96 (95% CI, 0.94-0.97). Significant heterogeneity was observed (I2 = 76%; heterogeneity P < .01). We failed to demonstrate an association between sensitivity and air bronchus sign, average nodule size, use of fluoroscopy, virtual bronchoscopy, guide sheath, cancer prevalence, multicenter status, or consecutive enrollment. Rapid onsite cytology was associated with increased sensitivity (P = .01). The pooled pneumothorax rate was 0.7% (95% CI, 0.3%-1.1%). Funnel plots were asymmetrical, demonstrating sample size-related effects and possible publication bias. CONCLUSIONS: r-EBUS has an excellent safety profile, but there is significant between-study heterogeneity. Sample size-related effects and possibly publication bias have led to overly optimistic estimates of the sensitivity of r-EBUS.
Subject(s)
Bronchoscopy , Endosonography , Image-Guided Biopsy , Lung Neoplasms/pathology , Bronchoscopy/methods , Bronchoscopy/standards , Endosonography/methods , Endosonography/standards , Humans , Image-Guided Biopsy/adverse effects , Image-Guided Biopsy/methods , Sensitivity and SpecificityABSTRACT
Este artículo presenta una aproximación exploratorio-descriptiva a los delitos sexuales cometidos por agresoras mujeres contra niños, niñas y adolescentes. A partir de las características fenomenológicas de los delitos sexuales, se toman algunas de las principales variables identificadas, tales como vínculo víctima-victimaria, estrategia de sometimiento, tipo de delito, entre otras, las que se investigaron a través de un enfoque cuantitativo, teniendo como fuentes de información expedientes judiciales e informes psicológicos forenses. Los principales hallazgos indican que la mayoría de las víctimas infanto-juveniles son preescolares y tienen un vínculo de confianza y/o afecto con la agresora y la clase de contacto sexual impuesta por la autora está en relación con la edad de la víctima. A modo de conclusión, se aprecia un vuelco fenomenológico respecto a la casuística en agresores hombres, siendo el rol de cuidadora de la víctima el que cobra protagonismo.
This article is a phenomenological descriptive-exploratory approach to sex offenses committed by women against children and adolescents, both male and female. The study is based on the quantification of the main variables generally taken into account by the specialized literature, such as victim-offender bond, victim, victimization strategy, nature of the offense, among others. The sources of information used for the investigation consisted of legal records and psychological reports, both provided by an institution which has an assisting role to the Chilean legal system. The main findings indicate that most of the victims belong to nursery school and have a publically known bond to the offender. Also, the strategy used to achieve submission of the victim as well as the nature of the sexual contact itself are both likely to be related to the age of the victim. As a conclusion, a phe-nomenological turn can be recognized regarding the place of the offender in the victim's life, in which the role of care-taker becomes crucial in the comprehension of this kind of offence.