Cribado de cáncer de páncreas en la práctica clínica: es el momento de la prevención

El cribado de cáncer de páncreas en población de alto riesgo puede mejorar la supervivencia. Sin embargo, hay pocas referencias sobre su aplicabilidad y hallazgos en la práctica clínica habitual. Nuestro objetivo es evaluar los hallazgos de las pruebas de cribado de cáncer de páncreas en individuos de alto riesgo en la práctica clínica y describir las variables asociadas a la presencia de lesiones relevantes. Este es un estudio observacional prospectivo en el que se seleccionaron pacientes con alto riesgo de cáncer de páncreas, según los criterios del Consorcio Internacional de Cribado de Cáncer de Páncreas. Se analizaron variables demográficas, presencia de factores de riesgo de cáncer páncreas y los hallazgos de las pruebas. Posteriormente se compararon pacientes que presentan lesiones relevantes con aquellos sin hallazgos. De 70 pacientes de alto riesgo, 25 cumplieron los criterios de cribado. El síndrome hereditario más frecuente fue el cáncer de mama y ovario hereditario (60%). En once individuos (44%) se identificaron hallazgos y en tres (12%) fueron relevantes: dos tumores papilares mucinosos intraductales y un tumor sólido localizado. La mutación en BRCA2 fue la más frecuente en lesiones significativas (66,7% vs 30%, p=0,376) sin encontrar asociación con diabetes ni tabaquismo (0 vs 18 %, p=0,578 y 0 vs 4,5%, p=0,880 respectivamente). En conclusión, las pruebas de cribado permiten detectar lesiones en estadio precoz o resecables en un importante porcentaje de población de alto riesgo seleccionada. Los hallazgos más relevantes fueron en los pacientes pertenecientes al síndrome de cáncer de mama y ovario hereditario.

Pancreatic cancer surveillance can improve outcomes in high-risk individuals. However, little is known about its applicability and findings in routine clinical practice. Our aim was to evaluate findings on screening tests in high-risk individuals in a clinical practice setting and to analyze factors associated with the presence of relevant pancreatic lesions. We developed a prospective observational study of pancreatic cancer high risk patients that meet criteria of surveillance from the International Cancer of the Pancreas Screening Consortium. The demographic variables, other risk factors and imaging findings are collected. Patients with significant findings are compared to those without noteworthy findings. Of 70 high-risk individuals, 25 fitted the criteria for pancreatic cancer surveillance. The most frequent condition was hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome (60%). We identified eleven abnormal imaging findings (44%) and three of them (12%) were relevant: two intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms and one localized pancreatic neoplasm. BRCA2 mutation was more frequent in patients with significant lesions (66.7% vs 30%, p=0.376) but smoking and diabetes were not associated with relevant findings (0 vs 18 %, p=0.578 and 0 vs 4.5%, p=0.880 respectively). Screening test could detect early-stage or resectable lesions in a significant in a significant percentage of the selected high-risk population. The most relevant findings were in patients belonging to hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome.

[Pancreatic cancer screening in a clinical practice setting: it is the moment of Prevention]. / Cribado de cáncer de páncreas en la práctica clínica: es el momento de la prevención.

Pancreatic cancer surveillance can improve outcomes in high-risk individuals. However, little is known about its applicability and findings in routine clinical practice. Our aim was to evaluate findings on screening tests in high-risk individuals in a clinical practice setting and to analyze factors associated with the presence of relevant pancreatic lesions. We developed a prospective observational study of pancreatic cancer high risk patients that meet criteria of surveillance from the International Cancer of the Pancreas Screening Consortium. The demographic variables, other risk factors and imaging findings are collected. Patients with significant findings are compared to those without noteworthy findings. Of 70 high-risk individuals, 25 fitted the criteria for pancreatic cancer surveillance. The most frequent condition was hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome (60%). We identified eleven abnormal imaging findings (44%) and three of them (12%) were relevant: two intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms and one localized pancreatic neoplasm. BRCA2 mutation was more frequent in patients with significant lesions (66.7% vs 30%, p=0.376) but smoking and diabetes were not associated with relevant findings (0 vs 18 %, p=0.578 and 0 vs 4.5%, p=0.880 respectively). Screening test could detect early-stage or resectable lesions in a significant in a significant percentage of the selected high-risk population. The most relevant findings were in patients belonging to hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome.

Coledocolitiasis como causa de elevación importante del marcador tumoral CA 19-9 / Significantly elevated CA 19-9 levels in a patient with choledocholithiasis

No disponible

Ulcerated submucosal gastric tumor. Could it be a benign condition?

In this article we present the case and images of an infrequent submucosal gastric tumor: an inflammatory fibroid polyp or Vanek´s tumor. When the tumor size exceeds the centimeter, it may be difficult to differentiate from malignant lesions. Endoscopic removal may be feasible and curative.

Isquemia hepática aguda tras hemorragia digestiva alta por varices esofagogástricas / Acute liver ischaemia after gastro-oesophageal variceal bleeding

INTRODUCCIÓN: La hemorragia digestiva alta por varices esofagogástricas (HDA por VEG) puede desencadenar una isquemia hepática aguda (IHA). El objetivo de este estudio fue analizar la incidencia de IHA tras una HDA por VEG, los factores de riesgo y su mortalidad. PACIENTES Y MÉTODOS: Estudio retrospectivo sobre pacientes cirróticos con HDA por VEG. Se clasificaron en 2 grupos, determinados por el desarrollo o no de una IHA. Definimos IHA como AST y ALT por encima de 10 veces el valor basal, descartando otras causas de hepatitis aguda. El tratamiento inicial estándar fue soporte hemodinámico, endoscopia urgente con ligadura con bandas y/o escleroterapia, somatostatina y antibióticos. En caso de fracaso de estas medidas, se recurrió a la implantación de una derivación portosistémcica percutánea intrahepática (DPPI). Ambos grupos (IHA y no-IHA) fueron comparados. RESULTADOS: Durante un periodo de 5 años, se recogieron 68 pacientes con HDA por VEG. La incidencia de IHA fue del 16,2%. Tras el análisis univariante, los factores asociados con IHA fueron la diabetes mellitus (OR: 7,5; IC: 1,9-29), shock (OR: 8,5; IC: 2,06-34) y la persistencia de la hemorragia (OR: 9, IC: 1,6-49, p = 0,03). En el análisis multivariante solo mostraron significación estadística la diabetes mellitus (OR: 8,61; IC: 1,4-52,5) y el shock (OR: 7,58; IC: 1,26-45,51). La mortalidad del grupo de IHA fue mayor (45%) que en el grupo no-IHA (10,5%) (p = 0,012). CONCLUSIONES: La IHA tras una hemorragia digestiva por VEG en el paciente cirrótico ocurrió en el 16,2%, asociándose con un peor pronóstico y una mortalidad del 45%. Nuestros resultados sugieren que la diabetes mellitus y el shock hipovolémico son factores de riesgo para el desarrollo de IHA. La detección precoz de estos pacientes en riesgo podría por tanto ayudar a prevenir la IHA

INTRODUCTION: Variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) can trigger acute hypoxic hepatitis (AHH). The aim of this study was to analyse the incidence, associated risk factors and mortality of AHH after variceal UGIB. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective study of cirrhotic patients with variceal UGIB, classified into 2 groups according to the development of AHH. AHH was diagnosed when AST and ALT reached levels 10 times above the upper limit of normal, after ruling out other causes of hepatitis. The standard initial treatment consisted of haemodynamic support, emergency endoscopy with rubber band ligation, somatostatin and antibiotics. In the case of failure of primary haemostasis, a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) was implanted. Both groups (AHH and non-AHH) were compared. RESULTS: Sixty-eight cirrhotic patients with variceal UGIB admitted to the gastroenterology department of Hospital Ramón y Cajal between January 2007 and March 2012 were analysed. Eleven of these patients (16.2%) developed AHH. Univariate analysis showed the following items as risk factors: diabetes (OR: 7.5; CI: 1.9-29), shock (OR: 8.5; CI: 2.06-34) and persistent bleeding (OR: 9.0, CI: 1.6-49, P = .03). However, multivariate analysis confirmed only diabetes (OR: 8.61; CI: 1.4-52.5) and shock (OR: 7.58; CI: 1.26-45.51) as risk factors. Mortality rate in the AHH group was 45%, compared to 10.5% in the non-HAA group (P = .012). CONCLUSIONS: AHH after variceal UGIB occurred in 16.2% of cirrhotic patients and was associated with a poorer prognosis, with a mortality rate of 45%. Our findings suggest that diabetes and shock are risk factors for the development of AHH. Early identification of at-risk patients could therefore help prevent AHH

Tumoración gástrica submucosa ulcerada. ¿Puede ser algo benigno? / Ulcerated submucosal gastric tumor. Could it be a benign condition?

No disponible

Hepatitis fulminante por herpes virus tipo 6 en adultos inmunocompetentes / Fulminant hepatitis caused by herpes virus 6 in immunocompetent adults

No disponible

[Acute liver ischaemia after gastro-oesophageal variceal bleeding]. / Isquemia hepática aguda tras hemorragia digestiva alta por varices esofagogástricas.

INTRODUCTION: Variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) can trigger acute hypoxic hepatitis (AHH). The aim of this study was to analyse the incidence, associated risk factors and mortality of AHH after variceal UGIB. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective study of cirrhotic patients with variceal UGIB, classified into 2 groups according to the development of AHH. AHH was diagnosed when AST and ALT reached levels 10 times above the upper limit of normal, after ruling out other causes of hepatitis. The standard initial treatment consisted of haemodynamic support, emergency endoscopy with rubber band ligation, somatostatin and antibiotics. In the case of failure of primary haemostasis, a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) was implanted. Both groups (AHH and non-AHH) were compared. RESULTS: Sixty-eight cirrhotic patients with variceal UGIB admitted to the gastroenterology department of Hospital Ramón y Cajal between January 2007 and March 2012 were analysed. Eleven of these patients (16.2%) developed AHH. Univariate analysis showed the following items as risk factors: diabetes (OR: 7.5; CI: 1.9-29), shock (OR: 8.5; CI: 2.06-34) and persistent bleeding (OR: 9.0, CI: 1.6-49, P=.03). However, multivariate analysis confirmed only diabetes (OR: 8.61; CI: 1.4-52.5) and shock (OR: 7.58; CI: 1.26-45.51) as risk factors. Mortality rate in the AHH group was 45%, compared to 10.5% in the non-HAA group (P=.012). CONCLUSIONS: AHH after variceal UGIB occurred in 16.2% of cirrhotic patients and was associated with a poorer prognosis, with a mortality rate of 45%. Our findings suggest that diabetes and shock are risk factors for the development of AHH. Early identification of at-risk patients could therefore help prevent AHH.

Hepatotoxicidad secundaria a enoxaparina / Enoxaparin-induced hepatotoxicity

No disponible

¿Es posible suspender el tratamiento con antivirales orales en los pacientes con hepatitis crónica B antígeno e negativa? Experiencia y nuevas expectativas / Is it possible to stop treatment with nucleos(t)ide analogs in patients with e-antigen negative chronic hepatitis B? Experience and new expectations

INTRODUCCIÓN: El tratamiento de la hepatitis crónica B antígeno e negativa (HCB HBeAg negativa) con antivíricos orales (AO) suele prolongarse de forma indefinida debido a que la pérdida del antígeno de superficie como objetivo para su suspensión es un hecho infrecuente. Recientemente han aparecido las primeras evidencias que sugieren finalizar la terapia con AO en casos seleccionados. OBJETIVOS: Analizar la tasa de rebote virológico en pacientes con HCB Age negativa que suspendieron el tratamiento con AO. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: Estudio retrospectivo observacional que incluyó 140 casos de HCB HBeAg negativa. Veintidós pacientes, que recibieron exclusivamente AO, los suspendieron por diversos motivos realizándose un seguimiento posterior. Todos presentaban transaminasas normales, ADN indetectable y ausencia de cirrosis o comorbilidades importantes al finalizar el tratamiento. RESULTADOS: Doce pacientes presentaron rebote virológico (54,54%), transcurriendo una media de 6,38 meses (± 1,9) desde la suspensión hasta el rebote (el 75% dentro de los 12 primeros meses tras la suspensión). Cinco recibieron adefovir, uno lamivudina más adefovir, uno tenofovir y 5 lamivudina. La duración media del tratamiento, desde el inicio hasta la suspensión, fue de 38,5 meses (± 4,5). El grupo con respuesta sostenida presentaba una edad media y duración del tratamiento superior a los sujetos con rebote, si bien estas diferencias no resultaron estadísticamente significativas. CONCLUSIONES: Los resultados sugieren que es posible suspender la terapia con AO en casos seleccionados de HCB Age negativa, siempre que no exista cirrosis, se cumpla un tiempo mínimo de tratamiento, las transaminasas sean normales y el ADN indetectable de forma mantenida. En estos casos, se debe realizar un seguimiento estrecho durante el primer año y posteriormente de forma indefinida

BACKGROUND: Treatment of HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B (CHB) with nucleos(t)ide analogues (NA) is usually indefinite, since the loss of HBsAg, as a criterion for its discontinuation, is a rare event. Recent evidence suggests that discontinuing NA therapy may be feasible in selected patients. OBJECTIVES: To analyze the rate of virological relapse in patients with HBeAg-negative CHB who discontinued treatment with NAs. METHODS: We performed a single-center observational study that included 140 patients with HBsAg-negative CHB. Twenty-two patients, who received only NAs, discontinued treatment for different reasons and were subsequently monitored. All had normal ALT and AST, undetectable DNA and absence of cirrhosis or significant comorbidities before stopping treatment. RESULTS: Twelve patients showed virologic relapse (54.54%). The mean interval between discontinuation and relapse was 6.38 months (± 1.9) (75% relapsed during the first 12 months after discontinuation). Five received adefovir, 1 lamivudine and adefovir, 1 tenofovir and 5 lamivudine alone. The mean treatment duration in this group was 38.5 months (± 4.5). The sustained response group had a higher mean age and longer treatment duration than patients with virologic relapse but these differences were not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that NA treatment can be stopped in selected patients with CHB as long as they are not cirrhotic, have completed a minimum period of treatment, have normal ALT and sustained undetectable DNA. These patients should be closely monitored during the first year and then indefinitely

[Is it possible to stop treatment with nucleos(t)ide analogs in patients with e-antigen negative chronic hepatitis B? Experience and new expectations]. / ¿Es posible suspender el tratamiento con antivirales orales en los pacientes con hepatitis crónica B antígeno e negativa? Experiencia y nuevas expectativas.

BACKGROUND: Treatment of HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B (CHB) with nucleos(t)ide analogues (NA) is usually indefinite, since the loss of HBsAg, as a criterion for its discontinuation, is a rare event. Recent evidence suggests that discontinuing NA therapy may be feasible in selected patients. OBJECTIVES: To analyze the rate of virological relapse in patients with HBeAg-negative CHB who discontinued treatment with NAs. METHODS: We performed a single-center observational study that included 140 patients with HBsAg-negative CHB. Twenty-two patients, who received only NAs, discontinued treatment for different reasons and were subsequently monitored. All had normal ALT and AST, undetectable DNA and absence of cirrhosis or significant comorbidities before stopping treatment. RESULTS: Twelve patients showed virologic relapse (54.54%). The mean interval between discontinuation and relapse was 6.38 months (± 1.9) (75% relapsed during the first 12 months after discontinuation). Five received adefovir, 1 lamivudine and adefovir, 1 tenofovir and 5 lamivudine alone. The mean treatment duration in this group was 38.5 months (± 4.5). The sustained response group had a higher mean age and longer treatment duration than patients with virologic relapse but these differences were not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that NA treatment can be stopped in selected patients with CHB as long as they are not cirrhotic, have completed a minimum period of treatment, have normal ALT and sustained undetectable DNA. These patients should be closely monitored during the first year and then indefinitely.