Evaluation of the diagnostic performance of the creatinine-based Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation in people with diabetes: A systematic review.

AIMS: GFR estimated with the creatinine-based Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPICr ) equation is used to screen for diabetic kidney disease and assess its severity. We systematically reviewed the process and outcome of evaluating CKD-EPICr in estimating point GFR or GFR decline over time in adults with type 1 or type 2 diabetes. METHODS: In this systematic review, MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched up to August 2019. Observational studies comparing CKD-EPICr with measured GFR (mGFR) in adults with diabetes were included. Studies on people with kidney transplant, non-diabetes related kidney disease, pregnancy, potential kidney donors, and those with critical or other systematic illnesses were excluded. Two independent reviewers extracted data from published papers and disagreements were resolved by consensus. Risk-of-bias was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool. (PROSPERO registration number: CRD42018108776). RESULTS: From the 2820 records identified, 29 studies (14 704 participants) were included. All studies were at risk of bias. Bias (eight different forms) ranged from -26 to 35 ml min-1  1.73 m-2 ; precision (five different forms) ranged between 9 and 63 ml min-1  1.73 m-2 ; accuracy (five different forms) ranged between 16% and 96%; the correlation coefficient between CKD-EPICr and mGFR (four different forms) ranged between 0.38 and 0.86; and the reduced major axis regression slope ranged between 0.8 and 1.8. CONCLUSIONS: Qualitative synthesis of data suggested CKD-EPICr was inaccurate in estimating point GFR or GFR decline over time. Furthermore, a lack of consistency in the methods and processes of evaluating the diagnostic performance of CKD-EPICr limits reliable quantitative assessment. The equation needs to be improved in adults with diabetes.

Change in emotional eating after bariatric surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The effect of bariatric surgery on 'emotional eating' (EE) in people with obesity is unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to examine changes in self-reported emotional eating behaviour after bariatric surgery. METHODS: Fifteen electronic databases were searched from inception to August 2019. Included studies encompassed patients undergoing primary bariatric surgery, quantitatively assessed EE, and reported EE scores before and after surgery in the same participants. Studies were excluded if they were not in English or available in full text. The systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. Random-effects models were used for quantitative analysis. Study quality was assessed using the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute quality assessment tool for before-after (pre-post) studies with no control group. RESULTS: Some 23 studies containing 6749 participants were included in the qualitative synthesis, with follow-up of from 2 weeks to 48 months. EE scores decreased to 12 months after surgery. Results were mixed beyond 12 months. Quantitative synthesis of 17 studies (2811 participants) found that EE scores decreased by a standardized mean difference of 1·09 (95 per cent c.i. 0·76 to 1·42) 4-18 months after surgery, indicating a large effect size. CONCLUSION: Bariatric surgery may mitigate the tendency to eat in response to emotions in the short to medium term.

ANTECEDENTES: El efecto de la cirugía bariátrica sobre la "alimentación emocional" (emotional eating, EE) en personas con obesidad no esta claro. Esta revisión sistemática y metaanálisis tuvo como objetivo examinar los cambios en el comportamiento de la alimentación emocional referida por los mismos pacientes después de cirugía bariátrica. MÉTODOS: Se realizó una búsqueda en 15 bases de datos electrónicas desde el inicio de las mismas hasta agosto de 2019. Los estudios seleccionados incluían pacientes con cirugía bariátrica primaria, EE evaluada de forma cuantitativa, y descripción de las puntuaciones de EE antes y después de la cirugía en los mismos participantes. Se excluyeron estudios que no estuvieran publicados en inglés o si no se disponía del texto completo. Esta revisión sistemática y metaanálisis se llevó a cabo de acuerdo con las recomendaciones PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses). Se utilizó un modelo de efectos aleatorios para el análisis cuantitativo. La calidad de los estudios individuales se evaluó utilizando la herramienta de evaluación de la calidad NHLBI para estudios de antes-después (pre-post) sin grupo control. RESULTADOS: Se incluyeron un total de 23 estudios con 6.749 participantes en la síntesis cualitativa, y un seguimiento de 2 semanas a 48 meses. Las puntuaciones EE disminuyeron a los 12 meses postoperatorios. Los resultados fueron variados más allá de los 12 meses. La síntesis cuantitativa de 17 estudios (2.811 participantes) encontró que las puntuaciones EE disminuyeron con una diferencia de medias ponderada de 1,09 (i.c. del 95% 0,76, 1,42) a los 4-18 meses tras la operación, lo que indica una magnitud de efecto grande. CONCLUSIÓN: La cirugía bariátrica puede atenuar la tendencia a comer en respuesta a las emociones en el corto y medio plazo.

Pre-diabetes tsunami: incidence rates and risk factors of pre-diabetes and its different phenotypes over 9 years of follow-up.

AIMS: To investigate the incidence of pre-diabetes and its different phenotypes and the related risk factors during 9 years of follow-up. METHODS: A total of 5879 people (2597 men and 3282 women) aged ≥ 20 years, free of diabetes and pre-diabetes, took part in the study. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard models were used to evaluate hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for all potential risk factors. RESULTS: Overall, 853 men and 902 women developed pre-diabetes. Incidence rates of pre-diabetes were 46.1 per 1000 person-years in men and 36.8 per 1000 person-years in women, while isolated impaired fasting glucose had the highest incidence rate among all pre-diabetes phenotypes. In both sexes, age, family history of diabetes, fasting plasma glucose and 2-hour post-challenge plasma glucose were related to incident pre-diabetes. Among women, waist-to-height ratio [HR: 1.02 (1.00-1.03)] and being divorced/widowed compared with married [HR: 0.67 (0.52-0.87)] were significant predictors of pre-diabetes; whereas among men, community-based intervention [HR: 0.79 (0.68-0.90)], higher level of education and being single [HR: 0.77 (0.6-0.97)] were protective against progression to pre-diabetes. Moreover, hip circumference among women [HR: 0.95 (0.93-0.98)] and current smoking among men [HR: 1.69 (1.15-2.48)] were related to incident combined impaired fasting glucose and impaired glucose tolerance. CONCLUSION: More than 4% of the Iranian population develop pre-diabetes each year, emphasizing the important role of socio-economic factors (marital status, education and smoking habits) and community-based intervention in progression to impaired glucose regulations. Thus, emergent intervention is necessary to halt the tsunami of pre-diabetes among the Iranian population.